EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Dollar Tree Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2005
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Dollar Tree Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
Analysis of the financial data reveals a consistent failure to generate positive economic profit over the observed six-year period. Throughout the timeframe from 2017 to 2022, economic profit remained negative, indicating that the net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) was insufficient to cover the cost of the capital invested in the business.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trends
- NOPAT exhibited significant volatility. After an initial increase from 1,187,252 thousand US$ in 2017 to 1,636,265 thousand US$ in 2018, a substantial decline occurred in 2019, where the figure dropped to a negative 1,112,626 thousand US$. A recovery followed in 2020, with NOPAT returning to positive territory at 1,176,670 thousand US$, eventually peaking in 2021 at 1,686,673 thousand US$ before a slight contraction in 2022.
- Cost of Capital and Invested Capital Dynamics
- The cost of capital showed a general upward trajectory, rising from 9.91% in 2017 to 12.08% by 2022. Concurrently, invested capital peaked in 2018 at 19,846,068 thousand US$, followed by a contraction to approximately 16.9 billion US$ by 2020. Since 2020, invested capital has trended upward again, reaching 18,201,900 thousand US$ in 2022.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit remained negative for all reported years, signifying a continuous destruction of shareholder value. The most severe deficit occurred in 2019, reaching negative 3,045,293 thousand US$, coinciding with the negative NOPAT and a high cost of capital. Although the economic loss narrowed to its lowest point of negative 352,059 thousand US$ in 2021, the trend reversed in 2022, with the deficit widening to negative 577,107 thousand US$.
The convergence of rising capital costs and fluctuating operating profits has prevented the transition to positive economic value added. The persistent negative economic profit suggests that the returns generated from operations have not met the minimum required rate of return demanded by the providers of capital.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).
3 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
4 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense, net = Adjusted interest expense, net × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).
- Net Income (Loss) Trend
- The net income exhibited significant fluctuations over the observed periods. Initially, there was a substantial increase from approximately $896.2 million in early 2017 to about $1.714 billion in early 2018. However, this positive trend was interrupted by a reversal in early 2019, where the net income turned negative, with a loss of approximately $1.59 billion. Subsequently, the company recovered, returning to positive net income values, rising to around $827 million in 2020, followed by further increases to $1.342 billion and $1.328 billion in 2021 and 2022, respectively. This pattern indicates a volatile earnings performance with a notable setback in 2019 but a steady recovery thereafter.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trend
- The net operating profit after taxes mirrored a similar trajectory to net income. It rose from about $1.187 billion in 2017 to $1.636 billion in 2018, before experiencing a substantial downturn to a negative $1.11 billion in 2019. Following this decline, NOPAT rebounded to approximately $1.177 billion in 2020 and continued to improve to $1.687 billion in 2021. In 2022, there was a slight decrease to around $1.622 billion, although levels remained strong relative to the earlier years except for 2019. The NOPAT trend reflects the operational challenges faced in 2019 and subsequent recovery, showcasing operational resilience in the following years.
- Insights and Observations
- The financial performance over the six-year span reveals a company experiencing cyclical volatility, with 2019 marking a particularly challenging year, featuring declines in both net income and operational profitability into negative territory. The recovery phase post-2019 was marked by restored profitability and an ability to sustain high levels of operating profit, suggesting effective management responses and operational adjustments. The relative stability of net income and NOPAT in the last two periods indicates a stabilization phase, with strong earnings sustained despite minor fluctuations. Overall, the patterns suggest responsiveness to external or internal challenges and a capacity for financial recovery and growth.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
- Provision for Income Taxes
- The provision for income taxes shows considerable fluctuation over the six-year period. It started at a high value of 433,200 thousand US dollars in early 2017, then sharply declined to a negative figure of -10,300 thousand US dollars in early 2018, indicating a possible tax benefit or adjustment during that year. Subsequently, the provision increased again, reaching 281,800 thousand US dollars in early 2019 and maintaining similarly elevated levels in the following years, with values of 271,700, 397,900, and 304,300 thousand US dollars in early 2020, 2021, and 2022 respectively. Overall, the provision exhibits volatility, but generally remains in the positive range, with a notable exception in 2018.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes demonstrate a clear declining trend from 2017 through 2020. Initially, the amount stood at 786,228 thousand US dollars in early 2017 and decreased steadily over the next three years to 664,515, 424,099, and 353,258 thousand US dollars by early 2018, 2019, and 2020 respectively. After 2020, this figure experienced a rebound, increasing to 450,561 thousand US dollars in early 2021, before slightly decreasing again to 411,860 thousand US dollars in early 2022. This suggests a reduction in cash operating tax outflows mid-period, followed by partial recovery in subsequent years.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of equity equivalents to shareholders’ equity.
4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
5 Subtraction of construction in progress.
- Total reported debt & leases
-
The total reported debt and leases show a consistent downward trend from January 28, 2017, to January 30, 2021, decreasing from approximately 12.43 billion US dollars to about 9.64 billion US dollars. This indicates a concerted effort towards debt reduction over this period. However, there is a slight increase in the debt level in the latest period, ending on January 29, 2022, rising to roughly 9.97 billion US dollars.
- Shareholders’ equity
-
Shareholders’ equity exhibits fluctuations over the analyzed periods but generally trends upward. It increased substantially between January 28, 2017, and February 3, 2018, rising from approximately 5.39 billion to 7.18 billion US dollars. This was followed by a decline in the following year to around 5.64 billion US dollars, and then a steady recovery and growth through January 29, 2022, reaching about 7.72 billion US dollars. The overall increase suggests strengthening equity positions over the long term.
- Invested capital
-
Invested capital shows a pattern characterized by an initial increase from January 28, 2017, to February 3, 2018, peaking at approximately 19.85 billion US dollars. Subsequently, there is a decline over the next two years, bottoming out at about 16.99 billion US dollars in February 1, 2020, before a gradual increase resumes, reaching approximately 18.20 billion US dollars by January 29, 2022. This trend suggests a period of contraction followed by renewed investment activities or asset accumulation.
- Overall analysis
-
The data portray a company that has actively managed its capital structure, notably reducing total reported debt over a significant period while recovering from a dip in shareholders’ equity. The invested capital trend aligns with these dynamics, showcasing initial growth, mid-term contraction, and later resurgence. The slight uptick in debt in the most recent reporting period warrants monitoring, although the continuous increase in equity and invested capital indicates a potentially improving financial position.
Cost of Capital
Dollar Tree Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 33.70%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 33.70%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Costco Wholesale Corp. | |||||||
| Target Corp. | |||||||
| Walmart Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2017 to 2022 is characterized by a consistent inability to generate positive economic profit, indicating that the returns on invested capital have remained below the company's cost of capital throughout the analyzed period. This persistent negative economic profit signifies a continuous destruction of shareholder value over the six-year timeframe.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit remained negative for all reported years, exhibiting significant volatility. A notable deterioration occurred in 2019, where economic profit plummeted to -3.045 billion US dollars. Subsequent years showed a recovery, with the loss narrowing to -352.059 million US dollars by January 30, 2021, before widening again to -577.107 million US dollars in January 2022.
- Invested Capital Fluctuations
- Invested capital showed a general lack of a linear trend, peaking in February 2018 at 19.846 billion US dollars. A contraction followed, reaching a period low of 16.987 billion US dollars in February 2020. Since that low point, there has been a gradual increase in invested capital, rising to 18.202 billion US dollars by January 29, 2022.
- Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
- The economic spread ratio mirrors the trajectory of economic profit, remaining negative throughout the period. The most severe value destruction is evident in 2019, with the ratio dropping to -17.90%. The ratio improved significantly by January 30, 2021, reaching its highest point at -1.99%, which represents the period's closest approach to value creation. However, the ratio declined to -3.17% by January 29, 2022, suggesting a reversal of the recovery trend observed in the previous year.
Economic Profit Margin
| Jan 29, 2022 | Jan 30, 2021 | Feb 1, 2020 | Feb 2, 2019 | Feb 3, 2018 | Jan 28, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Net sales | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Costco Wholesale Corp. | |||||||
| Target Corp. | |||||||
| Walmart Inc. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the economic value added reveals that the organization consistently operated with a negative economic profit throughout the six-year period ending January 29, 2022. While net sales exhibited a steady upward trajectory, increasing from approximately 20.7 billion US dollars in 2017 to 26.3 billion US dollars in 2022, this growth in top-line revenue did not translate into the generation of positive economic value. The persistent negative economic profit indicates that the returns generated were insufficient to cover the cost of capital employed.
- Economic Profit Margin Volatility
- The economic profit margin demonstrated significant volatility, characterized by a severe contraction in February 2019, where the margin dropped to -13.34%. This represents the most substantial deterioration in value creation over the observed period, with economic profit falling to negative 3.05 billion US dollars. Following this trough, a recovery phase occurred, leading to the most favorable margin of -1.38% in January 2021, before shifting back to -2.19% in January 2022.
- Revenue Growth and Value Divergence
- A divergence is observed between sales growth and economic profit performance. Despite a consistent increase in net sales over six consecutive years, the economic profit remained negative. This suggests that the expansion of the business scale did not yield the necessary efficiencies or returns required to achieve an economic profit break-even point.
- Long-term Margin Trend
- Excluding the anomalous decline in 2019, the economic profit margin generally fluctuated within a narrow band between -1.38% and -3.43%. The trend suggests a stabilization of the economic loss relative to sales, although the failure to reach a positive percentage indicates a systemic inability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital during this timeframe.