AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Time Warner Cable Inc. (NYSE:TWC)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 28, 2016.

Analysis of Property, Plant and Equipment

Microsoft Excel

Property, Plant and Equipment Disclosure

Time Warner Cable Inc., balance sheet: property, plant and equipment

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Land 174 173 173 170 158
Buildings and improvements 1,919 1,865 1,678 1,608 1,399
Distribution systems 27,126 24,951 23,119 21,141 19,470
Converters and modems 6,743 6,141 5,687 5,806 5,591
Capitalized software costs 2,924 2,572 2,252 1,895 1,643
Vehicles and other equipment 2,466 2,374 2,286 2,214 2,191
Construction in progress 424 476 424 438 468
Property, plant and equipment, gross 41,776 38,552 35,619 33,272 30,920
Accumulated depreciation (24,831) (22,562) (20,563) (18,530) (17,015)
Property, plant and equipment, net 16,945 15,990 15,056 14,742 13,905

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


Gross property, plant and equipment experienced consistent year-over-year growth from 2011 to 2015, increasing from 30,920 million US$ to 41,776 million US$. This expansion reflects a sustained period of capital investment across multiple asset categories.

Primary Infrastructure Investments
Distribution systems represent the largest portion of the asset base and showed the most significant absolute growth, rising from 19,470 million US$ in 2011 to 27,126 million US$ in 2015. Similarly, capitalized software costs exhibited a strong upward trajectory, increasing from 1,643 million US$ to 2,924 million US$ over the same period, indicating a strategic focus on digital infrastructure and software capabilities.
Hardware and Facilities Growth
Buildings and improvements increased steadily from 1,399 million US$ to 1,919 million US$. Converters and modems also trended upward, growing from 5,591 million US$ in 2011 to 6,743 million US$ in 2015, despite a slight contraction observed in 2013. Vehicles and other equipment showed marginal but consistent growth, ending the period at 2,466 million US$.
Capital Expenditure Pipeline
Construction in progress remained relatively stagnant throughout the five-year period, fluctuating between a low of 424 million US$ and a high of 476 million US$. This stability suggests that new projects were completed and transitioned into active asset categories at a rate similar to the initiation of new construction.
Depreciation and Net Asset Value
Accumulated depreciation increased from 17,015 million US$ in 2011 to 24,831 million US$ in 2015. While gross assets grew by approximately 34.5%, net property, plant and equipment grew at a more moderate pace, from 13,905 million US$ to 16,945 million US$, reflecting the impact of ongoing depreciation on the expanding asset base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Asset Age Ratios (Summary)

Time Warner Cable Inc., asset age ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Average age ratio 59.69% 58.79% 58.01% 55.98% 55.31%
Estimated total useful life (years) 12 12 11 10 10
Estimated age, time elapsed since purchase (years) 7 7 7 6 6
Estimated remaining life (years) 5 5 5 5 5

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).


An analysis of the asset age ratios indicates a steady increase in the proportion of the useful life consumed by the company's property, plant, and equipment. The progression suggests a maturing asset base and adjustments in the estimation of asset longevity over the five-year period.

Average Age Ratio
A consistent upward trend is observed in the average age ratio, which rose from 55.31% in 2011 to 59.69% by 2015. This incremental growth signifies that, on average, a larger percentage of the assets' estimated useful lives have been exhausted, reflecting a general aging of the asset portfolio.
Estimated Total Useful Life
The estimated total useful life of assets was adjusted upward over the period, increasing from 10 years in 2011 and 2012 to 11 years in 2013, and finally to 12 years in 2014 and 2015. This expansion suggests a revision in accounting estimates or an improvement in the expected durability of the equipment.
Elapsed Age and Remaining Life
The estimated age, representing the time elapsed since purchase, remained relatively stable, moving from 6 years in 2011 to 7 years by 2013 and remaining at that level through 2015. Concurrently, the estimated remaining life remained constant at 5 years throughout the entire period. The stability of the remaining life, despite the increase in total useful life and elapsed age, indicates a consistent projection for the window of asset utility before replacement is required.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Age

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 24,831 22,562 20,563 18,530 17,015
Property, plant and equipment, gross 41,776 38,552 35,619 33,272 30,920
Land 174 173 173 170 158
Asset Age Ratio
Average age1 59.69% 58.79% 58.01% 55.98% 55.31%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

2015 Calculations

1 Average age = 100 × Accumulated depreciation ÷ (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land)
= 100 × 24,831 ÷ (41,776 – 174) = 59.69%


An examination of the fixed asset profile reveals a consistent increase in both the total gross value of property, plant, and equipment and the associated accumulated depreciation from 2011 through 2015.

Asset Base and Depreciation Trends
Gross property, plant, and equipment grew steadily from 30,920 million US dollars in 2011 to 41,776 million US dollars in 2015. Concurrently, accumulated depreciation rose from 17,015 million US dollars to 24,831 million US dollars over the same period. This indicates a pattern of continuous capital investment, although the total volume of depreciation is increasing in tandem with the expansion of the asset base.
Average Age Ratio Analysis
The average age ratio demonstrates a persistent upward trend, rising from 55.31% in 2011 to 59.69% by the end of 2015. This progression suggests that the overall asset base is aging. Since the ratio continues to climb despite the increase in gross asset value, it can be inferred that the rate of depreciation is outpacing the rate of new asset acquisition or the replacement of obsolete equipment.
Land Asset Stability
Land holdings remained relatively static, moving from 158 million US dollars in 2011 to 174 million US dollars in 2015. This stability indicates that the growth in the company's fixed asset base is driven almost exclusively by depreciable infrastructure and equipment rather than the acquisition of real estate.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Total Useful Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, gross 41,776 38,552 35,619 33,272 30,920
Land 174 173 173 170 158
Depreciation expense 3,560 3,236 3,155 3,154 2,994
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated total useful life1 12 12 11 10 10

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

2015 Calculations

1 Estimated total useful life = (Property, plant and equipment, gross – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (41,776 – 174) ÷ 3,560 = 12


Between 2011 and 2015, a consistent expansion in the gross value of property, plant, and equipment was observed, rising from 30,920 million US dollars to 41,776 million US dollars. This represents a total increase of approximately 35% over the five-year period. The growth is predominantly attributed to equipment and infrastructure, as land holdings remained relatively stagnant, increasing only marginally from 158 million US dollars to 174 million US dollars.

Estimated Useful Life Extension
A progressive increase in the estimated total useful life of assets is evident. The estimate remained constant at 10 years through 2012, increased to 11 years in 2013, and further rose to 12 years by 2014, where it remained through 2015. This 20% extension in the estimated life suggests a strategic reassessment of asset longevity or a shift toward acquiring assets with longer operational lifespans.
Depreciation Expense Correlation
Depreciation expense grew from 2,994 million US dollars in 2011 to 3,560 million US dollars in 2015. While the gross asset base grew by 35%, the depreciation expense increased by only 18.9% over the same period. The divergence between the growth of the asset base and the growth of the depreciation expense is consistent with the extension of the estimated useful life, which serves to spread the cost of assets over a longer duration, thereby reducing the annual depreciation impact on the income statement.
Asset Composition and Investment Focus
The negligible growth in land values relative to the substantial increase in gross property, plant, and equipment indicates that capital expenditures were heavily concentrated in depreciable assets rather than non-depreciable real estate. This pattern reflects a period of intensive investment in technical infrastructure and operational capacity.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Age, Time Elapsed since Purchase

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Accumulated depreciation 24,831 22,562 20,563 18,530 17,015
Depreciation expense 3,560 3,236 3,155 3,154 2,994
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Time elapsed since purchase1 7 7 7 6 6

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

2015 Calculations

1 Time elapsed since purchase = Accumulated depreciation ÷ Depreciation expense
= 24,831 ÷ 3,560 = 7


The financial trajectory between 2011 and 2015 reveals a consistent increase in the aging of the asset base and a corresponding rise in both cumulative and annual depreciation costs.

Accumulated Depreciation Growth
A continuous upward trend is observed in accumulated depreciation, which climbed from 17,015 million US dollars in 2011 to 24,831 million US dollars by 2015. This represents a significant increase in the total amount of asset cost allocated as expense over the five-year period, indicating a maturing infrastructure.
Depreciation Expense Patterns
Annual depreciation expenses grew steadily from 2,994 million US dollars in 2011 to 3,560 million US dollars in 2015. While the growth was relatively incremental between 2012 and 2014, a more pronounced increase occurred in 2015, suggesting an expansion in capital expenditures or a shift in the depreciation schedule of newer assets.
Asset Age Analysis
The time elapsed since purchase, serving as a proxy for the average age of property, plant, and equipment, increased from 6 years in 2011 and 2012 to 7 years for the period spanning 2013 to 2015. This progression confirms that the weighted average age of the company's tangible assets is increasing, which aligns with the observed rise in accumulated depreciation.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Estimated Remaining Life

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2015 Dec 31, 2014 Dec 31, 2013 Dec 31, 2012 Dec 31, 2011
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, net 16,945 15,990 15,056 14,742 13,905
Land 174 173 173 170 158
Depreciation expense 3,560 3,236 3,155 3,154 2,994
Asset Age Ratio (Years)
Estimated remaining life1 5 5 5 5 5

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2013-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2012-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2011-12-31).

2015 Calculations

1 Estimated remaining life = (Property, plant and equipment, net – Land) ÷ Depreciation expense
= (16,945 – 174) ÷ 3,560 = 5


The analysis of property, plant and equipment reveals a consistent growth trend in the net asset base over the five-year period from 2011 to 2015.

Net Asset Growth
Net property, plant and equipment increased steadily from US$ 13,905 million in 2011 to US$ 16,945 million in 2015. This upward trajectory indicates a sustained period of capital investment in physical infrastructure.
Depreciation Expense Patterns
Depreciation expenses followed a general upward trend, rising from US$ 2,994 million in 2011 to US$ 3,560 million in 2015. A notable acceleration in depreciation occurred between 2014 and 2015, coinciding with the period of highest net asset value.
Land Holdings
Land values remained relatively stable, starting at US$ 158 million in 2011 and ending at US$ 174 million in 2015. The minimal growth in land compared to the total asset base suggests that investment was primarily focused on depreciable equipment and infrastructure rather than real estate.
Estimated Remaining Life
The estimated remaining useful life of assets remained constant at 5 years for every year in the analyzed period. The persistence of this figure, despite the growth in the total asset base and increasing depreciation expenses, indicates a consistent capital replacement cycle where new assets are added at a rate that maintains a stable average remaining life across the portfolio.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?