EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Las Vegas Sands Corp. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2005
- Return on Assets (ROA) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Las Vegas Sands Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in financial performance as measured by economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) initially increased before experiencing substantial declines. The cost of capital exhibited a generally decreasing trend, though with a recent increase, while invested capital showed volatility. These factors combined to create a shifting pattern in economic profit.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT increased from US$3,351 million in 2018 to US$3,870 million in 2019, indicating improved operational profitability. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2020, with NOPAT falling to a loss of US$1,708 million. This negative trend continued in 2021 and 2022, with losses of US$1,040 million and US$997 million respectively, though the magnitude of the loss stabilized somewhat in the latter year.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital decreased from 15.59% in 2018 to 13.90% in 2021, suggesting a declining risk profile or improved financing conditions. However, it increased to 14.75% in 2022, potentially reflecting rising interest rates or perceived risk. The overall trend suggests a moderate decrease in the cost of capital over the period, despite the recent uptick.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital decreased from US$19,047 million in 2018 to US$15,828 million in 2021. A subsequent increase was observed in 2022, with invested capital rising to US$18,926 million. This suggests potential strategic shifts in capital allocation, including divestitures or reduced investment followed by reinvestment.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit peaked at US$1,072 million in 2019, coinciding with the highest NOPAT and a decreasing cost of capital. The subsequent decline in NOPAT, coupled with a relatively stable cost of capital and fluctuating invested capital, resulted in substantial negative economic profits in 2020, 2021, and 2022. Specifically, economic profit was negative US$4,044 million in 2020, negative US$3,240 million in 2021, and negative US$3,788 million in 2022. This indicates that the company’s returns are not covering its cost of capital during these years.
The observed pattern indicates a deterioration in value creation, particularly from 2020 onwards. While the cost of capital has shown some moderation, it has been insufficient to offset the significant decline in NOPAT. The increase in invested capital in 2022 did not translate into improved economic profit, suggesting potential inefficiencies in capital deployment or a lag in realizing returns from new investments.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in provision for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp..
4 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
5 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense, net of amounts capitalized = Adjusted interest expense, net of amounts capitalized × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to Las Vegas Sands Corp..
7 Elimination of discontinued operations.
The data reveals notable fluctuations in the profitability of the company over the five-year period. Both net income attributable to the company and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) follow a similar trajectory, indicating consistent trends in core profitability measures.
- 2018 to 2019
- There is a positive growth trend in profitability. Net income increased from 2413 million USD to 2698 million USD, while NOPAT grew from 3351 million USD to 3870 million USD. This indicates improved operational efficiency and overall financial performance during this period.
- 2019 to 2020
- A significant decline is evident, with net income shifting from a strong positive figure to a substantial loss of 1685 million USD. Similarly, NOPAT declined sharply to a negative value of 1708 million USD. This suggests a severe disruption in operations or adverse market conditions affecting profitability.
- 2020 to 2021
- While still negative, there is an improvement in financial results compared to 2020. Net income losses reduced to 961 million USD and NOPAT losses to 1040 million USD, indicating a partial recovery or better cost management despite continuing challenges.
- 2021 to 2022
- Profitability returns to positive territory, with net income reported at 1832 million USD. However, NOPAT remains negative at 997 million USD, though with an improvement relative to previous years. This disparity may point to differences in tax effects or non-operating items influencing net income positively.
Overall, the data highlights a period marked by major volatility. Initial growth gave way to steep declines and losses in 2020 and 2021, likely reflecting exceptional external pressures. The return to positive net income in 2022 signals a potential stabilization or recovery phase, despite ongoing operational challenges as suggested by the continued negative NOPAT.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial data reveals distinct fluctuations in tax-related expenses and cash outflows over the analyzed period.
- Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
- From 2018 to 2019, there is a marked increase in income tax expense, rising from 375 million to 468 million US dollars. This trend reversed sharply in 2020 and 2021, where the figures turned negative, indicating income tax benefits (or credits) of 38 million and 5 million US dollars respectively. In 2022, the tax expense reverted to a positive amount of 154 million US dollars, though it remained significantly lower than the pre-2020 levels.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes show a somewhat different pattern. There is an initial decline from 370 million US dollars in 2018 to 431 million US dollars in 2019, after which a steep reduction is noted in 2020 to 110 million US dollars. Despite the partial recovery to 172 million in 2021, the cash operating taxes notably increase in 2022, reaching 305 million US dollars. Despite this increase, the 2022 level remains below levels seen in 2018 and 2019.
Overall, the data indicates a significant impact on income tax expense and cash tax payments from 2020 onward, possibly linked to external or extraordinary factors influencing taxable income and tax payment obligations. While income tax expense shifted into credits during 2020 and 2021, cash operating taxes, although reduced, remained positive with an upward trend resuming in 2022. This reflects variability in tax dynamics, suggesting changing profitability or tax regulation impacts during these years.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of equity equivalents to total Las Vegas Sands Corp. stockholders’ equity.
5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
6 Subtraction of construction in progress.
- Total reported debt & leases
-
The total reported debt and leases exhibit an overall upward trend from 2018 to 2022. Starting at 13,299 million USD in 2018, the figure slightly decreased to 12,825 million USD in 2019. However, it then increased consistently over the next three years, reaching 14,330 million USD in 2020, 14,963 million USD in 2021, and peaking at 16,148 million USD in 2022. This pattern indicates a gradual increase in the company’s leverage over the period, with a notable rise following 2019.
- Total Las Vegas Sands Corp. stockholders’ equity
-
The stockholders’ equity experienced a declining trend from 2018 through 2021, indicative of a reduction in the company's net worth ascribed to shareholders. Equity decreased from 5,684 million USD in 2018 to 5,187 million USD in 2019, then sharply declined to 2,973 million USD in 2020 and further to 1,996 million USD in 2021. In 2022, there was a partial recovery with equity increasing to 3,881 million USD. Despite this improvement, the 2022 equity remains significantly lower than the initial 2018 level.
- Invested capital
-
Invested capital showed a declining trend from 19,047 million USD in 2018 to 15,828 million USD in 2021, which may reflect reduced asset base or adjustments in the company’s capital structure. However, in 2022, invested capital increased to 18,926 million USD, nearly returning to the initial level observed in 2018. This suggests that after several years of contraction, there was a resurgence in the resources dedicated to the company's operations or investments in 2022.
- Overall observations
-
Throughout the period from 2018 to 2022, the company increased its debt and lease obligations, indicating a growing reliance on external financing. Concurrently, stockholders’ equity declined significantly until 2021 but partially rebounded in 2022, potentially reflecting changes such as retained earnings, losses or capital injections. Invested capital contracted steadily until 2021, then expanded in 2022, suggesting renewed investment activity or asset acquisition. The trends imply a period of financial adjustment and restructuring through 2020 and 2021, followed by an attempt to stabilize and strengthen the balance sheet in 2022.
Cost of Capital
Las Vegas Sands Corp., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current maturities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current maturities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current maturities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current maturities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current maturities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | ||||||
| Booking Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | ||||||
| DoorDash, Inc. | ||||||
| McDonald’s Corp. | ||||||
| Starbucks Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited significant fluctuations over the observed period. Initially positive, it transitioned to substantial negative values, indicating a declining ability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital. A review of the underlying components, economic profit and invested capital, reveals the drivers of this trend.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio began at 2.00% in 2018, representing a positive spread between returns and the cost of capital. This ratio increased substantially to 5.95% in 2019, suggesting improved profitability relative to invested capital. However, a dramatic shift occurred in 2020, with the ratio plummeting to -25.35%. This negative trend continued in subsequent years, with ratios of -20.47% and -20.02% recorded in 2021 and 2022, respectively. The consistency of negative values from 2020 onward suggests a sustained period of underperformance relative to capital costs.
Economic profit, a key determinant of the economic spread ratio, experienced a similar trajectory. While positive in 2018 and 2019, it became negative in 2020 and remained so through 2022. This decline in economic profit directly contributed to the deterioration of the economic spread ratio.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital decreased from US$19,047 million in 2018 to US$15,949 million in 2020. While it experienced a slight increase in 2021 to US$15,828 million, it rose more significantly to US$18,926 million in 2022. The decrease in invested capital during 2018-2020 did not offset the decline in economic profit, and the subsequent increase in 2022 did not return the economic spread ratio to positive territory.
The combination of declining economic profit and fluctuations in invested capital resulted in a consistently worsening economic spread ratio from 2019 to 2022. The substantial negative values observed in the latter years indicate a significant shortfall in generating returns sufficient to cover the cost of capital employed.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | ||||||
| Booking Holdings Inc. | ||||||
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | ||||||
| DoorDash, Inc. | ||||||
| McDonald’s Corp. | ||||||
| Starbucks Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited significant fluctuations between 2018 and 2022. Initially positive, it transitioned to substantial negative values, indicating a declining ability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital. A detailed examination of the trends is presented below.
- Economic Profit Margin
- In 2018, the economic profit margin stood at 2.77%. This value increased considerably to 7.80% in 2019, suggesting improved profitability relative to capital employed. However, a dramatic shift occurred in 2020, with the margin plummeting to -111.95%. This represents a significant loss, exceeding the cost of capital by a wide margin. The margin remained negative in 2021 at -76.53%, and further deteriorated to -92.17% in 2022. This consistent negativity over the latter period indicates persistent underperformance in generating economic profit.
- Relationship to Net Revenues
- Net revenues remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2019, at approximately US$13.7 billion. A substantial decrease was observed in 2020, with revenues falling to US$3.612 billion. While revenues partially recovered in 2021 to US$4.234 billion, they remained below pre-pandemic levels and experienced a slight decline in 2022 to US$4.110 billion. The decline in net revenues appears to correlate with the worsening economic profit margin, particularly the sharp drop in 2020. However, the continued negative margin in 2021 and 2022, despite some revenue recovery, suggests that factors beyond revenue volume are significantly impacting profitability.
- Economic Profit Trend
- Economic profit followed a similar trajectory to the economic profit margin. Positive values of US$380 million and US$1,072 million were recorded in 2018 and 2019, respectively. A substantial loss of US$4,044 million was reported in 2020, followed by losses of US$3,240 million and US$3,788 million in 2021 and 2022. The magnitude of these losses underscores the challenges faced in generating returns that cover the cost of capital. The consistent negative economic profit reinforces the conclusion that the company’s investments are not consistently creating value for its investors during this period.
Overall, the period under review demonstrates a clear deterioration in economic profitability. While revenue fluctuations contribute to the observed trends, the consistently negative economic profit margin and substantial economic losses suggest underlying issues related to cost management, capital efficiency, or both.