EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Economic Profit
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2021 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= 413,095 – 20.10% × 2,842,921 = -158,260
The analysis of economic profit from 2017 to 2021 reveals a period of significant operational growth that failed to consistently translate into economic value creation. While the company experienced a substantial increase in nominal operating profits, the simultaneous and more rapid expansion of the invested capital base, coupled with a high cost of capital, resulted in overall economic losses in four of the five years analyzed.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- A consistent upward trajectory in NOPAT is observed, growing from 47,642 thousand US$ in 2017 to 413,095 thousand US$ in 2021. The most significant acceleration occurred between 2019 and 2020, where NOPAT nearly quadrupled, indicating a period of rapid operational scaling and increased profitability.
- Invested Capital Trends
- Invested capital expanded aggressively over the period, increasing from 498,789 thousand US$ in 2017 to 2,842,921 thousand US$ by 2021. The growth in invested capital accelerated sharply after 2019, with the 2021 figure representing more than a five-fold increase compared to the 2017 baseline.
- Cost of Capital Stability
- The cost of capital remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a range of 20.10% to 23.57%. A gradual decline is noted toward the end of the period, reaching its lowest point of 20.10% in 2021.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit remained negative for the majority of the period, indicating that NOPAT was insufficient to cover the required return on invested capital. A temporary shift to positive economic profit occurred in 2020 (48,383 thousand US$), coinciding with the peak surge in NOPAT. However, this gain was reversed in 2021, with economic profit falling to -158,260 thousand US$. This downturn is attributed to the fact that the growth in invested capital outpaced the growth in operating profit, thereby increasing the capital charge and eroding economic value.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income.
5 2021 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= 47,764 × 4.46% = 2,130
6 2021 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= 12,015 × 21.00% = 2,523
7 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income.
An analysis of the financial performance between 2017 and 2021 reveals a substantial upward trajectory in both net income and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT), characterized by a period of steady growth followed by a significant acceleration in 2020.
- Net Income Trajectory
- Net income exhibited a slight decline in 2018, falling to 77,491 thousand from 81,800 thousand in 2017. This was followed by a recovery in 2019 and an exponential increase in 2020, where net income rose to 349,246 thousand. The growth trend continued into 2021, with net income reaching a peak of 493,507 thousand.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Performance
- NOPAT demonstrated consistent year-over-year growth from 2017 through 2019, increasing from 47,642 thousand to 103,763 thousand. A sharp inflection point occurred in 2020, with NOPAT surging to 393,749 thousand, a nearly four-fold increase over the prior year. By 2021, NOPAT grew at a more moderate pace, concluding the period at 413,095 thousand.
- Comparative Analysis of Profitability Metrics
- A divergence is observed in the relationship between net income and NOPAT over the five-year period. In 2017, net income exceeded NOPAT; however, by 2019 and 2020, NOPAT became the higher of the two metrics, indicating strong operating efficiency relative to final net earnings. In 2021, the trend reversed as net income grew more aggressively than NOPAT, ending the period with net income surpassing NOPAT by 80,412 thousand.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of tax-related cash flows reveals a significant divergence between accounting tax provisions and actual cash tax outflows over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021.
- Cash Operating Taxes Trend
- A consistent upward trajectory is observed in cash operating taxes. Starting from a tax benefit of US$ 1.4 million in 2017, outflows increased to US$ 5.8 million in 2018 and US$ 2.8 million in 2019. A sharp escalation occurred in 2020, reaching US$ 23.3 million, and culminated in a peak of US$ 69.6 million by the end of 2021, indicating a substantial increase in the actual cash burden of taxes.
- Income Tax Provision Volatility
- The income tax provision exhibits substantial volatility and does not correlate linearly with cash tax payments. Tax benefits were recorded in 2017, 2018, 2019, and 2021, with the only exception being 2020, where a provision of US$ 16.5 million was recognized. A notable discrepancy is evident in 2021, where a tax benefit of US$ 21.9 million was reported despite the record high cash tax outflow of US$ 69.6 million.
- Implications for Economic Value Added (EVA)
- The increasing magnitude of cash operating taxes suggests a growing cash drain that impacts the determination of after-tax operating profit. The widening gap between the accounting tax benefit and actual cash payments, particularly in 2021, indicates that non-cash tax adjustments or the utilization of deferred tax assets are masking the actual cash costs associated with the company's tax obligations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue.
5 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
6 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
7 Subtraction of construction in progress.
8 Subtraction of marketable securities.
Invested capital experienced an aggressive upward trajectory between 2017 and 2021, growing from 498,789 thousand US dollars to 2,842,921 thousand US dollars. This represents a significant expansion of the capital base used to generate economic value, characterized by a shift in the underlying funding structure.
- Total Reported Debt and Leases
- A rapid and consistent increase in debt and lease obligations is observed. From 2017 to 2021, this figure rose from 88,048 thousand US dollars to 2,435,883 thousand US dollars. The most pronounced acceleration occurred between 2020 and 2021, where debt levels more than doubled, indicating a strategic pivot toward leveraging external financing to fund operations or growth.
- Stockholders' Equity
- Equity remained relatively stagnant from 2017 through 2019, fluctuating minimally around the 400,000 thousand US dollar mark. A significant increase occurred in 2020, peaking at 742,424 thousand US dollars, followed by a moderate contraction to 628,619 thousand US dollars by the end of 2021. Compared to the growth in debt, equity played a secondary role in the expansion of total invested capital.
- Composition of Invested Capital
- The capital structure underwent a fundamental transformation over the five-year period. In 2017, stockholders' equity constituted the majority of invested capital. By 2021, the composition shifted heavily toward debt, which accounted for the vast majority of the total invested capital. This trend suggests an increased reliance on borrowed capital to drive the expansion of the balance sheet.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cost of Capital
Etsy Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 18,920,287) | 18,920,287) | ÷ | 22,754,289) | = | 0.83 | 0.83 | × | 24.09% | = | 20.03% | ||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | 3,786,238) | 3,786,238) | ÷ | 22,754,289) | = | 0.17 | 0.17 | × | 0.46% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.06% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 47,764) | 47,764) | ÷ | 22,754,289) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 4.46% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.01% | ||
| Total: | 22,754,289) | 1.00 | 20.10% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 27,764,874) | 27,764,874) | ÷ | 28,984,790) | = | 0.96 | 0.96 | × | 24.09% | = | 23.07% | ||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | 1,198,198) | 1,198,198) | ÷ | 28,984,790) | = | 0.04 | 0.04 | × | 3.81% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.12% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 21,718) | 21,718) | ÷ | 28,984,790) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 4.26% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.00% | ||
| Total: | 28,984,790) | 1.00 | 23.20% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 6,831,610) | 6,831,610) | ÷ | 7,752,517) | = | 0.88 | 0.88 | × | 24.09% | = | 21.23% | ||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | 894,451) | 894,451) | ÷ | 7,752,517) | = | 0.12 | 0.12 | × | 4.28% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.39% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 26,456) | 26,456) | ÷ | 7,752,517) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 4.26% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.01% | ||
| Total: | 7,752,517) | 1.00 | 21.63% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 8,521,497) | 8,521,497) | ÷ | 8,890,586) | = | 0.96 | 0.96 | × | 24.09% | = | 23.09% | ||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | 345,070) | 345,070) | ÷ | 8,890,586) | = | 0.04 | 0.04 | × | 4.81% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.15% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 24,019) | 24,019) | ÷ | 8,890,586) | = | 0.00 | 0.00 | × | 7.65% × (1 – 21.00%) | = | 0.02% | ||
| Total: | 8,890,586) | 1.00 | 23.25% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | 3,076,450) | 3,076,450) | ÷ | 3,164,497) | = | 0.97 | 0.97 | × | 24.09% | = | 23.42% | ||
| Debt and finance lease liabilities3 | 69,962) | 69,962) | ÷ | 3,164,497) | = | 0.02 | 0.02 | × | 8.49% × (1 – 35.00%) | = | 0.12% | ||
| Operating lease liability4 | 18,086) | 18,086) | ÷ | 3,164,497) | = | 0.01 | 0.01 | × | 8.49% × (1 – 35.00%) | = | 0.03% | ||
| Total: | 3,164,497) | 1.00 | 23.57% | ||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease liabilities. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | (158,260) | 48,383) | (88,338) | (48,185) | (69,931) | |
| Invested capital2 | 2,842,921) | 1,488,547) | 888,183) | 536,522) | 498,789) | |
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | -5.57% | 3.25% | -9.95% | -8.98% | -14.02% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | -1.96% | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 12.21% | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 9.18% | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | -12.60% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × -158,260 ÷ 2,842,921 = -5.57%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 indicates a period of significant capital expansion coupled with volatile value creation. While the invested capital base grew consistently and aggressively throughout the period, the resulting economic profit failed to maintain a positive trajectory, leading to fluctuations in the economic spread ratio.
- Invested Capital Trends
- A consistent and accelerating upward trend in invested capital is observed, increasing from US$ 498,789 thousand in 2017 to US$ 2,842,921 thousand by 2021. This represents a substantial increase in the capital base, with the most pronounced growth occurring between 2019 and 2021, suggesting a period of aggressive scaling or resource deployment.
- Economic Profit Analysis
- Economic profit exhibited significant volatility throughout the five-year period. Negative values were recorded in 2017, 2018, and 2019, with a brief transition to a positive economic profit of US$ 48,383 thousand in 2020. This positive momentum was short-lived, as 2021 saw a sharp decline to negative US$ 158,260 thousand, the most significant economic loss in the analyzed timeframe.
- Economic Spread Ratio Interpretation
- The economic spread ratio remained negative for the majority of the period, signifying that the returns generated were generally insufficient to cover the cost of capital. An improvement trend was noted from -14.02% in 2017 to a peak of 3.25% in 2020, indicating a temporary period of value creation. However, the ratio reverted to -5.57% in 2021, demonstrating that the increase in invested capital did not translate into sustained economic efficiency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | (158,260) | 48,383) | (88,338) | (48,185) | (69,931) | |
| Revenue | 2,329,114) | 1,725,625) | 818,379) | 603,693) | 441,231) | |
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | 1,075) | 3,647) | 139) | 1,216) | 614) | |
| Adjusted revenue | 2,330,189) | 1,729,272) | 818,518) | 604,909) | 441,845) | |
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | -6.79% | 2.80% | -10.79% | -7.97% | -15.83% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Amazon.com Inc. | -0.84% | — | — | — | — | |
| Home Depot Inc. | 4.60% | — | — | — | — | |
| Lowe’s Cos. Inc. | 2.91% | — | — | — | — | |
| TJX Cos. Inc. | -8.77% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × -158,260 ÷ 2,330,189 = -6.79%
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by aggressive revenue growth contrasted with significant volatility in economic profit and an inability to maintain a consistent positive economic profit margin.
- Adjusted Revenue Trends
- A consistent and accelerating upward trajectory in adjusted revenue is observed, increasing from 441,845 thousand US dollars in 2017 to 2,330,189 thousand US dollars by 2021. The most substantial expansion occurred between 2019 and 2020, where revenue more than doubled, indicating rapid scale growth.
- Economic Profit Fluctuations
- Economic profit remained predominantly negative throughout the analyzed period, indicating that the company generally failed to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital. After fluctuating between -69,931 thousand and -88,338 thousand US dollars from 2017 to 2019, a pivot to a positive value of 48,383 thousand US dollars was achieved in 2020. However, this gain was reversed in 2021, resulting in the period's largest deficit of -158,260 thousand US dollars.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin mirrored the volatility of the absolute economic profit. The margin improved from -15.83% in 2017 to -7.97% in 2018, before declining to -10.79% in 2019. The only instance of positive economic value creation occurred in 2020 with a margin of 2.80%. By 2021, the margin fell to -6.79%, suggesting that despite record-high revenues, the cost of capital or operational expenditures expanded at a rate that negated the revenue gains.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?