Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
Analysis of the property, plant, and equipment (PP&E) accounts from 2017 to 2021 reveals a strategic focus on roadway infrastructure and technological integration, contrasted by a reduction in physical rolling stock assets.
- Roadway Infrastructure Trends
- Gross roadway assets exhibited a consistent upward trajectory, increasing from 28,648 million USD in 2017 to 30,600 million USD by 2021. This growth is underpinned by steady increases in rail and other track materials, ties, and ballast. Specifically, ties grew from 5,181 million USD to 5,779 million USD, while ballast rose from 2,654 million USD to 3,041 million USD over the same period, indicating ongoing capital investment in track stability and capacity.
- Equipment and Technological Assets
- Total equipment values remained relatively stagnant, moving from 10,775 million USD in 2017 to 10,541 million USD in 2021. A significant divergence is observed within this category: freight car values declined steadily from 3,256 million USD to 2,701 million USD. Conversely, investments in computers and software grew consistently from 610 million USD to 893 million USD, suggesting a strategic shift toward digitalization and operational efficiency over the expansion of physical rolling stock.
- Construction and Other Property
- Construction in process for both roadway and equipment showed general volatility with an overall downward trend toward 2021, suggesting the completion of several major capital projects. Furthermore, other property assets experienced a sharp decline, falling from 474 million USD in 2017 to 90 million USD in 2021, indicating a divestment or write-down of non-core assets.
- Net Book Value and Depreciation
- The total cost of properties grew modestly from 42,239 million USD to 43,684 million USD. Accumulated depreciation remained relatively stable, ending at -12,031 million USD in 2021 compared to -11,909 million USD in 2017. This stability indicates that the pace of asset depreciation is being closely matched by new capital expenditures, resulting in a gradual increase in the net book value of properties from 30,330 million USD to 31,653 million USD.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of asset age ratios from 2017 through 2021 reveals a consistent and stable approach to the management of property, plant, and equipment. The metrics indicate a disciplined capital expenditure strategy where asset replacement and new acquisitions effectively balance the natural aging and depreciation of the asset base.
- Average Age Ratio
- The average age ratio exhibited minimal volatility, fluctuating within a narrow range between 29.07% and 30.09%. A slight peak occurred in 2018 at 30.09%, followed by a stabilization around 29.2% in the subsequent years. This stability suggests a steady-state replacement cycle, ensuring that the proportional age of the asset portfolio remains constant.
- Estimated Total Useful Life
- A gradual downward trend is observed in the estimated total useful life, which declined from 38 years in 2017 to 35 years by 2021. This reduction may reflect more conservative accounting estimates regarding asset longevity or a shift in the composition of the asset portfolio toward equipment with shorter operational lifespans.
- Estimated Age and Remaining Life
- The estimated age, representing the time elapsed since purchase, remained constant at 11 years from 2017 to 2019 before decreasing to 10 years in 2020 and 2021. Parallel to this, the estimated remaining life shifted from 26 years to 25 years during the same period. The decrease in estimated age indicates a relative rejuvenation of the asset base, likely resulting from strategic capital investments in newer equipment toward the end of the analyzed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Properties, cost – Land)
= 100 × 12,031 ÷ (43,684 – 2,453) = 29.18%
Analysis of the property, plant, and equipment profile from 2017 to 2021 indicates a highly stable capital investment strategy and a consistent asset replacement cycle. The overall valuation of properties, cost, demonstrated a steady upward trajectory, rising from 42,239 million USD to 43,684 million USD, reflecting a measured expansion of the physical asset base.
- Average Age Ratio Stability
- The average age ratio exhibited minimal volatility, fluctuating within a narrow range between 29.07% and 30.09%. After reaching a peak of 30.09% in 2018, the ratio declined and stabilized at 29.18% by 2021. This consistency suggests that the rate of asset replacement effectively offsets depreciation, preventing the infrastructure from aging significantly relative to its total cost.
- Accumulated Depreciation and Asset Cost Trends
- Accumulated depreciation remained relatively stagnant throughout the period, beginning at 11,909 million USD and ending at 12,031 million USD. The stability of accumulated depreciation, paired with the increase in total property costs, contributed to the slight reduction in the average age ratio observed between 2018 and 2021, indicating that new investments are moderately outpacing the depreciation of existing assets.
- Land Valuation Growth
- Land assets showed a marginal but steady increase from 2,342 million USD in 2017 to 2,453 million USD in 2021. As land is a non-depreciable asset, this growth contributes to the total property cost without impacting the accumulated depreciation, thereby exerting a slight downward pressure on the average age ratio over the long term.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = (Properties, cost – Land) ÷ Depreciation
= (43,684 – 2,453) ÷ 1,181 = 35
The financial data indicates a period of relative stability in gross asset valuation accompanied by a systematic adjustment in the accounting estimates for asset longevity and depreciation.
- Asset Cost and Land Acquisition
- Total property costs exhibited a gradual upward trajectory, rising from 42,239 million US dollars in 2017 to 43,684 million US dollars by 2021. Within this category, land holdings demonstrated a consistent increase, growing from 2,342 million US dollars to 2,453 million US dollars over the five-year period, suggesting a steady expansion of the physical asset base.
- Estimated Total Useful Life
- A clear downward trend is observed in the estimated total useful life of assets. The estimation decreased annually from 38 years in 2017 to 35 years in 2020, remaining stable at 35 years through 2021. This reduction represents a contraction of approximately 7.9% in the projected operational lifespan of the company's property and equipment.
- Depreciation Trends
- Annual depreciation expenses rose consistently each year, increasing from 1,059 million US dollars in 2017 to 1,181 million US dollars in 2021. This steady increase in depreciation costs aligns with the reduction in estimated useful life, as shorter amortization periods typically accelerate the annual depreciation charge against the asset's cost.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation
= 12,031 ÷ 1,181 = 10
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment reveals a consistent upward trajectory in annual depreciation expenses, which rose steadily from 1,059 million USD in 2017 to 1,181 million USD in 2021. This trend indicates a growth in the depreciable asset base or the introduction of higher-value assets over the observed period.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- Accumulated depreciation reached a peak of 12,374 million USD in 2018 before experiencing a reduction to 11,982 million USD in 2019. Following this decrease, the balance remained relatively stable, ending at 12,031 million USD in 2021. The decline observed in 2019 suggests a significant disposal of older, fully or partially depreciated assets or an accounting adjustment that reduced the total accumulated balance.
- Asset Age and Renewal Cycle
- The estimated time elapsed since purchase remained constant at 11 years from 2017 through 2019, subsequently decreasing to 10 years in 2020 and 2021. This contraction in the average age of assets, occurring simultaneously with rising annual depreciation charges, suggests a period of capital reinvestment where newer assets were integrated into the portfolio, thereby lowering the weighted average age of the property, plant, and equipment.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = (Properties, net book value – Land) ÷ Depreciation
= (31,653 – 2,453) ÷ 1,181 = 25
The analysis of the company's property, plant, and equipment reflects a period of steady asset growth and a slight adjustment in the estimated longevity of its infrastructure. Net book values and depreciation expenses exhibited a consistent upward trajectory, while the estimated remaining life of assets remained largely stable with a minor downward revision toward the end of the period.
- Property Valuation and Land Assets
- The net book value of properties experienced a general increase from 30,330 million US$ in 2017 to 31,653 million US$ by 2021. Although a slight contraction occurred in 2020, the overall trend indicates a net expansion of the asset base. Land values followed a similar positive trajectory, rising from 2,342 million US$ to 2,453 million US$, suggesting incremental acquisitions or adjustments in land valuation over the five-year period.
- Depreciation Expense Trends
- Annual depreciation expenses demonstrated a continuous linear increase, rising from 1,059 million US$ in 2017 to 1,181 million US$ in 2021. This steady growth in depreciation correlates with the increase in the total net book value of properties, reflecting a larger pool of depreciable assets.
- Asset Longevity and Remaining Life
- The estimated remaining life of the company's assets remained constant at 26 years between 2017 and 2019. In 2020, a marginal decrease to 25 years was observed, a figure that remained unchanged through 2021. This shift suggests a slight acceleration in the projected consumption of asset utility or a conservative adjustment in the company's accounting estimates regarding infrastructure lifespan.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?