Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,126) | 40) | 303) | 2,196) | 1,630) | |
| Invested capital2 | 16,745) | 16,335) | 16,952) | 18,006) | 20,519) | |
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| ROIC3 | 12.70% | 0.25% | 1.79% | 12.20% | 7.94% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROIC, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 56.77% | — | — | — | — | |
| Analog Devices Inc. | 2.37% | 6.95% | — | — | — | |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 41.96% | 29.68% | — | — | — | |
| Broadcom Inc. | 10.98% | 4.78% | — | — | — | |
| Intel Corp. | 22.03% | — | — | — | — | |
| KLA Corp. | 31.64% | — | — | — | — | |
| Lam Research Corp. | 37.13% | — | — | — | — | |
| Marvell Technology Inc. | -2.75% | — | — | — | — | |
| Micron Technology Inc. | 13.01% | — | — | — | — | |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 33.44% | — | — | — | — | |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 42.56% | 27.48% | — | — | — | |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 48.28% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 2,126 ÷ 16,745 = 12.70%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a period of strong performance, a severe contraction, and a subsequent robust recovery.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT experienced extreme fluctuations during the analyzed period. After an initial increase from US$ 1,630 million in 2017 to US$ 2,196 million in 2018, a sharp decline occurred, with values falling to US$ 303 million in 2019 and reaching a trough of US$ 40 million in 2020. A substantial recovery was recorded in 2021, as NOPAT rose to US$ 2,126 million.
- Invested Capital Trends
- Invested capital showed a steady downward trajectory from 2017 to 2020, decreasing from US$ 20,519 million to US$ 16,335 million. This suggests a reduction in the capital base over four years, followed by a slight increase to US$ 16,745 million in 2021.
- ROIC Analysis
- The ROIC closely mirrored the volatility of NOPAT. The ratio improved from 7.94% in 2017 to 12.20% in 2018, before dropping precipitously to 1.79% in 2019 and 0.25% in 2020. By 2021, the ROIC rebounded to 12.70%, marking the highest efficiency level in the five-year period. The disparity between the stable invested capital and the volatile NOPAT indicates that the fluctuations in ROIC were primarily driven by operational earnings rather than changes in the capital structure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Decomposition of ROIC
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »
2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »
3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »
The Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a sharp contraction in the middle of the period followed by a robust recovery. While the turnover of capital remained relatively stable with a positive trajectory, the overall return was heavily influenced by fluctuations in operating margins and the effective cash tax rate.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- Operating margins showed extreme variance, peaking at 28.07% in 2018 before plummeting to a low of 4.59% in 2020. This compression in profitability was a primary driver for the decline in ROIC during 2019 and 2020. However, a strong rebound occurred in 2021, with the margin returning to 22.69%, indicating a restoration of operational efficiency.
- Turnover of Capital (TO)
- Capital efficiency demonstrated a consistent upward trend throughout the analyzed period. Starting at 0.45 in 2017, the ratio increased steadily to reach a peak of 0.66 by 2021. This suggests an improved ability to generate revenue from the invested capital base, maintaining growth even during the years when profitability declined.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate Impact (1 – CTR)
- The after-tax multiplier experienced a severe decline, falling from 83.16% in 2018 to a critical low of 10.14% in 2020. This indicates a significant increase in the effective cash tax burden during that window, which further suppressed the final ROIC. A full recovery to 84.69% was observed in 2021, aligning with the overall recovery in returns.
- Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) Synthesis
- The ROIC trend mirrors the combined volatility of the operating profit margin and the tax rate. After reaching 12.20% in 2018, the ROIC collapsed to 0.25% in 2020, the result of simultaneous margin compression and a spike in the effective cash tax rate. The recovery to 12.70% in 2021 was driven by the convergence of improved operating margins, higher capital turnover, and a more favorable tax position.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,126) | 40) | 303) | 2,196) | 1,630) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 384) | 355) | 275) | 445) | 386) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 2,511) | 395) | 578) | 2,640) | 2,015) | |
| Revenue | 11,063) | 8,612) | 8,877) | 9,407) | 9,256) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| OPM3 | 22.69% | 4.59% | 6.52% | 28.07% | 21.77% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| OPM, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 22.70% | — | — | — | — | |
| Analog Devices Inc. | 20.52% | 26.98% | — | — | — | |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 30.54% | 25.67% | — | — | — | |
| Broadcom Inc. | 30.96% | 17.06% | — | — | — | |
| Intel Corp. | 28.05% | — | — | — | — | |
| KLA Corp. | 36.39% | — | — | — | — | |
| Lam Research Corp. | 34.25% | — | — | — | — | |
| Marvell Technology Inc. | -8.08% | — | — | — | — | |
| Micron Technology Inc. | 23.10% | — | — | — | — | |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 28.45% | — | — | — | — | |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 30.10% | 24.17% | — | — | — | |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 49.60% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 2,511 ÷ 11,063 = 22.69%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operating performance between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by significant volatility, marked by a period of severe contraction followed by a robust recovery. While revenues remained relatively stable with a slight downward trend prior to 2021, the operating profit and subsequent margins experienced a dramatic decline between 2019 and 2020 before returning to near-peak levels.
- Revenue Trends
- Revenue experienced marginal growth between 2017 and 2018, followed by a two-year decline, reaching a low of US$ 8,612 million in 2020. A substantial recovery occurred in 2021, with revenue increasing to US$ 11,063 million, representing the highest volume of sales within the observed five-year period.
- Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
- A sharp divergence between revenue and profit is evident from 2019 to 2020. NOPBT peaked at US$ 2,640 million in 2018 but fell precipitously to US$ 578 million in 2019 and further to US$ 395 million in 2020. By 2021, NOPBT rebounded strongly to US$ 2,511 million, nearly reaching the 2018 peak despite the revenue levels being higher in 2021 than in 2018.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- The OPM demonstrates a highly volatile trajectory. The margin improved from 21.77% in 2017 to a maximum of 28.07% in 2018. This was followed by a collapse to 6.52% in 2019 and a further decline to 4.59% in 2020, indicating a severe compression of operational efficiency or an increase in operating expenses relative to sales. The margin recovered to 22.69% in 2021, effectively restoring the profit efficiency to levels observed at the beginning of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Turnover of Capital (TO)
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Revenue | 11,063) | 8,612) | 8,877) | 9,407) | 9,256) | |
| Invested capital1 | 16,745) | 16,335) | 16,952) | 18,006) | 20,519) | |
| Efficiency Ratio | ||||||
| TO2 | 0.66 | 0.53 | 0.52 | 0.52 | 0.45 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| TO, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 2.65 | — | — | — | — | |
| Analog Devices Inc. | 0.16 | 0.31 | — | — | — | |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 1.57 | 1.31 | — | — | — | |
| Broadcom Inc. | 0.42 | 0.36 | — | — | — | |
| Intel Corp. | 0.89 | — | — | — | — | |
| KLA Corp. | 1.01 | — | — | — | — | |
| Lam Research Corp. | 1.24 | — | — | — | — | |
| Marvell Technology Inc. | 0.33 | — | — | — | — | |
| Micron Technology Inc. | 0.61 | — | — | — | — | |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 1.28 | — | — | — | — | |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 1.66 | 1.33 | — | — | — | |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 1.12 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Invested capital. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
TO = Revenue ÷ Invested capital
= 11,063 ÷ 16,745 = 0.66
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of the capital turnover indicates a consistent improvement in asset efficiency between 2017 and 2021. The turnover of capital ratio grew from 0.45 to 0.66 over the five-year period, signifying that the organization generated more revenue per unit of invested capital by the end of the period than at the beginning.
- Revenue Performance
- Revenue exhibited volatility between 2017 and 2020, peaking initially at 9,407 million US$ in 2018 before declining to a low of 8,612 million US$ in 2020. However, a significant recovery occurred in 2021, with revenue increasing to 11,063 million US$, representing the highest value in the observed timeframe.
- Invested Capital Trends
- A sustained reduction in invested capital was observed from 2017 to 2020, falling from 20,519 million US$ to 16,335 million US$. This downward trend suggests a period of capital optimization or divestment. A slight increase was noted in 2021, bringing the invested capital to 16,745 million US$.
- Turnover of Capital Dynamics
- The improvement in the turnover ratio was driven by two distinct phases. From 2017 to 2020, the ratio rose from 0.45 to 0.53; this growth was primarily facilitated by the reduction in the invested capital base, which offset the moderate declines in revenue. In 2021, the ratio accelerated to 0.66, a result of the substantial surge in revenue coupled with a relatively stable capital base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 2,126) | 40) | 303) | 2,196) | 1,630) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 384) | 355) | 275) | 445) | 386) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 2,511) | 395) | 578) | 2,640) | 2,015) | |
| Tax Rate | ||||||
| CTR3 | 15.31% | 89.86% | 47.56% | 16.84% | 19.15% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| CTR, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 5.73% | — | — | — | — | |
| Analog Devices Inc. | 25.70% | 16.31% | — | — | — | |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 12.33% | 12.01% | — | — | — | |
| Broadcom Inc. | 16.50% | 22.68% | — | — | — | |
| Intel Corp. | 12.07% | — | — | — | — | |
| KLA Corp. | 14.30% | — | — | — | — | |
| Lam Research Corp. | 12.57% | — | — | — | — | |
| Marvell Technology Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Micron Technology Inc. | 6.93% | — | — | — | — | |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 8.10% | — | — | — | — | |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 14.84% | 14.19% | — | — | — | |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 12.93% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 20-F (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 384 ÷ 2,511 = 15.31%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The effective cash tax rate (CTR) exhibits significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a strong inverse correlation with the net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT). While absolute cash operating taxes remained relatively stable over the five-year period, the dramatic fluctuations in operating profit led to extreme swings in the effective tax percentage.
- Initial Stability Period (2017-2018)
- During the first two years, the CTR remained low and consistent, ranging between 16.84% and 19.15%. This stability coincided with robust NOPBT levels, which reached 2,640 million US dollars in 2018, indicating a predictable tax burden during periods of high profitability.
- Tax Rate Escalation (2019-2020)
- A period of sharp escalation in the CTR occurred between 2019 and 2020, with the rate peaking at 89.86%. This surge was driven by a substantial contraction in NOPBT, which dropped to 578 million US dollars in 2019 and further to 395 million US dollars in 2020. The lack of a proportional decrease in cash tax payments relative to the precipitous decline in operating profit resulted in an atypically high effective tax rate.
- Normalization and Recovery (2021)
- In 2021, the CTR normalized to 15.31%, the lowest rate recorded in the analyzed period. This decrease was accompanied by a strong recovery in NOPBT to 2,511 million US dollars. This shift indicates a return to the operational and tax efficiency patterns observed prior to 2019.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?