Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
An analysis of profitability metrics between 2011 and 2015 reveals a period of volatility in operational performance. EBITDA exhibited a non-linear trajectory, characterized by an initial surge, a multi-year contraction, and a subsequent recovery toward the end of the period.
- EBITDA Performance Trends
- The highest EBITDA was recorded in 2012 at 2,959 million US$, representing a significant increase from the 2,471 million US$ reported in 2011. This growth was followed by a sustained decline over the next two fiscal years, with figures dropping to 2,542 million US$ in 2013 and reaching a period low of 2,318 million US$ in 2014. A recovery phase began in 2015, where EBITDA rose to 2,689 million US$.
- Correlation Between Earnings Metrics
- A strong positive correlation is observed between EBITDA and the other profitability indicators, including EBIT, EBT, and Net Income. All four metrics peaked in 2012 and reached their lowest points in 2014, suggesting that the factors influencing operational cash flow were mirrored across the entire earnings structure, from gross operational profit down to the final net income.
- Analysis of Non-Cash Expenses
- The variance between EBITDA and EBIT provides insight into the impact of depreciation and amortization. In 2011, the difference was 628 million US$, while in 2012, it expanded to 645 million US$. The gap narrowed slightly in 2014 to 739 million US$ (EBITDA 2,318 vs EBIT 1,579), indicating that non-cash charges remained a substantial component of the operating expense structure throughout the five-year period.
- Net Income Conversion
- The conversion of EBITDA to Net Income shows consistent pressures from interest, taxes, and non-cash charges. For instance, in 2012, while EBITDA reached 2,959 million US$, Net Income was 1,597 million US$, representing a conversion rate of approximately 54%. By 2014, this conversion rate shifted slightly to approximately 45%, with Net Income at 1,051 million US$ against an EBITDA of 2,318 million US$.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 35,686) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 2,689) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 13.27 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Airbnb Inc. | 27.31 |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 13.34 |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 16.83 |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 46.80 |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 14.01 |
| Starbucks Corp. | 25.01 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Dec 26, 2015 | Dec 27, 2014 | Dec 28, 2013 | Dec 29, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 31,712) | 35,761) | 34,919) | 31,364) | 32,369) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 2,689) | 2,318) | 2,542) | 2,959) | 2,471) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 11.79 | 15.43 | 13.74 | 10.60 | 13.10 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
3 2015 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 31,712 ÷ 2,689 = 11.79
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data for YUM! Brands Inc. from 2011 to 2015 reveals a period of volatility in both enterprise valuation and operational earnings, resulting in fluctuating valuation multiples.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Analysis
- Enterprise Value exhibited a non-linear trend, initially decreasing in 2012 before climbing to a period peak of 35,761 million in 2014. A significant contraction occurred in 2015, with the value falling to 31,712 million, the lowest level observed in the five-year span.
- EBITDA Performance
- Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation, and amortization demonstrated inconsistent growth. The highest operational performance was recorded in 2012 at 2,959 million, followed by a two-year decline that bottomed at 2,318 million in 2014. A partial recovery was observed in 2015, with EBITDA rising to 2,689 million.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Interpretation
- The EV/EBITDA ratio fluctuated between 10.60 and 15.43. The lowest multiple in 2012 coincided with peak EBITDA and a reduced Enterprise Value, suggesting a period of high operational efficiency relative to market valuation. Conversely, the ratio peaked in 2014 at 15.43, driven by the simultaneous occurrence of the period's highest Enterprise Value and lowest EBITDA. By 2015, the ratio compressed to 11.79, reflecting a correction driven by lower enterprise value and improved operational earnings.
The overall trend indicates that the valuation multiple was heavily influenced by the inverse movement of Enterprise Value and EBITDA, particularly between 2012 and 2014, before stabilizing toward the end of the analyzed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?