AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Dollar Tree Inc. (NASDAQ:DLTR)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since November 22, 2022.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Dollar Tree Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Jan 29, 2022 17.20% = 6.11% × 2.81
Jan 30, 2021 18.42% = 6.48% × 2.84
Feb 1, 2020 13.22% = 4.22% × 3.13
Feb 2, 2019 -28.19% = -11.78% × 2.39
Feb 3, 2018 23.87% = 10.50% × 2.27
Jan 28, 2017 16.63% = 5.71% × 2.91

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


The financial performance between January 2017 and January 2022 is characterized by significant volatility in profitability metrics, punctuated by a severe contraction in the 2019 fiscal period. The Return on Equity (ROE) demonstrates a non-linear trajectory, fluctuating from a peak of 23.87% in 2018 to a deep negative of -28.19% in 2019, before stabilizing in the 13% to 18% range during the subsequent three years.

Return on Assets (ROA)
ROA served as the primary driver of volatility within the ROE calculation. A positive trend was observed initially, with ROA rising from 5.71% in 2017 to 10.50% in 2018. This was followed by a substantial decline to -11.78% in 2019, indicating a period of negative net income relative to total assets. Recovery began in 2020 with a return to positivity (4.22%), eventually plateauing around 6.11% by 2022.
Financial Leverage
The financial leverage ratio remained relatively stable compared to profitability metrics, though it acted as a multiplier for both gains and losses. Leverage decreased from 2.91 in 2017 to 2.27 in 2018, which suggests that the increase in ROE during that period was driven by operational efficiency rather than increased debt. A peak in leverage occurred in 2020 at 3.13, which amplified the recovery of ROE following the 2019 downturn.
Return on Equity (ROE)
The two-component disaggregation reveals that ROE fluctuations were predominantly dictated by the swings in ROA. The precipitous drop in 2019 was a direct result of the negative ROA, as the leverage ratio of 2.39 magnified the underlying operational loss. The subsequent stabilization of ROE at 17.20% in 2022 reflects a convergence of moderate asset productivity (6.11% ROA) and a consistent leverage multiplier (2.81).

In summary, the analysis indicates that the company's equity returns are highly sensitive to asset productivity. While financial leverage has been used to bolster returns during recovery phases, the fundamental driver of shareholder value over this period has been the volatility of the Return on Assets.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Dollar Tree Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Jan 29, 2022 17.20% = 5.05% × 1.21 × 2.81
Jan 30, 2021 18.42% = 5.26% × 1.23 × 2.84
Feb 1, 2020 13.22% = 3.50% × 1.21 × 3.13
Feb 2, 2019 -28.19% = -6.97% × 1.69 × 2.39
Feb 3, 2018 23.87% = 7.71% × 1.36 × 2.27
Jan 28, 2017 16.63% = 4.33% × 1.32 × 2.91

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibits significant volatility over the analyzed period, characterized by a severe contraction in 2019 followed by a multi-year recovery. This fluctuation is predominantly driven by instability in net profit margins, while asset turnover and financial leverage remained relatively more stable.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability is the primary driver of ROE variance. A peak of 7.71% in 2018 was followed by a sharp decline to -6.97% in 2019, marking a period of net losses. From 2020 onward, margins recovered and stabilized, fluctuating within a narrower range between 3.50% and 5.26%.
Asset Turnover
Operational efficiency remained generally consistent, typically ranging between 1.21 and 1.36. A notable exception occurred in 2019, where asset turnover peaked at 1.69; however, this increase in efficiency did not translate to profitability, as it coincided with the lowest net profit margin of the period.
Financial Leverage
The use of debt to amplify returns shifted between a low of 2.27 in 2018 and a peak of 3.13 in 2020. The increase in leverage during 2020 contributed to the restoration of positive ROE following the previous year's losses. By 2022, leverage stabilized at 2.81.
ROE Synthesis
The comprehensive ROE trend reflects a volatile cycle, dropping from 23.87% in 2018 to -28.19% in 2019 before returning to 17.20% by 2022. The analysis indicates that while financial leverage provides a consistent magnifying effect, the overall return is hypersensitive to fluctuations in net profit margins.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Dollar Tree Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Jan 29, 2022 17.20% = 0.81 × 0.90 × 6.88% × 1.21 × 2.81
Jan 30, 2021 18.42% = 0.77 × 0.92 × 7.40% × 1.23 × 2.84
Feb 1, 2020 13.22% = 0.75 × 0.87 × 5.34% × 1.21 × 3.13
Feb 2, 2019 -28.19% = — × — × -4.11% × 1.69 × 2.39
Feb 3, 2018 23.87% = 1.01 × 0.85 × 9.02% × 1.36 × 2.27
Jan 28, 2017 16.63% = 0.67 × 0.78 × 8.23% × 1.32 × 2.91

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2022, characterized by a severe contraction in 2019 followed by a gradual recovery. The performance shifted from 16.63% in 2017 to a peak of 23.87% in 2018, before plummeting to -28.19% in 2019. From 2020 onward, ROE stabilized, returning to a range between 13.22% and 18.42%.

Operating Profitability
The EBIT Margin served as the primary driver of ROE volatility. After maintaining margins between 8.23% and 9.02% in the first two years, a sharp decline to -4.11% occurred in 2019, which directly precipitated the negative ROE for that period. Profitability recovered in 2020 at 5.34% and trended upward to 7.40% in 2021, before a slight moderation to 6.88% in 2022.
Asset Efficiency
Asset Turnover remained relatively consistent, generally fluctuating between 1.21 and 1.36. A notable anomaly occurred in 2019, where turnover spiked to 1.69. Given the simultaneous collapse in EBIT margin, this suggests that the spike in turnover was likely the result of a reduction in the asset base rather than an increase in operational efficiency.
Financial Leverage
The company maintained a high level of financial leverage throughout the period, typically ranging between 2.27 and 3.13. Leverage peaked in 2020 at 3.13, acting as an amplifier for the recovery in profitability. The sustained high leverage indicates a consistent strategy of using debt to boost equity returns, which simultaneously increased the risk profile during the 2019 downturn.
Tax and Interest Burdens
The Interest Burden showed a steady upward trend, improving from 0.78 in 2017 to 0.90 in 2022, indicating that a smaller portion of operating profits was consumed by interest expenses over time. The Tax Burden remained more volatile, peaking at 1.01 in 2018, which suggests a tax benefit that temporarily boosted net income, before stabilizing between 0.75 and 0.81 in the latter years.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Dollar Tree Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Jan 29, 2022 6.11% = 5.05% × 1.21
Jan 30, 2021 6.48% = 5.26% × 1.23
Feb 1, 2020 4.22% = 3.50% × 1.21
Feb 2, 2019 -11.78% = -6.97% × 1.69
Feb 3, 2018 10.50% = 7.71% × 1.36
Jan 28, 2017 5.71% = 4.33% × 1.32

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility over the analyzed six-year period, characterized by a sharp peak in 2018, a profound contraction in 2019, and a subsequent period of stabilization between 2020 and 2022. The overall trend indicates that ROA fluctuations were primarily driven by volatility in profit margins rather than changes in asset utilization efficiency.

Net Profit Margin
A period of initial growth is observed from 2017 to 2018, where the margin increased from 4.33% to 7.71%. This was followed by a severe decline to -6.97% in 2019, representing the most significant volatility in the dataset. A recovery occurred in 2020 with a return to a positive margin of 3.50%, eventually stabilizing at approximately 5.05% by 2022.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization remained relatively consistent, generally fluctuating between 1.21 and 1.36. An anomalous peak occurred in 2019, where the ratio reached 1.69. Despite this increase in operational efficiency regarding asset usage, it was insufficient to offset the negative profit margins recorded in the same period.
ROA Disaggregation Analysis
The interaction between the two components reveals that the ROA is highly sensitive to profit margin swings. The peak ROA of 10.50% in 2018 was the result of coinciding strengths in both profit margin and asset turnover. Conversely, the negative ROA of -11.78% in 2019 highlights a critical failure in profitability that overrode the highest recorded asset turnover ratio. Since 2020, the stabilization of the Net Profit Margin around 5% has led to a corresponding stabilization of ROA within the 4.22% to 6.48% range.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Dollar Tree Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Jan 29, 2022 6.11% = 0.81 × 0.90 × 6.88% × 1.21
Jan 30, 2021 6.48% = 0.77 × 0.92 × 7.40% × 1.23
Feb 1, 2020 4.22% = 0.75 × 0.87 × 5.34% × 1.21
Feb 2, 2019 -11.78% = — × — × -4.11% × 1.69
Feb 3, 2018 10.50% = 1.01 × 0.85 × 9.02% × 1.36
Jan 28, 2017 5.71% = 0.67 × 0.78 × 8.23% × 1.32

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility over the analyzed six-year period, characterized by a severe contraction in 2019 followed by a gradual recovery and subsequent stabilization. While ROA reached a peak of 10.50% in 2018, a sharp decline to -11.78% occurred the following year, primarily driven by a collapse in operating profitability. Since 2020, the metric has stabilized, returning to a range between 4.22% and 6.48%.

Operating Profitability (EBIT Margin)
The EBIT margin was the primary driver of ROA volatility. After reaching 9.02% in 2018, the margin plummeted to -4.11% in 2019, indicating a period of substantial operational loss. A recovery phase ensued starting in 2020, with margins normalizing between 5.34% and 7.40% through 2022, although these levels remained below the 2018 peak.
Asset Efficiency (Asset Turnover)
Asset turnover experienced an anomalous peak of 1.69 in 2019, occurring simultaneously with the lowest point of profitability. Following this spike, asset efficiency declined and remained relatively stagnant, fluctuating narrowly between 1.21 and 1.23 from 2020 to 2022, suggesting a plateau in the effectiveness of asset utilization for revenue generation.
Financial and Tax Burdens
The interest burden demonstrated a general upward trend, rising from 0.78 in 2017 to 0.90 by 2022, which implies that interest expenses consumed a smaller proportion of operating income over time. The tax burden exhibited higher irregularity, peaking at 1.01 in 2018 before settling into a tighter range between 0.75 and 0.81 from 2020 to 2022.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

Dollar Tree Inc., decomposition of net profit margin ratio

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Jan 29, 2022 5.05% = 0.81 × 0.90 × 6.88%
Jan 30, 2021 5.26% = 0.77 × 0.92 × 7.40%
Feb 1, 2020 3.50% = 0.75 × 0.87 × 5.34%
Feb 2, 2019 -6.97% = — × — × -4.11%
Feb 3, 2018 7.71% = 1.01 × 0.85 × 9.02%
Jan 28, 2017 4.33% = 0.67 × 0.78 × 8.23%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-02-01), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-01-28).


Net profit margin exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2022, characterized by a sharp contraction in 2019 followed by a period of gradual recovery and stabilization. The margin peaked at 7.71% in 2018 before falling to a deficit of -6.97% in 2019, eventually recovering to 5.05% by 2022.

EBIT Margin
Operating profitability served as the primary driver of net income fluctuations. The EBIT margin rose from 8.23% in 2017 to a peak of 9.02% in 2018, followed by a severe decline to -4.11% in 2019. A recovery trend ensued, with the margin climbing to 7.40% in 2021 before settling at 6.88% in 2022, indicating that operational performance regained most, but not all, of its 2018 strength.
Interest Burden
A consistent upward trend is observed in the interest burden ratio, which improved from 0.78 in 2017 to 0.90 in 2022. This progression suggests a reduction in the relative impact of interest expenses on operating income, reflecting a more favorable relationship between EBIT and interest obligations over time.
Tax Burden
The tax burden ratio demonstrated inconsistency, ranging from a low of 0.67 in 2017 to a high of 1.01 in 2018. Following a period of missing data, the ratio stabilized between 0.75 and 0.81 from 2020 to 2022, suggesting a moderate increase in the effective tax impact on pre-tax earnings in the final years of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?