Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
1, 2 See details »
A divergent trend is observed between cash provided by operating activities and Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) over the period from 2015 to 2020. While operating cash flows demonstrated consistent growth, FCFF experienced significant volatility followed by a steady decline, suggesting an increase in capital expenditures or other investments relative to operational gains.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Cash provided by operating activities exhibited a positive upward trajectory, increasing from US$ 2,437,800 thousand in 2015 to US$ 3,264,700 thousand in 2020. This represents a steady improvement in the entity's ability to generate cash from its core business operations, with the most significant growth occurring between 2018 and 2020.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- FCFF displayed a non-linear pattern, peaking in 2016 at US$ 1,763,250 thousand. Following this peak, a general downward trend is observed, with FCFF falling to US$ 822,429 thousand by September 30, 2020. This indicates that the cash available to all capital providers decreased despite the growth in operating cash flow.
- Analysis of Cash Flow Divergence
- The gap between operating cash flow and FCFF widened considerably toward the end of the period. In 2016, FCFF represented approximately 65% of operating cash flow, whereas by 2020, this ratio declined to approximately 25%. This contraction suggests a strategic shift toward higher capital intensity or an acceleration of long-term investment projects that absorbed a larger portion of the operating cash generated.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
2 2020 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized, tax = Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized × EITR
= 67,200 × 19.70% = 13,238
3 2020 Calculation
Capitalized interest, tax = Capitalized interest × EITR
= 15,900 × 19.70% = 3,132
An analysis of the financial data from September 30, 2015, to September 30, 2020, reveals significant fluctuations in interest expenditures and tax rates. While cash interest payments generally trended upward for the majority of the period, a sharp contraction occurred in the final year. Simultaneously, capitalized interest showed a consistent downward trajectory, and the effective tax rate experienced a notable structural shift after 2016.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Trends
- The EITR exhibited volatility, peaking at 27.50% in 2016 before declining sharply to 18.40% in 2017. Following this decrease, the rate remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow band between 17.60% and 19.70% from 2017 through 2020. This suggests a fundamental change in the tax environment or corporate tax strategy starting in 2017.
- Cash Paid for Interest, Net of Tax
- Cash outflows for interest, net of tax, demonstrated a steady growth pattern from 2015 (US$ 74,100 thousand) through 2019, where they reached a peak of US$ 126,123 thousand. This represents a substantial increase in net interest expenses over a five-year period. However, 2020 saw a precipitous decline to US$ 53,962 thousand, the lowest level in the observed period, indicating a significant reduction in net interest cash outflows.
- Capitalized Interest, Net of Tax
- A contrary trend is observed in capitalized interest, which declined consistently from a high of US$ 37,316 thousand in 2015 to a low of US$ 10,922 thousand in 2019. A slight recovery was noted in 2020, with the figure rising to US$ 12,768 thousand. The overall downward trend suggests a reduction in the scale of interest-bearing investments being capitalized over the period.
- Correlation Between Interest Components
- Between 2015 and 2019, there was an inverse relationship between cash interest paid and capitalized interest; as the amount of interest capitalized decreased, the amount paid in cash increased. This shift suggests a transition from capitalizing interest costs to expensing them. The anomaly in 2020, characterized by a collapse in cash interest payments despite a slight increase in capitalized interest, suggests an external liquidity event, a significant debt repayment, or a substantial change in financing costs.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 62,954,505) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 822,429) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 76.55 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Linde plc | 43.69 |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | 29.11 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Sep 30, 2020 | Sep 30, 2019 | Sep 30, 2018 | Sep 30, 2017 | Sep 30, 2016 | Sep 30, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 61,669,949) | 52,915,712) | 35,745,103) | 35,621,405) | 35,233,696) | 35,850,244) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 822,429) | 1,117,245) | 1,103,802) | 1,612,638) | 1,763,250) | 934,416) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 74.99 | 47.36 | 32.38 | 22.09 | 19.98 | 38.37 | |
| Benchmarks | |||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | |||||||
| Linde plc | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-09-30), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-09-30).
3 2020 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 61,669,949 ÷ 822,429 = 74.99
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of the enterprise value to free cash flow to the firm (EV/FCFF) ratio reveals a substantial increase in valuation multiples over the six-year period ending September 30, 2020. While the ratio experienced initial volatility, a clear and aggressive upward trend emerged after 2017, indicating that the enterprise value expanded at a rate far exceeding the growth of operational cash flow generation.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- Enterprise value remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2018, fluctuating within a narrow range around 35 billion US dollars. However, a significant escalation occurred starting in 2019, with the value rising to 52.9 billion US dollars and further increasing to 61.7 billion US dollars by 2020.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Trends
- FCFF peaked in 2016 at 1.76 billion US dollars, followed by a general downward trajectory. By September 30, 2020, FCFF had declined to 822 million US dollars, representing its lowest point within the analyzed timeframe and signaling a contraction in the firm's ability to generate surplus cash.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Analysis
- The EV/FCFF ratio shifted from 38.37 in 2015 to a low of 19.98 in 2016, driven by the spike in cash flow. Subsequently, the ratio entered a period of rapid expansion, rising from 32.38 in 2018 to 74.99 in 2020. This trend was propelled by the simultaneous increase in enterprise value and the decrease in free cash flow, resulting in a significantly higher valuation multiple relative to the firm's cash yield.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
How can I help you?