Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Axon Enterprise Inc. (NASDAQ:AXON)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since May 9, 2023.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Axon Enterprise Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2022 11.60% = 5.16% × 2.25
Dec 31, 2021 -5.73% = -3.56% × 1.61
Dec 31, 2020 -0.18% = -0.12% × 1.41
Dec 31, 2019 0.16% = 0.10% × 1.56
Dec 31, 2018 6.25% = 4.06% × 1.54

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The return on equity (ROE) exhibits significant volatility over the five-year period, characterized by a multi-year decline that reached a trough in 2021 before a sharp recovery in 2022. This trajectory is primarily driven by fluctuations in asset productivity, which were further amplified by changes in the company's capital structure toward the end of the period.

Return on Assets (ROA)
A downward trend is observed from 2018 to 2021, where ROA fell from 4.06% to -3.56%. This decline indicates a period of diminishing asset efficiency or net losses. A substantial recovery occurred in 2022, with ROA increasing to 5.16%, marking the highest level of asset productivity within the observed timeframe.
Financial Leverage
The leverage ratio remained relatively stable between 1.41 and 1.61 from 2018 through 2021. However, a significant increase to 2.25 was recorded in 2022. This shift indicates a higher reliance on debt or a reduction in equity relative to total assets, increasing the financial risk profile while simultaneously amplifying potential returns.
Return on Equity (ROE) Synthesis
The ROE closely mirrors the movement of the ROA but with greater magnitude due to the multiplier effect of leverage. The negative ROE values seen in 2020 (-0.18%) and 2021 (-5.73%) were a direct consequence of negative asset returns. The recovery to 11.60% in 2022 resulted from a dual positive impact: the return to a positive ROA and the simultaneous expansion of financial leverage.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Axon Enterprise Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2022 11.60% = 12.37% × 0.42 × 2.25
Dec 31, 2021 -5.73% = -6.95% × 0.51 × 1.61
Dec 31, 2020 -0.18% = -0.25% × 0.49 × 1.41
Dec 31, 2019 0.16% = 0.17% × 0.63 × 1.56
Dec 31, 2018 6.25% = 6.95% × 0.58 × 1.54

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility over the five-year period, characterized by a steady decline from 6.25% in 2018 to a trough of -5.73% in 2021, followed by a sharp recovery to 11.60% in 2022. This fluctuation is primarily driven by shifts in profitability and financial structure rather than operational efficiency.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability served as the primary driver of ROE volatility. A precipitous decline is observed from 6.95% in 2018 to negative margins in 2020 (-0.25%) and 2021 (-6.95%). This period of contraction suggests a phase of increased expenditure or operational challenges. However, a significant reversal occurred in 2022, with the margin expanding to 12.37%, the highest level in the analyzed period, which fundamentally restored the positive ROE.
Asset Turnover
Efficiency in asset utilization demonstrated a general downward trend. After a peak of 0.63 in 2019, the ratio declined steadily to 0.42 by 2022. This consistent decrease indicates that the company generated progressively less revenue per unit of asset held, suggesting that asset growth has outpaced revenue growth over the five-year span.
Financial Leverage
The leverage ratio remained relatively stable between 1.41 and 1.61 from 2018 through 2021. A notable shift occurred in 2022, where leverage increased sharply to 2.25. This increase indicates a higher reliance on debt or liabilities to finance assets, which served to amplify the positive impact of the improved net profit margin on the final Return on Equity in 2022.

In summary, the recovery of ROE in 2022 was the result of a dual impact: a substantial increase in net profit margins coupled with an increase in financial leverage, which together offset the continued decline in asset turnover efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Axon Enterprise Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2022 11.60% = 0.75 × 1.00 × 16.56% × 0.42 × 2.25
Dec 31, 2021 -5.73% = — × — × -16.37% × 0.51 × 1.61
Dec 31, 2020 -0.18% = — × — × -0.92% × 0.49 × 1.41
Dec 31, 2019 0.16% = 0.43 × 0.98 × 0.40% × 0.63 × 1.56
Dec 31, 2018 6.25% = 1.04 × 1.00 × 6.71% × 0.58 × 1.54

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility over the five-year period, characterized by a steady decline into negative territory before a sharp recovery. The metric shifted from 6.25% in 2018 to a low of -5.73% in 2021, eventually reaching a period high of 11.60% by the end of 2022.

Operating Profitability
The EBIT margin served as the primary driver of ROE fluctuations. A severe contraction is observed from 2018 (6.71%) through 2021, where the margin reached its lowest point at -16.37%. This trend reversed sharply in 2022, with the margin rising to 16.56%, indicating a substantial improvement in operational efficiency or a successful transition in the cost structure.
Asset Efficiency
Asset turnover remained relatively stable but followed a general downward trajectory. After peaking at 0.63 in 2019, the ratio declined to 0.42 by 2022. This suggests a decrease in the efficiency of asset utilization, where revenue growth did not keep pace with the growth of the asset base.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage remained consistent between 1.41 and 1.61 from 2018 to 2021. A notable increase is recorded in 2022, where the ratio rose to 2.25. This increase in leverage amplified the impact of the improved operating margins on the overall return to shareholders.
Interest and Tax Burdens
The interest burden remained near 1.00 throughout the period, indicating that interest expenses had a negligible impact on the conversion of operating profit to net income. The tax burden showed higher variability, dropping from 1.04 in 2018 to 0.43 in 2019, and ending at 0.75 in 2022, reflecting fluctuations in the effective tax rate.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Axon Enterprise Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2022 5.16% = 12.37% × 0.42
Dec 31, 2021 -3.56% = -6.95% × 0.51
Dec 31, 2020 -0.12% = -0.25% × 0.49
Dec 31, 2019 0.10% = 0.17% × 0.63
Dec 31, 2018 4.06% = 6.95% × 0.58

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility over the five-year period, characterized by a steady decline into negative territory before a sharp recovery in the final year. The ROA transitioned from 4.06% in 2018 to a low of -3.56% in 2021, before rebounding to a period high of 5.16% in 2022. This trajectory indicates a period of operational instability followed by a strong financial recovery.

Net Profit Margin
The net profit margin served as the primary driver of ROA fluctuations. A sharp contraction occurred between 2018 and 2021, with margins falling from 6.95% to a deficit of -6.95%. This trend suggests a period of increasing costs or declining pricing power. However, a significant reversal occurred in 2022, where the margin expanded to 12.37%, the highest level recorded in the analyzed period, indicating a substantial improvement in bottom-line profitability.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization efficiency showed a general downward trend. After a peak of 0.63 in 2019, the asset turnover ratio declined steadily to 0.42 by 2022. This consistent decrease suggests that the company is generating less revenue per unit of asset employed, reflecting a potential increase in the asset base that has not yet been matched by proportional revenue growth.
ROA Disaggregation Analysis
The two-component disaggregation reveals that the recovery in ROA in 2022 was driven exclusively by profit margin expansion rather than operational efficiency. While asset turnover reached its lowest point in 2022, the surge in net profit margin was sufficient to override the inefficiency in asset utilization, lifting the overall return on assets to its peak value. Consequently, the company's current ROA growth is predicated on profitability improvements rather than increased asset productivity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Axon Enterprise Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2022 5.16% = 0.75 × 1.00 × 16.56% × 0.42
Dec 31, 2021 -3.56% = — × — × -16.37% × 0.51
Dec 31, 2020 -0.12% = — × — × -0.92% × 0.49
Dec 31, 2019 0.10% = 0.43 × 0.98 × 0.40% × 0.63
Dec 31, 2018 4.06% = 1.04 × 1.00 × 6.71% × 0.58

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility between 2018 and 2022, characterized by a multi-year decline into negative territory followed by a sharp recovery. After starting at 4.06% in 2018, the ROA reached a trough of -3.56% in 2021 before rebounding to a period high of 5.16% in 2022.

Operating Profitability
The EBIT Margin acted as the primary driver of the overall ROA fluctuations. A severe contraction in operating profitability is observed from 2018 (6.71%) through 2021, where the margin fell to -16.37%. This downward trajectory was reversed abruptly in 2022, with the margin expanding to 16.56%, indicating a significant improvement in operating leverage or a shift in the cost structure.
Asset Efficiency
Asset Turnover showed a general trend of deterioration. While a peak of 0.63 was reached in 2019, the ratio declined to 0.42 by 2022. This persistent decrease suggests that assets are being utilized less efficiently to generate revenue, or that the asset base has grown at a rate exceeding revenue growth.
Financial and Tax Influence
The Interest Burden remained exceptionally stable, hovering around 1.00, which implies that interest expenses had a negligible impact on the net return relative to operating results. The Tax Burden exhibited more volatility, dropping to 0.43 in 2019 and ending at 0.75 in 2022, reflecting variations in the tax environment or the application of deferred tax assets and liabilities.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

Axon Enterprise Inc., decomposition of net profit margin ratio

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Dec 31, 2022 12.37% = 0.75 × 1.00 × 16.56%
Dec 31, 2021 -6.95% = — × — × -16.37%
Dec 31, 2020 -0.25% = — × — × -0.92%
Dec 31, 2019 0.17% = 0.43 × 0.98 × 0.40%
Dec 31, 2018 6.95% = 1.04 × 1.00 × 6.71%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The net profit margin exhibited significant volatility over the observed five-year period, characterized by a sustained decline into negative territory followed by a sharp recovery. After starting at 6.95% in 2018, the margin compressed to near-zero levels in 2019 and 2020, reaching a low of -6.95% in 2021, before rebounding strongly to 12.37% in 2022.

EBIT Margin
Operational profitability served as the primary driver of the net profit margin's trajectory. The EBIT margin mirrored the overall downward trend, falling from 6.71% in 2018 to a significant deficit of -16.37% in 2021. This precipitous decline indicates a period of substantial operational headwinds or increased expenditures. However, a dramatic reversal occurred in 2022, with the EBIT margin climbing to 16.56%, suggesting a successful pivot toward operational efficiency or a surge in high-margin revenue.
Interest Burden
The interest burden remained remarkably stable, maintaining a ratio of approximately 1.00 across available data points. This consistency indicates that interest expenses had a negligible impact on the disaggregation of the net profit margin, suggesting that financing costs did not contribute to the volatility observed in the bottom line.
Tax Burden
The tax burden showed fluctuating patterns, starting at 1.04 in 2018 and decreasing to 0.43 in 2019, with a subsequent value of 0.75 in 2022. The values below 1.00 in later years suggest that tax benefits or a lower effective tax rate provided a modest cushion to the net profit margin, although this effect was secondary to the movements in operational profitability.

In summary, the disaggregation of the net profit margin reveals that the company's financial performance was almost entirely dependent on its operating results. The transition from a deep operational loss in 2021 to a robust profit margin in 2022 highlights a rapid turnaround in core business profitability, while debt and tax factors remained relatively neutral or supportive.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?