AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Apache Corp. (NYSE:APA)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 4, 2016.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

Apache Corp., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 3.62 3.89 3.76 3.60 4.43
Receivables turnover 5.09 6.79 5.56 5.49 5.46
Payables turnover 3.34 2.27 2.07 3.00 2.77
Working capital turnover 3.34 5.00 9.85 — —
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 101 94 97 101 82
Add: Average receivable collection period 72 54 66 66 67
Operating cycle 173 148 163 167 149
Less: Average payables payment period 109 160 176 122 132
Cash conversion cycle 64 -12 -13 45 17

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


The operational activity ratios indicate a general decline in short-term asset efficiency and a significant shift in working capital management between 2011 and 2015. The operating cycle expanded over the period, reflecting longer durations to convert inventory and receivables into cash.

Inventory and Receivables Efficiency
Inventory turnover experienced a downward trend, decreasing from 4.43 in 2011 to 3.62 in 2015. This is mirrored by the average inventory processing period, which rose from 82 days to 101 days, suggesting a slowdown in the movement of goods. Receivables turnover remained relatively stable for much of the period, peaking at 6.79 in 2014 before dropping to 5.09 in 2015. Consequently, the average receivable collection period fluctuated, ending at 72 days in 2015, the highest level in the analyzed period.
Payables and Liability Management
Payables turnover exhibited volatility, reaching a low of 2.07 in 2013 before increasing to 3.34 by 2015. This volatility is reflected in the average payables payment period, which peaked at 176 days in 2013 and 160 days in 2014, indicating a period of extended credit utilization from suppliers. However, by 2015, the payment period contracted sharply to 109 days, suggesting a more rapid settlement of obligations.
Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
The operating cycle showed a general upward trajectory, increasing from 149 days in 2011 to 173 days in 2015. The cash conversion cycle demonstrated the most significant volatility; it shifted from a positive 17 days in 2011 to negative values in 2013 (-13 days) and 2014 (-12 days), where supplier credit effectively financed the operating cycle. This trend reversed abruptly in 2015, with the cash conversion cycle expanding to 64 days, indicating a substantial increase in the time required to recover cash outflows.
Working Capital Productivity
Working capital turnover showed a precipitous decline from 9.85 in 2013 to 3.34 in 2015. This downward trend suggests a diminishing ability to generate sales relative to the investment in working capital, signaling reduced efficiency in the utilization of short-term assets.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

Apache Corp., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of revenues 2,065 2,752 3,353 3,271 2,901
Inventories 570 708 891 908 655
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 3.62 3.89 3.76 3.60 4.43
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of revenues ÷ Inventories
= 2,065 ÷ 570 = 3.62

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2011 and 2015, operating activity related to inventory reflects a period of initial expansion followed by a significant contraction in scale. While both the cost of revenues and absolute inventory levels fluctuated, the inventory turnover ratio exhibited a general decline from its 2011 peak, followed by a period of relative stabilization.

Cost of Revenues Trend
The cost of revenues increased from 2,901 million US dollars in 2011 to a peak of 3,353 million US dollars in 2013. This growth was followed by a consistent downward trend, with the figure falling to 2,752 million US dollars in 2014 and further declining to 2,065 million US dollars by the end of 2015.
Inventory Level Fluctuations
Inventory holdings saw a sharp increase between 2011 and 2012, rising from 655 million US dollars to 908 million US dollars. These levels remained elevated through 2013 before entering a steady decline, eventually reaching 570 million US dollars in 2015, which is lower than the initial 2011 levels.
Inventory Turnover Analysis
The inventory turnover ratio experienced a notable decrease from 4.43 in 2011 to 3.60 in 2012, suggesting a slowing of inventory conversion. A period of marginal improvement occurred between 2013 and 2014, where the ratio rose to 3.76 and 3.89, respectively. However, this recovery was reversed in 2015, with the ratio settling at 3.62. This pattern indicates that despite the significant reduction in both cost of revenues and inventory volume in the final two years, the efficiency of inventory turnover remained largely stagnant relative to 2012 levels.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

Apache Corp., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Oil and gas production revenues 6,383 13,749 16,402 16,947 16,810
Receivables, net of allowance 1,253 2,024 2,952 3,086 3,079
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 5.09 6.79 5.56 5.49 5.46
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Oil and gas production revenues ÷ Receivables, net of allowance
= 6,383 ÷ 1,253 = 5.09

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the operating activity indicates a significant contraction in business scale and revenue generation toward the end of the observed period, coupled with fluctuating efficiency in managing accounts receivable.

Revenue and Receivables Correlation
From 2011 to 2013, revenues and net receivables remained relatively stable, with revenues hovering around 16.4 to 16.9 billion US$ and receivables maintaining a level near 3 billion US$. A downward trend commenced in 2014, accelerating sharply in 2015, where revenues fell to 6.383 billion US$. Net receivables decreased in parallel, dropping to 1.253 billion US$ by the end of 2015, suggesting that the reduction in outstanding receivables was largely driven by the overall decline in sales volume rather than a change in credit policy alone.
Receivables Turnover Dynamics
The receivables turnover ratio exhibited stability between 2011 and 2013, ranging from 5.46 to 5.56. A notable increase occurred in 2014, with the ratio peaking at 6.79. This spike indicates a period of heightened collection efficiency or a more rapid reduction in the receivables balance relative to the decline in revenues. However, this trend reversed in 2015, as the ratio dropped to 5.09, the lowest point in the five-year period.
Operational Efficiency Insights
The decline in the turnover ratio in 2015 suggests that while both revenues and receivables decreased, the velocity of collections did not keep pace with the collapse in revenue. The drop from a peak of 6.79 to 5.09 implies a deterioration in the efficiency of converting receivables into cash during a period of severe revenue contraction, potentially indicating slower payments from customers or a higher proportion of lagging receivables relative to the diminished sales base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

Apache Corp., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of revenues 2,065 2,752 3,353 3,271 2,901
Accounts payable 618 1,210 1,616 1,092 1,048
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 3.34 2.27 2.07 3.00 2.77
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of revenues ÷ Accounts payable
= 2,065 ÷ 618 = 3.34

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity between 2011 and 2015 reveals a period of fluctuation in cost structures and liability management, culminating in a significant contraction of both expenditures and payables by the end of the period.

Cost of Revenues Trend
Operational expenses experienced an upward trajectory in the early part of the period, peaking in 2013 at 3,353 million US dollars. This was followed by a consistent decline through 2015, where costs fell to 2,065 million US dollars, indicating a substantial reduction in the cost of revenues over the final two years of the sequence.
Accounts Payable Volatility
A significant increase in short-term liabilities is observed between 2011 and 2013, with accounts payable rising from 1,048 million to a peak of 1,616 million US dollars. This trend reversed sharply after 2013, with balances dropping to 618 million US dollars by 2015, representing a marked decrease in outstanding obligations to suppliers.
Payables Turnover Interpretation
The payables turnover ratio demonstrates an inverse relationship with the balance of accounts payable. The ratio reached its lowest point of 2.07 in 2013, coinciding with the peak in liabilities, which suggests a slower payment cycle or a higher reliance on supplier credit. Conversely, the ratio peaked at 3.34 in 2015, indicating a significant acceleration in the rate at which obligations were settled relative to the cost of revenues.

The evidence suggests a strategic shift occurring after 2013, moving from a period of expanding costs and increasing liabilities toward a more lean operational phase characterized by lower spending and more rapid payment cycles.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

Apache Corp., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 3,752 6,415 6,366 4,962 4,803
Less: Current liabilities 1,841 3,664 4,700 5,536 4,963
Working capital 1,911 2,751 1,666 (574) (160)
 
Oil and gas production revenues 6,383 13,749 16,402 16,947 16,810
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 3.34 5.00 9.85 — —
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Oil and gas production revenues ÷ Working capital
= 6,383 ÷ 1,911 = 3.34

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the operating activity ratios reveals a significant decline in working capital efficiency between 2013 and 2015, coinciding with a substantial contraction in production revenues.

Working Capital Dynamics
A transition in liquidity structure is evident, as working capital shifted from negative positions in 2011 (-160 million USD) and 2012 (-574 million USD) to positive values starting in 2013. Working capital peaked in 2014 at 2,751 million USD before decreasing to 1,911 million USD by the end of 2015.
Revenue Trends
Production revenues remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2013, fluctuating around 16,000 million USD. However, a downward trend emerged in 2014, followed by a sharp decline in 2015, where revenues fell to 6,383 million USD, representing a significant reduction in top-line performance.
Working Capital Turnover Efficiency
The working capital turnover ratio demonstrates a consistent and steep decline during the period for which data is available. The ratio fell from 9.85 in 2013 to 5.00 in 2014, and further to 3.34 in 2015. This trajectory indicates a diminishing ability to generate revenue relative to the investment in working capital, primarily driven by the precipitous drop in production revenues that outpaced the reduction in working capital levels.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

Apache Corp., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 3.62 3.89 3.76 3.60 4.43
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 101 94 97 101 82
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 3.62 = 101

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity ratios indicates a period of volatility in inventory efficiency between 2011 and 2015. A clear inverse correlation is observed between the inventory turnover ratio and the average inventory processing period, reflecting fluctuations in the company's ability to manage and liquidate its inventory holdings.

Inventory Turnover Ratio
A peak turnover ratio of 4.43 was recorded in 2011, followed by a sharp decline to 3.60 in 2012. A moderate recovery trend ensued over the next two years, with the ratio increasing to 3.76 in 2013 and 3.89 in 2014. However, this upward momentum was lost by the end of 2015, as the ratio decreased to 3.62.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The time required to process inventory increased significantly from 82 days in 2011 to 101 days in 2012. A marginal improvement in operational efficiency was observed between 2012 and 2014, during which the period decreased to 97 days and then to 94 days. This trend reversed in 2015, with the processing period returning to 101 days.

Overall, the evidence suggests a deterioration in inventory management efficiency compared to the 2011 baseline. The increase in the average processing period and the corresponding decline in turnover indicate a slower conversion of inventory into revenue, with the most pronounced inefficiencies appearing in 2012 and 2015.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

Apache Corp., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 5.09 6.79 5.56 5.49 5.46
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 72 54 66 66 67
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.09 = 72

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance regarding receivable management from 2011 to 2015 exhibits a period of stability followed by significant volatility in collection efficiency. An inverse correlation is observed between the receivables turnover ratio and the average collection period, reflecting the speed at which credit sales are converted into cash.

Receivables Turnover Trends
The turnover ratio remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2013, marginalizing an increase from 5.46 to 5.56. A significant improvement in turnover efficiency occurred in 2014, reaching a peak of 6.79. This upward trend was reversed in 2015, as the ratio declined to 5.09, the lowest level recorded within the five-year period.
Average Receivable Collection Period Trends
Collection periods remained consistent at 66 to 67 days from 2011 through 2013. A notable optimization of the collection cycle was achieved in 2014, where the period dropped to 54 days. However, 2015 marked a substantial regression in efficiency, with the collection period extending to 72 days. This represents the longest duration for receivable recovery in the analyzed timeframe, indicating a slowing of cash inflows relative to credit sales.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

Apache Corp., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 101 94 97 101 82
Average receivable collection period 72 54 66 66 67
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 173 148 163 167 149
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 101 + 72 = 173

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating cycle exhibits significant volatility over the five-year period from 2011 to 2015, characterized by fluctuations in both inventory management and credit collection efficiency. The total duration required to convert resources into cash increased overall, starting at 149 days in 2011 and peaking at 173 days in 2015.

Average Inventory Processing Period
The inventory processing period experienced an initial sharp increase from 82 days in 2011 to 101 days in 2012. This was followed by a period of moderate improvement, with the period declining to 97 days in 2013 and 94 days in 2014. However, this trend reversed in 2015, as the period returned to 101 days, indicating a slowdown in inventory turnover toward the end of the analyzed period.
Average Receivable Collection Period
Receivable collections remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2013, hovering around 66 to 67 days. A notable improvement in collection efficiency occurred in 2014, where the period dropped to a five-year low of 54 days. This efficiency gain was short-lived, as 2015 saw a significant spike to 72 days, the highest collection period in the observed timeframe.
Operating Cycle
The combined operating cycle reflects the cumulative impact of the inventory and receivable trends. After an expansion to 167 days in 2012, the cycle contracted to 148 days by 2014, nearly returning to 2011 levels. The cycle reached its maximum length of 173 days in 2015, driven by simultaneous increases in both inventory processing and receivable collection times. This suggests a general decline in short-term operational efficiency by the end of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

Apache Corp., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 3.34 2.27 2.07 3.00 2.77
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 109 160 176 122 132
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 3.34 = 109

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the short-term operating activity ratios reveals significant volatility in the management of accounts payable between 2011 and 2015. The data indicates a cyclical pattern in how obligations to suppliers were settled, characterized by a notable expansion of the payment cycle mid-period followed by a sharp contraction by the end of 2015.

Payables Turnover
The payables turnover ratio exhibited fluctuations over the five-year period. After a slight increase from 2.77 in 2011 to 3.00 in 2012, the ratio declined to its lowest point of 2.07 in 2013. A gradual recovery followed in 2014, with the ratio reaching a peak of 3.34 by December 31, 2015. This upward trend in the final two years suggests an increase in the frequency with which the company settled its short-term obligations.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average time taken to settle payables mirrored the inverse movement of the turnover ratio. The payment period decreased from 132 days in 2011 to 122 days in 2012, before surging to a peak of 176 days in 2013. This peak represents a significant extension of the credit window utilized by the company. Subsequently, the period was reduced to 160 days in 2014 and dropped sharply to 109 days in 2015, the shortest duration within the analyzed timeframe.
Operational Implications
The alignment of the lowest turnover ratio and the longest payment period in 2013 suggests a period of delayed payments to vendors, which may have been a result of strategic working capital management or liquidity pressures. Conversely, the transition to a turnover ratio of 3.34 and a payment period of 109 days by 2015 indicates a substantial acceleration in payment activity, reflecting a more aggressive settlement of liabilities.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

Apache Corp., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 101 94 97 101 82
Average receivable collection period 72 54 66 66 67
Average payables payment period 109 160 176 122 132
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 64 -12 -13 45 17
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

1 2015 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 101 + 72 – 109 = 64

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The cash conversion cycle exhibited significant volatility between 2011 and 2015, characterized by a transition from a positive cycle to a negative financing position and a subsequent return to a positive cycle. This fluctuation was primarily driven by changes in the timing of supplier payments rather than shifts in inventory management or receivable collections.

Average Inventory Processing Period
The inventory processing period remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period, ranging between 82 and 101 days. After an initial increase in 2012, the duration hovered around the 94 to 101-day mark, suggesting a consistent pace of inventory turnover.
Average Receivable Collection Period
Receivable collections were steady at approximately 66 to 67 days from 2011 to 2013. A notable improvement in efficiency occurred in 2014, with the period dropping to 54 days, followed by a sharp increase to a period high of 72 days in 2015.
Average Payables Payment Period
The payment period for payables served as the primary driver of volatility in the operating cycle. There was a substantial expansion of this period, peaking at 176 days in 2013 and remaining elevated at 160 days in 2014. However, a significant contraction occurred in 2015, with the period falling to 109 days.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle fluctuated from 17 days in 2011 to a peak of 45 days in 2012. A strategic shift occurred in 2013 and 2014, where the cycle became negative (-13 and -12 days, respectively), indicating that the company was effectively utilizing supplier credit to finance its operations. This trend reversed sharply in 2015, as the cycle climbed to 64 days, coinciding with the reduction in the payables payment period and a slowdown in receivable collections.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?