Decomposing ROE involves expressing net income divided by shareholders’ equity as the product of component ratios.
Paying user area
Try for free
Dollar Tree Inc. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Dollar Tree Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-30).
The analysis of quarterly financial ratios reveals distinct patterns and fluctuations over the observed periods. Three key metrics examined include Return on Assets (ROA), Financial Leverage, and Return on Equity (ROE).
- Return on Assets (ROA)
-
The ROA shows a generally positive trend starting from the period with data available in January 2017, where it hovered around 5.7%. There is a notable increase peaking around early 2018 with values exceeding 10%. However, this upward trajectory is interrupted towards late 2018 and early 2019, where the ROA sharply declined into negative territory, reaching lows near -11.78%. Following this decline, the ROA gradually recovers, becoming positive again from early 2020 onwards, with a steady increase through late 2022, stabilizing around 6.9% to 7.1%.
- Financial Leverage
-
The financial leverage ratio reveals a declining trend from 3.44 in early 2016 down to approximately 2.10 by late 2018, indicating a reduction in the use of debt relative to equity during this period. This ratio then reverses and increases sharply around early 2019 to values exceeding 3.3, suggesting increased leverage. From 2020 forward, the financial leverage stabilizes generally in the range between 2.7 and 3.1, with minor fluctuations but no clear trend toward significant increase or decrease.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
-
The ROE closely mirrors the pattern observed in ROA but with amplified effects likely due to leverage changes. It starts near 16.6% in early 2017, rises sharply peaking near 23.9% in early 2018, then experiences a dramatic fall into deep negative territory from late 2018 through early 2019, dropping as low as -28.19%. After this period, ROE recovers substantially, regaining positive territory by early 2020 and gradually ascending to near 19.5% by late 2022. This rebound suggests improved profitability and efficiency in capital management after a period of financial distress.
Summary of insights:
- Profitability Trends
- Both ROA and ROE demonstrate a significant dip around 2019, indicating a period of financial difficulty or reduced operational efficiency. Subsequently, recovery in these ratios through 2020 to 2022 suggests a return to more effective asset utilization and equity profitability.
- Leverage Impact
- The decline in financial leverage leading up to 2018 followed by an increase in 2019 may have contributed to volatility in ROE, as leverage tends to amplify returns. The peak in leverage coincides with the negative ROE period, possibly indicating riskier financial structure or distress financing during that interval.
- Stabilization Post-2019
- Post-2019 data depicts stabilization in financial leverage and consistent improvement in both ROA and ROE, signaling a phase of recovery and stronger financial health overall.
Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-30).
The analysis of the quarterly financial ratios over the presented periods reveals several notable trends and fluctuations.
- Net Profit Margin (%)
- The net profit margin demonstrates an overall fluctuation with a period of negative values occurring between early 2019 and early 2020, reaching lows around -6.97%. Before this downturn, margins ranged from about 4% to 7.7%, with a peak near 7.71% in early 2018. Post the negative period, the margin recovered, showing consistent positive values around 3.5% to 5.8% and a generally rising trend towards the end of the data, indicating improvement in profitability after the losses.
- Asset Turnover (ratio)
- The asset turnover ratio remained relatively stable, typically fluctuating between approximately 1.18 and 1.42. An exception is observed in late 2018 and early 2019 when the ratio peaked around 1.69 but shortly dropped back to near 1.19. The data suggests moderate efficiency in using assets to generate sales, with no strong upward or downward trend over the multi-year span.
- Financial Leverage (ratio)
- Financial leverage shows a declining trend from 3.44 in early 2016 to around 2.1 in late 2018, indicating a reduction in reliance on debt or increased equity financing during that interval. Subsequently, leverage ratios fluctuate moderately between 2.7 and 3.36, with no clear long-term upward or downward momentum in the later periods. This stability suggests a controlled approach to capital structure with moderate leverage levels.
- Return on Equity (ROE) (%)
- ROE follows a pattern similar to net profit margin, with positive values around 15-23% prior to early 2019, indicating healthy profitability. A sharp and significant negative decline occurs around late 2018 to early 2020, with ROE falling as low as -28.19%, mirroring the net profit margin's negative performance. Following this period, ROE recovers steadily to the 17-21% range by late 2022, reflecting an overall restoration of returns to shareholders and improved operational performance.
In summary, the financial data exhibits a period of financial distress marked by negative profitability and returns around late 2018 to early 2020, followed by a gradual recovery phase. Asset turnover and financial leverage ratios remain relatively stable with minor fluctuations, indicating consistent operational efficiency and a managed capital structure throughout the period. The recovering net profit margin and ROE ratios in recent quarters suggest improved profitability and shareholder returns after the adverse period.
Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-30).
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden ratio shows fluctuating values over the observed quarters. After an initial increase reaching values slightly above 1.0 in early 2018, it stabilizes around 0.75 to 0.81 from 2020 onwards. This indicates relative consistency in the effective tax rate affecting net income during the latter periods.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden ratio demonstrates a gradual upward trend from approximately 0.66 in early 2017 to about 0.92 by late 2022. This suggests a reduction in interest expenses relative to earnings before interest and taxes, reflecting improved interest cost management or refinancing benefits over time.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin exhibits volatility with a period of negative margins during 2018 and early 2019, reaching declines around -4.83%. In contrast, margins fluctuate positively in most other periods, peaking near 9% in 2018 and rising above 7% by late 2022. The recovery from negative margins indicates operational improvements after a challenging period.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover remains relatively stable throughout, mostly ranging between 1.18 and 1.42, with a notable spike to 1.69 in late 2018. This spike may represent a temporary increase in efficiency in utilizing assets to generate revenue, followed by a return to usual levels. The consistency suggests steady asset utilization over time.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage ratios decline from values above 3.4 in early 2016 to around 2.1 in late 2018, indicating reduced use of debt. Subsequently, leverage rises again to near 3.3 by mid-2019 before stabilizing in the range of 2.7 to 2.9 until late 2022. This pattern points to fluctuating financing strategies with a moderate degree of leverage maintained in recent periods.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- The ROE shows significant variability, with strong positive returns above 22% during 2017 and early 2018, followed by drastic negative returns reaching nearly -28% during 2018 and early 2019. A clear recovery trend follows, with ROE climbing back over 19% by late 2022. This pattern mirrors the operational struggles and subsequent recovery observed in EBIT margins, reflecting the impact on shareholder returns.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-30).
The financial data reveals a dynamic performance pattern over the observed periods. Analysis based on key financial ratios indicates shifts in profitability, asset efficiency, and overall returns.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin shows notable fluctuations throughout the timeframe. Initially, data for early periods is missing, but starting from April 29, 2017, the margin varied between approximately 4% and 7.7%, showing a strong profitability phase through early 2018. A significant decline is observed around late 2018 and early 2019, with the margin dipping into negative territory between -6.4% and -7%, indicating a period of losses. Recovery begins in early 2020, with margins steadily improving and reaching roughly 5.8% by the last reported period. This pattern suggests volatility in profitability, with a major downturn followed by a gradual return to positive margins.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover ratios are fairly stable, ranging between approximately 1.18 and 1.42 through most periods. Initially, volumes hovered near 1.3 to 1.4, demonstrating consistent efficiency in asset utilization. Minor declines occurred around mid-2019, where the ratio reached a low of about 1.19, remaining close to this level onwards, with slight incremental improvements around 2021 to 1.26, before stabilizing again near 1.2. Overall, asset turnover maintained a steady performance, reflecting relatively consistent management of asset value to generate sales.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- ROA closely mirrors the trends observed in net profit margin, with an upward trajectory reaching around 10.5% during early 2018, representing strong asset profitability at that stage. A sharp decline follows into negative values near -11.8% in late 2018, coinciding with the net profit margin downturn. Subsequent recovery is evident from early 2020 onward, with ROA improving steadily to approximately 7.1% in the final period. The fluctuations reflect the impact of profit margin trends on overall efficiency in generating returns from assets, corroborating a period of financial strain followed by recovery.
In summary, the data indicates a period of relative operational efficiency and solid profit generation until late 2018, followed by a marked decline in profitability and returns. The company then appears to embark on a recovery path from 2020 forward, restoring positive profitability and asset returns, though asset turnover remains largely steady throughout the periods assessed.
Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-30).
The financial data reveals multiple notable trends in the reported ratios and margins over the observed periods.
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden ratio experiences initial fluctuations with values around 0.66–0.67 in early periods, spikes notably above 1.0 between early 2018 dates, suggesting possible tax credits or irregular tax events, and then stabilizes in later periods around 0.74 to 0.81. This indicates a normalization after the spike, reflecting consistent tax expense relative to pre-tax income in recent quarters.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden ratio shows a gradual upward trend over time. Starting near 0.78, it climbs steadily reaching approximately 0.92 in the latest periods. This increment may indicate decreasing interest expenses relative to earnings before interest and taxes (EBIT), suggesting improved interest management or lower debt costs.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin demonstrates considerable variability. It remains positive and relatively stable around 8–9% for several quarters before experiencing sharp declines into negative territory near -4.1% to -4.8% in late 2018 and early 2019. Following this downturn, margins recover to positive levels, gradually rising back toward 7.8% by late 2022. This pattern may reflect operational challenges during the downturn period, followed by successful margin recovery efforts.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover ratios are relatively stable with values hovering around 1.3 to 1.4 in earlier periods, then showing pronounced variation with a peak above 1.6 in early 2018 followed by a drop to approximately 1.19 during mid-2019. Subsequently, asset turnover stabilizes again in a narrow band circa 1.18 to 1.26. This shows fluctuating efficiency in asset utilization with recovery in subsequent periods.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- ROA follows a pattern akin to EBIT margin, starting with moderate positive returns near 5–6%, surging above 10% in early 2018, then plunging into negative territory between -8% and -12% during late 2018 and early 2019. Thereafter, ROA improves steadily back into positive territory, approaching approximately 7% by the most recent quarter. This trend aligns with operational performance disruptions and later recovery indicated in other metrics.
In summary, the financial data reveals a period of stability, followed by significant volatility especially around 2018–2019 when key profitability indicators turned negative. Subsequently, there is a consistent recovery phase with improved margins, returns, and operational efficiency. Tax and interest burdens demonstrate normalization and improvement, contributing to the overall positive trend in company performance metrics toward the latter periods.
Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2016-04-30).
- Tax Burden Ratio
- The tax burden ratio demonstrates fluctuations over the observed periods. Initially, it maintains values near 0.66 to 0.67 between early 2017 and early 2018, indicating a relatively stable tax impact on earnings during that time. A notable increase occurs around early to late 2018, with values exceeding 1.00, peaking at approximately 1.11. This sudden rise suggests an unusual change in tax treatment or benefit. Afterwards, from early 2020 onward, the ratio stabilizes in the range of 0.74 to 0.81, reflecting a more normalized tax burden.
- Interest Burden Ratio
- The interest burden ratio shows a gradual improving trend over time. Starting from about 0.78 in early 2017, it slightly increases through 2018 and early 2019, fluctuating mostly between 0.78 and 0.85. From early 2020 onward, the ratio consistently rises, reaching approximately 0.92 by late 2022, indicating a reduction in interest expense impact relative to earnings before interest and taxes.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin presents considerable volatility. From early 2017 through early 2018, the margin is positive and relatively stable, ranging mostly from around 8.0% to 9.1%. However, a sharp decline occurs late 2018 to early 2019, where the margin turns negative, reaching lows near -4.83%, indicating operational challenges or extraordinary expenses during this period. Subsequently, from early 2020 onward, the EBIT margin recovers steadily, moving upward from around 5.3% to near 7.9% by late 2022, suggesting improving operational efficiency and profitability.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin mirrors the overall trajectory of the EBIT margin, with positive margins close to 4.1% to 7.7% from early 2017 through early 2018, reflecting effective cost management and profitability. Similar to EBIT margin trends, it dips significantly into negative territory between late 2018 and early 2019, bottoming near -6.82%. Following this period, a gradual recovery is discernible from early 2020, with margins increasing steadily to approximately 5.8% by late 2022. This recovery denotes improved bottom-line performance and expense management.