- Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
- Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
- Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
- Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
- Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The financial data indicates a significant divergence between current income tax obligations and deferred tax adjustments, resulting in a highly volatile net provision for income taxes from 2018 through 2022.
- Current Income Tax Trends
- A consistent and accelerating upward trend is observed in current tax expenses. Starting at 26.3 million USD in 2018, the current tax liability increased to 256.4 million USD by 2022. This substantial growth suggests a marked increase in taxable income over the five-year period, with the most aggressive increase occurring between 2021 and 2022.
- Deferred Income Tax Volatility
- Deferred taxes exhibit significant fluctuations, alternating between benefits and expenses. While 2019 saw a deferred tax expense of 30.2 million USD, the subsequent years were characterized by increasing deferred tax benefits. This trend culminated in 2022 with a deferred tax benefit of 225.6 million USD, which served as a critical offset to the rising current tax expenses.
- Net Provision Analysis
- The total provision for income taxes does not mirror the linear growth seen in current taxes due to the impact of deferred tax items. In 2018, a net tax benefit of 81.3 million USD was recognized. Between 2019 and 2022, the company maintained a net tax expense, though this figure remained relatively low compared to the gross current tax. Notably, in 2022, the net provision of 30.8 million USD was achieved despite the highest current tax expense in the period, owing to the substantial deferred tax benefit recognized in the same year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Statutory federal income tax rate | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | |
| Effective income tax rate | 3.22% | 2.24% | 9.82% | 13.90% | -32.40% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The analysis of the income tax profile reveals a significant and persistent divergence between the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective income tax rate (EITR) over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022.
- Statutory Rate Stability
- The statutory federal income tax rate remained constant at 21.00% throughout the period, establishing a fixed benchmark against which the actual tax burden is measured.
- Effective Tax Rate Volatility and Trends
- The effective income tax rate exhibited substantial volatility and a general downward trend relative to the statutory rate. In 2018, the rate was negative at -32.40%, indicating the recognition of significant tax benefits or credits that exceeded tax liabilities. This transitioned to a positive rate of 13.90% in 2019, followed by a consistent decline to 9.82% in 2020 and a low of 2.24% in 2021. A marginal increase to 3.22% was recorded in 2022.
- Analysis of the Statutory-Effective Gap
- A widening disparity between the statutory baseline and the EITR is observable from 2019 onward. While the statutory rate remained at 21.00%, the effective rate decreased significantly, ending the period at a level drastically lower than the federal requirement. This suggests the impact of substantial permanent or temporary differences, such as the utilization of tax credits, foreign tax differentials, or other strategic tax optimizations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The net deferred tax asset position exhibited substantial growth over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022. Net deferred tax assets increased from 246.0 million US dollars in 2018 to 561.3 million US dollars in 2022, reflecting a significant accumulation of future tax benefits that outweigh deferred tax obligations.
- Primary Drivers of Deferred Tax Assets
- Deferred revenue represents a primary contributor to the asset base, increasing from 223.9 million US dollars in 2018 to 380.1 million US dollars in 2022, despite a temporary decline in 2019. Another significant trend is observed in capitalized research expenditures, which first appeared in 2020 at 16.6 million US dollars and experienced rapid escalation to 176.7 million US dollars by 2022.
- General business credit carryforwards also showed a strong upward trajectory, rising from 29.5 million US dollars to 95.0 million US dollars over the period. Reserves and accruals grew steadily, moving from 26.6 million US dollars to 90.1 million US dollars.
- Analysis of Deferred Tax Liabilities
- Deferred tax liabilities expanded from 52.1 million US dollars in 2018 to 147.2 million US dollars in 2022. This increase was primarily driven by deferred contract costs, which grew from 52.1 million US dollars to 117.5 million US dollars.
- Operating lease right-of-use (ROU) assets emerged as a liability component in 2019 and steadily increased to 20.9 million US dollars by 2022, offsetting the growth seen in operating lease liabilities on the asset side.
- Valuation Allowance and Net Asset Position
- A corresponding increase in the valuation allowance is observed, rising from 14.9 million US dollars in 2018 to 100.8 million US dollars in 2022. This suggests a conservative accounting approach to the realizability of certain deferred tax assets.
- Despite the rising valuation allowance and increased deferred tax liabilities, the growth in gross deferred tax assets—which climbed from 313.0 million US dollars to 809.3 million US dollars—resulted in a strengthened net deferred tax asset position by the end of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deferred tax assets | 569,400) | 342,300) | 245,200) | 232,600) | 255,000) | |
| Deferred tax liabilities | 8,100) | 8,000) | 8,000) | 5,000) | 9,000) |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The analysis of the deferred tax accounts between 2018 and 2022 reveals a significant expansion of the net deferred tax asset position. While deferred tax liabilities remained marginal and stable throughout the period, deferred tax assets experienced accelerated growth in the latter years, substantially increasing the company's future tax recovery potential.
- Deferred Tax Assets Trend
- A period of relative stability was observed between 2018 and 2020, with values fluctuating slightly between 232.6 million and 255 million US dollars. However, a sharp upward trajectory began in 2021, with assets rising to 342.3 million US dollars, followed by a substantial increase to 569.4 million US dollars by the end of 2022. This represents a growth of approximately 123% from the 2018 baseline.
- Deferred Tax Liabilities Profile
- Deferred tax liabilities remained consistently low and immaterial relative to the assets. The balance fluctuated within a narrow range, starting at 9 million US dollars in 2018, dipping to 5 million US dollars in 2019, and stabilizing around 8 million to 8.1 million US dollars from 2020 through 2022. This indicates a minimal accumulation of future taxable obligations.
- Net Deferred Tax Position
- The net position is heavily weighted toward assets. The gap between deferred tax assets and liabilities widened significantly over the five-year period. In 2018, the net asset position was approximately 246 million US dollars; by the end of 2022, this net position expanded to 561.3 million US dollars, suggesting a strengthened balance sheet regarding future tax benefits.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
Fortinet Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
An analysis of the financial adjustments reveals a consistent divergence between reported and adjusted figures resulting from the removal of deferred taxes. The most significant impact is observed in the asset and equity accounts, while liabilities remain largely unaffected. Over the five-year period from 2018 to 2022, the removal of deferred tax components led to a systematic reduction in the perceived financial strength of the balance sheet.
- Asset Valuation Impact
- A widening gap is observed between reported and adjusted total assets. In 2018, the difference was 255 million US$, which expanded to 569.4 million US$ by 2022. This indicates an increasing reliance on deferred tax assets to support the reported total asset value over time.
- Liability Stability
- Adjusted total liabilities remain nearly identical to reported total liabilities across all years. The variance consistently remains below 10 million US$, suggesting that the tax adjustments are almost exclusively related to assets rather than deferred tax liabilities.
- Equity Erosion and Deficit Acceleration
- The adjustment for deferred taxes significantly exacerbates the decline in stockholders' equity. While reported equity transitioned from a positive 1.01 billion US$ in 2018 to a deficit of 281.6 million US$ in 2022, the adjusted equity shows a much steeper decline, ending at a deficit of 842.9 million US$ in 2022. This demonstrates that the reported equity figures were partially sustained by deferred tax assets.
- Net Income Variance
- Adjusted net income generally trends lower than reported net income, particularly in the later years of the period. In 2022, reported net income of 857.3 million US$ was reduced to an adjusted figure of 631.7 million US$, indicating that a substantial portion of the reported profitability was attributable to deferred tax benefits rather than operational cash flows.
The cumulative effect of these adjustments reveals a more fragile financial position than reported. The simultaneous increase in the asset adjustment gap and the deepening of the equity deficit suggest that the removal of deferred taxes exposes a higher degree of financial leverage and a lower intrinsic net worth.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
Fortinet Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
The divergence between reported and adjusted financial ratios indicates that deferred taxes have had a significant impact on the company's reflected profitability and capital structure over the five-year period. While reported metrics often present a more stable narrative, the adjusted figures reveal greater volatility and a more aggressive leverage profile.
- Profitability Margins
- The reported net profit margin exhibited a gradual upward trend, rising from 18.44% in 2018 to 19.41% in 2022. Conversely, the adjusted net profit margin showed a non-linear trajectory, peaking at 18.56% in 2020 before declining to 14.30% by 2022. This suggests that in the latter years of the period, deferred tax benefits contributed positively to reported net income, masking a decline in the adjusted operational profit margin.
- Asset Utilization
- Total asset turnover improved for both reported and adjusted metrics over the period, reaching 0.71 and 0.78 respectively by 2022. The adjusted asset turnover remained consistently higher than the reported turnover across all years, indicating that the removal of deferred tax assets results in a leaner asset base, thereby enhancing the efficiency ratio of revenue generation per unit of asset.
- Financial Leverage and Equity Returns
- A sharp increase in financial leverage is observed between 2018 and 2021. Reported leverage rose from 3.05 to 7.57, while adjusted leverage experienced a more dramatic surge from 3.69 to 12.46. This escalation in leverage directly correlated with an exponential increase in Return on Equity (ROE). Adjusted ROE grew from 29.39% in 2018 to 114.98% in 2021, significantly outpacing the reported ROE of 77.63% in the same year.
- Return on Assets (ROA)
- The return on assets remained relatively stable with a slight upward trajectory, peaking in 2022 at a reported 13.77%. However, the adjusted ROA was lower than the reported ROA in 2018, 2021, and 2022, further illustrating that deferred tax effects tended to inflate the reported return on the company's total asset base during those specific intervals.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income attributable to Fortinet, Inc. ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 857,300 ÷ 4,417,400 = 19.41%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to Fortinet, Inc. ÷ Revenue
= 100 × 631,700 ÷ 4,417,400 = 14.30%
Net income attributable to Fortinet, Inc. demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory over the five-year period from 2018 to 2022. Reported net income grew from 332.2 million US$ in 2018 to 857.3 million US$ in 2022, representing a substantial increase in absolute profitability. Adjusted net income followed a similar growth pattern, rising from 224.6 million US$ to 631.7 million US$, although the growth rate slowed relative to reported figures in the final two years of the analysis.
- Reported Net Profit Margin Trends
- The reported net profit margin remained relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 15.14% and 19.41%. After a dip in 2019, the margin recovered and reached its period peak of 19.41% by December 31, 2022, indicating a steady ability to convert revenue into reported profit.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Trends
- The adjusted net profit margin exhibited greater volatility than the reported margin. An initial growth phase was observed from 2018 to 2020, where the margin increased from 12.47% to a peak of 18.56%. However, a subsequent downward trend occurred in 2021 and 2022, with the margin declining to 14.30% by the end of the period.
- Divergence Between Reported and Adjusted Performance
- A notable divergence is observed in the relationship between reported and adjusted margins. From 2018 to 2020, adjusted margins generally tracked or exceeded reported margins. Conversely, in 2021 and 2022, reported margins surpassed adjusted margins. This reversal suggests that the items being excluded in the adjusted net income calculations had a more significant positive impact on the reported bottom line in the later years compared to the earlier years of the analyzed period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Total assets
= 4,417,400 ÷ 6,228,000 = 0.71
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Revenue ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 4,417,400 ÷ 5,658,600 = 0.78
An analysis of asset utilization from 2018 to 2022 reveals a consistent expansion of the asset base alongside fluctuating efficiency metrics. Total assets grew substantially over the five-year period, with significant expansions occurring in 2019 and 2021.
- Asset Base Expansion
- Reported total assets increased from 3,078,000 thousand US$ in 2018 to 6,228,000 thousand US$ by 2022. Adjusted total assets followed a similar trajectory, rising from 2,823,000 thousand US$ to 5,658,600 thousand US$. The consistent gap between reported and adjusted asset totals indicates the presence of specific accounting adjustments that reduce the asset base for efficiency calculations.
- Asset Turnover Trends
- Asset turnover exhibited a volatile pattern throughout the period. The reported ratio declined in 2019 and 2021 but reached a five-year peak of 0.71 in 2022. Similarly, the adjusted total asset turnover fluctuated, decreasing in 2019 and 2021, while peaking at 0.78 in 2022. This suggests a cyclical improvement in the ability to generate revenue relative to the asset base.
- Comparative Efficiency Analysis
- A consistent premium is observed in the adjusted total asset turnover compared to the reported ratio across all observed years. This discrepancy suggests that the exclusion of certain assets results in a higher perceived operational efficiency. The most significant improvement in efficiency was recorded between 2021 and 2022, where the adjusted turnover rose from 0.60 to 0.78, indicating a sharp increase in asset productivity during the final year of the analysis.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Total Fortinet, Inc. stockholders’ equity (deficit)
= 6,228,000 ÷ -281,600 = —
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted total Fortinet, Inc. stockholders’ equity (deficit)
= 5,658,600 ÷ -842,900 = —
A significant divergence is observed between the growth of total assets and the stability of stockholders' equity from 2018 to 2022. While total assets expanded consistently, stockholders' equity experienced a severe decline, ultimately transitioning into a deficit position by the end of the period.
- Asset Growth Trends
- Reported total assets grew from 3.08 billion USD in 2018 to 6.23 billion USD in 2022. A similar trajectory is noted in adjusted total assets, which increased from 2.82 billion USD to 5.66 billion USD over the same period. This represents a steady expansion of the company's asset base.
- Equity Erosion and Deficit Transition
- Stockholders' equity showed a marked decline. Reported equity fell from 1.01 billion USD in 2018 to a deficit of 281.6 million USD in 2022. The adjusted equity figures demonstrate an even more pronounced contraction, moving from 764.2 million USD in 2018 to a deficit of 842.9 million USD in 2022. This erosion of the equity base suggests a significant shift in the capital structure.
- Financial Leverage Escalation
- The increase in asset value coupled with the decrease in equity resulted in a sharp rise in financial leverage. Reported financial leverage increased from 3.05 in 2018 to 7.57 in 2021. The adjusted financial leverage ratio exhibited a more aggressive increase, rising from 3.69 in 2018 to 12.46 in 2021. The absence of leverage ratios for 2022 coincides with the transition of stockholders' equity into negative territory, rendering the standard leverage ratio calculation non-applicable or indicative of a fully levered position.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income attributable to Fortinet, Inc. ÷ Total Fortinet, Inc. stockholders’ equity (deficit)
= 100 × 857,300 ÷ -281,600 = —
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to Fortinet, Inc. ÷ Adjusted total Fortinet, Inc. stockholders’ equity (deficit)
= 100 × 631,700 ÷ -842,900 = —
The financial performance between 2018 and 2022 is characterized by strong growth in net income coupled with a significant decline in stockholders' equity, culminating in a deficit position by the end of the period.
- Net Income Analysis
- Reported net income attributable to the company exhibited consistent growth, increasing from US$ 332.2 million in 2018 to US$ 857.3 million in 2022. Adjusted net income followed a similar upward trend, rising from US$ 224.6 million in 2018 to US$ 631.7 million in 2022, indicating a sustained increase in overall profitability.
- Equity Position and Capital Structure
- A substantial contraction in stockholders' equity is observed over the analyzed timeframe. Reported equity peaked in 2019 at US$ 1.32 billion before declining steadily to a deficit of US$ 281.6 million by December 31, 2022. The adjusted equity followed a more aggressive downward trajectory, falling from US$ 1.09 billion in 2019 to a deficit of US$ 842.9 million in 2022.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Interpretation
- Both reported and adjusted ROE experienced sharp increases from 2019 through 2021. Adjusted ROE rose from 29.39% in 2018 to 114.98% in 2021. This trend was driven by the dual effect of increasing net income and a shrinking equity base, which mathematically inflated the return percentages. By 2022, ROE values are not provided, coinciding with the shift to negative stockholders' equity, which renders the standard ROE calculation non-applicable.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
2022 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income attributable to Fortinet, Inc. ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 857,300 ÷ 6,228,000 = 13.77%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income attributable to Fortinet, Inc. ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 631,700 ÷ 5,658,600 = 11.16%
Profitability and asset bases exhibited substantial expansion between 2018 and 2022. Reported net income increased from 332.2 million USD to 857.3 million USD, reflecting a consistent upward trajectory. Similarly, adjusted net income grew from 224.6 million USD to 631.7 million USD, although a more moderate growth rate was observed between 2020 and 2021 compared to the reported figures.
- Asset Expansion
- Total assets grew significantly over the analyzed five-year period. Reported total assets increased from 3.08 billion USD in 2018 to 6.23 billion USD in 2022. Adjusted total assets followed a parallel trajectory, rising from 2.82 billion USD to 5.66 billion USD, indicating a consistent scaling of the balance sheet to support operational growth.
- Reported Return on Assets (ROA) Trends
- Reported ROA demonstrated volatility, starting at 10.79% in 2018, dipping to 8.40% in 2019, and subsequently climbing to a peak of 13.77% by 2022. This trend suggests an overall improvement in the efficiency of asset utilization to generate reported net income over the long term.
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) Trends
- Adjusted ROA showed a distinct trajectory, peaking at 12.67% in 2020 before declining to 9.22% in 2021 and recovering to 11.16% in 2022. The divergence between reported and adjusted ROA, particularly in 2021 and 2022 where reported figures exceeded adjusted figures, suggests that non-recurring items or specific accounting adjustments had a material impact on the final profitability metrics.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?