Decomposing ROE involves expressing net income divided by shareholders’ equity as the product of component ratios.
Paying user area
Try for free
Dollar Tree Inc. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Dollar Tree Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29).
The analysis of the quarterly financial ratios for Dollar Tree Inc. reveals several noteworthy trends over the presented periods.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
-
Initially, ROA exhibited a generally positive and upward trend, increasing from 5.4% in April 2017 to a peak near 10.65% by August 2018. This indicates improving efficiency in generating profits from asset investments during this phase.
However, starting with the quarter ending February 2019, ROA sharply declined into negative territory, reaching a low of approximately -11.78%. This significant downturn persisted for several quarters, suggesting a period of operational challenges or asset underperformance.
Following this trough, there was a recovery beginning around February 2020, with ROA gradually returning to positive values and stabilizing in a range between approximately 3.9% to 7.3% through October 2022. This recovery phase indicates restoration of asset profitability, though the ratio did not reach previous peak levels.
- Financial Leverage
-
Financial leverage showed a declining trend from 2.85 in April 2017 down to around 2.1 by November 2018, reflecting a reduction in the use of debt relative to equity.
Subsequently, leverage increased notably during the quarters experiencing negative ROA and ROE values, peaking near 3.36 in May 2019, which may imply increased reliance on debt financing amid profitability challenges.
After this peak, leverage gradually declined again, fluctuating around values slightly above 2.7 from early 2020 through late 2022. This suggests a moderation in debt levels as operational performance improved.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
-
ROE trends closely mirror those of ROA, with an initial increase from 15.4% in April 2017 to near 23.87% by February 2018, indicating enhanced shareholder value generation.
A dramatic decline occurred beginning in early 2019, with ROE plunging to roughly -28.19%, highlighting severe equity holder losses during that period. This negative performance extended through multiple quarters, signaling persistent financial difficulties.
Recovery commenced around February 2020, with ROE gradually rising back to a positive zone above 12%, and continuing to improve to nearly 19.5% by October 2022. This demonstrates regained profitability and improved returns for shareholders, although not reaching the high levels seen prior to the downturn.
Overall, the financial ratios depict a cycle of strong performance until late 2018, followed by a pronounced deterioration in profitability and increased financial leverage through 2019. The company then undertook a recovery phase starting in 2020, marked by gradual restoration of returns and a concomitant reduction in leverage. These patterns suggest the company faced significant operational or market challenges culminating in 2019, after which strategic or market improvements contributed to financial stabilization and moderate growth.
Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29).
The analysis of the financial ratios over the given quarterly periods reveals several notable trends and fluctuations in the company's performance metrics.
- Net Profit Margin (%)
- The net profit margin demonstrated initial growth from 4.13% to a peak of approximately 7.7% by early 2018. However, there was a sharp reversal beginning in early 2019, where the margin declined drastically to negative values around -7% and remained negative for several consecutive quarters. Starting in early 2020, the margin recovered back to positive territory and showed a steady improvement, stabilizing in the range of approximately 3.3% to 5.8% by late 2022. This pattern suggests a period of financial difficulty or increased costs in 2019, followed by a recovery phase.
- Asset Turnover (ratio)
- Asset turnover remained relatively stable with slight variations around 1.3 to 1.4 until early 2019. A significant spike to 1.69 was observed at the start of 2019, which was followed by a sharp drop to approximately 1.19 that persisted for multiple quarters. Since early 2020, asset turnover showed slight fluctuations but remained generally stable in the range of 1.18 to 1.26. The spike followed by a steep decline may indicate a temporary increase in asset productivity or sales efficiency that was not maintained.
- Financial Leverage (ratio)
- Financial leverage exhibited a moderate decreasing trend from a high of about 2.85 to 2.1 by the end of 2018, suggesting a reduction in the use of debt or improved equity financing. Contrarily, starting early 2019, leverage increased sharply to above 3.3, indicating heavier reliance on debt financing or reduced equity. Subsequently, from 2020 onward, financial leverage gradually declined again, reaching approximately 2.7 to 2.8 towards late 2022. The fluctuations in leverage correspond closely with the observed volatility in net profit margin and ROE.
- Return on Equity (ROE) (%)
- ROE followed a pattern parallel to net profit margin, initially improving from about 15.4% to a peak exceeding 23% by early 2018. Subsequently, it plunged to deeply negative values of approximately -28% in early 2019, coinciding with the period of poor profitability and increased leverage. The company then experienced a significant recovery starting in 2020, with ROE steadily rising and stabilizing around 18% to nearly 20% by late 2022. This indicates a restored capacity to generate returns for shareholders after a period of financial strain.
In summary, the financial ratios illustrate a cycle of growth followed by a sharp decline in profitability and efficiency around early 2019, accompanied by increased leverage and negative returns. The subsequent recovery phase from 2020 onward shows improvement and stabilization across all measured metrics, reflecting enhanced profitability, controlled leverage, and steady asset utilization.
Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29).
The financial data reveals several notable trends across the analyzed periods. The tax burden ratio exhibits variability, initially maintaining values around 0.66 to 0.67, but then sharply increasing to a peak above 1.0 during early 2018, followed by missing data for several consecutive quarters. From early 2020 onward, it stabilizes between 0.74 and 0.81, demonstrating a moderated and consistent tax effect on earnings in recent periods.
The interest burden ratio shows a generally positive trajectory, starting near 0.78 and increasing steadily to approximately 0.92 by the end of the latest period. This gradual improvement suggests a reduction in interest expense relative to earnings before interest and taxes, reflecting enhanced financial health or more favorable borrowing conditions.
The EBIT margin percentage experiences significant fluctuations. It begins with moderate positive margins near 8%, improving slightly up to 9.13% by mid-2018. However, there is a marked downturn manifested by strongly negative EBIT margins between late 2018 and early 2020, indicating periods of operational challenges or exceptional costs. From early 2020 onward, the margin recovers steadily, reaching levels close to or above 7%, denoting renewed operational profitability.
Asset turnover ratios remain fairly stable overall, fluctuating mostly between 1.18 and 1.42 but with a notable spike to 1.69 in early 2019. This indicates relative steadiness in the efficiency of asset utilization to generate revenues, aside from this outlier period where asset productivity temporarily improved.
Financial leverage ratios reflect shifts in the capital structure. Initially trending downwards from about 2.85 to 2.10 amid the first half of the timeline, leverage then increases notably to over 3.3 during mid to late 2019. Subsequently, there is a gradual decline towards values near 2.7, stabilizing somewhat in the latest quarters. This pattern suggests periods of increased borrowing followed by deleveraging or repayment efforts to manage financial risk.
The return on equity exhibits a pronounced volatility pattern. Early periods display consistent ROE in the range of approximately 15% to 23%. This is interrupted by a substantial negative phase between late 2018 and early 2020, aligning with the negative EBIT margins and indicating significant losses impacting shareholder returns. Afterwards, ROE recovers and climbs progressively, attaining values close to 19.5% at the most recent data points, signaling a restoration of profitability and effective equity utilization.
- Summary of Key Insights
- The tax burden has stabilized after a sharp prior increase, while interest burden improvements suggest cost-effective financing strategies.
- Operational profitability experienced a severe downturn but has shown a resilient recovery in recent periods.
- Asset turnover remains relatively consistent, except for a single notable increase, indicating stable asset efficiency overall.
- Financial leverage increased significantly but decreased afterwards, reflecting shifts in debt strategy.
- Return on equity mirrors the operational trends, with early stability, a severe negative phase, and steady recovery thereafter.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29).
The financial indicators exhibit noteworthy fluctuations across the observed periods, revealing phases of both growth and challenges.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin demonstrated a general upward trajectory from 4.13% in late April 2017, reaching a peak of 7.71% by early February 2018. This positive trend was maintained through late 2018 at levels above 7%, indicating efficient cost management and profitability during this period. However, starting in February 2019, there was a significant downturn with margins turning negative, reaching approximately -6.97%, and remaining negative through early 2020. This sharp decline signifies operational difficulties or extraordinary expenses impacting profitability. Subsequently, from February 2020 onwards, the margin recovered steadily, regaining positive territory and gradually improving to around 5.84% by late October 2022, reflecting restored profitability and operational stabilization.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover ratios fluctuated moderately across the periods. The ratio began near 1.31 in April 2017 and increased slightly to about 1.42 by mid-2018, indicating enhanced efficiency in utilizing assets to generate sales. There was a notable peak of 1.69 in early February 2019, suggesting a temporary boost in asset use efficiency despite the simultaneous negative profit margins. Following this peak, the ratio decreased and stabilized around 1.19 to 1.23 for most of 2019 through 2022, indicating a consistent but more moderate level of asset utilization during the recovery phase.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- Return on assets mirrored the trends observed in net profit margin, starting at 5.4% in April 2017 and improving to over 10.5% by early 2018. ROA remained strong through late 2018, emphasizing effective asset use for profit generation. However, a pronounced drop into negative territory occurred in early 2019, with ROA reaching as low as -11.78%, aligning with the period of negative net margins, reflecting significant operational losses or impairments. From early 2020 forward, there was a recovery in ROA, gradually increasing back above 7% by late 2022, which suggests a return to profitable use of assets and improved operational outcomes.
In summary, the company experienced a period of strong profitability and efficient asset use up to late 2018, followed by a significant downturn in early 2019 marked by negative earnings and returns. The subsequent periods show a recovery phase with improving profitability and steadier asset utilization, indicating a stabilization of financial performance through 2022.
Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29).
The analyzed financial data reveals notable fluctuations and trends in key performance ratios over the observed quarters. The tax burden ratio displays variability, initially increasing above 1.0 in early 2018, which suggests a tax burden exceeding reported pre-tax income, before stabilizing around 0.75 to 0.81 in later periods, indicating a reduction in effective tax pressure over time.
The interest burden ratio shows a gradual improvement, moving from approximately 0.78 in early periods to above 0.9 by 2021 and onwards. This upward trend implies a decline in interest expenses relative to earnings before interest and taxes, enhancing operating performance by reducing financing costs.
The EBIT margin exhibits a marked volatility. Early quarters maintain margins close to 8-9%, however, there is a significant decline into negative territory from mid-2018 to early 2020, with margins dropping as low as approximately -4.8%. This indicates operational challenges or extraordinary charges during this period. Following this slump, margins recover to positive territory, reaching approximately 7.9% towards the end of 2022, reflecting an improvement in core profitability.
Asset turnover remains relatively stable with moderate fluctuations, generally ranging between 1.18 and 1.42. Notably, there is a sharp peak at 1.69 in February 2019, suggesting a temporary improvement in asset utilization. Subsequent periods show a slight decline and stabilization near 1.20. This pattern indicates a generally consistent efficiency in using assets to generate sales, with some short-term variability.
Return on assets (ROA) follows a pattern consistent with the EBIT margin trends. It increases steadily to over 10.5% by early 2018, then sharply declines into negative values reaching below -11% during 2019 to early 2020, signaling overall asset inefficiency and potentially large losses in that timeframe. ROA then recovers progressively, stabilizing around 6-7% from mid-2020 through 2022, highlighting a return to profitability and more effective use of assets.
Overall, the data indicates a period of operational and financial difficulty around 2018 to early 2020, with recovery and improvement thereafter. Improvements in interest burden and EBIT margin correspond with the recovery in ROA, suggesting enhanced operational efficiency and better management of financial costs. Asset turnover remains mostly stable, implying that changes in profitability were more influenced by operating margins and cost structures rather than asset utilization changes.
- Tax Burden Ratio
- Initial increase above 1.0 followed by stabilization near 0.75-0.81, indicating reduced tax impact over time.
- Interest Burden Ratio
- Gradual improvement from about 0.78 to above 0.9, showing decreasing interest expenses relative to earnings.
- EBIT Margin
- Consistent 8-9% margins initially, sharp negative dip (-4.83%) during 2018-2020, then recovery to nearly 8% by late 2022.
- Asset Turnover
- Generally stable around 1.2-1.4 with a peak at 1.69 in early 2019, indicating consistent asset utilization with some short-term variance.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- Rise to over 10.5% by early 2018, sharp decline to approximately -11.8% in 2019-2020, followed by steady recovery to around 7% by 2022.
Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-10-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-07-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2022-04-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-10-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-07-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2021-05-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-10-31), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-08-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2020-05-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-11-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-08-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2019-05-04), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-11-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-08-04), 10-Q (reporting date: 2018-05-05), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-10-28), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-07-29), 10-Q (reporting date: 2017-04-29).
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden ratio remained relatively stable around 0.66 to 0.67 in 2017, before increasing significantly to values above 1.0 in early 2018, peaking around 1.11 by November 2018. Following a period of missing data, it stabilized near 0.75 to 0.8 from early 2020 through late 2022, showing a slight upward trend toward the end of the period.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden ratio showed a gradual improvement from 0.78 in April 2017 to around 0.85 by February 2018, then fluctuated slightly but remained near 0.8 through late 2018. Data gaps occur following this period, but from early 2020 onward, the ratio steadily increased from approximately 0.87 to about 0.92 by late 2022, indicating improved interest coverage over time.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin exhibited positive values in 2017 and the first part of 2018, ranging from 8.0% to just over 9.1%, reflecting healthy operational profitability. However, a significant downturn occurred during late 2018 and early 2019, with margins turning negative and reaching as low as -4.83%. Recovery began in early 2020, with margins improving steadily to values between 5.15% and 7.94% through 2022, although never reaching the peak levels observed in 2017 and early 2018.
- Net Profit Margin
- The net profit margin followed a pattern similar to EBIT margin, increasing from around 4.13% in early 2017 to a peak of approximately 7.7% in early 2018. This was followed by a sharp decline into negative territory from late 2018 through early 2020, reaching lows near -6.97%. From 2020 onwards, there was steady recovery with margins rising to approximately 5.8% by late 2022, yet remaining below the pre-downturn peaks.