Profitability ratios measure the company ability to generate profitable sales from its resources (assets).
Profitability Ratios (Summary)
Return on Sales
Return on Investment
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The profitability ratios for the period between 2018 and 2022 exhibit consistent negative values, indicating sustained operating losses and a lack of net income. While there were periodic fluctuations, the overall trend reflects a high cost structure relative to generated revenue.
- Profit Margins
- Operating profit margins remained deeply negative throughout the observed period. A significant temporary improvement was noted in 2020, where the margin rose from -367.97% in 2019 to -168.27%. However, this improvement was not sustained, with the margin declining to -264.54% in 2021 and further to -342.75% in 2022. Net profit margins followed a similar pattern but remained more severe than operating margins, reaching a low of -452.93% in 2019 and ending the period at -411.21% in 2022.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- A trend of narrowing losses relative to total assets was observed from 2018 to 2020, with ROA improving from -50.33% to -23.85%. This upward trajectory stalled in 2021 and reversed in 2022, with the ratio widening to -38.33%, suggesting a decrease in asset efficiency in the final year of the analysis.
- Return on Equity (ROE)
- Return on equity figures were substantially negative, though the magnitude of the losses relative to equity decreased over the available data points. The ROE improved from -409.84% in 2018 to -88.29% by 2021, indicating a reduction in the rate of equity erosion despite the continued lack of profitability.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Operating loss | (324,202) | (186,313) | (93,943) | (98,867) | (88,916) | |
| Revenues | 94,588) | 70,428) | 55,828) | 26,868) | 31,501) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| Operating profit margin1 | -342.75% | -264.54% | -168.27% | -367.97% | -282.26% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Operating Profit Margin, Competitors2 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | 31.21% | 31.89% | — | — | — | |
| Amgen Inc. | 38.57% | 31.44% | — | — | — | |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 17.96% | 15.91% | — | — | — | |
| Danaher Corp. | 27.61% | 25.35% | — | — | — | |
| Eli Lilly & Co. | 24.97% | 22.45% | — | — | — | |
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | 27.17% | 36.72% | — | — | — | |
| Johnson & Johnson | 24.63% | 24.95% | — | — | — | |
| Merck & Co. Inc. | 30.27% | 25.74% | — | — | — | |
| Pfizer Inc. | 35.37% | 24.70% | — | — | — | |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 38.93% | 55.67% | — | — | — | |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 18.69% | 25.57% | — | — | — | |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 48.23% | 36.73% | — | — | — | |
| Operating Profit Margin, Sector | ||||||
| Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences | 28.59% | 26.98% | — | — | — | |
| Operating Profit Margin, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | 18.74% | 18.04% | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Operating profit margin = 100 × Operating loss ÷ Revenues
= 100 × -324,202 ÷ 94,588 = -342.75%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The company exhibits a trend of expanding revenues coupled with accelerating operating losses, resulting in a consistently negative and volatile operating profit margin over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022.
- Revenue Growth Trends
- Revenues demonstrated a general upward trajectory, increasing from US$ 31,501 thousand in 2018 to US$ 94,588 thousand in 2022. Following a slight contraction in 2019, revenue experienced significant growth, nearly tripling between 2019 and 2022.
- Operating Loss Expansion
- Operating losses remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2020, fluctuating between approximately US$ 88.9 million and US$ 98.9 million. However, a sharp acceleration in losses occurred in the subsequent two years, with the operating loss increasing to US$ 186,313 thousand in 2021 and further widening to US$ 324,202 thousand by the end of 2022.
- Operating Profit Margin Analysis
- The operating profit margin remained deeply negative throughout the period, reflecting a cost structure that far exceeds current revenue generation. A temporary improvement in efficiency was observed in 2020, where the margin narrowed to -168.27%. This improvement was reversed in 2021 and 2022, with the margin deteriorating to -264.54% and -342.75%, respectively. The widening of the negative margin indicates that operating expenses grew at a significantly faster rate than revenue during the final two years of the analyzed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Net Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Net loss | (388,955) | (215,314) | (127,290) | (121,692) | (106,289) | |
| Revenues | 94,588) | 70,428) | 55,828) | 26,868) | 31,501) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| Net profit margin1 | -411.21% | -305.72% | -228.00% | -452.93% | -337.41% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Net Profit Margin, Competitors2 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | 20.39% | 20.54% | — | — | — | |
| Amgen Inc. | 26.42% | 24.25% | — | — | — | |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 13.71% | 15.08% | — | — | — | |
| Danaher Corp. | 22.91% | 21.84% | — | — | — | |
| Eli Lilly & Co. | 21.88% | 19.71% | — | — | — | |
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | 17.02% | 23.05% | — | — | — | |
| Johnson & Johnson | 18.90% | 22.26% | — | — | — | |
| Merck & Co. Inc. | 24.49% | 26.79% | — | — | — | |
| Pfizer Inc. | 31.01% | 26.76% | — | — | — | |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 35.64% | 50.25% | — | — | — | |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 15.47% | 19.70% | — | — | — | |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 37.20% | 30.92% | — | — | — | |
| Net Profit Margin, Sector | ||||||
| Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences | 22.55% | 23.38% | — | — | — | |
| Net Profit Margin, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | 14.65% | 15.24% | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100 × Net loss ÷ Revenues
= 100 × -388,955 ÷ 94,588 = -411.21%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory between 2018 and 2022 is characterized by a significant expansion in revenue coupled with an accelerating increase in net losses. Although the top-line growth indicates an expanding operational scale, the disproportionate growth in expenses has led to consistently deep negative net profit margins, suggesting a period of heavy investment or high operational burn.
- Revenue Growth Trends
- Revenues exhibited a general upward trend over the five-year period. After a slight contraction between 2018 and 2019, where revenues decreased from US$ 31.5 million to US$ 26.9 million, a period of sustained growth followed. Revenues increased significantly to US$ 55.8 million in 2020 and continued to climb, reaching US$ 94.6 million by December 31, 2022.
- Net Loss Escalation
- Net losses expanded consistently throughout the analyzed period. The net loss grew from US$ 106.3 million in 2018 to US$ 127.3 million in 2020. A sharp acceleration in losses occurred after 2020, with the deficit increasing to US$ 215.3 million in 2021 and peaking at US$ 389.0 million in 2022, indicating that expenditures grew at a rate far exceeding revenue gains.
- Net Profit Margin Volatility
- The net profit margin remained deeply negative, reflecting a lack of profitability. The margin worsened from -337.41% in 2018 to -452.93% in 2019. A temporary improvement was observed in 2020, where the margin narrowed to -228.00% due to a substantial increase in revenue relative to a stable net loss. However, this trend reversed in subsequent years, with the margin deteriorating to -305.72% in 2021 and further declining to -411.21% in 2022.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Return on Equity (ROE)
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Net loss | (388,955) | (215,314) | (127,290) | (121,692) | (106,289) | |
| Stockholders’ equity (deficit) | (107,900) | 243,863) | 113,383) | (10,937) | 25,934) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| ROE1 | — | -88.29% | -112.27% | — | -409.84% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROE, Competitors2 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | 68.60% | 74.91% | — | — | — | |
| Amgen Inc. | 178.97% | 87.96% | — | — | — | |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 20.37% | 19.46% | — | — | — | |
| Danaher Corp. | 14.39% | 14.24% | — | — | — | |
| Eli Lilly & Co. | 58.64% | 62.16% | — | — | — | |
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | 21.62% | 29.55% | — | — | — | |
| Johnson & Johnson | 23.36% | 28.20% | — | — | — | |
| Merck & Co. Inc. | 31.57% | 34.17% | — | — | — | |
| Pfizer Inc. | 32.79% | 28.47% | — | — | — | |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 19.14% | 43.03% | — | — | — | |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 15.80% | 18.94% | — | — | — | |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 23.88% | 23.19% | — | — | — | |
| ROE, Sector | ||||||
| Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences | 27.99% | 29.75% | — | — | — | |
| ROE, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | 24.82% | 25.44% | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
ROE = 100 × Net loss ÷ Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
= 100 × -388,955 ÷ -107,900 = —
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory from 2018 to 2022 is characterized by widening net losses and significant volatility in stockholders' equity, which has fundamentally impacted the return on equity (ROE) profile. The persistent inability to generate profit, coupled with fluctuating capital levels, indicates a period of heavy expenditure and reliance on external financing.
- Net Loss Trends
- A consistent and accelerating increase in net losses is observed over the five-year period. Net losses grew from -106,289 thousand USD in 2018 to -388,955 thousand USD by 2022. The most significant acceleration occurred between 2021 and 2022, where losses increased by approximately 80%, suggesting an escalation in operational costs or research and development expenditures.
- Stockholders' Equity Volatility
- The equity position has fluctuated between positive balances and deficits. After falling into a deficit in 2019, equity rose sharply in 2020 and 2021, peaking at 243,863 thousand USD. However, this trend reversed in 2022, with equity dropping to a deficit of -107,900 thousand USD. This reversal is directly attributable to the substantial net loss recorded in 2022, which eroded the previously accumulated equity base.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
- The ROE remains negative throughout the periods reported, reflecting the continuous net losses. While the ROE showed a mathematical improvement from -409.84% in 2018 to -88.29% in 2021, this trend was primarily driven by the increase in the equity denominator through capital infusions rather than an improvement in operational profitability. ROE values are absent for 2019 and 2022, coinciding with periods of negative stockholders' equity, rendering the ratio conceptually inapplicable or misleading during those years.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Return on Assets (ROA)
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Net loss | (388,955) | (215,314) | (127,290) | (121,692) | (106,289) | |
| Total assets | 1,014,775) | 841,319) | 533,803) | 289,814) | 211,178) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| ROA1 | -38.33% | -25.59% | -23.85% | -41.99% | -50.33% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROA, Competitors2 | ||||||
| AbbVie Inc. | 8.53% | 7.88% | — | — | — | |
| Amgen Inc. | 10.06% | 9.63% | — | — | — | |
| Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 6.53% | 6.40% | — | — | — | |
| Danaher Corp. | 8.55% | 7.73% | — | — | — | |
| Eli Lilly & Co. | 12.62% | 11.44% | — | — | — | |
| Gilead Sciences Inc. | 7.27% | 9.16% | — | — | — | |
| Johnson & Johnson | 9.57% | 11.47% | — | — | — | |
| Merck & Co. Inc. | 13.30% | 12.35% | — | — | — | |
| Pfizer Inc. | 15.91% | 12.11% | — | — | — | |
| Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 14.85% | 31.75% | — | — | — | |
| Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. | 7.15% | 8.12% | — | — | — | |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. | 18.30% | 17.44% | — | — | — | |
| ROA, Sector | ||||||
| Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences | 10.67% | 10.42% | — | — | — | |
| ROA, Industry | ||||||
| Health Care | 9.66% | 9.46% | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 2022 Calculation
ROA = 100 × Net loss ÷ Total assets
= 100 × -388,955 ÷ 1,014,775 = -38.33%
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory from 2018 to 2022 is characterized by a simultaneous expansion of the asset base and a widening of net losses, resulting in a fluctuating and consistently negative Return on Assets (ROA).
- Net Loss Trend
- Net losses demonstrated a consistent increase over the five-year period. The loss grew from US$ 106.3 million in 2018 to US$ 388.9 million in 2022. A notable acceleration in losses occurred after 2020, with the net loss nearly tripling between 2020 and 2022.
- Total Asset Growth
- There was a substantial and steady increase in total assets, which grew from US$ 211.2 million in 2018 to US$ 1,014.8 million in 2022. This represents a nearly five-fold increase in the asset base over the period analyzed.
- Return on Assets (ROA) Dynamics
- ROA remained negative throughout the entire period, indicating that the company did not generate a profit from its assets. Between 2018 and 2020, the ROA improved from -50.33% to -23.85%, a trend driven by the fact that asset growth outpaced the increase in net losses. However, this improvement was reversed in the subsequent years; the ROA declined to -25.59% in 2021 and further deteriorated to -38.33% in 2022. This late-period decline reflects a shift where the escalation of net losses began to outstrip the growth of the total asset base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?