Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
A consistent upward trajectory is observed in operational profitability metrics, characterized by a significant expansion in earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) from 2017 through 2021. While net income and earnings before tax exhibited volatility during the mid-period, the core operational cash flow capacity demonstrated sustained and accelerated growth.
- EBITDA Expansion
- EBITDA grew from 1,999 million in 2017 to 5,658 million by 2021. The most substantial increase occurred between 2019 and 2020, where the value rose from 3,270 million to 5,097 million, representing a sharp acceleration in operational performance.
- Net Income and EBT Volatility
- Unlike the linear growth of EBITDA, net income and earnings before tax (EBT) experienced a notable decline in 2019, reaching 893 million and 1,112 million, respectively. However, a recovery trend followed, with net income reaching a five-year peak of 1,334 million in 2021.
- Operating Profitability Trends
- Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) maintained a generally positive trend, increasing from 1,566 million in 2017 to 2,462 million in 2021. The resilience of EBIT during the 2019 dip suggests that operational stability was maintained even when net profits were pressured.
- Divergence Analysis
- A widening gap is observable between EBITDA and EBIT over the analyzed period. The disparity between EBITDA (5,658 million) and EBIT (2,462 million) in 2021 is significantly larger than the gap observed in 2017, indicating a substantial increase in depreciation and amortization expenses over the five-year window.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 88,825) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 5,658) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 15.70 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Accenture PLC | 10.05 |
| Adobe Inc. | 9.57 |
| AppLovin Corp. | 21.55 |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | 51.70 |
| Datadog Inc. | 525.24 |
| International Business Machines Corp. | 15.07 |
| Intuit Inc. | 11.43 |
| Microsoft Corp. | 19.29 |
| Oracle Corp. | 15.99 |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | 294.20 |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | 245.34 |
| Salesforce Inc. | 14.40 |
| ServiceNow Inc. | 46.61 |
| Synopsys Inc. | 43.30 |
| Workday Inc. | 28.92 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Software & Services | 45.64 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Information Technology | 60.65 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 83,446) | 97,754) | 96,331) | 38,731) | 33,938) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 5,658) | 5,097) | 3,270) | 2,303) | 1,999) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 14.75 | 19.18 | 29.46 | 16.82 | 16.98 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Accenture PLC | 23.31 | 17.46 | — | — | — | |
| Adobe Inc. | 35.44 | 43.06 | — | — | — | |
| AppLovin Corp. | 30.05 | — | — | — | — | |
| Cadence Design Systems Inc. | 39.61 | — | — | — | — | |
| Datadog Inc. | 1,949.67 | — | — | — | — | |
| International Business Machines Corp. | 12.53 | — | — | — | — | |
| Intuit Inc. | 51.96 | — | — | — | — | |
| Microsoft Corp. | 24.59 | — | — | — | — | |
| Oracle Corp. | 13.78 | — | — | — | — | |
| Palantir Technologies Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Palo Alto Networks Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Salesforce Inc. | 33.83 | — | — | — | — | |
| ServiceNow Inc. | 147.45 | — | — | — | — | |
| Synopsys Inc. | 53.43 | 42.24 | — | — | — | |
| Workday Inc. | 670.04 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | ||||||
| Software & Services | 25.74 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | 20.52 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
3 2021 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 83,446 ÷ 5,658 = 14.75
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by a significant expansion in enterprise value and a consistent increase in operational profitability. While EBITDA exhibited a steady upward trend throughout the period, the enterprise value experienced a sharp escalation in 2019, which subsequently influenced the valuation multiples.
- Enterprise Value Evolution
- Enterprise value grew modestly between 2017 and 2018, followed by a substantial increase in 2019, rising from 38,731 million to 96,331 million. This valuation peaked in 2020 at 97,754 million before contracting to 83,446 million by the end of 2021.
- EBITDA Performance
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization demonstrated uninterrupted growth over the five-year period. EBITDA rose from 1,999 million in 2017 to 5,658 million in 2021, representing a nearly threefold increase in operational earnings.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Dynamics
- The valuation multiple remained stable near 16.9 between 2017 and 2018, but spiked to 29.46 in 2019, coinciding with the sharp rise in enterprise value. Following this peak, the ratio declined steadily to 19.18 in 2020 and reached a period low of 14.75 in 2021. This downward trend in the ratio, occurring despite rising EBITDA, indicates a significant compression of the valuation multiple over the final three years of the analyzed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?