Decomposing ROE involves expressing net income divided by shareholders’ equity as the product of component ratios.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial performance from 2018 to 2022 is characterized by persistent negative returns on both assets and equity, indicating continuous net losses relative to the company's asset and equity bases. While the magnitude of these losses fluctuated, a distinct trend of deleveraging was observed during the period for which data is available.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- ROA remained negative throughout the five-year period, reflecting an inability to generate positive earnings from total assets. A period of improvement occurred between 2018 and 2020, where ROA moved from -50.33% to -23.85%. However, this trend reversed after 2020, with ROA deteriorating to -25.59% in 2021 and further declining to -38.33% by the end of 2022.
- Financial Leverage
- A significant reduction in financial leverage is evident between 2018 and 2021. The leverage ratio decreased from 8.14 in 2018 to 4.71 in 2020, and further down to 3.45 in 2021. This downward trend indicates a reduction in the proportion of debt relative to equity, effectively lowering the company's financial risk profile and reducing the magnification of losses.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- ROE exhibited extreme volatility and remained deeply negative, though the magnitude of the negative return decreased substantially over time. The ROE improved from -409.84% in 2018 to -112.27% in 2020 and -88.29% in 2021. Based on the two-component DuPont disaggregation, this improvement in ROE was driven by two concurrent factors: the initial improvement in ROA and the aggressive reduction in financial leverage, which limited the multiplier effect that amplified negative asset returns into equity losses.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The Return on Equity (ROE) remains consistently negative throughout the analyzed period, although there is a trend toward a reduction in the magnitude of these losses between 2018 and 2021. The overall performance is primarily driven by substantial negative net profit margins, which overshadow the contributions of asset utilization and financial leverage.
- Net Profit Margin
- A pattern of extreme negative profitability is observed, with margins fluctuating significantly. The margin declined to its lowest point in 2019 at -452.93% before recovering to -228.00% in 2020. However, a subsequent deterioration occurred, with the margin falling to -411.21% by 2022, indicating persistent and volatile net losses relative to revenue.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover ratios are consistently low, beginning at 0.15 in 2018 and remaining within a narrow range between 0.08 and 0.10 from 2019 through 2022. This indicates a limited capacity to generate revenue from the existing asset base, which is characteristic of entities in heavy investment or research phases.
- Financial Leverage
- A clear downward trend is observed in financial leverage, which decreased from 8.14 in 2018 to 3.45 in 2021. This reduction suggests a decrease in the use of debt to finance assets or an increase in equity, effectively reducing the multiplier effect that amplifies negative net margins when calculating ROE.
The synthesis of these components reveals that the improvement in ROE from -409.84% in 2018 to -88.29% in 2021 was not the result of increased operational efficiency or profitability, but was primarily achieved through the reduction of financial leverage. The stagnation of asset turnover and the continued volatility of the net profit margin indicate that the underlying drivers of the negative return remain unresolved.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The five-component DuPont disaggregation reveals a period of significant operating losses and a changing capital structure. While the Return on Equity (ROE) remains deeply negative, there is a noticeable reduction in the magnitude of these negative returns from 2018 to 2021, moving from -409.84% to -88.29%.
- EBIT Margin
- The operating performance is characterized by severe and volatile negative margins. The EBIT margin fluctuated significantly, reaching a low of -428.28% in 2019 before improving to -199.41% in 2020, and subsequently declining again to -390.68% by 2022. This indicates a consistent inability to generate operating profit relative to revenue.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization remains extremely low and exhibits a slight downward trend. The ratio decreased from 0.15 in 2018 to 0.09 by 2022. This suggests that the entity is generating very little revenue for every unit of assets held, which is characteristic of organizations in intensive research and development phases.
- Financial Leverage
- A significant downward trend in financial leverage is observed. The ratio dropped from 8.14 in 2018 to 3.45 in 2021. This reduction in leverage indicates a decrease in the use of debt to finance assets, which effectively reduced the magnification of operating losses when calculating the final return on equity.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- The ROE is driven primarily by the deep negative EBIT margins. The improvement in ROE from 2018 to 2021 is not a result of operational profitability, but rather a combination of fluctuating operating losses and a substantial reduction in the financial leverage multiplier.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The five-year financial trajectory reflects a consistent state of negative profitability and low asset utilization, resulting in a persistently negative Return on Assets (ROA).
- Net Profit Margin
- Significant volatility is observed in net profit margins, which remained deeply negative throughout the period. A peak loss of -452.93% occurred in 2019, followed by a partial recovery to -228.00% in 2020. However, the margin deteriorated again in subsequent years, reaching -411.21% by 2022, indicating that operational expenses heavily outweigh revenues.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover remained consistently low and exhibited a general downward trend, declining from 0.15 in 2018 to 0.09 in 2022. This suggests a limited capacity to generate revenue from the existing asset base.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The ROA remained negative for all reported years. Although a period of relative improvement was observed, peaking in 2020 at -23.85%, the ROA declined again to -38.33% by 2022. The overall performance is primarily driven by the extreme negative margins rather than fluctuations in asset efficiency.
The disaggregation of ROA reveals that the primary driver of negative returns is the substantial net loss relative to revenue. While asset turnover is low, its relative stability compared to the high volatility of the profit margin confirms that operational losses are the dominant factor impacting the overall return on assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial performance from 2018 through 2022 is characterized by consistently negative returns on assets (ROA), reflecting a period of significant operational losses. While a moderate recovery in ROA was observed between 2018 and 2020, the trend reversed in the subsequent two years, culminating in a decline to -38.33% by the end of 2022.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- ROA remained negative throughout the five-year period. The most significant improvement occurred in 2020, where the ratio reached its peak at -23.85%. However, this improvement was not sustained, as the ROA deteriorated to -25.59% in 2021 and further declined to -38.33% in 2022, indicating a recurring inability to generate positive returns from the asset base.
- EBIT Margin
- The EBIT margin serves as the primary driver of the negative ROA, exhibiting extreme negative values that suggest operating expenses far exceed revenues. The margin fluctuated significantly, reaching a low of -428.28% in 2019 before improving to -199.41% in 2020. A subsequent downward trend is observed, with the margin falling to -390.68% by 2022, reflecting heightened operational inefficiency or increased investment in research and development.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset turnover remained consistently low, indicating a limited ability to generate revenue relative to the total assets employed. After an initial drop from 0.15 in 2018 to 0.09 in 2019, the ratio remained stagnant, oscillating between 0.08 and 0.10. This lack of growth in asset efficiency suggests that the expansion of the asset base has not translated into proportional revenue growth.
The overall disaggregation indicates that the deterioration in ROA is primarily linked to the volatility and depth of the negative EBIT margins rather than shifts in asset turnover. The inability to stabilize operating margins has precluded the company from achieving a positive return on its assets despite relatively stable, albeit low, asset utilization rates.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial performance from 2018 to 2022 is characterized by persistent and significant negative margins, indicating that operating expenses substantially exceed revenue. A volatile trajectory is observed, where a temporary reduction in losses during 2020 was followed by a steady decline in profitability metrics through 2022.
- EBIT Margin Trends
- The EBIT margin exhibited considerable volatility over the analyzed period. A deepening of operating losses occurred between 2018 and 2019, with the margin moving from -325.36% to -428.28%. A significant recovery was noted in 2020, as the margin improved to -199.41%. However, this trend reversed in the subsequent years, with the margin deteriorating to -282.38% in 2021 and reaching -390.68% by the end of 2022.
- Net Profit Margin Analysis
- The net profit margin mirrored the fluctuations seen in the EBIT margin but remained consistently more negative. The most severe deficit was recorded in 2019 at -452.93%, while the most favorable result occurred in 2020 at -228.00%. By the end of 2022, the net profit margin had declined to -411.21%, reflecting a continuing downward trend in bottom-line performance.
- Disaggregation of Margin Variance
- A consistent gap exists between the EBIT margin and the net profit margin across all five years. The net profit margin is invariably lower than the EBIT margin, which indicates that non-operating expenses, such as interest burdens, further diminish the financial outcome beyond the operating losses. This divergence was evident in 2022, where the net profit margin was 20.53 percentage points lower than the EBIT margin.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?