EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Time Warner Cable Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Selected Financial Data since 2006
- Total Asset Turnover since 2006
- Price to Operating Profit (P/OP) since 2006
- Analysis of Revenues
- Analysis of Debt
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Time Warner Cable Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2015 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The net operating profit after taxes exhibits fluctuations over the analyzed period. Starting at $3,328 million in 2011, it increases to a peak of $3,807 million in 2012, then declines to $3,388 million by 2013. Following this, there is a modest recovery to $3,745 million in 2014, before decreasing again to $3,391 million in 2015. Overall, the NOPAT does not show a consistent upward trend, indicating variability in operating profitability.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital shows an upward trend across the years. It starts at 8.86% in 2011 and dips slightly to 8.48% in 2012. From 2013 onwards, it rises steadily, reaching 10.23% in 2013, 10.06% in 2014, and further increasing to 11.08% in 2015. This increasing cost of capital suggests a growing expense associated with financing the company's capital, which could impact investment decisions and valuation.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital remains relatively stable over the period, fluctuating slightly around the $44 billion to $46 billion range. It starts at $44,961 million in 2011, rises marginally to $46,124 million in 2012, then decreases to $44,327 million in 2013. Subsequent years show small increases to $44,929 million in 2014 and $45,332 million in 2015. The limited variation indicates a stable level of capital investment in the business.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit consistently remains negative throughout the period, highlighting that the company does not generate value above its cost of capital. The deficit reduces significantly from -$658 million in 2011 to -$104 million in 2012, suggesting improved efficiency or profitability relative to invested capital. However, in 2013, economic profit deteriorates sharply to -$1,144 million, improving moderately to -$776 million in 2014, before worsening substantially to -$1,633 million in 2015. This pattern indicates challenges in covering the increasing cost of capital and maintaining value creation, with considerable volatility in economic profit performance.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful accounts.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue and subscriber-related liabilities.
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring reserves.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to TWC shareholders.
6 2015 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
7 2015 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 35.00% =
8 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to TWC shareholders.
- Net income attributable to TWC shareholders
- The net income showed an upward trend from 2011 to 2012, increasing from $1665 million to $2155 million. However, in 2013 a decline occurred to $1954 million, followed by a slight recovery in 2014 to $2031 million. The year 2015 saw another decrease to $1844 million, indicating a general volatility with a peak in 2012 and subsequent fluctuations.
- Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
- NOPAT increased from $3328 million in 2011 to $3807 million in 2012, mirroring the peak found in net income for the same year. In 2013, NOPAT declined to $3388 million but rose again in 2014 to $3745 million, approaching the 2012 level. By 2015, NOPAT decreased to $3391 million, showing the same fluctuating pattern observed in net income, with 2012 and 2014 as relatively stronger years.
- Overall financial performance trends
- Both net income and NOPAT exhibited similar cyclical patterns over the five-year period. The highest values were observed in the early part of the timeframe (specifically 2012), followed by periods of decline and partial recovery. This suggests fluctuations in profitability and operating efficiency, potentially reflecting changes in operational effectiveness, market conditions, or other external factors influencing financial outcomes.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
The financial data indicates fluctuations in the income tax provision and cash operating taxes of the company over the five-year period ending December 31, 2015.
- Income Tax Provision
- The income tax provision demonstrates an overall upward trend from 2011 through 2014, increasing from 795 million US dollars in 2011 to a peak of 1,217 million in 2014. However, in 2015, there is a slight decline to 1,144 million US dollars. This suggests rising taxable earnings or adjustments in tax liabilities during the initial years followed by a moderate reduction in the last year.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes present a more variable pattern. Beginning at 705 million US dollars in 2011, the amount rises sharply to 1,194 million in 2012 and continues to increase to 1,281 million in 2013. Subsequently, it decreases to 973 million in 2014 before partially rebounding to 1,057 million in 2015. This fluctuation may reflect changes in the company's actual cash outflows for taxes, potentially influenced by alterations in tax payment timing, tax credits, or tax planning strategies.
Overall, while the income tax provision generally increased over the period with a minor decline at the end, the cash operating taxes followed a less consistent path, showing considerable volatility. The divergence between the income tax provision and cash operating taxes in certain years may indicate differences between accounting for tax expenses and actual cash paid, affecting cash flow management and tax planning effectiveness.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of deferred revenue and subscriber-related liabilities.
5 Addition of restructuring reserves.
6 Addition of equity equivalents to total TWC shareholders’ equity.
7 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
8 Subtraction of construction in progress.
- Total reported debt & leases
-
The reported debt and leases demonstrate a consistent declining trend over the observed period. Starting at 27,138 million USD at the end of 2011, the debt slightly increased to 27,378 million USD in 2012, then steadily decreased each year thereafter, reaching 23,183 million USD by the end of 2015. This indicates a reduction in the company's leverage or obligations related to debt and lease commitments over five years.
- Total shareholders’ equity
-
Shareholders’ equity shows some fluctuations but a general upward trend across the period. Initially, the equity value decreased from 7,530 million USD in 2011 to 6,943 million USD in 2013. Afterward, the equity figures improved significantly, increasing to 8,013 million USD in 2014 and further to 8,995 million USD by the end of 2015. This growth suggests strengthening of the company's net asset position or profitability retention over time.
- Invested capital
-
Invested capital remained relatively stable throughout the period, with minor fluctuations. It started at 44,961 million USD in 2011, peaked at 46,124 million USD in 2012, then decreased to 44,327 million USD in 2013. It showed slight increases in subsequent years, ending at 45,332 million USD in 2015. This stability reflects consistency in the company's overall capital base employed in operations.
Cost of Capital
Time Warner Cable Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | ||||||
| Comcast Corp. | ||||||
| Meta Platforms Inc. | ||||||
| Netflix Inc. | ||||||
| Trade Desk Inc. | ||||||
| Walt Disney Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2015 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit shows a consistently negative trend throughout the analyzed period. Despite some fluctuations, the values remain below zero, indicating that the company did not generate economic profit in any of the years. The losses were smallest in 2012 at -104 million USD, but by 2015, the negative economic profit deepened considerably to -1,633 million USD. This suggests increasing challenges in achieving profitability beyond cost of capital over time.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital remained relatively stable from 2011 to 2015, fluctuating within a narrow range between approximately 44,000 and 46,000 million USD. This consistency indicates that the company's invested resources in assets or operations did not undergo significant expansion or contraction during the period. The stable invested capital base contrasts with the fluctuating economic profit figures.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio, representing the difference between return on invested capital and cost of capital, was consistently negative across all years. The ratio showed a slight improvement in 2012 (-0.22%) compared to 2011 (-1.46%) but deteriorated notably afterward, reaching its lowest point at -3.6% in 2015. This negative spread ratio confirms the company's struggle to generate returns exceeding its capital costs, with a worsening efficiency in capital utilization over time.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2015 | Dec 31, 2014 | Dec 31, 2013 | Dec 31, 2012 | Dec 31, 2011 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Revenue | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue and subscriber-related liabilities | ||||||
| Adjusted revenue | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Alphabet Inc. | ||||||
| Comcast Corp. | ||||||
| Meta Platforms Inc. | ||||||
| Netflix Inc. | ||||||
| Trade Desk Inc. | ||||||
| Walt Disney Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2015 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted revenue
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of the financial data over the five-year period shows notable fluctuations across the reported metrics.
- Adjusted Revenue
- There is a consistent upward trend in adjusted revenue, increasing from approximately 19.7 billion US dollars in 2011 to around 23.7 billion US dollars by the end of 2015. This reflects steady growth in the company's revenue base over the period.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit figures reveal a pattern of significant negative values throughout the period, indicating that the company has not generated positive economic profit at any point. The economic profit worsened notably in 2013 and again in 2015, where the magnitude of losses grew considerably compared to other years.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin follows a similar trajectory to economic profit, remaining negative across all periods. The margin decreased sharply in 2013 and reached its lowest point in 2015. The margin's decline despite increasing revenues suggests rising costs or capital charges that have eroded profitability.
Overall, while revenue growth is positive and steady, the company's economic profitability has declined, with increasing losses as shown by both economic profit and economic profit margin. This indicates challenges in converting revenue growth into sustainable economic gains, warranting further investigation into cost management and capital efficiency.