EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Etsy Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Liquidity Ratios
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Operating Profit Margin since 2015
- Return on Equity (ROE) since 2015
- Total Asset Turnover since 2015
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2015
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Etsy Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Initially, the company experienced economic losses, followed by a period of economic profit, and then a substantial return to economic loss. These shifts correlate with changes in net operating profit after taxes, cost of capital, and invested capital.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT exhibited a consistent upward trend from 2017 to 2020, increasing from US$47.642 million to US$393.749 million. However, growth slowed in 2021, with NOPAT reaching US$413.095 million. This suggests a potential deceleration in operational profitability towards the end of the analyzed period.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital generally decreased over the period, moving from 23.85% in 2017 to 20.33% in 2021. While there were minor fluctuations, the overall trend indicates a reduction in the company’s financing costs. This decrease in cost of capital would generally be expected to improve economic profit, all other factors being equal.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital increased substantially throughout the period, rising from US$498.789 million in 2017 to US$2,842.921 million in 2021. This significant growth in invested capital suggests considerable expansion and investment in the business. The rate of increase accelerated in later years.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit was negative from 2017 to 2019, ranging from -US$90.549 million to -US$71.301 million. A positive economic profit of US$44.356 million was achieved in 2020, coinciding with the peak in NOPAT growth and a decrease in the cost of capital. However, economic profit turned sharply negative again in 2021, reaching -US$164.936 million. This reversal is attributable to the substantial increase in invested capital outpacing the growth in NOPAT, coupled with a relatively stable cost of capital.
The substantial increase in invested capital in 2021 appears to have been a primary driver of the negative economic profit, despite the continued growth in NOPAT. The company’s ability to generate returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital on this expanded capital base warrants further investigation.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
5 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
6 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
- Net Income
- The net income demonstrates a generally increasing trend over the five-year period. Initially, the net income registers at 81,800 thousand USD at the end of 2017, followed by a slight decline to 77,491 thousand USD in 2018. From 2018 onwards, there is consistent growth, with net income rising to 95,894 thousand USD in 2019. This growth accelerates significantly in 2020, reaching 349,246 thousand USD, and continues to increase substantially in 2021, amounting to 493,507 thousand USD. The sharp increase during 2020 and 2021 indicates a notable improvement in profitability.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT figures also show a positive trajectory throughout the period. Starting at 47,642 thousand USD in 2017, NOPAT rises to 76,568 thousand USD in 2018, reflecting an increase in operating efficiency or profitability. The upward trend continues in 2019 with NOPAT reaching 103,763 thousand USD. A marked jump occurs in 2020, with NOPAT surging to 393,749 thousand USD, aligning with the sharp increase observed in net income during the same year. In 2021, NOPAT grows further but at a slower pace, reaching 413,095 thousand USD. This overall trend indicates enhanced operational performance and effective tax management over the years considered.
- Summary of Trends
- Both net income and NOPAT exhibit substantial growth, particularly between 2019 and 2021. The periods of 2020 and 2021 stand out as years of significant earnings expansion, indicating improved operational efficiency and overall profitability. The rise in NOPAT more closely aligns with operational improvements, while net income additionally reflects the impact of non-operational factors and tax considerations. The data suggests strengthened financial health and operational leverage leading to improved earnings capacity.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
- Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
- The income tax provision shows significant fluctuations over the five-year period. Beginning in 2017, the provision was a substantial negative figure indicating a tax benefit of -$49,535 thousand. This negative trend decreased in magnitude over the following years, with the benefit lessening to -$22,413 thousand in 2018 and further narrowing to -$15,248 thousand in 2019. Notably, in 2020, the trend reversed to a positive tax provision of $16,463 thousand, indicating an actual tax expense during this year. However, in 2021, the tax provision returned to a negative value of -$21,853 thousand. This irregular pattern suggests volatility in taxable income or tax strategy changes across the years.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes displayed a marked upward trend throughout the observed period. The value, which was a minor negative amount of -$1,409 thousand in 2017, shifted to positive in 2018 at $5,774 thousand. Following this, the amount continued to increase consistently each year, reaching $2,782 thousand in 2019, then sharply rising to $23,282 thousand in 2020, and culminating in a substantial $69,622 thousand in 2021. This steady and sharp increase suggests a growing cash outflow related to taxes paid from operating activities, possibly reflecting higher taxable earnings or changes in tax payment timing or policies.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of construction in progress.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases show a significant and consistent increase over the five-year period. Starting from 88,048 thousand US dollars at the end of 2017, the figure rose substantially to 2,435,883 thousand US dollars by the end of 2021. This represents a nearly 28-fold increase, indicating a sharp rise in the company's leverage and financial obligations.
- Stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity experienced moderate growth from 396,894 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 742,424 thousand in 2020, peaking during the year 2020. However, there was a decline in 2021 to 628,619 thousand US dollars. Overall, equity increased by approximately 58% from 2017 to 2021, but the decline in the final year suggests potential pressures or adjustments impacting the company's net assets.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital exhibited a continuous and pronounced increase throughout the period evaluated. Beginning at 498,789 thousand US dollars in 2017, it more than quintupled to 2,842,921 thousand US dollars by the end of 2021. This upward trajectory suggests substantial capital deployment, likely reflecting expansion activities supported by rising debt levels and equity contributions.
Cost of Capital
Etsy Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | ||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | ||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | ||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited considerable fluctuation between 2017 and 2021. Initially negative, the ratio improved significantly in 2020 before declining again in 2021. This movement correlates with changes in economic profit and invested capital over the same period.
- Economic Spread Ratio Trend
- The economic spread ratio began at -14.29% in 2017 and decreased to -9.25% in 2018. A further decline to -10.19% was observed in 2019. A substantial positive shift occurred in 2020, with the ratio reaching 2.98%. However, this improvement was reversed in 2021, as the ratio fell to -5.80%.
The economic spread ratio’s movement suggests a changing relationship between returns generated and the capital employed. The positive value in 2020 indicates that returns exceeded the cost of capital, while the negative values in other years suggest the opposite. The magnitude of the negative values indicates the extent to which returns fell short of the cost of capital.
- Relationship to Economic Profit
- The economic spread ratio’s positive value in 2020 aligns with the positive economic profit reported for that year. Conversely, the negative economic spread ratios in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021 correspond with negative economic profit values. This correlation suggests that the economic spread ratio is directly influenced by the absolute value of economic profit.
- Relationship to Invested Capital
- Invested capital increased consistently throughout the period, rising from US$498,789 thousand in 2017 to US$2,842,921 thousand in 2021. While economic profit was positive in 2020, the substantial increase in invested capital may have contributed to the subsequent decline in the economic spread ratio in 2021, despite a negative economic profit in that year.
The observed trends suggest that while the entity was able to generate economic profit in 2020, sustaining this performance while managing a rapidly growing capital base presents a challenge. The decline in the economic spread ratio in 2021 warrants further investigation to understand the underlying drivers and potential implications for future profitability.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Revenue | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | ||||||
| Adjusted revenue | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | ||||||
| Home Depot Inc. | ||||||
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | ||||||
| TJX Cos. Inc. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited considerable fluctuation between 2017 and 2021. Initially negative, the margin improved significantly in 2020 before declining again in 2021. This performance appears closely linked to the trend in economic profit, as adjusted revenue consistently increased over the period.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- The economic profit margin began at -16.14% in 2017 and decreased to -11.06% in 2019, indicating widening economic losses relative to revenue. A substantial positive shift occurred in 2020, with the margin reaching 2.57%, demonstrating a move into economic profitability. However, this improvement was short-lived, as the margin reverted to a negative value of -7.08% in 2021.
- Relationship to Economic Profit
- The economic profit margin’s trajectory mirrors that of economic profit. Negative economic profit values in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021 directly correlate with negative economic profit margins. The positive economic profit of US$44,356 thousand in 2020 is reflected in the positive margin for that year. The significant decline in economic profit to negative US$164,936 thousand in 2021 resulted in a substantial decrease in the economic profit margin.
- Adjusted Revenue Impact
- Adjusted revenue increased consistently throughout the observed period, growing from US$441,845 thousand in 2017 to US$2,330,189 thousand in 2021. Despite this revenue growth, the economic profit margin did not consistently improve, suggesting that increases in costs or required rate of return outpaced revenue gains in certain years, particularly 2019 and 2021.
The volatility in the economic profit margin suggests sensitivity to underlying economic profit drivers. While revenue growth is evident, maintaining consistent economic profitability remains a challenge, as demonstrated by the return to negative margins in the most recent year observed.