EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Air Products & Chemicals Inc. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Air Products & Chemicals Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | |||||||
| Cost of capital2 | |||||||
| Invested capital3 | |||||||
| Economic profit4 | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2020 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The analysis of the financial data reveals several notable trends and insights regarding the company's profitability, capital cost, invested capital, and economic profit over the period from September 2015 to September 2020.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT experienced fluctuations over the six-year period. It initially increased from approximately $1.42 billion in 2015 to a peak of about $1.66 billion in 2016, then decreased significantly in 2017 to $1.27 billion. Following this dip, NOPAT increased again steadily, reaching approximately $2.19 billion by 2020, indicating an overall positive growth trend despite some volatility.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital showed a gradual upward trend from 11.46% in 2015, peaking at 12.9% in 2019 before declining slightly to 12.11% in 2020. This suggests that the company faced increasing capital costs over the years, which slightly eased toward the end of the period.
- Invested Capital
- There was a consistent increase in invested capital over the reviewed period, rising from approximately $14.34 billion in 2015 to $20.88 billion in 2020. The steady growth in capital investment indicates ongoing expansion or reinvestment activities within the company.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative throughout the entire period, reflecting a failure to cover the cost of capital with operating profits. The deficit narrowed from -$225.8 million in 2015 to a much smaller gap of about -$97 million in 2016. However, it worsened significantly in 2017 and 2018, with losses exceeding $600 million each year. After these troughs, economic profit improved but remained negative, standing at approximately -$340.6 million in 2020. This ongoing negative economic profit suggests that, despite increases in operating profit and invested capital, the company struggled to generate returns above its capital costs during these years.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrual for cost reduction actions.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Air Products.
6 2020 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2020 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Air Products.
9 Elimination of discontinued operations.
- Net Income Attributable to Air Products
-
The net income exhibited notable volatility over the analyzed periods. There was a significant decline from 1,277,900 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 631,100 thousand US dollars in 2016, marking a substantial reduction. This was followed by a remarkable recovery in 2017, where net income more than quadrupled to 3,000,400 thousand US dollars. Subsequently, net income decreased considerably to 1,497,800 thousand US dollars in 2018 before gradually increasing again in 2019 and 2020 to 1,760,000 and 1,886,700 thousand US dollars respectively. Overall, the data reflect episodic fluctuations with a general upward trend in the last two years.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
The NOPAT showed a more consistent pattern compared to net income. It increased from 1,418,609 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 1,657,195 thousand US dollars in 2016, demonstrating growth. However, in 2017, NOPAT decreased to 1,274,219 thousand US dollars, representing a decline after the previous growth. From 2017 onwards, NOPAT exhibited an upward trajectory, reaching 1,476,037 thousand US dollars in 2018, and significantly increasing to 2,040,608 thousand US dollars in 2019, followed by further improvement to 2,189,491 thousand US dollars in 2020. This reflects an overall positive trend in operating profitability in the later years.
- Comparative Analysis
-
While net income showed substantial volatility with marked peaks and troughs, NOPAT reflected a steadier and more consistent increase over time. The sharp fluctuations in net income could indicate the impact of non-operational factors such as extraordinary items, taxes, or accounting adjustments. In contrast, the rising NOPAT suggests improving operational efficiency and profitability from core business activities, particularly evident in the substantial growth from 2018 through 2020.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
- Income Tax Provision
- The income tax provision showed a fluctuating trend over the analyzed periods. Starting at 415,900 thousand US dollars in 2015, it increased significantly to 586,500 thousand in 2016. In 2017, there was a notable decline to 260,900 thousand, followed by a recovery to 524,300 thousand in 2018. The provision then slightly decreased to 480,100 thousand in 2019 and remained almost stable at 478,400 thousand in 2020. This pattern indicates variability in income tax obligation, with a peak in 2016, a trough in 2017, and relative stabilization in the latest years.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes demonstrated a generally decreasing trend after 2016. Initially, there was an increase from 451,612 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 577,067 thousand in 2016. However, subsequent years saw a decline to 350,387 thousand in 2017, followed by a transient increase to 617,809 thousand in 2018, the highest in the analyzed range. The values then dropped substantially to 457,325 thousand in 2019 and further to 338,146 thousand in 2020. This suggests a reduction in the cash outflow related to operating taxes in recent years, despite some volatility earlier in the period.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »
5 Addition of accrual for cost reduction actions.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Air Products shareholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of construction in progress.
9 Subtraction of short-term investments.
The analyzed financial data reveals several notable trends in the company's capital structure over the six-year period ending September 30, 2020.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total debt and leases experienced variability during the period. From 2015 to 2016, debt slightly increased, reaching around 6.42 billion USD. However, a significant reduction followed in the subsequent years, with debt levels decreasing markedly to approximately 3.59 billion USD by 2019. In 2020, there was a sharp increase to over 8.31 billion USD, representing the highest debt level in the period under review. This pattern suggests potentially strategic borrowing or financing activities, with a conservative approach in the middle years and a notable spike in the latest year.
- Total Air Products shareholders’ equity
- Shareholders’ equity showed a generally increasing trend throughout the period. Starting at about 7.25 billion USD in 2015, it experienced a slight decline in 2016 but then consistently grew each year, reaching approximately 12.08 billion USD by 2020. This steady growth in equity indicates strengthening capitalization and possibly accumulated earnings or capital injections supporting the company's financial position.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital, reflecting the total funds used for operational assets, showed a continuous upward trend from around 14.34 billion USD in 2015 to over 20.88 billion USD in 2020. The increase was gradual from 2015 through 2019, with a more pronounced escalation in 2020. The upward movement suggests ongoing investment in company assets, which may align with growth initiatives or strategic expansion.
Overall, the data indicates the company maintained a robust equity base while managing its debt levels with some fluctuation, culminating in a significant rise in debt in 2020. Concurrently, continued investment in capital assets is evident, possibly reflecting growth or modernization efforts. The combination of higher equity and invested capital alongside increased debt in the latest year could imply a leveraged approach to fund expansion or other financial strategies.
Cost of Capital
Air Products & Chemicals Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 24.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 24.50%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Invested capital2 | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Linde plc | |||||||
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2020 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit has exhibited significant volatility and overall negative values across the analyzed periods. Starting at -225,828 thousand US$ in 2015, it improved notably to -96,947 thousand US$ in 2016, indicating a reduction in economic loss. However, this trend reversed sharply in 2017 and 2018 with substantial declines to -663,633 and -605,925 thousand US$ respectively, representing heightened economic losses. In 2019, there was a marked recovery with the economic loss reducing to -143,082 thousand US$, but the figure deteriorated again in 2020 to -340,581 thousand US$.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital showed a steady increasing trend throughout the entire period, reflecting continuous capital investment or asset growth. It rose from approximately 14.3 billion US$ in 2015 to 20.9 billion US$ in 2020. This consistent upward trajectory suggests ongoing expansion or reinvestment into business operations.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio remained negative over all periods, indicating that returns on invested capital were consistently below the cost of capital. The values show deterioration from -1.57% in 2015 to a low point of -4.24% in 2017, followed by slight improvement but still negative values in subsequent years. The ratio improved somewhat in 2019 to -0.85% but declined again in 2020 to -1.63%, reflecting ongoing challenges in generating positive economic returns.
- Overall Analysis
- The financial performance reflected by economic profit and economic spread ratio reveals the company struggled to generate value above its cost of capital during the period. Despite increased capital deployment, the negative economic spreads and fluctuating economic profit imply inefficiencies or returns below expectations. The periods of deeper economic losses in 2017 and 2018 are notable and suggest significant operational or market challenges at that time. While some recovery attempts are visible in 2019, the overall trend remains negative through 2020, signaling the need for strategic reassessment to enhance capital efficiency and profitability.
Economic Profit Margin
| Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Economic profit1 | |||||||
| Sales | |||||||
| Performance Ratio | |||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | |||||||
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | |||||||
| Linde plc | |||||||
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | |||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2020 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial data reveals notable fluctuations in the company's economic profit and its overall sales performance over the six-year period ending in 2020. A detailed review of trends in the key metrics offers insight into the company's operational efficiency and profitability dynamics.
- Sales Trends
- Sales figures depict a declining trajectory from 2015 through 2017, falling from approximately 9.89 billion US dollars to 8.19 billion US dollars. This downward movement reversed somewhat in 2018 and 2019 where sales increased to around 8.93 and 8.92 billion US dollars, respectively, before experiencing a slight decrease again in 2020 to approximately 8.86 billion US dollars. Overall, the sales data indicates some volatility, with a general pattern of decline followed by modest recovery and subsequent stabilization.
- Economic Profit Analysis
- The company consistently reported negative economic profits throughout the period analyzed, indicating that its net operating profit after taxes was insufficient to cover the cost of capital. The lowest economic profit was observed in 2017 with a substantial loss of about 664 million US dollars. Although there was some improvement in 2018 and 2019, the economic profit again deteriorated considerably in 2020 to a loss of approximately 341 million US dollars. This trend underscores challenges in generating returns above the company's cost of capital during these years.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin followed a similar pattern to the absolute economic profit figures, reflecting the ratio of economic profit to sales revenue. Negative margins were evident in all years, reaching a nadir of -8.11% in 2017. Subsequently, margins improved in 2018 and 2019, with a reduction in losses to -6.79% and -1.6%, respectively, before widening again to -3.85% in 2020. The margin volatility parallels fluctuations in both sales and economic profit, indicating sensitivity to operational and market conditions.
In summary, the company faced persistent challenges in creating economic value over the reported period, as evidenced by sustained negative economic profits and margins. While sales exhibited some recovery after an initial decline, profitability metrics did not demonstrate a consistent improvement, signaling areas for strategic focus to enhance capital efficiency and overall financial health.