Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
A consistent upward trajectory in the gross value of property, plant, and equipment is observed from 2015 to 2020. The most significant expansion occurred within production facilities, which grew from 12.82 billion US dollars to 17.29 billion US dollars, establishing this category as the primary driver of the company's asset base growth.
- Gross Asset Composition and Trends
- Production facilities maintain the largest share of the asset portfolio, showing steady year-over-year increases. Distribution and other machinery and equipment also exhibited a gradual climb, rising from 3.96 billion US dollars in 2015 to 4.81 billion US dollars in 2020. Land holdings showed a moderate but consistent increase, growing by approximately 31% over the analyzed period.
- Capital Expenditure and Construction Cycles
- Construction in progress demonstrated significant volatility, indicating cyclical investment patterns. The value decreased from 2.27 billion US dollars in 2015 to a period low of 748.5 million US dollars in 2018, before increasing sharply to 1.78 billion US dollars by 2020. This suggests a sequence of project completions followed by the initiation of new large-scale capital investments.
- Depreciation and Net Book Value Analysis
- Accumulated depreciation rose from 10.72 billion US dollars in 2015 to 13.21 billion US dollars in 2020, reflecting the ongoing aging of the asset base and the integration of new capital expenditures. The net book value of plant and equipment experienced an initial decline, dropping from 9.64 billion US dollars in 2015 to 8.44 billion US dollars in 2017, before entering a growth phase that culminated in a value of 11.96 billion US dollars by September 30, 2020.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Asset Age Ratios (Summary)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
The analysis of asset age ratios reveals a period of relative stability characterized by a moderate cycle of asset aging followed by renewal. The overall trend indicates a strategic balance between the natural depreciation of existing property, plant, and equipment and the integration of new capital investments.
- Average Age Ratio
- An upward trend is observed between 2015 and 2017, with the ratio increasing from 53.25% to a peak of 57.50%. This movement suggests a period where the asset base aged relative to its useful life. Subsequently, a downward trend occurred from 2018 through 2020, with the ratio declining to 53.10%, signaling a rejuvenation of the asset portfolio through new acquisitions or upgrades.
- Estimated Total Useful Life and Asset Age
- The estimated total useful life remained stable, fluctuating minimally between 21 and 23 years. During the same period, the estimated age—representing time elapsed since purchase—peaked at 13 years in 2016 and 2017 before trending downward to 11 years by 2020. This reduction in elapsed age aligns with the decline in the average age ratio, confirming a shift toward a younger asset profile in the latter years of the analysis.
- Estimated Remaining Life
- The estimated remaining life exhibited absolute consistency, remaining at 10 years for every year from 2015 to 2020. This lack of variance suggests a disciplined asset replacement cycle and a consistent application of depreciation assumptions across the property, plant, and equipment portfolio.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Age
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
2020 Calculations
1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Plant and equipment, at cost – Land)
= 100 × 13,211,500 ÷ (25,176,200 – 296,800) = 53.10%
The analysis of property, plant, and equipment indicates a strategic shift in asset management between 2015 and 2020. While the asset base experienced a period of aging in the first three years of the period, a subsequent acceleration in capital expenditure led to a rejuvenation of the overall asset profile by 2020.
- Average Age Ratio Trends
- The average age ratio exhibited an upward trend from 2015 to 2017, rising from 53.25% to a peak of 57.50%. This increase suggests that during this interval, the rate of depreciation exceeded the acquisition of new fixed assets. However, a consistent reversal occurred from 2018 through 2020, with the ratio declining to 53.10%. This downward trajectory indicates a successful modernization of the asset base, as new capital investments effectively lowered the average age of the company's operational equipment.
- Capital Investment and Asset Cost
- A significant expansion in plant and equipment cost is observed after 2017. The gross cost of assets decreased slightly to 19.55 billion US dollars in 2017 but climbed sharply to 25.18 billion US dollars by September 30, 2020. This growth in the cost base outpaced the increase in accumulated depreciation, which rose from 11.11 billion US dollars in 2017 to 13.21 billion US dollars in 2020, thereby driving the reduction in the average age ratio.
- Land Asset Progression
- Land holdings demonstrate a steady and incremental increase throughout the analyzed period. Value rose from 226.2 million US dollars in 2015 to 296.8 million US dollars in 2020. This consistent growth suggests a gradual expansion of the physical footprint to support the broader increase in plant and equipment capacity.
Overall, the financial indicators reflect a transition from a phase of asset utilization and depreciation to a phase of aggressive capital reinvestment. The synchronization of rising asset costs and a falling average age ratio confirms that the company significantly expanded and updated its production capacity toward the end of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Total Useful Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
2020 Calculations
1 Estimated total useful life = (Plant and equipment, at cost – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (25,176,200 – 296,800) ÷ 1,150,500 = 22
The financial data indicates a period of strategic asset expansion and stability in depreciation methodology between 2015 and 2020. Following a slight contraction in total plant and equipment cost through 2017, a sustained increase in capital investment was observed, culminating in a peak of approximately $25.18 billion by September 30, 2020.
- Asset Base Expansion
- Total plant and equipment costs experienced a notable rise from $19.55 billion in 2017 to $25.18 billion in 2020. This growth is mirrored in the land holdings, which increased steadily from $226.2 million in 2015 to $296.8 million in 2020, suggesting a consistent investment in physical infrastructure and site acquisition.
- Depreciation Dynamics
- Depreciation expenses exhibit a strong positive correlation with the total cost of plant and equipment. After reaching a low of $843.2 million in 2017, expenses rose to $1.15 billion by 2020. The steady increase in these charges is primarily attributable to the expanding asset base rather than volatility in depreciation rates.
- Stability of Useful Life Estimates
- The estimated total useful life of assets remained relatively constant, fluctuating within a narrow range of 21 to 23 years. The slight variation—peaking at 23 years in 2017 and 2018 before adjusting to 22 years in 2020—indicates a stable accounting approach to asset longevity, ensuring that the increase in depreciation expense is driven by asset volume rather than aggressive changes in estimated life spans.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
2020 Calculations
1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 13,211,500 ÷ 1,150,500 = 11
The financial data indicates a period of asset modernization and increased capital investment between 2015 and 2020. While accumulated depreciation generally trended upward, a notable shift occurred after 2017, characterized by rising depreciation expenses coupled with a decrease in the average age of the assets.
- Accumulated Depreciation Trends
- Accumulated depreciation rose from 10,717.7 million USD in 2015 to 13,211.5 million USD by 2020. A temporary contraction is observed in 2017, where the balance decreased to 11,107.6 million USD, suggesting the disposal or retirement of older assets during that fiscal year.
- Depreciation Expense Analysis
- Annual depreciation expense exhibited a U-shaped trajectory. Following a decline from 900.4 million USD in 2015 to a low of 843.2 million USD in 2017, the expense grew steadily, reaching 1,150.5 million USD by 2020. This steady increase from 2018 onward suggests an expansion of the depreciable asset base.
- Asset Age and Capital Replacement
- The estimated time elapsed since purchase peaked at 13 years in 2016 and 2017, before trending downward to 11 years by 2020. This reduction in the average age of property, plant, and equipment, occurring simultaneously with rising depreciation expenses, indicates significant capital expenditures in new assets during the latter half of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Estimated Remaining Life
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
2020 Calculations
1 Estimated remaining life = (Plant and equipment, net – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (11,964,700 – 296,800) ÷ 1,150,500 = 10
The analysis of the property, plant, and equipment accounts reveals a distinct transition from a period of asset contraction to a phase of sustained capital expansion between 2015 and 2020.
- Net Asset Value Trends
- Net plant and equipment experienced a decline from September 30, 2015, to September 30, 2017, dropping from 9.64 billion US dollars to 8.44 billion US dollars. Following this period, a significant upward trend was observed, with the value increasing to 11.96 billion US dollars by September 30, 2020, indicating a substantial reinvestment in capital assets during the latter half of the period.
- Depreciation Expense Correlation
- Depreciation expenses mirrored the trajectory of the net asset base. Costs decreased from 900.4 million US dollars in 2015 to a low of 843.2 million US dollars in 2017, before rising steadily to 1.15 billion US dollars by 2020. The alignment between the growth in net plant and equipment and the increase in depreciation expenses suggests that the newer asset acquisitions are contributing to higher periodic non-cash charges.
- Land Investment Patterns
- Land holdings exhibited a consistent growth pattern, increasing from 226.2 million US dollars in 2015 to 296.8 million US dollars in 2020. This steady increase suggests a strategic expansion of the physical footprint to support the overall growth in operational capacity.
- Consistency of Estimated Remaining Life
- The estimated remaining life of the assets remained stagnant at 10 years throughout the six-year period. This stability indicates a consistent accounting policy and a uniform expectation regarding the economic utility of the company's capital assets, regardless of the fluctuations in the total volume of investments.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?