Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-01).
An analysis of the financial performance between February 2019 and February 2024 reveals a period of significant operational expansion followed by a recent downturn in earnings capacity. EBITDA exhibited a strong upward trajectory for the first three years of the period, peaking in January 2021, before experiencing fluctuations and a notable decline in the final reporting period.
- Growth and Peak Performance (2019–2021)
- EBITDA grew from US$ 2,569,421 thousand in 2019 to a peak of US$ 4,129,002 thousand in 2021. This indicates a substantial increase in operational cash flow potential, with the most aggressive growth occurring between 2020 and 2021, where EBITDA increased by approximately 47%.
- Operational Volatility (2022–2023)
- Following the 2021 peak, EBITDA experienced a slight contraction to US$ 3,861,991 thousand in 2022, followed by a partial recovery to US$ 4,052,764 thousand in 2023. This period suggests a phase of stabilization where earnings remained elevated but failed to establish a new growth trend.
- Recent Earnings Contraction (2024)
- A significant decrease is observed in the period ending February 2, 2024, with EBITDA falling to US$ 3,295,093 thousand. This decline is mirrored across all reported earnings levels, including EBIT and Net Income, indicating a broad reduction in profitability during the most recent fiscal year.
- Analysis of Non-Cash Charges and Bottom-Line Conversion
- The variance between EBITDA and EBIT has widened consistently each year, signifying a steady increase in depreciation and amortization expenses over the six-year period. Furthermore, the conversion of operational earnings to Net Income has weakened in the most recent year; while EBITDA decreased by approximately 18.7% from 2023 to 2024, Net Income fell more sharply by approximately 31.2%, suggesting heightened pressure from interest, taxes, or other non-operating expenses.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 24,942,374) |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | 3,295,093) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | 7.57 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Costco Wholesale Corp. | 30.07 |
| Target Corp. | 9.94 |
| Walmart Inc. | 22.44 |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail | 27.77 |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Consumer Staples | 23.22 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-02-02).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Feb 2, 2024 | Feb 3, 2023 | Jan 28, 2022 | Jan 29, 2021 | Jan 31, 2020 | Feb 1, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 39,584,942) | 51,722,539) | 56,382,282) | 47,683,439) | 38,699,281) | 33,114,877) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | 3,295,093) | 4,052,764) | 3,861,991) | 4,129,002) | 2,807,108) | 2,569,421) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | 12.01 | 12.76 | 14.60 | 11.55 | 13.79 | 12.89 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Costco Wholesale Corp. | 32.85 | 22.66 | 21.19 | 22.64 | — | — | |
| Target Corp. | 10.37 | 13.52 | 9.00 | 10.35 | — | — | |
| Walmart Inc. | 14.63 | 13.92 | 13.94 | 12.01 | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |||||||
| Consumer Staples Distribution & Retail | 17.87 | 15.84 | 14.18 | 13.50 | — | — | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |||||||
| Consumer Staples | 17.62 | 16.39 | 16.42 | 15.65 | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2024-02-02), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-02-03), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-01-28), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-01-29), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-01-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-02-01).
3 2024 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 39,584,942 ÷ 3,295,093 = 12.01
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory from 2019 to 2024 is characterized by a period of significant expansion in enterprise value and earnings, followed by a notable contraction in the most recent fiscal years. Enterprise value grew steadily from 33.1 billion in 2019 to a peak of 56.4 billion in 2022, before declining to 39.6 billion by February 2024.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- A sustained upward trend in enterprise value was observed between 2019 and 2022, representing an increase of approximately 70%. This growth reversed after 2022, with a sharp reduction in value occurring over the subsequent two years, bringing the enterprise value back toward 2020 levels.
- EBITDA Performance
- Operational earnings showed a strong upward trajectory early in the period, with EBITDA rising from 2.57 billion in 2019 to a peak of 4.13 billion in 2021. Following this peak, earnings experienced volatility, stabilizing around 4.05 billion in 2023 before dropping to 3.30 billion in 2024, indicating a recent decline in operational profitability.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
- The EV/EBITDA ratio remained relatively stable despite the volatility in absolute values, fluctuating within a range of 11.55 to 14.60. The ratio peaked in 2022 at 14.60, suggesting a higher market valuation relative to earnings during that period. By February 2024, the ratio moderated to 12.01, reflecting a realignment of the enterprise value in response to the simultaneous decline in both EV and EBITDA.
Overall, the correlation between enterprise value and EBITDA suggests that while the company experienced a valuation surge through 2022, the current trend indicates a contraction in both market valuation and operational earnings, leading to a more conservative valuation multiple.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?