Decomposing ROE involves expressing net income divided by shareholders’ equity as the product of component ratios.
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility over the analyzed five-year period, characterized by a sustained contraction from 2018 through 2021, followed by a sharp expansion in 2022. ROE decreased from 19.34% in 2018 to a minimum of 2.20% in 2021, before rebounding to 33.70% at the end of 2022.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- A consistent downward trend in ROA is observed between 2018 and 2021, falling from 9.15% to 1.13%. This trajectory indicates a period of diminishing profitability relative to the asset base. In 2022, a dramatic reversal occurred, with ROA ascending to 17.40%, representing the most significant driver of the overall recovery in equity returns.
- Financial Leverage
- Financial leverage peaked at 2.51 in 2019 and generally trended downward to 1.94 by 2022. The reduction in the leverage ratio during the latter part of the period suggests a decreased reliance on debt to amplify returns, contrasting with the operational trends observed in asset returns.
- Two-Component ROE Synthesis
- The disaggregation demonstrates that ROE fluctuations were predominantly driven by operational efficiency (ROA) rather than changes in capital structure. While the increase in leverage from 2018 to 2019 slightly mitigated the decline in ROA, the subsequent collapse in ROE through 2021 was a direct result of plummeting asset returns. Notably, the exceptional ROE growth in 2022 was achieved despite a decrease in financial leverage, confirming that the improvement was fundamentally driven by a substantial surge in asset productivity and net profitability.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a steady decline followed by a sharp recovery. From a high of 19.34% in 2018, ROE contracted annually to reach a trough of 2.20% in 2021, before surging to 33.70% in 2022. This trajectory indicates a period of eroding shareholder returns that was abruptly reversed by a substantial improvement in operational performance.
- Net Profit Margin
- Profitability served as the primary driver for the fluctuations in ROE. A consistent downward trend was observed from 2018 to 2021, with margins falling from 20.55% to a low of 3.72%. This contraction suggests a period of increasing cost pressures or declining pricing power. However, 2022 marked a dramatic reversal, with the margin expanding to 36.75%, the highest level in the observed period, which fundamentally propelled the recovery of ROE.
- Asset Turnover
- Asset utilization efficiency experienced a decline in the early part of the period, dropping from 0.45 in 2018 to a plateau of 0.30 in 2020 and 2021. This indicates a period where the asset base grew faster than the generated revenue or where revenue generation slowed. A significant rebound occurred in 2022, with the ratio rising to 0.47, suggesting an optimization of asset usage or a substantial increase in sales volume.
- Financial Leverage
- The impact of financial leverage on ROE was secondary and shifted over time. Leverage increased from 2.11 in 2018 to a peak of 2.51 in 2019, providing a temporary boost to equity returns. Subsequently, a deleveraging trend emerged, with the ratio declining to 1.94 by 2022. Because ROE peaked in 2022 while leverage was at its lowest point, it is evident that the increase in shareholder returns was driven by operational efficiency and profitability rather than increased financial risk.
The overall analysis reveals that the volatility in ROE was almost entirely synchronized with movements in net profit margin and asset turnover. The recovery in 2022 represents a high-quality increase in ROE, as it was achieved through simultaneous expansions in both profit margins and asset efficiency while simultaneously reducing the company's reliance on debt.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a consistent decline from 19.34% to a low of 2.20% in 2021, followed by a sharp recovery to 33.70% in 2022. The analysis of the five-component disaggregation reveals that this trend was primarily driven by operational margins and asset efficiency rather than financial leverage or tax effects.
- Operational Performance
- The EBIT margin served as the most volatile driver of performance, contracting from 26.39% in 2018 to 6.45% in 2021 before surging to 43.76% in 2022. This operational swing was complemented by the asset turnover ratio, which declined from 0.45 to a plateau of 0.30 during 2020 and 2021, before recovering to 0.47 in 2022. These movements suggest a severe compression of operational efficiency and pricing power that was rapidly reversed in the final year.
- Financial Structure and Debt Burden
- Financial leverage peaked in 2019 at 2.51 and generally trended downward to 1.94 by 2022, indicating a reduction in the reliance on debt to amplify returns. The interest burden showed a notable dip in 2021, reaching 0.71, which coincided with the period of lowest EBIT margins and ROE. By 2022, the interest burden improved to 0.96, suggesting that interest expenses became a smaller fraction of operating income as profitability recovered.
- Taxation Effects
- The tax burden remained relatively constant throughout the analyzed period, fluctuating minimally between 0.81 and 0.87. This stability indicates that changes in the corporate tax environment did not contribute significantly to the fluctuations in the net return to shareholders.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited a consistent downward trajectory from 2018 through 2021 before experiencing a significant reversal in 2022. This performance trend is a direct result of the combined fluctuations in operational profitability and asset utilization efficiency.
- Net Profit Margin Trends
- A sustained contraction in profitability is observed from 2018 to 2021, as the net profit margin fell from 20.55% to a low of 3.72%. This period of decline suggests a compression of net earnings relative to revenue. However, 2022 marked a substantial turnaround, with the margin expanding to 36.75%, indicating a sharp increase in the company's ability to convert sales into profit.
- Asset Turnover Performance
- Asset utilization efficiency deteriorated between 2018 and 2020, decreasing from a ratio of 0.45 to 0.30, where it remained stagnant through 2021. This decline indicates a reduced capacity to generate revenue from the asset base. In 2022, asset turnover recovered strongly to 0.47, exceeding the initial 2018 levels and reflecting improved operational efficiency.
- ROA Disaggregation Synthesis
- The decline in ROA from 9.15% in 2018 to 1.13% in 2021 was driven by the simultaneous erosion of both net profit margins and asset turnover. The dramatic surge to 17.40% in 2022 was achieved through a dual recovery; while the increase in asset turnover provided a baseline for improvement, the exponential growth in the net profit margin served as the primary driver for the overall increase in asset productivity.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The Return on Assets (ROA) experienced a consistent decline from 2018 to 2021, falling from 9.15% to a low of 1.13%, before undergoing a significant recovery to reach 17.40% in 2022. This volatility is primarily driven by fluctuations in operating profitability and asset utilization, while tax and interest burdens played secondary but observable roles.
- Operating Profitability (EBIT Margin)
- The EBIT margin serves as the primary driver of ROA volatility. A steady contraction was observed from 2018 (26.39%) through 2021, where it reached a nadir of 6.45%. This downward trend indicates a period of diminishing operating efficiency or increasing input costs. However, a substantial reversal occurred in 2022, with the margin expanding to 43.76%, suggesting a dramatic improvement in pricing power or a sharp reduction in operating expenses.
- Asset Utilization (Asset Turnover)
- Asset turnover followed a similar trajectory to the EBIT margin, declining from 0.45 in 2018 to a plateau of 0.30 in 2020 and 2021. This suggests a period of decreased efficiency in generating revenue from the asset base. The recovery in 2022 to 0.47 indicates that the company maximized its asset utility to a level exceeding the 2018 baseline, contributing positively to the surge in ROA.
- Financial Leverage and Interest Burden
- The interest burden remained relatively stable until 2021, when it dropped to 0.71, indicating a higher relative cost of debt or a decrease in EBIT relative to interest obligations. By 2022, the ratio recovered to 0.96, the highest level in the period analyzed, which reflects a significant reduction in the impact of interest expenses on net income.
- Tax Efficiency (Tax Burden)
- The tax burden exhibited the least volatility among the four components, fluctuating within a narrow range between 0.81 and 0.87. This stability suggests that changes in the effective tax rate had a negligible impact on the overall trend of the return on assets compared to the operational and financial drivers.
In summary, the sharp increase in ROA observed in 2022 resulted from a simultaneous peak in EBIT margin and asset turnover, complemented by a minimized interest burden. This indicates that the recovery was driven by strong operational performance and improved asset efficiency rather than tax-related gains.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The net profit margin exhibited significant volatility between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a consistent contraction over a four-year period followed by a substantial recovery. The margin decreased from 20.55% in 2018 to a period low of 3.72% in 2021, before surging to 36.75% in 2022.
- Operating Profitability
- The EBIT margin was the primary driver of the overall net profit margin fluctuations. A downward trend was observed from 2018 (26.39%) through 2021, where the margin reached a minimum of 6.45%. This trend reversed sharply in 2022, with the EBIT margin expanding to 43.76%, indicating a significant increase in operational efficiency or pricing power during the final year of the period.
- Interest Burden
- The interest burden declined from 0.94 in 2018 to a low of 0.71 in 2021, suggesting that interest expenses exerted greater pressure on earnings as operating income diminished. This ratio recovered strongly in 2022 to 0.96, reflecting a diminished impact of interest expenses relative to the substantially higher operating profits achieved that year.
- Tax Burden
- The tax burden remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 0.81 and 0.87. Because this ratio showed minimal variance compared to the EBIT and interest burdens, it is concluded that tax effects were not a significant contributor to the volatility of the net profit margin during this timeframe.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?