Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
An analysis of the cash flow metrics from 2011 to 2015 reveals a period of relative stability in operating cash generation, contrasted by a more volatile trajectory in free cash flow to the firm (FCFF).
- Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
- Operating cash flows exhibited minor fluctuations over the five-year period. After reaching a peak of US$ 2,294 million in 2012, the figures experienced a gradual decline through 2014, reaching a low of US$ 2,049 million, before recovering to US$ 2,139 million in 2015. This indicates a consistent ability to generate liquid assets from core business operations.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- FCFF demonstrated a general downward trend for the majority of the observed period. Starting at US$ 1,332 million in 2011, the value declined annually to a trough of US$ 1,099 million in 2014. A moderate recovery occurred in 2015, with FCFF rising to US$ 1,250 million, although this figure remained below the levels recorded at the start of the period.
- Relationship Between Operating Cash and FCFF
- A divergence is observed between operating cash flow and FCFF, particularly in 2014. While operating cash flows remained relatively stable, the more pronounced dip in FCFF during 2014 suggests an increase in capital expenditures or other firm-level investments during that fiscal year. By 2015, the recovery in FCFF aligned with the recovery in operating cash flows, returning the FCFF-to-operating cash ratio to levels similar to those seen in 2013.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
2 2015 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, tax = Cash paid for interest × EITR
= 154 × 27.30% = 42
The financial data indicates a period of volatility in interest expenditures and shifting tax obligations between 2011 and 2015. A notable correlation exists between the peak of the effective tax rate and the maximum net cash outflow for interest payments, followed by a period of relative stabilization in the latter two years of the period.
- Effective Income Tax Rate Trends
- The effective income tax rate experienced a consistent upward trajectory from 2011 to 2013, rising from 19.50% to a peak of 31.40%. This represents a significant increase in the tax burden over a three-year period. Following this peak, the rate moderated slightly, ending at 27.30% by December 2015.
- Analysis of Net Interest Payments
- Cash paid for interest, net of tax, exhibited non-linear movement. After an initial decrease from 160 million USD in 2011 to 125 million USD in 2012, there was a sharp increase to 185 million USD in 2013. This peak was followed by a substantial reduction to 107 million USD in 2014, with a marginal increase to 112 million USD in 2015.
- Correlation Between Tax Rates and Interest Costs
- The most significant spike in net interest payments occurred in 2013, coinciding with the highest recorded effective income tax rate of 31.40%. Because interest is tax-deductible, a higher tax rate generally increases the tax shield; however, the net cash outflow still rose to its period high, suggesting that gross interest expenses increased substantially enough to outweigh the benefit of the higher tax rate. The subsequent decline in 2014 suggests a potential reduction in debt principal or a successful refinancing strategy to lower interest costs.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 35,686) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 1,250) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 28.55 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Airbnb Inc. | 20.12 |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 12.76 |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 30.21 |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 41.28 |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 28.27 |
| Starbucks Corp. | 46.44 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 26, 2015 | Dec 27, 2014 | Dec 28, 2013 | Dec 29, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 31,712) | 35,761) | 34,919) | 31,364) | 32,369) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 1,250) | 1,099) | 1,260) | 1,303) | 1,332) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 25.37 | 32.55 | 27.72 | 24.08 | 24.30 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
3 2015 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 31,712 ÷ 1,250 = 25.37
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The valuation metrics from 2011 to 2015 exhibit a period of volatility characterized by an expansion of the valuation multiple that peaked in 2014, followed by a contraction in 2015. The relationship between enterprise value and free cash flow to the firm indicates shifting market perceptions of value relative to the actual cash generated by the business operations.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- Enterprise value fluctuated throughout the five-year period. After a slight decrease in 2012, the value rose steadily to reach a peak of 35,761 million in 2014. A significant correction occurred in 2015, with the value dropping to 31,712 million, the lowest level recorded in the period.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- A gradual downward trend in FCFF is observed from 2011 to 2014, where cash flows declined from 1,332 million to a period low of 1,099 million. This decline was reversed in 2015, as FCFF recovered to 1,250 million.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Analysis
- The EV/FCFF ratio remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2012, hovering around 24x. A sharp increase followed, with the ratio climbing to 27.72 in 2013 and peaking at 32.55 in 2014. This peak represents a point of maximum valuation divergence, driven by the simultaneous occurrence of the highest enterprise value and the lowest free cash flow. In 2015, the ratio normalized to 25.37, returning toward historical levels due to the combined effect of a reduced enterprise value and improved cash flow generation.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?