EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Albemarle Corp. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Albemarle Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Initially, the company experienced negative economic profit, which worsened over a three-year span before a substantial positive shift in the final year. This analysis details the observed trends in net operating profit after taxes, cost of capital, invested capital, and their combined impact on economic profit.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT decreased from US$827.216 million in 2018 to US$504.001 million in 2020, indicating a declining operational profitability. However, a dramatic increase occurred in 2022, with NOPAT reaching US$3,022.027 million. This represents a substantial improvement in the company’s core earnings.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital exhibited a moderate increase over the period, rising from 20.60% in 2018 to 22.12% in 2022. While not drastic, this upward trend suggests increasing financing costs or perceived risk associated with the company’s operations.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital generally increased from US$5,433.093 million in 2018 to US$10,052.399 million in 2022. The largest increase occurred between 2021 and 2022. This suggests significant investment in the business, potentially driving future growth, but also requiring a higher capital base to generate returns.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative from 2018 through 2021, ranging from -US$291.871 million to -US$1,236.140 million. This indicates that the company’s NOPAT was insufficient to cover its cost of capital during these years. However, 2022 saw a significant turnaround, with economic profit becoming positive at US$798.094 million. This positive economic profit suggests the company generated returns exceeding its cost of capital in that year.
The substantial increase in NOPAT in 2022, coupled with a relatively stable cost of capital and increased invested capital, drove the positive economic profit. The earlier period of negative economic profit highlights a challenge in generating returns sufficient to satisfy investor expectations, but the recent shift suggests improved performance and value creation.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation.
5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest and financing expenses = Adjusted interest and financing expenses × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation.
- Net Income Attributable to Albemarle Corporation
- The net income showed a declining trend from 2018 to 2021, decreasing from approximately 693.6 million USD in 2018 to 123.7 million USD in 2021. This represents a substantial drop over four years. However, in 2022, there was a significant and notable rebound, with net income reaching approximately 2.69 billion USD, marking an exceptional increase compared to previous years.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT followed a similar pattern to net income over the observed period. From 2018 to 2021, NOPAT steadily decreased from around 827.2 million USD to 230.4 million USD, indicating a reduction in operating profitability after taxes. In 2022, there was a strong recovery, with NOPAT rising to approximately 3.02 billion USD, which surpasses all previous years by a wide margin.
- Overall Trend Analysis
- Both net income and NOPAT experienced a clear downward trend during the period from 2018 to 2021, reflecting challenges that negatively impacted profitability. The drastic improvement in 2022 suggests a significant positive change in the company's operational performance or market conditions, resulting in substantially higher earnings and operating profits. This marked turnaround may warrant further investigation into underlying drivers, such as changes in revenue, cost structure, or market factors.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Income Tax Expense
- The income tax expense shows a decreasing trend from 2018 to 2021, moving from 144,826 thousand US dollars in 2018 down to 29,446 thousand US dollars in 2021. This represents a significant reduction over the four-year period. However, in 2022, the income tax expense sharply increased to 390,588 thousand US dollars, indicating a reversal of the previous downward trend and a substantial rise compared to all prior years in the dataset.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes decreased steadily from 107,671 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 72,906 thousand US dollars in 2020. There was a slight increase in 2021, with cash operating taxes rising to 82,002 thousand US dollars. In 2022, there was a notable surge to 324,092 thousand US dollars, mirroring the sharp increase seen in income tax expense for the same year. Overall, the trend from 2018 through 2021 was downward with a peak drop in 2020, followed by a steep upward movement in 2022.
- Summary of Tax-Related Expenses
- Both income tax expense and cash operating taxes generally declined from 2018 through 2021, reaching their lowest values in 2021. The year 2022, however, saw a pronounced increase in these tax-related costs, with figures markedly higher than previous years. This substantial rise in 2022 may reflect changes in taxable income, tax rates, or other external factors affecting the company's tax obligations in that period.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »
5 Addition of equity equivalents to total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of construction in progress.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases exhibit a fluctuating pattern over the analyzed period. Starting from approximately 1.84 billion at the end of 2018, the debt level increased substantially to about 3.19 billion by the end of 2019, marking a notable escalation. This upward trend continued into 2020, reaching roughly 3.71 billion, before experiencing a decline to around 2.55 billion in 2021. However, in 2022, the debt surged again, rising to approximately 3.35 billion. Overall, this indicates periods of increased leveraging interspersed with some reduction, pointing to possible strategic financing adjustments or capital restructuring during these years.
- Total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity
- Shareholders’ equity showed a consistent upward trajectory throughout the five-year span. Beginning with about 3.59 billion at the end of 2018, equity rose steadily each year, reaching approximately 7.98 billion by the end of 2022. The rate of increase became more pronounced in the later years, particularly from 2021 to 2022, suggesting strong retention of earnings and/or additional equity financing. This growth in equity signifies an improvement in the company's net asset base and financial strength, supporting sustainable long-term operations.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital also demonstrated an overall increasing trend, albeit with some variability. Starting at about 5.43 billion in 2018, it increased to roughly 6.90 billion in 2019 and 7.38 billion in 2020. In 2021, there was a noticeable decline to approximately 6.79 billion, before a significant jump to about 10.05 billion in 2022. The sharp increase in the final year suggests substantial new investments or acquisitions that expanded the company’s capital base. Fluctuations in invested capital correspond closely with changes in debt and equity, reflecting shifts in funding strategy and capital deployment over time.
Cost of Capital
Albemarle Corp., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Linde plc | ||||||
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited a consistently negative trend from 2018 through 2021, followed by a significant positive shift in 2022. This indicates a progression from substantial underperformance relative to the cost of capital to a position of value creation. The magnitude of the negative spread increased each year until 2021, before reversing dramatically.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- In 2018, the economic spread ratio was -5.37%. This worsened to -8.51% in 2019, and continued to decline, reaching -13.25% in 2020. The most substantial negative spread was recorded in 2021 at -18.20%. A marked improvement occurred in 2022, with the ratio becoming positive at 7.94%.
The negative economic spread ratios from 2018 to 2021 suggest that the returns generated by the invested capital were consistently below the company’s cost of capital. The increasing negativity of the ratio during this period implies a widening gap between returns and the cost of capital. The substantial positive shift in 2022 indicates that the company’s returns exceeded its cost of capital, generating economic value.
- Relationship to Economic Profit
- The trend in economic profit mirrors the economic spread ratio. Negative economic profit values were observed from 2018 to 2021, corresponding with the negative spread ratios. The transition to positive economic profit in 2022 aligns with the positive economic spread ratio, confirming the creation of economic value during that year.
The invested capital generally increased from 2018 to 2022, with a slight decrease observed between 2020 and 2021. However, the substantial increase in economic profit in 2022, despite a significant rise in invested capital, demonstrates a substantial improvement in capital efficiency and profitability.
- Invested Capital Considerations
- While invested capital grew over the period, the positive economic spread ratio in 2022 suggests that the increased capital was deployed effectively, generating returns exceeding the cost of that capital. The earlier years, however, demonstrate that increases in invested capital did not translate into commensurate returns.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Linde plc | ||||||
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited a significant shift over the five-year period. Initially negative, the metric transitioned to positive territory in the most recent year analyzed. This evolution warrants a closer examination of the underlying factors contributing to these changes.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- From 2018 to 2021, the economic profit margin consistently declined. Beginning at -8.65% in 2018, it reached -37.14% in 2021, indicating a widening gap between the company’s cost of capital and the returns generated from its operations. However, a substantial positive swing occurred in 2022, with the economic profit margin rising to 10.90%.
- Relationship to Net Sales
- Net sales demonstrated fluctuations throughout the period. While experiencing modest growth from 2018 to 2019, sales decreased in 2020. A recovery was observed in 2021, but a considerable increase in net sales occurred in 2022, reaching US$7,320,104 in thousands. This substantial growth in net sales likely played a key role in the positive shift in the economic profit margin during that year.
- Economic Profit Progression
- The economic profit itself followed a similar trajectory to the economic profit margin, displaying negative values from 2018 through 2021. The magnitude of the negative economic profit increased each year during this period, peaking at -US$1,236,140 in thousands in 2021. The year 2022 marked a turning point, with economic profit becoming positive at US$798,094 in thousands, aligning with the improvement in the economic profit margin.
The substantial improvement in both economic profit and its margin in 2022 suggests a significant enhancement in the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital. Further investigation into the drivers behind the increased net sales and any cost management initiatives implemented during that year would be beneficial to understand the sustainability of this positive trend.