Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1, 2 See details »
A comprehensive analysis of cash flow metrics reveals a substantial contraction in the ability to generate liquidity between 2018 and 2022. There is a clear transition from a period of strong positive cash generation to a sustained period of cash depletion, characterized by negative operational and firm-level cash flows starting in 2020.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Net cash generated from operating activities experienced a precipitous decline, falling from a peak of US$ 4,701 million in 2018 to US$ 3,038 million in 2019, before entering negative territory in 2020 at US$ -1,312 million. Although a marginal recovery was noted in 2021 with a deficit of US$ -243 million, the trend reversed in 2022, ending the period with a negative balance of US$ -944 million.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- FCFF exhibits a trajectory closely aligned with operating activities but with more pronounced deficits. FCFF decreased from US$ 4,063 million in 2018 to US$ 2,240 million in 2019, followed by a sharp drop to US$ -2,208 million in 2020. While the deficit narrowed to US$ -460 million in 2021, it widened again to US$ -1,098 million by the end of 2022.
- Analysis of Capital Commitments
- The consistent variance between operating cash flow and FCFF indicates a persistent allocation of funds toward capital expenditures. Because FCFF remained lower than operating cash flow in every recorded year—and more deeply negative during the deficit years of 2020 through 2022—it is evident that investment in assets continued to exert downward pressure on the total cash available to the firm, regardless of operational performance.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2 2022 Calculation
Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized, tax = Cash payments for interest, net of amounts capitalized × EITR
= 614 × 21.00% = 129
3 2022 Calculation
Capitalized Interest, tax = Capitalized Interest × EITR
= 4 × 21.00% = 1
Analysis of the financial data indicates a general upward trend in net interest expenditures from 2018 through 2021, followed by a moderate reduction in 2022. The volatility in the effective income tax rate during this period significantly influences the net-of-tax values reported for interest payments and capitalization.
- Cash Payments for Interest, Net of Tax
- Cash outflows for interest payments increased consistently over a four-year period, rising from 289 million USD in 2018 to a peak of 589 million USD in 2021. This represents a growth of approximately 103% over that timeframe. A subsequent decline to 485 million USD occurred in 2022, suggesting either a reduction in total debt obligations or a shift in the cost of borrowing.
- Capitalized Interest, Net of Tax
- Interest capitalization followed a non-linear trajectory, starting at 3 million USD in 2018 and peaking at 21 million USD in 2020. The figures remained relatively elevated in 2021 at 15 million USD before returning to 3 million USD by the end of 2022. This pattern indicates a concentration of capital-intensive projects or asset development between 2019 and 2021.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Fluctuations
- The EITR exhibited extreme volatility, which directly impacts the "net of tax" calculations. After remaining stable between 11.30% and 12.40% in 2018 and 2019, the rate collapsed to 1.70% in 2020 and 0.30% in 2021. A sharp reversal occurred in 2022, with the rate ascending to 21.00%. The minimal tax rates in 2020 and 2021 likely reduced the tax shield effect on interest expenses during those years.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 44,089) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | (1,098) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | — |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Airbnb Inc. | 20.12 |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 12.76 |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 30.21 |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 41.28 |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 28.27 |
| Starbucks Corp. | 46.44 |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |
| Consumer Services | 34.94 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Consumer Discretionary | 91.88 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 53,831) | 46,945) | 54,882) | 60,584) | 56,136) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | (1,098) | (460) | (2,208) | 2,240) | 4,063) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | — | — | — | 27.05 | 13.82 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Airbnb Inc. | 22.46 | 42.36 | — | — | — | |
| Booking Holdings Inc. | 14.11 | 36.39 | — | — | — | |
| Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc. | 51.53 | 50.61 | — | — | — | |
| DoorDash, Inc. | 844.08 | 65.41 | — | — | — | |
| McDonald’s Corp. | 35.39 | 26.32 | — | — | — | |
| Starbucks Corp. | 42.44 | 28.09 | 281.97 | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
| Consumer Services | 28.89 | 32.14 | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
| Consumer Discretionary | 51.09 | 60.31 | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
3 2022 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 53,831 ÷ -1,098 = —
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory between 2018 and 2022 reveals a significant deterioration in cash flow generation capabilities despite a relatively resilient enterprise value.
- Enterprise Value Trends
- Enterprise value exhibited volatility over the five-year period, peaking at 60,584 million USD in 2019. A subsequent contraction occurred, leading to a period low of 46,945 million USD in 2021, before recovering to 53,831 million USD by the end of 2022.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- A sharp downward trend is observed in FCFF. After a strong position of 4,063 million USD in 2018, cash flows declined to 2,240 million USD in 2019 and shifted into negative territory for the remainder of the period. The most severe deficit was recorded in 2020 at -2,208 million USD, followed by a temporary reduction in losses in 2021 (-460 million USD) and a further decline in 2022 to -1,098 million USD.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Interpretation
- The EV/FCFF ratio experienced a substantial increase from 13.82 in 2018 to 27.05 in 2019, signaling a decrease in the efficiency of cash flow generation relative to the total company value. From 2020 through 2022, the ratio is not calculable as a positive metric due to the negative FCFF, indicating that the entity transitioned from generating value for capital providers to consuming cash resources.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?