AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

YUM! Brands Inc. (NYSE:YUM)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 11, 2016.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

YUM! Brands Inc., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 40.87 32.17 32.32 31.48 33.48
Receivables turnover 29.56 34.84 35.06 39.31 38.09
Payables turnover 15.19 13.95 13.50 14.40 12.84
Working capital turnover — — — — —
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 9 11 11 12 11
Add: Average receivable collection period 12 10 10 9 10
Operating cycle 21 21 21 21 21
Less: Average payables payment period 24 26 27 25 28
Cash conversion cycle -3 -5 -6 -4 -7

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


The operating activity analysis indicates a highly efficient short-term asset management strategy characterized by a consistently negative cash conversion cycle. This suggests that the company generates cash from its operations before its accounts payable obligations fall due, effectively using supplier financing to fund its working capital needs.

Inventory Management
Inventory turnover remained relatively stable between 31.48 and 33.48 from 2011 to 2014, before experiencing a significant increase to 40.87 in 2015. This acceleration in turnover is mirrored by the average inventory processing period, which decreased from a range of 11 to 12 days to a low of 9 days by the end of the period.
Receivables Performance
A gradual decline in receivables turnover is observed, falling from 38.09 in 2011 to 29.56 in 2015. This trend corresponds with a slight increase in the average receivable collection period, which rose from 9 or 10 days to 12 days in 2015, indicating a marginal slowdown in the speed of cash collection from customers.
Payables and Liabilities
Payables turnover showed a moderate upward trend, increasing from 12.84 in 2011 to 15.19 in 2015. Consequently, the average payables payment period shortened from 28 days to 24 days over the same timeframe, suggesting a faster settlement of obligations to suppliers.
Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
The operating cycle remained remarkably constant at 21 days throughout the entire five-year period, demonstrating stability in the combined time required to process inventory and collect receivables. The cash conversion cycle remained negative throughout the period, fluctuating between -7 and -3 days. While the cycle shifted closer to zero by 2015, the company maintained its capacity to operate with negative working capital requirements.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

YUM! Brands Inc., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Company restaurant expenses 9,359 9,682 9,501 9,852 9,140
Inventories 229 301 294 313 273
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 40.87 32.17 32.32 31.48 33.48
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Company restaurant expenses ÷ Inventories
= 9,359 ÷ 229 = 40.87

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An examination of operating activity from 2011 to 2015 reveals a period of relative stability in asset management followed by a significant increase in inventory efficiency. While the cost of restaurant operations remained consistent, the sharp rise in the turnover ratio during the final year indicates a notable shift in the management of short-term assets.

Company Restaurant Expenses
Operational expenses related to restaurants fluctuated within a stable range, starting at 9,140 million USD in 2011 and peaking at 9,852 million USD in 2012. By 2015, these expenses settled at 9,359 million USD, suggesting a consistent level of resource consumption across the analyzed period.
Inventory Levels
Inventories saw a moderate increase from 273 million USD in 2011 to 313 million USD in 2012, remaining above 290 million USD through 2014. A significant contraction occurred in 2015, with inventory levels dropping to 229 million USD, representing a substantial reduction in held stock compared to previous years.
Inventory Turnover Ratio
The inventory turnover ratio remained highly stable between 2011 and 2014, moving within a tight corridor between 31.48 and 33.48. In 2015, the ratio increased sharply to 40.87. This spike was primarily driven by the reduction in inventory holdings rather than an increase in restaurant expenses, indicating an acceleration in the rate at which inventory was utilized and replaced.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

YUM! Brands Inc., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Company sales 11,145 11,324 11,184 11,833 10,893
Accounts and notes receivable, net 377 325 319 301 286
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 29.56 34.84 35.06 39.31 38.09
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc. — — — — —
Booking Holdings Inc. — — — — —
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
DoorDash, Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Company sales ÷ Accounts and notes receivable, net
= 11,145 ÷ 377 = 29.56

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity from 2011 to 2015 reveals a gradual decline in the efficiency of receivables management. While the company maintained a high turnover rate in the early part of the period, a downward trend became evident starting in 2013, culminating in a significant decrease by the end of 2015.

Sales Performance
Annual sales showed volatility, peaking at US$ 11,833 million in 2012 before experiencing a slight downward adjustment and stabilizing around US$ 11,145 million by 2015. This indicates a relatively flat revenue trajectory over the five-year window.
Receivables Accumulation
Net accounts and notes receivable exhibited a continuous upward trend, increasing from US$ 286 million in 2011 to US$ 377 million in 2015. The steady growth of these balances suggests an increase in the volume of outstanding credit or a slowing of the collection cycle.
Receivables Turnover Ratio
The turnover ratio decreased from a peak of 39.31 in 2012 to 29.56 in 2015. The divergence between stagnant sales and rising receivable balances indicates that the company is taking longer to convert its receivables into cash, thereby reducing operational efficiency regarding credit collection.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

YUM! Brands Inc., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Company restaurant expenses 9,359 9,682 9,501 9,852 9,140
Accounts payable 616 694 704 684 712
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 15.19 13.95 13.50 14.40 12.84
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc. — — — — —
Booking Holdings Inc. — — — — —
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
DoorDash, Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Payables turnover = Company restaurant expenses ÷ Accounts payable
= 9,359 ÷ 616 = 15.19

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a general increase in the efficiency of payables management between 2011 and 2015. The payables turnover ratio exhibits an upward trajectory, suggesting a faster rate of settlement of obligations to suppliers over the observed period.

Payables Turnover Ratio Trend
The ratio increased from 12.84 in 2011 to 15.19 in 2015. Although a slight contraction occurred in 2013, where the ratio dipped to 13.50, the subsequent recovery and peak in 2015 indicate an acceleration in the frequency with which accounts payable are cleared.
Accounts Payable Dynamics
A consistent downward trend is observed in the accounts payable balance, which decreased from 712 million US dollars in 2011 to 616 million US dollars by the end of 2015. This reduction in outstanding short-term liabilities is a primary driver behind the increasing turnover ratio.
Operational Expense Correlation
Company restaurant expenses remained relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating between 9,140 million US dollars in 2011 and a peak of 9,852 million US dollars in 2012. Since operating expenses did not experience a proportional decline, the rise in the turnover ratio is attributed to more aggressive payment schedules or a reduction in the credit terms extended by suppliers.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

YUM! Brands Inc., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 1,688 1,646 1,691 1,909 2,321
Less: Current liabilities 3,088 2,411 2,265 2,188 2,450
Working capital (1,400) (765) (574) (279) (129)
 
Company sales 11,145 11,324 11,184 11,833 10,893
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 — — — — —
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc. — — — — —
Booking Holdings Inc. — — — — —
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
DoorDash, Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Company sales ÷ Working capital
= 11,145 ÷ -1,400 = —

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data indicates a significant and consistent expansion of the negative working capital position between 2011 and 2015, occurring alongside relatively stagnant company sales.

Working Capital Trends
A persistent and accelerating deficit in working capital is observed. The negative balance increased from -129 million US dollars in 2011 to -1,400 million US dollars by 2015. This trajectory represents a substantial growth in the current liabilities exceeding current assets, suggesting a strategic or operational reliance on short-term funding to support the business model.
Revenue Stability
Company sales demonstrated minimal volatility over the five-year period, fluctuating within a narrow range. Revenues peaked in 2012 at 11,833 million US dollars and concluded the period at 11,145 million US dollars in 2015. The stability of the top line contrasts sharply with the rapid deterioration of the working capital balance.
Working Capital Turnover Analysis
The working capital turnover ratio remains negative throughout the period, which is characteristic of business models that leverage supplier credit and rapid inventory turnover. However, the absolute value of the turnover ratio declined sharply over time. This shift indicates that the growth of the working capital deficit has significantly outpaced the growth of sales, resulting in a lower ratio of revenue generated per unit of negative working capital.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

YUM! Brands Inc., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 40.87 32.17 32.32 31.48 33.48
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 9 11 11 12 11
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 40.87 = 9

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a high level of efficiency in inventory management, characterized by rapid turnover and a short processing cycle. For the majority of the observed period, these metrics remained relatively stable, followed by a significant improvement in operational efficiency in the final year.

Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio exhibited minor fluctuations between 2011 and 2014, ranging from a high of 33.48 to a low of 31.48. A substantial increase is observed in 2015, where the ratio rose to 40.87. This upward shift indicates a marked acceleration in the rate at which inventory is sold and replaced, suggesting enhanced supply chain efficiency or increased sales velocity.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period remained consistent, fluctuating between 11 and 12 days from 2011 through 2014. A notable reduction occurred in 2015, with the period decreasing to 9 days. This downward trend in the processing period aligns with the spike in turnover, reflecting a reduction in the time capital is tied up in inventory and a more streamlined movement of goods.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

YUM! Brands Inc., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 29.56 34.84 35.06 39.31 38.09
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 12 10 10 9 10
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc. — — — — —
Booking Holdings Inc. — — — — —
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
DoorDash, Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 29.56 = 12

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a general decline in receivables efficiency over the five-year period from 2011 to 2015. While the company maintained a highly rapid collection cycle for the majority of the period, a visible deceleration in turnover occurred toward the end of the observed timeframe.

Receivables Turnover Ratio
A peak in turnover efficiency was observed in 2012 with a ratio of 39.31. This was followed by a consistent downward trend, with the ratio decreasing to 35.06 in 2013 and 34.84 in 2014. A more pronounced decline occurred in 2015, where the ratio fell to 29.56, indicating a reduction in the frequency with which the company converted its receivables into cash.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period remained remarkably stable between 2011 and 2014, fluctuating minimally between 9 and 10 days. However, in 2015, the collection period increased to 12 days. This represents a notable increase in the time required to collect outstanding payments relative to the preceding four years.

The inverse relationship between the turnover ratio and the collection period is evident, particularly in 2015. The transition from a 10-day to a 12-day collection period, coupled with the sharpest drop in turnover, suggests a potential shift in credit terms or a decrease in payment timeliness from debtors, resulting in a slight expansion of the operating cycle.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

YUM! Brands Inc., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 9 11 11 12 11
Average receivable collection period 12 10 10 9 10
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 21 21 21 21 21
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 9 + 12 = 21

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating cycle exhibited absolute stability over the five-year period ending December 2015, remaining constant at 21 days. This consistency suggests a highly predictable operational cadence regarding the conversion of inventory and receivables into cash.

Average Inventory Processing Period
The time required to process inventory remained low and relatively stable, fluctuating between 9 and 12 days. A notable improvement is observed in 2015, where the period decreased to 9 days, indicating an acceleration in inventory turnover efficiency.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection of receivables demonstrated minimal volatility, typically ranging between 9 and 10 days. A slight increase to 12 days occurred in 2015, representing a marginal expansion in the time required to collect outstanding payments.
Operating Cycle Synthesis
Despite minor fluctuations in the individual components, the overall operating cycle remained fixed at 21 days from 2011 through 2015. The data reveals a compensatory relationship between the two metrics; specifically, the reduction in inventory processing time in 2015 was offset by the increase in the receivable collection period, resulting in a net-zero impact on the total cycle duration.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

YUM! Brands Inc., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 15.19 13.95 13.50 14.40 12.84
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 24 26 27 25 28
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Airbnb Inc. — — — — —
Booking Holdings Inc. — — — — —
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
DoorDash, Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 15.19 = 24

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2011 and 2015, a consistent trend toward accelerated supplier payments is evident. The efficiency of accounts payable management increased over the period, characterized by a general rise in turnover and a corresponding reduction in the time taken to settle obligations.

Payables Turnover
The payables turnover ratio demonstrated an overall upward trajectory, rising from 12.84 in 2011 to 15.19 by 2015. Although a moderate decrease to 13.50 occurred in 2013, the ratio recovered in subsequent years, reaching its five-year peak in 2015. This indicates a more frequent cycling of payable accounts over the analyzed timeframe.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average duration for settling supplier invoices decreased from 28 days in 2011 to 24 days in 2015. This downward trend mirrors the movement of the turnover ratio, with a brief extension to 27 days in 2013 before the period resumed its decline to the lowest point in the series by the end of 2015.
Correlation and Operational Insight
A strong inverse correlation is observed between the turnover ratio and the payment period. The reduction of four days in the payment cycle over five years suggests an increase in liquidity or a strategic shift toward more rapid settlement of short-term liabilities, resulting in a more compressed operating cycle regarding vendor obligations.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

YUM! Brands Inc., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 26, 2015 Dec 27, 2014 Dec 28, 2013 Dec 29, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 9 11 11 12 11
Average receivable collection period 12 10 10 9 10
Average payables payment period 24 26 27 25 28
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 -3 -5 -6 -4 -7
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. — — — — —
McDonald’s Corp. — — — — —
Starbucks Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-26), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-27), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 9 + 12 – 24 = -3

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity ratios reveals a consistently negative cash conversion cycle from 2011 to 2015. This indicates that the company generates cash from its operations before it is required to pay its suppliers, effectively utilizing accounts payable as a source of interest-free financing for its operational needs.

Average Inventory Processing Period
The duration for processing inventory remained relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating within a narrow range of 9 to 12 days. A notable improvement occurred in 2015, where the period reached its minimum of 9 days, suggesting an increase in inventory turnover efficiency.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period exhibited minimal volatility, remaining constant at 10 days between 2011 and 2014. A slight increase to 12 days was observed in 2015, indicating a marginal deceleration in the rate at which receivables are converted into cash.
Average Payables Payment Period
A gradual downward trend is observed in the payables payment period, which decreased from 28 days in 2011 to 24 days in 2015. This suggests a shift toward faster settlement of obligations to suppliers over the five-year period.
Cash Conversion Cycle Synthesis
The cash conversion cycle moved from -7 days in 2011 to -3 days in 2015. While the cycle remains negative, the trend toward zero is primarily attributable to the shortening of the payables payment period and the slight increase in the receivable collection period in the final year. Despite this narrowing margin, the company maintains a highly favorable working capital position by operating with a negative cash gap.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?