Income Statement
| 12 months ended: | Revenues | Operating profit | Net income, YUM! Brands, Inc. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2015 | 13,105) | 1,921) | 1,293) |
| Dec 27, 2014 | 13,279) | 1,557) | 1,051) |
| Dec 28, 2013 | 13,084) | 1,798) | 1,091) |
| Dec 29, 2012 | 13,633) | 2,294) | 1,597) |
| Dec 31, 2011 | 12,626) | 1,815) | 1,319) |
| Dec 25, 2010 | 11,343) | 1,769) | 1,158) |
| Dec 26, 2009 | 10,836) | 1,590) | 1,071) |
| Dec 27, 2008 | 11,279) | 1,506) | 964) |
| Dec 29, 2007 | 10,416) | 1,357) | 909) |
| Dec 30, 2006 | 9,561) | 1,262) | 824) |
| Dec 31, 2005 | 9,349) | 1,153) | 762) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).
The financial performance from 2005 to 2015 is characterized by a period of sustained growth followed by a phase of volatility and subsequent recovery. Total revenues and profitability metrics exhibited a strong upward trajectory during the first eight years of the period, peaking in 2012 before experiencing a correction and stabilization.
- Revenue Growth Trends
- Revenues grew consistently from 9,349 million US$ in 2005 to a peak of 13,633 million US$ in 2012. A marginal decline occurred in 2009, but the overall trend remained positive until 2012. Following the peak, revenues entered a plateau phase, fluctuating between 13,084 million US$ and 13,279 million US$ from 2013 to 2015, indicating a transition from aggressive expansion to a more stagnant top-line growth phase.
- Operating Profitability
- Operating profit followed a similar growth pattern to revenue, rising steadily from 1,153 million US$ in 2005 to a high of 2,294 million US$ in 2012. This represents a significant expansion in operational efficiency during that window. However, a sharp contraction is observed between 2013 and 2014, with operating profit falling to 1,557 million US$ by December 2014. A strong recovery occurred in 2015, with the figure rebounding to 1,921 million US$.
- Net Income Analysis
- Net income mirrored the operational trend, increasing from 762 million US$ in 2005 to a peak of 1,597 million US$ in 2012. The subsequent drop in 2013 was substantial, with net income falling to 1,091 million US$, and reaching a period low of 1,051 million US$ in 2014. By 2015, net income recovered to 1,293 million US$, though it remained below the 2012 peak.
- Profit Margin Dynamics
- The relationship between revenue and profit suggests fluctuating margins. The period from 2005 to 2012 saw an increase in the conversion of revenue to operating profit. The significant dip in net income and operating profit in 2013 and 2014, despite relatively stable revenues, indicates a temporary increase in operating expenses or non-operating costs during those years. The recovery in 2015 indicates a restoration of profit margins.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Balance Sheet: Assets
| Current assets | Total assets | |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2015 | 1,688) | 8,075) |
| Dec 27, 2014 | 1,646) | 8,345) |
| Dec 28, 2013 | 1,691) | 8,695) |
| Dec 29, 2012 | 1,909) | 9,011) |
| Dec 31, 2011 | 2,321) | 8,834) |
| Dec 25, 2010 | 2,313) | 8,316) |
| Dec 26, 2009 | 1,208) | 7,148) |
| Dec 27, 2008 | 951) | 6,527) |
| Dec 29, 2007 | 1,481) | 7,242) |
| Dec 30, 2006 | 901) | 6,353) |
| Dec 31, 2005 | 837) | 5,698) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).
The asset profile exhibits a period of sustained expansion followed by a gradual contraction between 2005 and 2015, with significant fluctuations in liquidity components.
- Total Asset Trajectory
- Total assets demonstrated a general upward trend from 2005, increasing from US$ 5,698 million to a peak of US$ 9,011 million in 2012. This growth was interrupted by a notable contraction in 2008, where assets fell to US$ 6,527 million. Following the 2012 peak, a consistent downward trend is observed, with total assets declining annually to reach US$ 8,075 million by the end of 2015.
- Current Asset Volatility
- Current assets displayed more pronounced volatility than total assets. A significant surge occurred between 2009 and 2011, with values rising from US$ 1,208 million to a peak of US$ 2,321 million. Subsequent to 2011, current assets entered a period of decline, reaching a low of US$ 1,646 million in 2014 before a marginal increase to US$ 1,688 million in 2015.
- Liquidity Composition
- The relationship between current assets and total assets indicates a shifting liquidity position. The proportion of current assets relative to total assets was approximately 14.7% in 2005, expanding significantly to peak at roughly 26.3% in 2011. By 2015, this ratio moderated to approximately 20.9%, suggesting a reduction in the concentration of short-term assets relative to the overall asset base compared to the 2010-2011 period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
YUM! Brands Inc., selected items from liabilities and stockholders’ equity, long-term trends
US$ in millions
| Current liabilities | Total liabilities | Total debt | Shareholders’ equity (deficit), YUM! Brands, Inc. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2015 | 3,088) | 7,100) | 3,977) | 911) |
| Dec 27, 2014 | 2,411) | 6,732) | 3,344) | 1,547) |
| Dec 28, 2013 | 2,265) | 6,427) | 2,989) | 2,166) |
| Dec 29, 2012 | 2,188) | 6,699) | 2,942) | 2,154) |
| Dec 31, 2011 | 2,450) | 6,918) | 3,317) | 1,823) |
| Dec 25, 2010 | 2,448) | 6,647) | 3,588) | 1,576) |
| Dec 26, 2009 | 1,653) | 6,034) | 3,266) | 1,025) |
| Dec 27, 2008 | 1,722) | 6,621) | 3,589) | (108) |
| Dec 29, 2007 | 2,062) | 6,103) | 3,212) | 1,139) |
| Dec 30, 2006 | 1,724) | 4,916) | 2,272) | 1,437) |
| Dec 31, 2005 | 1,605) | 4,249) | 1,860) | 1,449) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).
An analysis of the balance sheet components from 2005 to 2015 reveals a general expansion of the company's liability profile coupled with significant volatility in shareholders' equity. Total liabilities increased from 4,249 million US$ in 2005 to 7,100 million US$ by 2015, representing a substantial growth in overall obligations over the eleven-year period.
- Liability Trends
- Current liabilities exhibited a general upward trajectory, rising from 1,605 million US$ in 2005 to a peak of 3,088 million US$ in 2015. A notable surge occurred between 2009 and 2010, where current obligations increased by approximately 48%. Total liabilities grew steadily until 2011, followed by a period of relative stabilization and a subsequent increase toward the end of the period.
- Debt Accumulation
- Total debt grew from 1,860 million US$ in 2005 to 3,977 million US$ in 2015. The most rapid accumulation occurred between 2005 and 2008, when debt levels nearly doubled. While a period of deleveraging was observed between 2011 and 2013, debt levels rose sharply again in 2014 and 2015, ending the period at their highest recorded level.
- Shareholders' Equity Volatility
- The equity position demonstrated extreme fluctuations. A critical point occurred in 2008, when shareholders' equity transitioned into a deficit of 108 million US$. A recovery phase followed, with equity peaking at 2,166 million US$ in 2013. However, this was followed by a steep decline, with equity falling to 911 million US$ by 2015, a level significantly lower than the 2005 starting point of 1,449 million US$.
- Leverage and Capital Structure
- The relationship between total debt and shareholders' equity indicates a shift toward higher leverage. By 2015, total debt (3,977 million US$) exceeded shareholders' equity (911 million US$) by a factor of more than four, contrasting with the 2005 position where debt was only 1.28 times the value of equity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Flow Statement
| 12 months ended: | Net cash provided by operating activities | Net cash used in investing activities | Net cash used in financing activities |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2015 | 2,139) | (682) | (1,292) |
| Dec 27, 2014 | 2,049) | (936) | (1,114) |
| Dec 28, 2013 | 2,139) | (886) | (1,451) |
| Dec 29, 2012 | 2,294) | (1,005) | (1,716) |
| Dec 31, 2011 | 2,170) | (1,006) | (1,413) |
| Dec 25, 2010 | 1,968) | (579) | (337) |
| Dec 26, 2009 | 1,404) | (727) | (542) |
| Dec 27, 2008 | 1,521) | (641) | (1,459) |
| Dec 29, 2007 | 1,567) | (432) | (678) |
| Dec 30, 2006 | 1,302) | (476) | (673) |
| Dec 31, 2005 | 1,238) | (345) | (832) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).
The cash flow profile from 2005 to 2015 reflects a consistent capacity to generate liquidity from core operations, which has been systematically utilized to fund capital expenditures and manage financing obligations.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Net cash provided by operating activities exhibited a general upward trajectory, increasing from 1,238 million US$ in 2005 to 2,139 million US$ in 2015. A significant period of growth occurred between 2009 and 2012, with cash flows rising from 1,404 million US$ to a peak of 2,294 million US$. After 2012, the operating cash flow stabilized, maintaining a range between approximately 2,000 million US$ and 2,140 million US$.
- Investing Activity Patterns
- Cash used in investing activities remained consistently negative, indicating continuous capital deployment. Outflows grew from 345 million US$ in 2005 to a peak of 1,006 million US$ in 2011. The intensity of investing activities remained elevated between 2011 and 2014, averaging over 900 million US$ annually, before decreasing to 682 million US$ in 2015.
- Financing Activity Analysis
- Financing activities were characterized by persistent net cash outflows across the entire period, suggesting a sustained focus on debt repayment or shareholder returns. Outflows peaked in 2012 at 1,716 million US$. Notable spikes in financing outflows also occurred in 2008 (1,459 million US$) and 2011 (1,413 million US$), indicating periodic large-scale capital redistributions or liability settlements.
- Integrated Cash Flow Dynamics
- The operational cash generation was sufficient to fully cover all investing activities in every year analyzed. However, the combined burden of investing and financing activities occasionally exceeded operating cash flows, most notably in 2012, where combined outflows of 2,721 million US$ surpassed the 2,294 million US$ generated from operations. Conversely, in 2010, the company maintained a substantial surplus, with operating cash flow exceeding combined investing and financing outflows by more than 1,000 million US$.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Per Share Data
| 12 months ended: | Basic earnings per share 1 | Diluted earnings per share 2 | Dividend per share 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 26, 2015 | 2.97 | 2.92 | 1.74 |
| Dec 27, 2014 | 2.37 | 2.32 | 1.56 |
| Dec 28, 2013 | 2.41 | 2.36 | 1.41 |
| Dec 29, 2012 | 3.46 | 3.38 | 1.24 |
| Dec 31, 2011 | 2.81 | 2.74 | 1.07 |
| Dec 25, 2010 | 2.44 | 2.38 | 0.92 |
| Dec 26, 2009 | 2.28 | 2.22 | 0.80 |
| Dec 27, 2008 | 2.03 | 1.96 | 0.72 |
| Dec 29, 2007 | 1.74 | 1.68 | 0.45 |
| Dec 30, 2006 | 1.51 | 1.46 | 0.44 |
| Dec 31, 2005 | 1.33 | 1.28 | 0.23 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2010-12-25), 10-K (reporting date: 2009-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2008-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2007-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2006-12-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2005-12-31).
1, 2, 3 Data adjusted for splits and stock dividends.
An analysis of per share financial performance from 2005 to 2015 reveals a general upward trajectory in both earnings and dividend distributions, characterized by a period of strong growth followed by a temporary contraction and subsequent recovery.
- Earnings Per Share (EPS) Trends
- Basic and diluted earnings per share exhibited consistent growth from 2005 through 2012. Basic EPS rose from 1.33 US$ to a peak of 3.46 US$, while diluted EPS followed a similar path, increasing from 1.28 US$ to 3.38 US$. This period of expansion was interrupted in 2013, where basic EPS declined sharply to 2.41 US$. A period of stagnation followed in 2014 before a recovery occurred in 2015, with basic EPS rising back to 2.97 US$.
- Dividend Growth and Payout Strategy
- Dividend per share demonstrated uninterrupted annual growth throughout the entire eleven-year period. Starting at 0.23 US$ in 2005, the dividend increased every year to reach 1.74 US$ by 2015. Notably, this growth persisted even during the earnings contraction observed in 2013 and 2014, suggesting a corporate policy focused on maintaining and increasing shareholder returns regardless of short-term earnings volatility.
- Dilution Analysis
- The variance between basic and diluted earnings per share remained minimal across the reported timeframe. The narrow gap indicates a limited impact from dilutive securities, such as stock options or convertible bonds, ensuring that the earnings attributable to common shareholders were not significantly eroded by dilution.
- Earnings-to-Dividend Correlation
- While both metrics increased over the long term, the relationship between them shifted. In the early part of the period, earnings grew at a faster rate than dividends. However, toward the end of the period, particularly between 2012 and 2014, the dividend growth rate exceeded the earnings growth rate, resulting in a higher proportion of earnings being distributed as dividends.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?