Stock Analysis on Net

Air Products & Chemicals Inc. (NYSE:APD)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 9, 2021.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Air Products & Chemicals Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2020 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


Analysis of the financial period from 2015 to 2020 reveals a consistent inability to generate positive economic profit. Throughout the six-year duration, the cost of capital associated with the invested base systematically exceeded the net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT), resulting in continuous value destruction from an economic value added perspective.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A general upward trend is observed in operating profitability, with NOPAT increasing from US$ 1,418,609 thousand in 2015 to US$ 2,189,491 thousand in 2020. Despite a notable contraction in 2017, where profit fell to US$ 1,274,219 thousand, the subsequent years showed strong recovery and acceleration, particularly between 2018 and 2020.
Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
The capital base expanded steadily from US$ 14,344,261 thousand in 2015 to US$ 20,884,500 thousand in 2020. A significant surge in invested capital occurred in the final year of the analysis. Concurrently, the cost of capital remained relatively high, fluctuating between a low of 13.25% in 2015 and a peak of 14.93% in 2019, before adjusting to 14.01% in 2020.
Economic Profit Dynamics
Economic profit remained negative for the entire period, indicating that the returns on invested capital were insufficient to cover the weighted average cost of capital. The most significant economic losses occurred in 2017 and 2018, with deficits of US$ 967,188 thousand and US$ 930,501 thousand, respectively. Although 2019 showed a narrowing of the deficit to US$ 486,193 thousand, the substantial increase in invested capital in 2020 offset the gains in NOPAT, causing the economic profit to decline again to -US$ 736,546 thousand.

The divergence between the growth in NOPAT and the growth in invested capital suggests that the scale of investment has outpaced the company's ability to generate proportional operating returns. The persistent negative economic profit underscores a systemic gap between the actual return on capital and the required return demanded by the cost of capital.



Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Air Products & Chemicals Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015
Net income attributable to Air Products
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts2
Increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve3
Increase (decrease) in accrual for cost reduction actions4
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents5
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability6
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense7
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes8
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax9
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »

4 Addition of increase (decrease) in accrual for cost reduction actions.

5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to Air Products.

6 2020 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

7 2020 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to Air Products.

9 Elimination of discontinued operations.


Net Income Attributable to Air Products

The net income exhibited notable volatility over the analyzed periods. There was a significant decline from 1,277,900 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 631,100 thousand US dollars in 2016, marking a substantial reduction. This was followed by a remarkable recovery in 2017, where net income more than quadrupled to 3,000,400 thousand US dollars. Subsequently, net income decreased considerably to 1,497,800 thousand US dollars in 2018 before gradually increasing again in 2019 and 2020 to 1,760,000 and 1,886,700 thousand US dollars respectively. Overall, the data reflect episodic fluctuations with a general upward trend in the last two years.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)

The NOPAT showed a more consistent pattern compared to net income. It increased from 1,418,609 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 1,657,195 thousand US dollars in 2016, demonstrating growth. However, in 2017, NOPAT decreased to 1,274,219 thousand US dollars, representing a decline after the previous growth. From 2017 onwards, NOPAT exhibited an upward trajectory, reaching 1,476,037 thousand US dollars in 2018, and significantly increasing to 2,040,608 thousand US dollars in 2019, followed by further improvement to 2,189,491 thousand US dollars in 2020. This reflects an overall positive trend in operating profitability in the later years.

Comparative Analysis

While net income showed substantial volatility with marked peaks and troughs, NOPAT reflected a steadier and more consistent increase over time. The sharp fluctuations in net income could indicate the impact of non-operational factors such as extraordinary items, taxes, or accounting adjustments. In contrast, the rising NOPAT suggests improving operational efficiency and profitability from core business activities, particularly evident in the substantial growth from 2018 through 2020.



Cash Operating Taxes

Air Products & Chemicals Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015
Income tax provision
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).


Income Tax Provision
The income tax provision showed a fluctuating trend over the analyzed periods. Starting at 415,900 thousand US dollars in 2015, it increased significantly to 586,500 thousand in 2016. In 2017, there was a notable decline to 260,900 thousand, followed by a recovery to 524,300 thousand in 2018. The provision then slightly decreased to 480,100 thousand in 2019 and remained almost stable at 478,400 thousand in 2020. This pattern indicates variability in income tax obligation, with a peak in 2016, a trough in 2017, and relative stabilization in the latest years.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes demonstrated a generally decreasing trend after 2016. Initially, there was an increase from 451,612 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 577,067 thousand in 2016. However, subsequent years saw a decline to 350,387 thousand in 2017, followed by a transient increase to 617,809 thousand in 2018, the highest in the analyzed range. The values then dropped substantially to 457,325 thousand in 2019 and further to 338,146 thousand in 2020. This suggests a reduction in the cash outflow related to operating taxes in recent years, despite some volatility earlier in the period.


Invested Capital

Air Products & Chemicals Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015
Short-term borrowings
Current portion of long-term debt
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Long-term debt, related party
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Total Air Products shareholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for doubtful accounts3
LIFO reserve4
Accrual for cost reduction actions5
Equity equivalents6
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax7
Noncontrolling interests
Adjusted total Air Products shareholders’ equity
Construction in progress8
Short-term investments9
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »

5 Addition of accrual for cost reduction actions.

6 Addition of equity equivalents to total Air Products shareholders’ equity.

7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

8 Subtraction of construction in progress.

9 Subtraction of short-term investments.


The analyzed financial data reveals several notable trends in the company's capital structure over the six-year period ending September 30, 2020.

Total reported debt & leases
The total debt and leases experienced variability during the period. From 2015 to 2016, debt slightly increased, reaching around 6.42 billion USD. However, a significant reduction followed in the subsequent years, with debt levels decreasing markedly to approximately 3.59 billion USD by 2019. In 2020, there was a sharp increase to over 8.31 billion USD, representing the highest debt level in the period under review. This pattern suggests potentially strategic borrowing or financing activities, with a conservative approach in the middle years and a notable spike in the latest year.
Total Air Products shareholders’ equity
Shareholders’ equity showed a generally increasing trend throughout the period. Starting at about 7.25 billion USD in 2015, it experienced a slight decline in 2016 but then consistently grew each year, reaching approximately 12.08 billion USD by 2020. This steady growth in equity indicates strengthening capitalization and possibly accumulated earnings or capital injections supporting the company's financial position.
Invested capital
Invested capital, reflecting the total funds used for operational assets, showed a continuous upward trend from around 14.34 billion USD in 2015 to over 20.88 billion USD in 2020. The increase was gradual from 2015 through 2019, with a more pronounced escalation in 2020. The upward movement suggests ongoing investment in company assets, which may align with growth initiatives or strategic expansion.

Overall, the data indicates the company maintained a robust equity base while managing its debt levels with some fluctuation, culminating in a significant rise in debt in 2020. Concurrently, continued investment in capital assets is evident, possibly reflecting growth or modernization efforts. The combination of higher equity and invested capital alongside increased debt in the latest year could imply a leveraged approach to fund expansion or other financial strategies.



Cost of Capital

Air Products & Chemicals Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 24.50%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 24.50%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »



Economic Spread Ratio

Air Products & Chemicals Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Linde plc
Sherwin-Williams Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2020 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from 2015 to 2020 is characterized by a consistent failure to generate positive economic value, as evidenced by negative economic profit and a negative economic spread ratio throughout the entire period. This indicates that the returns on invested capital remained below the company's cost of capital, resulting in continuous economic value destruction.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained negative for all six years analyzed. The most significant deterioration occurred in 2017, where losses widened to -967.19 million USD. A period of recovery was observed between 2018 and 2019, with the deficit narrowing to -486.19 million USD by September 30, 2019. However, this recovery was reversed in 2020, with economic profit declining again to -736.55 million USD.
Invested Capital Expansion
A consistent upward trajectory in invested capital is observed, growing from 14.34 billion USD in 2015 to 20.88 billion USD in 2020. This represents a substantial increase in the capital base over the six-year window, with the most pronounced growth occurring between 2019 and 2020, where invested capital rose by approximately 3.96 billion USD.
Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
The economic spread ratio remained in negative territory, reflecting the inefficiency of the capital employed relative to its cost. The ratio reached its lowest point in 2017 at -6.18%, coinciding with the peak in economic losses. While the ratio improved to -2.87% in 2019, the combination of increased invested capital and declining economic profit in 2020 led to a further degradation of the spread ratio to -3.53%.

Overall, the data reveals a trend where the expansion of the invested capital base has not been accompanied by a corresponding increase in economic profitability. The volatility in the economic spread ratio suggests periodic fluctuations in operational efficiency or cost of capital, yet the company was unable to achieve a positive spread within the observed timeframe.



Economic Profit Margin

Air Products & Chemicals Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2019 Sep 30, 2018 Sep 30, 2017 Sep 30, 2016 Sep 30, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Sales
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Linde plc
Sherwin-Williams Co.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2020 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Sales
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the financial performance from 2015 to 2020 reveals a consistent inability to generate positive economic profit, indicating that the returns on invested capital remained below the company's cost of capital throughout the entire six-year period.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained negative for all reported years, exhibiting significant volatility. After a slight improvement in 2016, where losses narrowed to -367.9 million US$, a sharp decline occurred in 2017, reaching a peak deficit of -967.2 million US$. While a recovery was observed in 2019 with losses reducing to -486.2 million US$, the trend reversed in 2020, with economic profit falling again to -736.5 million US$.
Sales Performance
Revenue demonstrated a fluctuating trajectory, starting at 9.89 billion US$ in 2015 and reaching a low of 8.19 billion US$ in 2017. Following this contraction, sales stabilized between 8.86 billion and 8.93 billion US$ from 2018 through 2020. The correlation between the revenue trough in 2017 and the peak economic loss suggests a sensitivity to sales volume in relation to capital costs.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin followed the trajectory of the absolute economic profit, remaining negative across the period. The margin deteriorated from -4.87% in 2015 to its lowest point of -11.81% in 2017. A partial recovery occurred by 2019, where the margin improved to -5.45%, before widening again to -8.32% in 2020. This instability indicates a persistent gap between operational earnings and the required return on the capital employed.