EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Roper Technologies Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Analysis of Solvency Ratios
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Analysis of Revenues
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Roper Technologies Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period between 2018 and 2022 demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit. While net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) fluctuated, it was consistently insufficient to cover the cost of capital employed. Invested capital increased over the five-year period, contributing to the widening gap between capital costs and returns.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT increased significantly from 2018 to 2019, rising from US$1,152,486 thousand to US$1,986,174 thousand. However, this was followed by a substantial decrease in 2020 to US$1,253,044 thousand. A modest recovery occurred in 2021, reaching US$1,343,194 thousand, but NOPAT declined again in 2022 to US$1,275,289 thousand. This volatility suggests inconsistent operational performance or external factors impacting profitability.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable between 2018 and 2022, fluctuating between 14.78% and 16.17%. An initial decrease from 16.02% in 2018 to 14.78% in 2020 was observed, followed by increases in 2021 and 2022, reaching 16.17%. These changes, while not drastic, contribute to the overall economic profit calculation.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital exhibited a consistent upward trend throughout the period. It increased from US$14,785,177 thousand in 2018 to US$26,216,800 thousand in 2022. This growth in capital employed, coupled with insufficient NOPAT, directly contributed to the increasing negative economic profit.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative in each year analyzed. The deficit widened progressively from -US$1,216,119 thousand in 2018 to -US$2,963,645 thousand in 2022. This indicates that the company’s returns are not covering its cost of capital, resulting in value destruction. The increasing magnitude of the negative economic profit suggests a growing disparity between capital costs and operational performance.
In summary, the analysis reveals a concerning trend of declining economic profit despite increases in invested capital. While NOPAT experienced some fluctuation, it consistently failed to generate returns sufficient to cover the cost of capital. The continued negative economic profit signals a need for strategic review to improve profitability and capital allocation efficiency.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts and sales allowances.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings.
5 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense, net = Adjusted interest expense, net × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings.
8 Elimination of discontinued operations.
- Net Earnings
- Net earnings exhibited considerable fluctuation over the analyzed period. Beginning at approximately $944 million in 2018, earnings nearly doubled to about $1.77 billion in 2019. However, there was a notable decline to roughly $950 million in 2020, followed by a moderate increase to approximately $1.15 billion in 2021. The most significant change occurred in 2022, when net earnings surged sharply to approximately $4.54 billion, representing the highest value in the time series by a wide margin. This pattern indicates substantial volatility, with a pronounced financial performance improvement in the latest year.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT showed a relatively more stable trajectory compared to net earnings. Starting at about $1.15 billion in 2018, NOPAT increased substantially to nearly $2.0 billion in 2019. After this peak, it declined to roughly $1.25 billion in 2020 but experienced a slight recovery in 2021 with a value of approximately $1.34 billion. In 2022, NOPAT decreased marginally to about $1.28 billion. Despite some fluctuations, the variations in NOPAT were less extreme, suggesting consistent operating profitability even during periods of net earnings volatility.
- Comparative Insights
- When comparing net earnings and NOPAT trends, it is evident that while both metrics showed increases in 2019, net earnings were subject to greater volatility in the subsequent years. The sharp rise in net earnings in 2022 was not paralleled to the same extent by NOPAT, which remained relatively stable. This may indicate that extraordinary or non-operational factors significantly influenced net earnings in that year. Overall, operating profitability remained relatively steady throughout the period, despite fluctuations in reported net income.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Income Tax Expense
- The income tax expense shows a notable increase from 254,000 thousand US dollars in 2018 to a peak of 459,500 thousand US dollars in 2019. Following this peak, there is a sharp decline to 259,600 thousand US dollars in 2020, indicating a significant fluctuation. The values then exhibit a gradual increase in the subsequent years, rising to 288,400 thousand US dollars in 2021 and slightly further to 296,400 thousand US dollars in 2022. Overall, the tax expense demonstrates volatility over the five-year period while maintaining a level in the upper 200,000s to near 300,000 thousand US dollars range in the latest years.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes also exhibit a fluctuating pattern. Starting at 356,809 thousand US dollars in 2018, the figure grows substantially to 590,630 thousand US dollars in 2019, nearly a 65% increase. This is followed by a considerable reduction to 364,900 thousand US dollars in 2020. Subsequently, the cash operating taxes decline slightly in 2021 to 332,378 thousand US dollars, before escalating again sharply in 2022 to 511,065 thousand US dollars. Despite the fluctuations, the overall trend indicates significant variability with the cash operating taxes generally remaining above 300,000 thousand US dollars except for the exceptional peak and trough years.
- Comparison and Insights
- Both income tax expense and cash operating taxes experience their highest values in 2019, succeeded by a sharp decrease in 2020. The income tax expense shows more stability from 2020 onwards relative to cash operating taxes, which remains more volatile, especially with the substantial increase in 2022. This variance between income tax expense and cash operating taxes could suggest changes in tax payment timings or strategies impacting cash flow versus accounting recognition. The patterns imply that while accounting tax expenses are somewhat steady post-2020, actual cash tax payments are subject to larger swings.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
- Total Reported Debt & Leases
- The total reported debt and leases increased significantly from 2018 to 2020, rising from approximately $5.19 billion to $9.85 billion. However, in the following years, debt decreased, falling to about $8.15 billion in 2021 and further to $6.87 billion by the end of 2022. This trend indicates an initial period of increased leverage followed by a reduction in debt obligations over the last two years of the period analyzed.
- Stockholders’ Equity
- Stockholders’ equity showed consistent growth throughout the entire time frame. Starting at around $7.74 billion in 2018, equity increased steadily each year, reaching approximately $16.04 billion by the end of 2022. The growth became more pronounced from 2021 to 2022, suggesting a strong strengthening of the company's capital base during the most recent year.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital mirrored the trends observed in equity and debt, rising from about $14.79 billion in 2018 to a peak of $23 billion in 2020. A slight decrease occurred in 2021 to roughly $22.5 billion, followed by a rebound to approximately $26.2 billion in 2022. This reflects overall growth in the capital deployed by the company with some variability corresponding to changes in debt and equity levels.
Cost of Capital
Roper Technologies Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt, including current portion3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt, including current portion. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Apple Inc. | ||||||
| Arista Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Cisco Systems Inc. | ||||||
| Dell Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Super Micro Computer Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio demonstrates a consistent decline over the five-year period. Simultaneously, economic profit remains negative throughout the observed timeframe and exhibits an increasing negative trend. Invested capital shows an overall increase, though with a slight decrease between 2020 and 2021.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio, expressed as a percentage, decreased steadily from -8.23% in 2018 to -11.30% in 2022. This indicates a widening gap between the company’s return on invested capital and its weighted average cost of capital. The increasingly negative spread suggests diminishing value creation as the cost of capital exceeds the returns generated from investments.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit, measured in US$ thousands, is negative for each year presented. The magnitude of the negative economic profit increased from -1,216,119 in 2018 to -2,963,645 in 2022. This confirms that the company is destroying economic value, and the rate of value destruction is accelerating.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital increased from 14,785,177 in 2018 to 26,216,800 in 2022, representing a substantial overall growth in capital employed. However, a minor decrease occurred between 2020 (23,002,900) and 2021 (22,504,600). Despite the increase in invested capital, the negative economic profit and declining economic spread ratio suggest that these investments are not generating sufficient returns to cover the cost of capital.
The combined trends indicate that while the company continues to invest capital, it is failing to generate returns that exceed its cost of capital. The worsening economic spread ratio and increasing negative economic profit highlight a growing concern regarding value creation.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net revenues | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | ||||||
| Adjusted net revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Apple Inc. | ||||||
| Arista Networks Inc. | ||||||
| Cisco Systems Inc. | ||||||
| Dell Technologies Inc. | ||||||
| Super Micro Computer Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin demonstrates a consistently negative trend over the five-year period. Economic profit itself is negative throughout the observed timeframe, indicating the company’s returns are insufficient to cover its cost of capital. The economic profit margin, calculated as economic profit divided by adjusted net revenues, reveals the extent of this underperformance relative to revenue generation.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- The economic profit margin deteriorated significantly from -22.94% in 2018 to -52.20% in 2022. This represents a substantial decline in profitability when considering the cost of capital. The margin experienced its largest single-year decrease between 2020 and 2022.
Adjusted net revenues exhibited an initial increase from 2018 to 2021, growing from US$5,300.7 million to US$5,950.4 million. However, revenues decreased in 2022 to US$5,677.8 million. Despite the revenue growth in the earlier years, it was not enough to offset the increasing negative economic profit, contributing to the worsening economic profit margin.
- Relationship between Revenue and Economic Profit Margin
- While adjusted net revenues increased between 2018 and 2021, the economic profit margin became more negative during that same period. This suggests that the cost of capital is increasing at a faster rate than revenue growth, or that operational inefficiencies are eroding profitability. The revenue decline in 2022 coincided with a further substantial deterioration in the economic profit margin, reinforcing this observation.
The consistently negative and declining economic profit margin indicates a growing disparity between the company’s returns and its cost of capital. This trend warrants further investigation into the factors driving the increasing cost of capital and the potential for improving operational efficiency to generate higher returns.