Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Long-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
The analysis of long-term activity ratios indicates a period of declining asset efficiency from 2011 through 2014, followed by a significant and abrupt improvement in 2015. The synchronized movement between fixed asset and total asset turnover suggests that the overall efficiency trends were primarily driven by the utilization and management of long-term physical assets.
- Net Fixed Asset Turnover
- A consistent downward trend is observed from 2011 to 2014, during which the ratio decreased from 0.37 to 0.29. This decline indicates a diminishing capacity to generate revenue relative to the investment in fixed assets. However, this trend reversed sharply in 2015, with the ratio rising to 0.45, representing the highest efficiency level within the analyzed period.
- Total Asset Turnover
- Total asset turnover closely mirrored the trajectory of fixed asset turnover, declining steadily from 0.32 in 2011 to a period low of 0.25 in 2014. The recovery to 0.34 in 2015 suggests a broader improvement in the utilization of the entire asset base to drive revenue generation.
- Equity Turnover
- Equity turnover remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2014, fluctuating modestly between 0.58 and 0.49. A dramatic surge is observed in 2015, where the ratio increased to 2.49. This extreme escalation suggests a significant change in the financial structure, likely resulting from a substantial reduction in shareholders' equity or an extraordinary increase in revenue relative to the equity base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Net Fixed Asset Turnover
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Oil and gas production revenues | 6,383) | 13,749) | 16,402) | 16,947) | 16,810) | |
| Property and equipment, less accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization | 14,119) | 48,076) | 52,421) | 53,280) | 45,448) | |
| Long-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Net fixed asset turnover1 | 0.45 | 0.29 | 0.31 | 0.32 | 0.37 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Net Fixed Asset Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 2015 Calculation
Net fixed asset turnover = Oil and gas production revenues ÷ Property and equipment, less accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization
= 6,383 ÷ 14,119 = 0.45
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance between 2011 and 2015 is characterized by a gradual decline in asset utilization efficiency followed by a significant structural contraction in both revenue and the asset base during the final period.
- Net Fixed Asset Turnover Trend (2011-2014)
- A consistent downward trend in the net fixed asset turnover ratio is observed from 2011 to 2014, decreasing from 0.37 to 0.29. This decline indicates a diminishing ability to generate sales from the company's investment in property and equipment. While oil and gas production revenues remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2013, the increase in net fixed assets during 2012 contributed to the initial erosion of the turnover ratio.
- Revenue and Asset Contraction (2015)
- The 2015 fiscal year shows a precipitous drop in both primary metrics. Oil and gas production revenues declined by approximately 53.6% compared to 2014, falling to 6,383 million US$. Simultaneously, net property and equipment, less accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization, experienced a severe reduction of approximately 70.6%, ending the period at 14,119 million US$.
- Analysis of Ratio Divergence
- Despite the sharp decline in revenue in 2015, the net fixed asset turnover ratio increased to 0.45, the highest level recorded in the five-year period. This inverse relationship is attributed to the fact that the reduction in the net fixed asset base was significantly more aggressive than the loss in revenue. This suggests a major divestment of assets or substantial write-downs that mathematically improved the turnover ratio despite a weakened operational revenue stream.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Total Asset Turnover
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Oil and gas production revenues | 6,383) | 13,749) | 16,402) | 16,947) | 16,810) | |
| Total assets | 18,842) | 55,952) | 61,637) | 60,737) | 52,051) | |
| Long-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Total asset turnover1 | 0.34 | 0.25 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.32 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Total Asset Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 2015 Calculation
Total asset turnover = Oil and gas production revenues ÷ Total assets
= 6,383 ÷ 18,842 = 0.34
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2011 to 2015 is characterized by a period of asset expansion followed by a drastic contraction in both the balance sheet and revenue streams.
- Efficiency Trend (2011–2014)
- A consistent decline in the total asset turnover ratio is observed between 2011 and 2014, falling from 0.32 to 0.25. This downward trajectory coincided with an increase in total assets, which peaked at 61,637 million in 2013, while production revenues remained relatively stagnant or declined. This indicates a diminishing ability to generate sales relative to the investment in the asset base during this period.
- Structural Shift in 2015
- The year 2015 marked a significant pivot, with the total asset turnover ratio increasing to 0.34. This improvement occurred despite a sharp decline in oil and gas production revenues, which fell to 6,383 million. The increase in the turnover ratio is attributed to a disproportionately larger reduction in total assets, which plummeted to 18,842 million, suggesting extensive divestments or significant asset write-downs.
- Revenue and Asset Correlation
- Between 2011 and 2013, assets grew while revenues fluctuated marginally, leading to decreased operational efficiency. From 2014 to 2015, both metrics declined precipitously; however, because the contraction of the asset base outpaced the loss of revenue, the resulting asset turnover ratio increased, reflecting a leaner but significantly smaller operational scale.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Equity Turnover
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Oil and gas production revenues | 6,383) | 13,749) | 16,402) | 16,947) | 16,810) | |
| Total Apache shareholders’ equity | 2,566) | 25,937) | 33,396) | 31,331) | 28,993) | |
| Long-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Equity turnover1 | 2.49 | 0.53 | 0.49 | 0.54 | 0.58 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Equity Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 2015 Calculation
Equity turnover = Oil and gas production revenues ÷ Total Apache shareholders’ equity
= 6,383 ÷ 2,566 = 2.49
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2011 to 2015 reveals a period of initial stability followed by a severe contraction in both revenue and equity. While production revenues decreased steadily after 2012, a critical shift occurred in the final reporting period, where a precipitous drop in shareholders' equity fundamentally altered the equity turnover ratio.
- Revenue Trends
- Oil and gas production revenues remained relatively stable between 2011 and 2013, hovering between 16.4 billion and 16.9 billion US$. A downward trend commenced in 2014, with revenues falling to 13.7 billion US$, and accelerated sharply in 2015 to 6.4 billion US$, representing a significant decline in top-line performance.
- Shareholders' Equity Trajectory
- Equity showed an upward trend from 2011 to 2013, peaking at 33.4 billion US$. This growth was followed by a decline to 25.9 billion US$ in 2014 and a drastic reduction to 2.6 billion US$ by the end of 2015. The magnitude of the equity contraction in 2015 far exceeded the proportional decline in revenues during the same period.
- Equity Turnover Interpretation
- Between 2011 and 2014, the equity turnover ratio remained low and consistent, ranging from 0.49 to 0.58, indicating that the company generated approximately 0.50 US$ of revenue for every 1.00 US$ of equity. In 2015, the ratio spiked to 2.49. This increase is not indicative of improved asset utilization or operational efficiency, but is instead a mathematical result of the severe erosion of the equity base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?