Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
The analysis of property, plant and equipment from 2011 to 2015 reveals a period of capital expansion followed by a moderate contraction. Gross asset values increased consistently for four years before experiencing a decline in the final year of the period.
- Gross Property, Plant and Equipment Trends
- Gross property, plant and equipment grew from US$ 7,267 million in 2011 to a peak of US$ 8,082 million in 2014. This upward trajectory represents a cumulative increase of approximately 11.2% over three years. However, this trend reversed in 2015, with gross assets declining to US$ 7,832 million.
- Asset Composition and Distribution
- Buildings and improvements represent the most significant portion of the asset base, increasing from US$ 3,856 million in 2011 to US$ 4,549 million in 2014 before decreasing to US$ 4,462 million in 2015. Machinery and equipment followed a similar pattern, peaking at US$ 2,817 million in 2014. Land holdings remained relatively stable, fluctuating between a high of US$ 527 million in 2011 and a low of US$ 469 million in 2012. Capital leases remained the smallest component, maintaining a narrow range between US$ 199 million and US$ 316 million.
- Accumulated Depreciation and Asset Aging
- Accumulated depreciation and amortization showed a general upward trend, moving from US$ 3,225 million in 2011 to US$ 3,643 million in 2015. The steady increase in accumulated depreciation indicates the ongoing aging of the fixed asset base and suggests that depreciation expenses are consistently offsetting new capital expenditures.
- Net Book Value Analysis
- Net property, plant and equipment rose from US$ 4,042 million in 2011 to a peak of US$ 4,498 million in 2014. The subsequent decline to US$ 4,189 million in 2015 was driven by both a reduction in gross assets and the continued accumulation of depreciation. The net-to-gross asset ratio decreased from 55.6% in 2011 to 53.5% in 2015, reflecting a higher proportion of the asset base being depreciated over time.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
The asset age profile exhibits a period of relative stability followed by a gradual increase in the average age ratio toward the end of the observed timeframe, suggesting a shift in the lifecycle stage of the property, plant, and equipment portfolio.
- Average Age Ratio Trends
- The average age ratio experienced a slight decline to 45.36% in 2012 from 47.85% in 2011. Following this dip, a consistent upward trend is observed, with the ratio climbing to 46.19% in 2013, 47.31% in 2014, and peaking at 49.55% by December 2015. This progression indicates that a larger proportion of the asset base is approaching the midpoint of its estimated useful life.
- Useful Life and Remaining Life Adjustments
- The estimated total useful life remained constant at 11 years from 2011 through 2014. However, a downward revision to 10 years occurred in 2015. This adjustment directly impacted the estimated remaining life, which decreased from a stable 6 years during the 2011-2014 period to 5 years in 2015.
- Elapsed Asset Age Consistency
- The estimated age, representing the time elapsed since purchase, remained stagnant at 5 years throughout the entire five-year period. The stability of this metric, contrasted with the rising average age ratio and the reduction in total useful life, suggests that the increasing ratio in 2015 was driven by the revised depreciation assumptions rather than an actual increase in the physical age of the assets.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation and amortization ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land)
= 100 × 3,643 ÷ (7,832 – 480) = 49.55%
Between 2011 and 2015, the company's property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) profile exhibited a period of growth followed by an increase in the relative age of its asset base. While gross asset values peaked in 2014, the steady rise in accumulated depreciation toward the end of the period suggests a transition toward an older infrastructure cycle.
- Average Age Ratio Analysis
- The average age ratio experienced a slight decline from 47.85% in 2011 to 45.36% in 2012, indicating a period of asset rejuvenation or significant new capital investment. However, this trend reversed from 2013 onward, with the ratio climbing steadily to 49.55% by December 26, 2015. This upward trajectory signifies that the existing assets are progressing through their useful lives faster than new assets are being integrated into the balance sheet.
- Gross Asset and Depreciation Trends
- Property, plant, and equipment, gross, grew from US$ 7,267 million in 2011 to a peak of US$ 8,082 million in 2014, before contracting to US$ 7,832 million in 2015. In contrast, accumulated depreciation and amortization showed a general upward trend, rising from US$ 3,225 million in 2011 to US$ 3,643 million in 2015. The simultaneous decrease in gross assets and increase in accumulated depreciation in 2015 is a primary driver for the peak in the average age ratio for that year.
- Land Valuation Stability
- Land holdings remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period, with values fluctuating within a narrow range between US$ 469 million and US$ 527 million. This indicates that the shifts in the average age ratio were driven by the depreciation of plant and equipment rather than significant changes in real estate acquisitions or divestitures.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land) ÷ Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant and equipment
= (7,832 – 480) ÷ 712 = 10
An analysis of the property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) accounts reveals a period of general growth in gross assets followed by a slight contraction, coupled with a consistent increase in annual depreciation and amortization expenses.
- Gross Asset Trajectory
- Gross property, plant, and equipment exhibited a steady upward trend from December 31, 2011, through December 27, 2014, increasing from 7,267 million USD to a peak of 8,082 million USD. However, a reversal occurred in 2015, with gross assets declining to 7,832 million USD. Land holdings remained relatively stable throughout the five-year period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 469 million USD and 527 million USD.
- Depreciation and Amortization Trends
- Depreciation and amortization expenses demonstrated a continuous year-over-year increase, rising from 599 million USD in 2011 to 712 million USD in 2015. This growth persisted even during the 2015 fiscal year when gross PP&E values declined, indicating that the cost of asset consumption grew independently of the total asset base size.
- Estimated Useful Life Adjustment
- The estimated total useful life of assets remained constant at 11 years from 2011 through 2014. In 2015, a downward revision to 10 years was implemented. This reduction in the estimated useful life correlates with the continued rise in depreciation expenses, as a shorter recovery period accelerates the annual charge to the income statement.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation and amortization ÷ Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant and equipment
= 3,643 ÷ 712 = 5
An analysis of property, plant, and equipment trends between 2011 and 2015 reveals a consistent expansion of the asset base coupled with a highly stable asset replacement cycle.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- Accumulated depreciation and amortization grew from 3,225 million US dollars in 2011 to 3,643 million US dollars by 2015. A marginal decrease was observed in 2012, where the figure dropped to 3,139 million US dollars, potentially indicating the disposal of fully depreciated assets or specific write-offs. Following 2012, the balance increased steadily each year, reflecting the ongoing aging of the asset portfolio.
- Annual Depreciation Expenses
- Annual depreciation and amortization expenses exhibited a continuous upward trend, rising from 599 million US dollars in 2011 to 712 million US dollars in 2015. This consistent growth indicates a larger depreciable base over time, suggesting that capital expenditures for new property, plant, and equipment have outpaced the rate of asset retirement.
- Asset Age and Replacement Strategy
- The time elapsed since purchase remained constant at five years throughout the entire period. The stability of this metric, despite increasing total depreciation expenses and accumulated balances, suggests a standardized asset lifecycle management strategy. This indicates that new investments are being integrated at a rate that maintains a constant average age for the company's physical infrastructure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2015 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant and equipment, net – Land) ÷ Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant and equipment
= (4,189 – 480) ÷ 712 = 5
The net value of property, plant and equipment exhibited a growth trend between 2011 and 2014, rising from 4,042 million US$ to a peak of 4,498 million US$. However, a contraction occurred in 2015, with the value decreasing to 4,189 million US$. Land holdings remained relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating between a high of 527 million US$ in 2011 and a low of 469 million US$ in 2012.
- Depreciation and Amortization Trends
- A consistent annual increase in depreciation and amortization expenses is observed, growing from 599 million US$ in 2011 to 712 million US$ in 2015. This steady rise indicates an increasing volume of depreciable assets or a higher rate of capital consumption over the five-year period.
- Analysis of Estimated Remaining Life
- The estimated remaining useful life of the asset base remained stagnant at six years from 2011 through 2014. A downward revision to five years occurred in 2015. This adjustment suggests a change in accounting estimates, reflecting a shorter expected utility period for the property, plant and equipment.
- Correlation Between Asset Value and Life Estimates
- The synchronization of the decrease in net property, plant and equipment in 2015 with the reduction in estimated remaining life suggests an acceleration of depreciation. This combination typically indicates that assets are being written down more quickly or that the asset portfolio is aging faster than previously anticipated.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?