Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.
Paying user area
Try for free
Air Products & Chemicals Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Cash Flow Statement
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Current Ratio since 2005
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Air Products & Chemicals Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
Invested capital2 | |||||||
Performance Ratio | |||||||
ROIC3 | |||||||
Benchmarks | |||||||
ROIC, Competitors4 | |||||||
Linde plc | |||||||
Sherwin-Williams Co. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2020 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data reveals notable trends and fluctuations in key metrics over the six-year span analyzed.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
NOPAT exhibited variability during the period under review. Beginning with approximately 1.42 billion USD in 2015, it peaked near 1.66 billion USD in 2016 before declining sharply to around 1.27 billion USD in 2017. The figure then gradually increased over the next two years, reaching about 2.04 billion USD in 2019 and slightly rising further to nearly 2.19 billion USD in 2020. Overall, there is an upward trend with some intermediate volatility.
- Invested Capital
-
The invested capital steadily rose throughout the period. Starting at approximately 14.34 billion USD in 2015, it increased consistently each year, reaching over 20.88 billion USD by 2020. This represents a substantial expansion of invested resources, indicating ongoing capital deployment and potential growth or asset accumulation strategies.
- Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
-
ROIC demonstrated fluctuation in efficiency levels over time. Beginning at 9.89% in 2015, it increased to a peak of 10.91% in 2016, before dropping notably to 8.14% in 2017. Thereafter, it experienced a moderate recovery to 8.84% in 2018, followed by a strong rise to 12.06% in 2019, the highest value in the period. In 2020, ROIC slightly declined to 10.48%. These dynamics suggest periods of varying profitability relative to invested capital, with a general improvement trend towards the later years.
In summary, while the company expanded its invested capital base substantially, NOPAT showed a volatile path with a general upward trend culminating in higher profitability. The ROIC trends reflect this pattern, indicating fluctuations in capital efficiency but improving overall performance, particularly noticeable in the years 2019 and 2020. This suggests enhanced returns on capital despite increased investment levels.
Decomposition of ROIC
ROIC | = | OPM1 | × | TO2 | × | 1 – CTR3 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep 30, 2020 | = | × | × | ||||
Sep 30, 2019 | = | × | × | ||||
Sep 30, 2018 | = | × | × | ||||
Sep 30, 2017 | = | × | × | ||||
Sep 30, 2016 | = | × | × | ||||
Sep 30, 2015 | = | × | × |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »
2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »
3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »
The analysis of the financial ratios over the six-year period reveals several noteworthy trends.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- The operating profit margin showed an overall upward trend, increasing from 18.9% in 2015 to 28.54% in 2020. There were fluctuations during the period, with a decline in 2017 to 19.84%, followed by steady growth reaching a peak of 28.54% in 2020. This indicates improved operational efficiency and profitability over time.
- Turnover of Capital (TO)
- The turnover of capital exhibited a consistent decline, starting at 0.69 in 2015 and decreasing to 0.42 by 2020. This trend suggests a reduced efficiency in generating sales from the invested capital, possibly reflecting changes in asset utilization or an increase in the capital base that has not been matched by proportional revenue growth.
- 1 – Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
- The effective cash tax rate component (expressed here as 1 – CTR) fluctuated but generally increased, moving from 75.85% in 2015 to 86.62% in 2020. The spike in 2019 and 2020 indicates a higher proportion of effective cash tax savings or tax benefits during these years, which may positively impact net profitability.
- Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
- The return on invested capital displayed variability throughout the period, starting at 9.89% in 2015, peaking at 10.91% in 2016, dropping notably to 8.14% in 2017, and then recovering to 12.06% in 2019 before declining again to 10.48% in 2020. This volatility suggests fluctuating returns relative to the capital employed, with 2019 showing the strongest performance.
In summary, while profitability margins increased significantly, capital efficiency as measured by the turnover ratio declined, and returns on invested capital experienced fluctuations with year-to-year variability. The increase in the effective cash tax rate component in recent years may have contributed to net financial performance improvements.
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
Add: Cash operating taxes2 | |||||||
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | |||||||
Sales | |||||||
Profitability Ratio | |||||||
OPM3 | |||||||
Benchmarks | |||||||
OPM, Competitors4 | |||||||
Linde plc | |||||||
Sherwin-Williams Co. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2020 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Sales
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of financial performance over the six-year period indicates several notable trends in profitability and sales.
- Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
- The NOPBT exhibited fluctuations throughout the period. Beginning at approximately 1.87 billion USD in 2015, it rose significantly to about 2.23 billion USD in 2016. However, in 2017, there was a considerable decline to around 1.62 billion USD. Subsequently, a recovery occurred in 2018, with NOPBT increasing to over 2.09 billion USD. The upward trend continued through 2019 and 2020, with NOPBT reaching approximately 2.50 billion USD and 2.53 billion USD, respectively.
- Sales
- Sales figures reveal a general downward trend over the period. Starting at nearly 9.89 billion USD in 2015, sales slightly decreased to about 9.52 billion USD in 2016. This decline continued more sharply into 2017, where sales dropped to roughly 8.19 billion USD. From 2017 onwards, sales remained relatively stable but did not recover significantly, settling around 8.85 to 8.92 billion USD through 2018 to 2020.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- The operating profit margin demonstrates a trend of overall improvement and increasing efficiency. In 2015, the margin stood at 18.9%, improved markedly to 23.46% in 2016, and slightly decreased to 19.84% in 2017. Following this, the margin recovered strongly reaching 23.45% in 2018 and continuing to increase to 28.01% in 2019 and further to 28.54% in 2020.
In summary, while sales have experienced a decline and stabilization at lower levels, the company's operating profitability showed a strong resurgence from 2017 onward. The progressive increase in operating profit margin despite reduced sales suggests improved cost control, operational efficiencies, or changes in product mix contributing positively to profit generation. The rising NOPBT in the later years aligns with this margin improvement, indicating enhanced financial performance and operational effectiveness.
Turnover of Capital (TO)
Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
Sales | |||||||
Invested capital1 | |||||||
Efficiency Ratio | |||||||
TO2 | |||||||
Benchmarks | |||||||
TO, Competitors3 | |||||||
Linde plc | |||||||
Sherwin-Williams Co. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1 Invested capital. See details »
2 2020 Calculation
TO = Sales ÷ Invested capital
= ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of the provided financial data reveals several notable trends in the company's performance over the six-year period ending September 30, 2020.
- Sales Trend
- Sales figures demonstrate a predominantly declining trend. Beginning at approximately 9.89 billion US dollars in 2015, sales decreased to about 8.18 billion in 2017. There was a slight recovery in 2018 and 2019, with sales stabilizing around 8.9 billion, followed by a small decrease in 2020 to roughly 8.86 billion. Overall, sales declined by approximately 10.5% over the six-year period.
- Invested Capital Trend
- The invested capital shows a consistent upward trajectory, increasing from around 14.34 billion US dollars in 2015 to approximately 20.88 billion in 2020. This represents an increase of about 45.7% over the analyzed period, indicating ongoing capital investments. The most significant annual increase occurred between 2019 and 2020.
- Turnover of Capital (TO) Trend
- The turnover of capital ratio, which measures the efficiency of capital utilization, declined steadily from 0.69 in 2015 to 0.42 in 2020. This suggests that despite higher invested capital, the company generated proportionally less sales per unit of capital invested over time, pointing to decreasing operational efficiency or asset productivity.
- Overall Insights
- The data indicates a scenario in which the company continues to invest significantly in capital assets while experiencing decreased sales and diminishing capital turnover. This could reflect challenges in leveraging investments into revenue growth or possible changes in market conditions affecting sales volumes. The steady decline in turnover ratio highlights potential efficiency concerns that might require strategic attention to improve asset utilization.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
Add: Cash operating taxes2 | |||||||
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | |||||||
Tax Rate | |||||||
CTR3 | |||||||
Benchmarks | |||||||
CTR, Competitors4 | |||||||
Linde plc | |||||||
Sherwin-Williams Co. |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2020 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of the financial data over six years reveals notable trends in key operating tax and profitability metrics.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- The cash operating taxes exhibit fluctuations with a peak in 2018 at approximately 617.8 million US dollars, increasing sharply from the previous year. The value then decreases substantially over the next two years, falling to about 338.1 million US dollars by 2020. This suggests variability in tax payments, potentially influenced by changes in taxable income, tax regulations, or timing effects.
- Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
- The net operating profit before taxes shows less volatility compared to cash operating taxes. It rises from about 1.87 billion US dollars in 2015 to a peak near 2.53 billion US dollars by 2020, though this growth is inconsistent. There is a decrease in 2017 to approximately 1.62 billion US dollars, followed by a recovery and growth through 2019 and 2020. Overall, the trend indicates growth in operational profitability despite some interim dips.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
- The effective cash tax rate presents a declining trend over the period. Starting at 24.15% in 2015, it fluctuates somewhat in the initial years but declines notably from 2018 onward, reaching a low of 13.38% in 2020. This decreasing tax rate may be reflective of changes in tax policies, utilization of tax credits, or strategic tax planning resulting in reduced effective tax burden.
Overall, the data indicates that while the company has experienced growth in operating profit before taxes, the corresponding cash taxes paid have not increased proportionally, resulting in a declining effective cash tax rate. The reduction in tax rate coupled with growth in profitability could suggest improved tax efficiency or favorable tax environments during the latter years analyzed.