Stock Analysis on Net

Albemarle Corp. (NYSE:ALB)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 3, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Albemarle Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Initially, the company experienced negative economic profit, which progressively worsened before a substantial turnaround in the most recent year. This analysis details the observed trends in net operating profit after taxes, cost of capital, invested capital, and ultimately, economic profit.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT decreased from US$827.22 million in 2018 to US$504.00 million in 2020, indicating a declining operational profitability. However, a dramatic increase occurred in 2022, with NOPAT reaching US$3,022.03 million. This represents a significant improvement in the company’s core earnings.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital exhibited some volatility. It decreased from 17.73% in 2018 to 15.66% in 2019, then increased to 18.55% in 2021 before settling at 19.01% in 2022. The increasing cost of capital in later years suggests a potentially higher risk profile or changing market conditions.
Invested Capital
Invested capital generally increased over the period, rising from US$5,433.09 million in 2018 to US$10,052.40 million in 2022. The most substantial increase occurred between 2021 and 2022. This suggests a growing scale of operations and potentially significant capital investments.
Economic Profit
Economic profit was negative from 2018 through 2021, with the losses escalating each year, reaching a peak of negative US$1,029.25 million in 2021. This indicates that the company’s returns were not exceeding its cost of capital during these years. However, 2022 saw a substantial shift, with economic profit turning positive at US$1,111.19 million. This positive economic profit suggests the company generated returns exceeding its cost of capital in that year.

The substantial improvement in economic profit in 2022 appears to be driven by the significant increase in NOPAT, despite a slightly higher cost of capital and increased invested capital. The trend suggests a potential turning point in the company’s financial performance, although the sustainability of this improvement would require further investigation.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Albemarle Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve3
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents4
Interest and financing expenses
Interest expense, operating lease liability5
Adjusted interest and financing expenses
Tax benefit of interest and financing expenses6
Adjusted interest and financing expenses, after taxes7
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation.

5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest and financing expenses = Adjusted interest and financing expenses × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Albemarle Corporation.


Net Income Attributable to Albemarle Corporation
The net income showed a declining trend from 2018 to 2021, decreasing from approximately 693.6 million USD in 2018 to 123.7 million USD in 2021. This represents a substantial drop over four years. However, in 2022, there was a significant and notable rebound, with net income reaching approximately 2.69 billion USD, marking an exceptional increase compared to previous years.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT followed a similar pattern to net income over the observed period. From 2018 to 2021, NOPAT steadily decreased from around 827.2 million USD to 230.4 million USD, indicating a reduction in operating profitability after taxes. In 2022, there was a strong recovery, with NOPAT rising to approximately 3.02 billion USD, which surpasses all previous years by a wide margin.
Overall Trend Analysis
Both net income and NOPAT experienced a clear downward trend during the period from 2018 to 2021, reflecting challenges that negatively impacted profitability. The drastic improvement in 2022 suggests a significant positive change in the company's operational performance or market conditions, resulting in substantially higher earnings and operating profits. This marked turnaround may warrant further investigation into underlying drivers, such as changes in revenue, cost structure, or market factors.

Cash Operating Taxes

Albemarle Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Income tax expense
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest and financing expenses
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


Income Tax Expense
The income tax expense shows a decreasing trend from 2018 to 2021, moving from 144,826 thousand US dollars in 2018 down to 29,446 thousand US dollars in 2021. This represents a significant reduction over the four-year period. However, in 2022, the income tax expense sharply increased to 390,588 thousand US dollars, indicating a reversal of the previous downward trend and a substantial rise compared to all prior years in the dataset.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes decreased steadily from 107,671 thousand US dollars in 2018 to 72,906 thousand US dollars in 2020. There was a slight increase in 2021, with cash operating taxes rising to 82,002 thousand US dollars. In 2022, there was a notable surge to 324,092 thousand US dollars, mirroring the sharp increase seen in income tax expense for the same year. Overall, the trend from 2018 through 2021 was downward with a peak drop in 2020, followed by a steep upward movement in 2022.
Summary of Tax-Related Expenses
Both income tax expense and cash operating taxes generally declined from 2018 through 2021, reaching their lowest values in 2021. The year 2022, however, saw a pronounced increase in these tax-related costs, with figures markedly higher than previous years. This substantial rise in 2022 may reflect changes in taxable income, tax rates, or other external factors affecting the company's tax obligations in that period.

Invested Capital

Albemarle Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Current portion of long-term debt
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts3
LIFO reserve4
Equity equivalents5
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax6
Noncontrolling interests
Adjusted total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity
Construction in progress7
Marketable securities8
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »

5 Addition of equity equivalents to total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity.

6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

7 Subtraction of construction in progress.

8 Subtraction of marketable securities.


Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases exhibit a fluctuating pattern over the analyzed period. Starting from approximately 1.84 billion at the end of 2018, the debt level increased substantially to about 3.19 billion by the end of 2019, marking a notable escalation. This upward trend continued into 2020, reaching roughly 3.71 billion, before experiencing a decline to around 2.55 billion in 2021. However, in 2022, the debt surged again, rising to approximately 3.35 billion. Overall, this indicates periods of increased leveraging interspersed with some reduction, pointing to possible strategic financing adjustments or capital restructuring during these years.
Total Albemarle Corporation shareholders’ equity
Shareholders’ equity showed a consistent upward trajectory throughout the five-year span. Beginning with about 3.59 billion at the end of 2018, equity rose steadily each year, reaching approximately 7.98 billion by the end of 2022. The rate of increase became more pronounced in the later years, particularly from 2021 to 2022, suggesting strong retention of earnings and/or additional equity financing. This growth in equity signifies an improvement in the company's net asset base and financial strength, supporting sustainable long-term operations.
Invested capital
Invested capital also demonstrated an overall increasing trend, albeit with some variability. Starting at about 5.43 billion in 2018, it increased to roughly 6.90 billion in 2019 and 7.38 billion in 2020. In 2021, there was a noticeable decline to approximately 6.79 billion, before a significant jump to about 10.05 billion in 2022. The sharp increase in the final year suggests substantial new investments or acquisitions that expanded the company’s capital base. Fluctuations in invested capital correspond closely with changes in debt and equity, reflecting shifts in funding strategy and capital deployment over time.

Cost of Capital

Albemarle Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Albemarle Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Linde plc
Sherwin-Williams Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic spread ratio exhibited a significant shift over the observed period. Initially negative, the ratio demonstrated a progressively worsening trend before becoming positive in the final year. This evolution is closely tied to changes in economic profit and invested capital.

Economic Spread Ratio Trend
From 2018 to 2021, the economic spread ratio consistently declined. Starting at -2.50% in 2018, it reached -15.15% in 2021. This indicates an increasing disparity between the return generated on invested capital and the cost of that capital. However, a substantial reversal occurred in 2022, with the ratio surging to 11.05%. This suggests a significant improvement in profitability relative to invested capital.
Relationship to Economic Profit
The economic spread ratio’s negative values from 2018 through 2021 align with the consistently negative economic profit reported during those years. The magnitude of the negative economic profit increased each year, contributing to the declining economic spread ratio. The positive economic profit of US$1,111,186 thousand in 2022 directly drove the positive shift in the economic spread ratio.
Relationship to Invested Capital
Invested capital generally increased from 2018 to 2020, then decreased in 2021 before rising substantially in 2022. While the increasing invested capital from 2018-2020 coincided with worsening economic spread, the significant increase in invested capital in 2022 did not prevent the ratio from becoming positive, indicating a substantial improvement in the return generated on that capital. The ratio’s improvement in 2022 suggests that the increased capital was deployed effectively.

In summary, the economic spread ratio reflects a period of value destruction followed by value creation. The substantial improvement in 2022 is noteworthy and warrants further investigation to understand the drivers behind the increased profitability relative to invested capital.


Economic Profit Margin

Albemarle Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Net sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Linde plc
Sherwin-Williams Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Net sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin exhibited a significant shift over the five-year period. Initially negative, the metric transitioned to a positive value in the most recent year analyzed. This evolution reflects substantial changes in both economic profit and net sales.

Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin began at -4.03% in 2018 and demonstrated a consistent decline through 2021, reaching a low of -30.93%. This indicates that the company’s economic profit was increasingly negative relative to its net sales during this period. However, a dramatic reversal occurred in 2022, with the margin surging to 15.18%. This substantial improvement suggests a significant increase in value creation relative to sales.

The negative economic profit margins from 2018 to 2021 correlate with consistently negative economic profit values. The magnitude of the negative economic profit increased each year, contributing to the worsening margin. The substantial positive economic profit recorded in 2022 directly drove the positive economic profit margin observed in that year.

Net Sales Trend
Net sales fluctuated between 2018 and 2021, initially increasing from US$3,374,950 thousand to US$3,589,427 thousand, then decreasing to US$3,128,909 thousand in 2020, and recovering slightly to US$3,327,957 thousand in 2021. However, 2022 witnessed a considerable increase in net sales, reaching US$7,320,104 thousand. This substantial growth in sales, combined with the shift to positive economic profit, was instrumental in the significant improvement in the economic profit margin.

The year 2022 represents a turning point. The combination of significantly increased net sales and a move to positive economic profit resulted in a substantial improvement in the economic profit margin, indicating a considerable enhancement in the company’s ability to generate economic value.