Stock Analysis on Net

CSX Corp. (NASDAQ:CSX)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 20, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

CSX Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period under review demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit. While net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) fluctuates, it does not generate sufficient returns to cover the cost of capital employed. Invested capital shows a general upward trend, while the cost of capital remains relatively stable, contributing to the persistent negative economic profit.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
NOPAT experienced an initial increase from US$4,106 million in 2018 to US$4,174 million in 2019. A subsequent decline to US$3,545 million occurred in 2020, followed by recoveries to US$4,534 million in 2021 and US$4,863 million in 2022. Despite the increases in 2021 and 2022, NOPAT levels did not reach those observed in 2018 and 2019.
Cost of Capital
The cost of capital remained relatively consistent throughout the period, ranging from 16.36% to 17.08%. A slight upward trend is observable from 2018 to 2022, though the fluctuations are minimal. This stability suggests that the company’s risk profile, as perceived by investors, remained largely unchanged.
Invested Capital
Invested capital exhibited a consistent upward trend, increasing from US$34,219 million in 2018 to US$38,278 million in 2022. This indicates a continued investment in the business, potentially through capital expenditures or acquisitions. The increasing capital base, coupled with a consistent cost of capital, contributes to the growing absolute value of economic loss.
Economic Profit
Economic profit remained negative across all years examined. The losses ranged from US$1,586 million to US$2,614 million. While the magnitude of the loss decreased from 2019 to 2022, it remained substantial. The negative economic profit indicates that the company is not generating returns exceeding its cost of capital, suggesting potential inefficiencies in capital allocation or operational performance.

In summary, the company consistently failed to generate economic profit during the analyzed period. Increases in NOPAT in later years were insufficient to offset the rising invested capital and relatively stable cost of capital. Continued monitoring of these metrics is recommended to assess whether future performance improves the return on invested capital.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

CSX Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net earnings
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses2
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents3
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability4
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense5
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes6
Interest income
Investment income, before taxes
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income7
Investment income, after taxes8
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for credit losses.

3 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net earnings.

4 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

5 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

6 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net earnings.

7 2022 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

8 Elimination of after taxes investment income.


The financial data reveals several key trends concerning profitability over the analyzed five-year period. Net earnings exhibited an initial slight increase from 2018 to 2019, growing marginally from 3,309 million USD to 3,331 million USD. This was followed by a noticeable decline in 2020 down to 2,765 million USD, indicating a downturn in earnings performance during that year. Subsequently, net earnings demonstrated a robust recovery, increasing significantly to 3,781 million USD in 2021 and further to 4,166 million USD in 2022, surpassing earlier results. This indicates a strong rebound and an overall positive trajectory post-2020.

Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) exhibits a pattern comparable to net earnings, although at consistently higher absolute values. From 2018 to 2019, NOPAT increased slightly from 4,106 million USD to 4,174 million USD, similar to the initial net earnings rise. In 2020, NOPAT declined noticeably to 3,545 million USD, coinciding with the drop observed in net earnings. Afterwards, there was a marked recovery in 2021, with NOPAT rising to 4,534 million USD and continuing upward to 4,863 million USD in 2022, reflecting improvement in operational profitability.

Net Earnings Trends
- Slight growth from 2018 to 2019
- Decline in 2020, possibly reflecting adverse conditions
- Strong recovery and growth in 2021 and 2022, reaching record highs in the period
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trends
- Positive growth early in the period (2018-2019)
- Decrease in 2020 aligned with net earnings downturn
- Significant rebound in 2021 and continued growth in 2022, indicating operational efficiency improvements
Overall Insight
The data suggests resilience in profitability following a challenging 2020, with both net earnings and NOPAT showing strong recovery and growth thereafter. Operational profits consistently exceeded net earnings, implying favorable non-operating factors or financial management contributing positively to net results.

Cash Operating Taxes

CSX Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Income tax expense
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Less: Tax imposed on investment income
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The financial data reflects the progression of income tax expense and cash operating taxes from 2018 to 2022, measured in millions of US dollars.

Income Tax Expense
This item shows a fluctuating but generally increasing trend across the five-year period. The expense declined slightly from 995 million in 2018 to 985 million in 2019, followed by a more noticeable decrease to 862 million in 2020. However, from 2020 onward, there was a significant rise to 1,170 million in 2021 and a further increase to 1,248 million in 2022, surpassing earlier years’ figures.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes exhibit a similar pattern to income tax expense. Starting at 854 million in 2018, the value increased marginally to 862 million in 2019, then decreased moderately to 842 million in 2020. Subsequently, there was a considerable rise to 1,159 million in 2021 and an additional increase to 1,284 million in 2022. The growth in 2021 and 2022 was strong enough to exceed the levels observed prior to 2020.

Overall, both income tax expense and cash operating taxes suffered declines in 2020, possibly reflecting economic conditions or operational factors impacting taxable income or tax payments during that year. The subsequent two years show recovery and robust increases, indicating higher taxable profits or changes in tax rates or policies. Notably, cash operating taxes slightly outpaced income tax expense in the last two years, which could suggest timing differences or changes in tax payment structures.


Invested Capital

CSX Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Current maturities of long-term debt
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Shareholders’ equity, attributable to CSX
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Allowance for credit losses3
Equity equivalents4
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax5
Non-controlling minority interest
Adjusted shareholders’ equity, attributable to CSX
Construction in progress6
Investments at fair value7
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.

4 Addition of equity equivalents to shareholders’ equity, attributable to CSX.

5 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.

6 Subtraction of construction in progress.

7 Subtraction of investments at fair value.


Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases demonstrated an overall increasing trend across the observed periods. Starting at $15,060 million at the end of 2018, the figure rose steadily to $18,604 million by the end of 2022. There was a noticeable increment from 2019 to 2020, followed by a slight decline in 2021, and then an uptick again in 2022 reaching the highest value in the series.
Shareholders’ equity, attributable to CSX
Shareholders’ equity showed fluctuations during the five-year period. Beginning at $12,563 million in 2018, it decreased to $11,848 million in 2019. Subsequently, the equity improved, peaking at $13,490 million in 2021, before declining again to $12,615 million in 2022. This pattern suggests variable equity performance with no consistent growth trajectory.
Invested capital
Invested capital displayed a consistent growth pattern over the period examined. The value increased incrementally from $34,219 million in 2018 to $38,278 million in 2022. The growth was steady with modest year-to-year increases, indicating a gradual expansion of the capital base over time.

Cost of Capital

CSX Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, including current maturities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, including current maturities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, including current maturities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, including current maturities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt, including current maturities3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt, including current maturities. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

CSX Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
FedEx Corp.
Uber Technologies Inc.
Union Pacific Corp.
United Airlines Holdings Inc.
United Parcel Service Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The period between 2018 and 2022 demonstrates a consistent pattern of negative economic profit for the entity, alongside increasing invested capital. This has resulted in a consistently negative economic spread ratio throughout the analyzed timeframe.

Economic Profit
Economic profit exhibited volatility, beginning at negative $1,701 million in 2018, improving slightly to negative $1,586 million in 2019, then declining to negative $2,614 million in 2020. A partial recovery was seen in 2021 with a value of negative $1,882 million, followed by a further, albeit smaller, improvement to negative $1,676 million in 2022. Despite these fluctuations, economic profit remained negative each year.
Invested Capital
Invested capital showed a steady upward trend over the five-year period. Starting at $34,219 million in 2018, it increased to $34,802 million in 2019, $37,637 million in 2020, $37,644 million in 2021, and reached $38,278 million in 2022. The rate of increase slowed between 2020 and 2021, but continued into 2022.
Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio was negative throughout the period, indicating that the entity’s return on invested capital was less than its cost of capital. The ratio worsened from -4.97% in 2018 to -6.94% in 2020, representing the largest decline. A subsequent improvement occurred in 2021, with the ratio moving to -5.00%, and continued in 2022, reaching -4.38%. While the ratio improved in the latter two years, it remained negative, suggesting continued value destruction.

The consistent negative economic spread ratio, coupled with increasing invested capital, suggests that the entity has not been generating returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital. The improvements observed in 2021 and 2022, while positive, were not enough to shift the economic spread ratio into positive territory.


Economic Profit Margin

CSX Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Revenue
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
FedEx Corp.
Uber Technologies Inc.
Union Pacific Corp.
United Airlines Holdings Inc.
United Parcel Service Inc.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Revenue
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis reveals a consistent pattern of negative economic profit over the five-year period, though with some fluctuation. Revenue demonstrates a more volatile trend, exhibiting a decline in 2019 and 2020 before recovering and achieving substantial growth in 2021 and 2022. The economic profit margin mirrors the economic profit trend, remaining negative throughout the observed timeframe.

Economic Profit
Economic profit consistently registers as a negative value across all years examined. The magnitude of the loss decreased from 2018 to 2019, but increased significantly in 2020. A subsequent reduction in the loss is observed in 2021 and 2022, although it remains substantial. This indicates that the company’s returns are consistently below its cost of capital.
Revenue
Revenue experienced a slight decrease between 2018 and 2019. A more pronounced decline occurred from 2019 to 2020. However, revenue rebounded strongly in 2021 and continued to increase significantly in 2022, reaching its highest level during the analyzed period. This suggests a potential shift in market conditions or company performance contributing to increased sales.
Economic Profit Margin
The economic profit margin is negative for each year, indicating that the company is not generating economic profit on each dollar of revenue. The margin worsened considerably in 2020, reaching -24.70%, coinciding with the largest economic profit loss. The margin improved in both 2021 and 2022, aligning with the revenue growth and reduced economic profit losses, but remained in negative territory. The improvement suggests a potential increase in efficiency or a more favorable cost of capital relative to revenue, though economic profit remains negative overall.

In summary, while revenue has shown recent positive momentum, the company continues to struggle with generating economic profit, as evidenced by the consistently negative economic profit and economic profit margin. The substantial improvement in the margin in the latter years, despite remaining negative, warrants further investigation to understand the underlying drivers and sustainability of this trend.