Paying user area
Try for free
Las Vegas Sands Corp. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Return on Assets (ROA) since 2005
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Las Vegas Sands Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1, 2 See details »
- Net Cash Generated from (Used in) Operating Activities
- The net cash generated from operating activities shows a marked decline over the analyzed periods. In 2018, the figure was significantly positive at 4701 million US dollars. This amount decreased in 2019 to 3038 million US dollars, indicating a reduction in operating cash inflow. The trend further deteriorated in 2020, with the cash flow turning negative to -1312 million US dollars, signifying cash outflows from operations. Subsequent years, 2021 and 2022, also reported negative values, -243 million and -944 million US dollars respectively, confirming continued operational cash challenges, although 2021 experienced a smaller outflow compared to 2020 and 2022.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- The Free Cash Flow to the Firm also experienced a downward trajectory across the years. In 2018, it was 4063 million US dollars, which substantially decreased to 2240 million US dollars in 2019. The year 2020 showed a significant negative free cash flow of -2208 million US dollars, indicating increased capital expenditures or operational inefficiencies relative to cash generated. In 2021, the negative free cash flow improved slightly to -460 million US dollars but worsened again in 2022 to -1098 million US dollars. This pattern highlights volatility and challenges in maintaining positive free cash flow, reflecting potential investment activity, operational strain, or other financial pressures.
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2 2022 Calculation
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized, tax = Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized × EITR
= × =
3 2022 Calculation
Capitalized Interest, tax = Capitalized Interest × EITR
= × =
- Effective income tax rate (EITR)
- The effective income tax rate showed notable fluctuations over the analyzed period. It started at 11.3% in 2018, increasing slightly to 12.4% in 2019. In 2020 and 2021, the rate sharply declined to very low levels of 1.7% and 0.3%, respectively, indicating a significant reduction in tax expenses or possible utilization of tax credits or losses during these years. In 2022, the rate rose markedly to 21%, representing the highest tax burden in the five-year span and suggesting a return to more typical or higher taxable income levels.
- Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized, net of tax
- This item displayed an increasing trend from 2018 through 2021. The cash payments rose from $289 million in 2018 to a peak of $589 million in 2021, reflecting a substantial increase in interest expense obligations or possibly higher debt levels. In 2022, there was a decline to $485 million, indicating a reduction in net interest payments, which could be due to lower debt, refinancing, or changes in interest rates.
- Capitalized Interest, net of tax
- Capitalized interest showed considerable variability. Starting at $3 million in 2018, it increased significantly to $8 million in 2019 and surged further to $21 million in 2020. Thereafter, it decreased to $15 million in 2021 and sharply dropped back to $3 million in 2022. This pattern suggests fluctuating levels of capital expenditures or projects under development that warranted capitalizing interest costs, with 2020 having the highest capitalized interest, possibly reflecting increased investment activity in that year.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
Enterprise value (EV) | |
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | |
Valuation Ratio | |
EV/FCFF | |
Benchmarks | |
EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
Airbnb Inc. | |
Booking Holdings Inc. | |
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | |
DoorDash, Inc. | |
McDonald’s Corp. | |
Starbucks Corp. | |
EV/FCFF, Sector | |
Consumer Services | |
EV/FCFF, Industry | |
Consumer Discretionary |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
Enterprise value (EV)1 | ||||||
Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | ||||||
Valuation Ratio | ||||||
EV/FCFF3 | ||||||
Benchmarks | ||||||
EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
Airbnb Inc. | ||||||
Booking Holdings Inc. | ||||||
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | ||||||
DoorDash, Inc. | ||||||
McDonald’s Corp. | ||||||
Starbucks Corp. | ||||||
EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
Consumer Services | ||||||
EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
Consumer Discretionary |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data reveals notable trends over the five-year period from 2018 to 2022.
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- The enterprise value exhibited fluctuation throughout the observed periods. Initially, there was an increase from US$56,136 million in 2018 to US$60,584 million in 2019, indicating expansion or increased market valuation. However, this was followed by a decline to US$54,882 million in 2020 and a further reduction to US$46,945 million in 2021. In 2022, the EV experienced a partial recovery, rising again to US$53,831 million. This pattern suggests volatility possibly due to external market conditions or company-specific factors affecting valuation.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF)
- The free cash flow shows a downward trend over the same timeframe. Positive cash flow of US$4,063 million in 2018 decreased significantly to US$2,240 million in 2019. Thereafter, the company experienced negative free cash flow, with -US$2,208 million in 2020, slightly improved but still negative -US$460 million in 2021, followed by a deterioration to -US$1,098 million in 2022. This shift from positive to negative free cash flow indicates potential operational challenges or increased investment expenditures not yet translating into cash generation.
- EV to FCFF Ratio
- The EV/FCFF ratio was 13.82 in 2018 and surged to 27.05 in 2019. No subsequent ratio values are provided due to negative FCFF in later years, making the ratio undefined or non-meaningful. The increase in this ratio in 2019 suggests that enterprise value grew faster than free cash flow, which could imply overvaluation or declining cash flow returns at that time.
Overall, the data indicates a company experiencing valuation fluctuations accompanied by a declining ability to generate free cash flow. The transition into negative free cash flow from 2020 onward is a critical trend, signaling potential operational or financial stress. The partial recovery in enterprise value in 2022, despite continued negative free cash flow, may reflect market optimism or other external influences rather than improved cash generation capability.