Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
The financial profile is characterized by a divergence between operational cash generation and free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) over the 2019-2023 period. While there was a general upward trajectory in the ability to generate cash from operations, FCFF remained consistently negative, signaling an intensive capital allocation strategy.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Net cash provided by operating activities showed significant fluctuations, starting at 174,201 thousand in 2019 and declining to 37,120 thousand in 2020. A period of robust growth followed, with values rising to 237,559 thousand in 2021 and peaking at 873,369 thousand in 2022, before settling at 602,260 thousand in 2023. This indicates a strengthened operational capacity to generate liquidity over the analyzed timeframe.
- FCFF Trajectory and Volatility
- FCFF remained in negative territory throughout the five-year period. A steady narrowing of the deficit was observed from 2019 through 2022, during which the negative value moved from 476,581 thousand to a near-breakeven point of 21,072 thousand. However, 2023 witnessed a sharp reversal, with FCFF dropping to 770,535 thousand, representing the most significant cash outflow of the period.
- Capital Expenditure Implications
- The persistent disparity between positive operating cash flows and negative FCFF indicates that cash generated from core operations was consistently exceeded by capital expenditures. This trend was most pronounced in 2023; despite generating 602,260 thousand in operating cash, the FCFF reached negative 770,535 thousand, implying a substantial surge in investment in long-term assets during that fiscal year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
2 2023 Calculation
Interest paid related to long-term debt arrangements, tax = Interest paid related to long-term debt arrangements × EITR
= 15,000 × 6.80% = 1,020
The analysis of interest expenditures net of tax reveals a fluctuating trajectory over the five-year period from 2019 to 2023, characterized by a prolonged period of decline followed by a recent upward reversal.
- Interest Expenditure Trends
- A consistent downward trend in net interest payments was observed between 2019 and 2022. Interest paid decreased from 17,935 thousand US dollars in 2019 to a period low of 9,164 thousand US dollars in 2022. This represented a reduction of approximately 48.9% over the four-year interval. However, this trend reversed in 2023, with payments increasing to 13,980 thousand US dollars.
- Effective Income Tax Rate Volatility
- The effective income tax rate exhibited significant volatility throughout the period, fluctuating from 4.60% in 2019 to peaks of 21.00% in 2020 and 2022. A sharp contraction was recorded in 2023, with the rate falling to 6.80%.
- Interaction Between Tax Rates and Interest Costs
- The net-of-tax interest figures are influenced by the prevailing effective tax rate. In 2022, the lowest net interest payment coincided with a peak tax rate of 21.00%, suggesting a higher tax shield effect on debt servicing. Conversely, the increase in net interest paid in 2023 occurred despite a significant drop in the tax rate to 6.80%. This indicates that the increase in gross interest obligations was substantial enough to outweigh the diminished tax benefit associated with the lower effective rate.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 19,851,148) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | (770,535) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | — |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 141.41 |
| Analog Devices Inc. | 44.34 |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 49.53 |
| Broadcom Inc. | 55.22 |
| Intel Corp. | — |
| KLA Corp. | 48.91 |
| Lam Research Corp. | 54.73 |
| Marvell Technology Inc. | 90.14 |
| Micron Technology Inc. | 14.49 |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 49.22 |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 14.11 |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 95.13 |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | |
| Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 250.73 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Information Technology | 77.64 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 13,966,957) | 15,638,230) | 6,454,817) | 7,119,181) | 3,642,553) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | (770,535) | (21,072) | (292,331) | (367,744) | (476,581) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Advanced Micro Devices Inc. | 225.41 | 38.82 | 43.41 | — | — | |
| Analog Devices Inc. | 25.61 | 23.12 | 39.16 | 27.12 | — | |
| Applied Materials Inc. | 17.40 | 19.06 | 26.22 | 22.52 | — | |
| Broadcom Inc. | 28.53 | 14.74 | 19.47 | 16.54 | — | |
| Intel Corp. | — | — | 16.94 | — | — | |
| KLA Corp. | 19.99 | 19.05 | 26.29 | — | — | |
| Lam Research Corp. | 17.99 | 24.08 | 24.40 | — | — | |
| Marvell Technology Inc. | 32.51 | 83.26 | 44.07 | — | — | |
| Micron Technology Inc. | — | 16.58 | 28.79 | — | — | |
| NVIDIA Corp. | 142.92 | 78.06 | 69.50 | — | — | |
| Qualcomm Inc. | 11.61 | 18.18 | 17.47 | 30.89 | — | |
| Texas Instruments Inc. | 89.85 | 27.02 | 24.20 | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Sector | ||||||
| Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment | 59.47 | 35.63 | 26.35 | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
| Information Technology | 33.99 | 26.47 | 27.37 | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
3 2023 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 13,966,957 ÷ -770,535 = —
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An examination of the financial metrics between 2019 and 2023 reveals a significant divergence between the growth in enterprise value and the generation of free cash flow to the firm. While the market valuation experienced substantial expansion, operational cash flows remained negative throughout the entire five-year period.
- Enterprise Value Trends
- The enterprise value exhibited a strong upward trajectory, increasing from approximately 3.64 billion USD in 2019 to a peak of 15.64 billion USD in 2022. Despite a moderate contraction to 13.97 billion USD in 2023, the overall valuation remains significantly elevated compared to the 2019 baseline, suggesting a substantial increase in the market's perceived value of the entity.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- FCFF remained consistently negative from 2019 through 2023. A period of steady improvement was observed between 2019 and 2022, as annual deficits narrowed from 476.58 million USD to a minimum deficit of 21.07 million USD. However, this trend reversed sharply in 2023, with FCFF declining to its lowest point in the observed period at negative 770.54 million USD.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Analysis
- Because FCFF remained negative for every year analyzed, a positive EV/FCFF ratio was not established. The combination of a rising enterprise value and persistent negative cash flows indicates that the valuation is predicated on anticipated future growth and strategic positioning rather than current cash generation. The sharp deterioration in FCFF in 2023, coupled with a high enterprise value, suggests an increase in the disconnect between current cash flow productivity and market valuation.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?