Stock Analysis on Net

CSX Corp. (NASDAQ:CSX)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 20, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

CSX Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


An analysis of the financial performance from 2018 to 2022 reveals a consistent failure to generate positive economic profit, indicating that operating returns were insufficient to exceed the cost of the capital employed during this period.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT exhibited a volatile yet generally upward trajectory over the five-year span. After starting at 4,106 million US$ in 2018, a significant contraction occurred in 2020, with profits dropping to 3,545 million US$. However, a strong recovery followed, with NOPAT rising to 4,534 million US$ in 2021 and peaking at 4,863 million US$ in 2022.
Capital Structure and Cost of Capital
The invested capital base expanded steadily, growing from 34,219 million US$ in 2018 to 38,278 million US$ in 2022. During this expansion, the cost of capital remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 16.29% and 17.01%, suggesting a consistent requirement for returns on invested assets.
Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained negative throughout the entire analysis period, confirming that the company did not create economic value. The most severe deficit occurred in 2020, reaching -2,587 million US$, which correlates with the decline in NOPAT. Although the economic profit improved to -1,647 million US$ by 2022, the persistent negative figures demonstrate that the growth in operating profit was not sufficient to offset the cost of the increasing capital base.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

CSX Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net earnings
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents3
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability4
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense5
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes6
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income7
Investment income, after taxes8
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings.

4 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

5 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings.

7 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


The financial data reveals several key trends concerning profitability over the analyzed five-year period. Net earnings exhibited an initial slight increase from 2018 to 2019, growing marginally from 3,309 million USD to 3,331 million USD. This was followed by a noticeable decline in 2020 down to 2,765 million USD, indicating a downturn in earnings performance during that year. Subsequently, net earnings demonstrated a robust recovery, increasing significantly to 3,781 million USD in 2021 and further to 4,166 million USD in 2022, surpassing earlier results. This indicates a strong rebound and an overall positive trajectory post-2020.

Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibits a pattern comparable to net earnings, although at consistently higher absolute values. From 2018 to 2019, NOPAT increased slightly from 4,106 million USD to 4,174 million USD, similar to the initial net earnings rise. In 2020, NOPAT declined noticeably to 3,545 million USD, coinciding with the drop observed in net earnings. Afterwards, there was a marked recovery in 2021, with NOPAT rising to 4,534 million USD and continuing upward to 4,863 million USD in 2022, reflecting improvement in operational profitability.

Net Earnings Trends
- Slight growth from 2018 to 2019
- Decline in 2020, possibly reflecting adverse conditions
- Strong recovery and growth in 2021 and 2022, reaching record highs in the period
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trends
- Positive growth early in the period (2018-2019)
- Decrease in 2020 aligned with net earnings downturn
- Significant rebound in 2021 and continued growth in 2022, indicating operational efficiency improvements
Overall Insight
The data suggests resilience in profitability following a challenging 2020, with both net earnings and NOPAT showing strong recovery and growth thereafter. Operational profits consistently exceeded net earnings, implying favorable non-operating factors or financial management contributing positively to net results.


Cash Operating Taxes

CSX Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Income tax expense
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The financial data reflects the progression of income tax expense and cash operating taxes from 2018 to 2022, measured in millions of US dollars.

Income Tax Expense
This item shows a fluctuating but generally increasing trend across the five-year period. The expense declined slightly from 995 million in 2018 to 985 million in 2019, followed by a more noticeable decrease to 862 million in 2020. However, from 2020 onward, there was a significant rise to 1,170 million in 2021 and a further increase to 1,248 million in 2022, surpassing earlier years’ figures.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes exhibit a similar pattern to income tax expense. Starting at 854 million in 2018, the value increased marginally to 862 million in 2019, then decreased moderately to 842 million in 2020. Subsequently, there was a considerable rise to 1,159 million in 2021 and an additional increase to 1,284 million in 2022. The growth in 2021 and 2022 was strong enough to exceed the levels observed prior to 2020.

Overall, both income tax expense and cash operating taxes suffered declines in 2020, possibly reflecting economic conditions or operational factors impacting taxable income or tax payments during that year. The subsequent two years show recovery and robust increases, indicating higher taxable profits or changes in tax rates or policies. Notably, cash operating taxes slightly outpaced income tax expense in the last two years, which could suggest timing differences or changes in tax payment structures.



Invested Capital

CSX Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Current maturities of long-term debt
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Shareholders’ equity, attributable to CSX
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
Equity equivalents4
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax5
Non-controlling minority interest
Adjusted shareholders’ equity, attributable to CSX
Construction in progress6
Investments at fair value7
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of equity equivalents to shareholders’ equity, attributable to CSX.

5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

6 Subtraction of construction in progress.

7 Subtraction of investments at fair value.


Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases demonstrated an overall increasing trend across the observed periods. Starting at $15,060 million at the end of 2018, the figure rose steadily to $18,604 million by the end of 2022. There was a noticeable increment from 2019 to 2020, followed by a slight decline in 2021, and then an uptick again in 2022 reaching the highest value in the series.
Shareholders’ equity, attributable to CSX
Shareholders’ equity showed fluctuations during the five-year period. Beginning at $12,563 million in 2018, it decreased to $11,848 million in 2019. Subsequently, the equity improved, peaking at $13,490 million in 2021, before declining again to $12,615 million in 2022. This pattern suggests variable equity performance with no consistent growth trajectory.
Invested capital
Invested capital displayed a consistent growth pattern over the period examined. The value increased incrementally from $34,219 million in 2018 to $38,278 million in 2022. The growth was steady with modest year-to-year increases, indicating a gradual expansion of the capital base over time.


Cost of Capital

CSX Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, including current maturities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, including current maturities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, including current maturities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, including current maturities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, including current maturities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »



Economic Spread Ratio

CSX Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
FedEx Corp.
Uber Technologies Inc.
Union Pacific Corp.
United Airlines Holdings Inc.
United Parcel Service Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the financial performance from 2018 to 2022 reveals a consistent trend of negative economic value creation. The company failed to generate a positive economic profit throughout the five-year period, indicating that the returns on invested capital remained below the weighted average cost of capital.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained negative across the entire observation period. After a slight improvement in 2019, a significant decline occurred in 2020, where losses reached a peak of negative 2,587 million US dollars. A recovery trend followed in 2021 and 2022, with the economic profit improving to negative 1,647 million US dollars by the end of 2022, though it remained near 2018 levels.
Invested Capital Growth
There is a steady upward trajectory in invested capital, which grew from 34,219 million US dollars in 2018 to 38,278 million US dollars in 2022. This indicates a continuous expansion of the capital base despite the inability to achieve a positive economic spread.
Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
The economic spread ratio remained negative throughout the period, mirroring the volatility of the economic profit. The ratio deteriorated to its lowest point of negative 6.87% in 2020, coinciding with the sharpest drop in economic profit. By 2022, the ratio improved to negative 4.30%, the highest value in the series, although the negative figure confirms that the company continued to destroy economic value rather than create it.

The correlation between the increasing invested capital and the persistent negative economic spread suggests that the additional capital deployed has not yet translated into returns sufficient to cover the cost of capital. While the recovery in the spread ratio since 2020 is observable, the overall trend indicates a sustained period of economic value erosion.



Economic Profit Margin

CSX Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Revenue
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
FedEx Corp.
Uber Technologies Inc.
Union Pacific Corp.
United Airlines Holdings Inc.
United Parcel Service Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Revenue
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the financial performance from 2018 to 2022 reveals a consistent failure to achieve positive economic profit, indicating that the company did not generate returns exceeding its cost of capital during this period. While the absolute economic loss remained substantial, there is evidence of a recovery trend in the final two years of the observation window.

Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained negative throughout the five-year duration. The losses reached a peak in 2020 at negative 2,587 million US dollars, representing a significant deterioration from the 2018 and 2019 levels. However, a steady recovery followed, with the loss narrowing to negative 1,647 million US dollars by December 31, 2022, returning to levels similar to those seen at the start of the period.
Revenue Trajectory
Revenue exhibited volatility, experiencing a decline from 12,250 million US dollars in 2018 to a low of 10,583 million US dollars in 2020. Following this trough, a strong growth phase occurred, with revenue increasing to 12,522 million US dollars in 2021 and reaching a period high of 14,853 million US dollars by the end of 2022.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin mirrors the volatility of both revenue and absolute economic profit. The margin dropped sharply to its lowest point of negative 24.44% in 2020, coinciding with the period of lowest revenue and highest economic loss. Subsequent years showed a consistent improvement in the margin, rising to negative 14.80% in 2021 and further improving to negative 11.09% in 2022. This upward trend suggests an improving efficiency in capital utilization and a movement toward value creation, despite the margin remaining in negative territory.

The correlation between the recovery in revenue and the improvement of the economic profit margin suggests that increased scale contributed to a reduction in the relative economic loss. By the end of 2022, the company achieved its most favorable economic profit margin of the five-year period, although it has yet to cross the threshold into positive economic value added.