Stock Analysis on Net

Cytokinetics Inc. (NASDAQ:CYTK)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since November 3, 2023.

Analysis of Profitability Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Profitability Ratios (Summary)

Cytokinetics Inc., profitability ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Return on Sales
Operating profit margin
Net profit margin
Return on Investment
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on assets (ROA)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


Operating Profit Margin
The operating profit margin exhibited substantial negative values throughout the observed periods. Starting at -282.26% in 2018, it sharply declined to -367.97% in 2019, indicating a significant deterioration in operational efficiency relative to revenue. A marked improvement followed in 2020, with the margin reducing its negative magnitude to -168.27%, before deteriorating once again in 2021 to -264.54%, and further to -342.75% in 2022. Overall, the trend shows considerable volatility with persistent negative margins, reflecting sustained challenges in controlling operating costs or generating sufficient operational income.
Net Profit Margin
Net profit margin also remained deeply negative across all years, mirroring the pattern observed in operating profit margin but with even greater negative values. It dropped from -337.41% in 2018 to -452.93% in 2019, indicating increased total losses after accounting for all expenses and taxes. Although there was some improvement in 2020 to -228%, the margin again worsened in subsequent years, reaching -305.72% in 2021 and -411.21% in 2022. This progression suggests ongoing issues with overall profitability, potentially due to high costs, significant non-operating expenses, or other financial burdens.
Return on Equity (ROE)
Return on equity showed extreme negative values where data is available, starting at -409.84% in 2018, indicating severe inefficiency in generating profits from shareholder equity. The absence of data in 2019 makes complete trend analysis difficult, but the ratio improved notably in 2020 to -112.27% and further to -88.29% in 2021. Despite this relative improvement, the ROE remains significantly negative, highlighting continued challenges in providing returns to equity investors.
Return on Assets (ROA)
Return on assets demonstrated persistently negative returns throughout the period. It improved modestly from -50.33% in 2018 to -23.85% in 2020, suggesting some enhanced efficiency in asset utilization. Nevertheless, the figure deteriorated again in 2021 to -25.59% and further to -38.33% in 2022. These negative values reflect continued difficulty in generating profits from total asset base, possibly due to unprofitable asset deployment or high operating losses.

Return on Sales


Return on Investment


Operating Profit Margin

Cytokinetics Inc., operating profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Operating loss
Revenues
Profitability Ratio
Operating profit margin1
Benchmarks
Operating Profit Margin, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc.
Amgen Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Danaher Corp.
Eli Lilly & Co.
Gilead Sciences Inc.
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co. Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Operating Profit Margin, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences
Operating Profit Margin, Industry
Health Care

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Operating profit margin = 100 × Operating loss ÷ Revenues
= 100 × ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data reveals notable trends in operating loss, revenues, and operating profit margin over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022.

Operating Loss
The operating loss exhibits a generally increasing magnitude year over year. From 2018 to 2022, the loss grew from approximately $88.9 million to over $324.2 million. Despite a slight moderation in 2020 compared to 2019, the overall trend from 2018 through 2022 is a substantial increase in operating losses, with a particularly sharp rise occurring between 2021 and 2022.
Revenues
Revenues show an overall upward trend across the same period. They started at around $31.5 million in 2018, decreased modestly in 2019 to about $26.9 million, then increased significantly in 2020, 2021, and 2022, reaching approximately $94.6 million in the latest year. This reflects growing sales or income generation capacity, with the most notable expansion after 2019.
Operating Profit Margin
The operating profit margin remains deeply negative throughout the entire timeframe, indicating persistent operating losses relative to revenues. The margin dropped further from -282.26% in 2018 to an extreme low of -367.97% in 2019, improved notably in 2020 to -168.27%, but worsened again in the following years to reach -342.75% in 2022. This fluctuation suggests periods of relative improvement in operational efficiency, but recurring losses significantly overshadow any gains made.

In summary, despite increasing revenues over the five years, operating losses have substantially increased, leading to highly negative and volatile operating profit margins. The financial performance indicates considerable challenges in controlling expenses or achieving profitability, as rising income has not sufficed to offset growing operating costs.


Net Profit Margin

Cytokinetics Inc., net profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net loss
Revenues
Profitability Ratio
Net profit margin1
Benchmarks
Net Profit Margin, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc.
Amgen Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Danaher Corp.
Eli Lilly & Co.
Gilead Sciences Inc.
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co. Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Net Profit Margin, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences
Net Profit Margin, Industry
Health Care

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Net profit margin = 100 × Net loss ÷ Revenues
= 100 × ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Net Loss Trend
The net loss has shown a consistent and significant increase from 2018 to 2022. Starting at a loss of approximately 106.3 million USD in 2018, the deficit widened to 388.9 million USD by 2022. The most substantial jump occurred between 2021 and 2022, where the loss increased by roughly 173.6 million USD, indicating escalating financial challenges or increased expenditures during this period.
Revenue Development
Revenues exhibited a generally upward trajectory over the five-year period. Beginning at 31.5 million USD in 2018, revenues decreased slightly in 2019 to 26.9 million USD, but then experienced consistent growth, reaching 94.6 million USD by 2022. The increase between 2019 and 2020 was especially pronounced, with revenues more than doubling from 26.9 million USD to 55.8 million USD, signaling improved sales or operational performance.
Net Profit Margin
The net profit margin remained deeply negative throughout the period, reflecting persistent unprofitability. The margin was -337.4% in 2018 and experienced further deterioration to -452.9% in 2019. It improved somewhat to -228% in 2020 but declined again in the subsequent two years, reaching -411.2% by 2022. This fluctuation indicates variability in cost structure or efficiency relative to revenue, with overall profitability remaining unfavorable and even worsening relative to sales in later years.
Overall Financial Insights
Despite steady revenue growth, the company’s net losses have substantially increased, indicating that rising revenues have not been sufficient to offset escalating costs or possibly investment outlays. The highly negative and volatile net profit margins corroborate this situation, pointing to persistent operational losses and challenges in achieving profitability. The marked increase in losses, especially in 2021 and 2022, suggests intensified financial pressures that may warrant scrutiny of expense management or capital deployment strategies.

Return on Equity (ROE)

Cytokinetics Inc., ROE calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net loss
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
Profitability Ratio
ROE1
Benchmarks
ROE, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc.
Amgen Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Danaher Corp.
Eli Lilly & Co.
Gilead Sciences Inc.
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co. Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.
ROE, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences
ROE, Industry
Health Care

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
ROE = 100 × Net loss ÷ Stockholders’ equity (deficit)
= 100 × ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Net Loss
The net loss has exhibited a consistent and significant increase over the analyzed periods. Starting at approximately $106.3 million in 2018, the loss deepened to about $121.7 million in 2019, and further rose to $127.3 million in 2020. A sharp escalation is observed in 2021, with the net loss reaching $215.3 million, followed by a dramatic surge to $389.0 million in 2022. This trend indicates worsening profitability and potentially increasing operational costs or losses from activities over time.
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
The stockholders’ equity has shown considerable volatility throughout the examined periods. It started positive at roughly $25.9 million in 2018, then turned into a deficit of about $10.9 million in 2019. There was a marked recovery in 2020, with equity rising sharply to $113.4 million, and a further increase to $243.9 million in 2021. However, in 2022, the equity again declined substantially, resulting in a deficit of approximately $107.9 million. This fluctuation signifies periods of financial recovery followed by deterioration, reflecting challenges in maintaining consistent equity levels, possibly influenced by operational losses and capital structure changes.
Return on Equity (ROE)
ROE figures available for certain years indicate consistently negative returns, reflecting the company’s ongoing net losses. In 2018, the ROE was deeply negative at -409.84%, suggesting very poor profitability relative to equity. In 2020 and 2021, ROE remained negative at -112.27% and -88.29%, respectively, indicating continued inefficiency in generating returns on shareholders’ equity. Data for 2019 and 2022 are not provided. Overall, the negative ROE aligns with the trend of net losses and fluctuating equity.

Return on Assets (ROA)

Cytokinetics Inc., ROA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net loss
Total assets
Profitability Ratio
ROA1
Benchmarks
ROA, Competitors2
AbbVie Inc.
Amgen Inc.
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.
Danaher Corp.
Eli Lilly & Co.
Gilead Sciences Inc.
Johnson & Johnson
Merck & Co. Inc.
Pfizer Inc.
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc.
ROA, Sector
Pharmaceuticals, Biotechnology & Life Sciences
ROA, Industry
Health Care

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
ROA = 100 × Net loss ÷ Total assets
= 100 × ÷ =

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Net Loss
The net loss has exhibited a consistently increasing trend over the five-year period. Starting at -106,289 thousand US dollars in 2018, the loss deepened each year, reaching -388,955 thousand US dollars by 2022. This indicates a significant worsening in profitability, with the annual net loss nearly quadrupling within the period.
Total Assets
Total assets have expanded substantially from 211,178 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 1,014,775 thousand US dollars in 2022. The growth is continuous and acceleration is observable particularly from 2019 onward, with the asset base increasing by more than fourfold over five years. This suggests increased capital investment or asset accumulation despite ongoing losses.
Return on Assets (ROA)
The ROA has remained negative throughout the period, reflecting the net losses relative to asset size. Initially, ROA improved from -50.33% in 2018 to -23.85% in 2020, indicating somewhat better asset efficiency. However, the improvement was not sustained as ROA declined again to -38.33% in 2022, paralleling the worsening net loss despite the expanding asset base. This points to challenges in generating returns from assets over latest years.