Activity ratios measure how efficiently a company performs day-to-day tasks, such us the collection of receivables and management of inventory.
Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)
Turnover Ratios
Average No. Days
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
Analysis of short-term operating activity indicates a general deceleration in asset turnover and a lengthening of the cash conversion cycle toward the end of the observed period.
- Asset Management and Turnover
- Receivables turnover exhibits a consistent downward trend, decreasing from 11.53 in 2017 to 8.07 in 2021. This decline is mirrored by the average receivable collection period, which extended from 32 days to 45 days over the same timeframe. Inventory turnover remained volatile, reaching its lowest point in 2021 at 3.34, which contributed to an increase in the average inventory processing period to a peak of 109 days.
- Liability and Working Capital Efficiency
- Payables turnover declined from 12.14 in 2017 to 7.26 in 2021, reflecting a strategic or operational increase in the average payables payment period from 30 to 50 days. Simultaneously, working capital turnover experienced a substantial increase, rising from 2.87 in 2017 to 22.97 in 2021, with a particularly sharp acceleration occurring between 2019 and 2020.
- Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
- The operating cycle lengthened significantly, reaching 154 days in 2021 compared to 118 days in 2017. Although the cash conversion cycle saw a temporary reduction to 83 days in 2020, it ultimately rose to 104 days by 2021. This indicates that the slowing of inventory movement and receivable collections in the final year outweighed the extended payment terms granted by suppliers.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Inventory Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 9,157,100) | 7,616,800) | 8,009,000) | 8,088,900) | 6,566,600) | |
| Inventories | 2,741,400) | 1,739,200) | 2,076,400) | 2,270,200) | 1,547,200) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Inventory turnover1 | 3.34 | 4.38 | 3.86 | 3.56 | 4.24 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Inventory Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Linde plc | 10.12 | — | — | — | — | |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | 5.92 | — | — | — | — | |
| Inventory Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Chemicals | 7.91 | — | — | — | — | |
| Inventory Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Materials | 5.27 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Inventories
= 9,157,100 ÷ 2,741,400 = 3.34
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of short-term operating activity from 2017 to 2021 reveals a fluctuating pattern in inventory management efficiency. While the cost of goods sold generally trended upward over the five-year period, inventory levels exhibited significant volatility, resulting in an inconsistent inventory turnover ratio.
- Inventory Turnover Ratio Trends
- The inventory turnover ratio began at 4.24 in 2017 before declining to 3.56 in 2018. A period of improvement followed, with the ratio increasing to 3.86 in 2019 and peaking at 4.38 in 2020, marking the highest efficiency level in the observed period. This positive trend reversed sharply in 2021, when the ratio fell to 3.34, the lowest value recorded during the analyzed timeframe.
- Correlation Between Inventory Levels and Cost of Goods Sold
- The volatility in the turnover ratio is closely linked to substantial shifts in inventory holdings. In 2021, a significant increase in inventories to 2.74 billion US dollars outpaced the growth in the cost of goods sold, which reached 9.16 billion US dollars, thereby depressing the turnover ratio. Conversely, the efficiency peak in 2020 was driven by a reduction in inventory to 1.74 billion US dollars, indicating a leaner inventory position relative to the 7.62 billion US dollars in cost of goods sold during that year.
- Operational Observations
- The data suggests a lack of linear stability in inventory movement. The transition from 2020 to 2021 represents the most significant shift, where the rapid accumulation of stock significantly slowed the rate of inventory clearance, despite the highest annual cost of goods sold occurring in the same period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Receivables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Net sales | 12,357,400) | 8,681,700) | 8,906,300) | 9,587,300) | 7,409,400) | |
| Receivables, net | 1,531,900) | 881,100) | 803,900) | 838,500) | 642,600) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Receivables turnover1 | 8.07 | 9.85 | 11.08 | 11.43 | 11.53 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Receivables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Linde plc | 6.84 | — | — | — | — | |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | 8.48 | — | — | — | — | |
| Receivables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Chemicals | 7.41 | — | — | — | — | |
| Receivables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Materials | 9.18 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Receivables, net
= 12,357,400 ÷ 1,531,900 = 8.07
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a consistent decline in receivables turnover over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. While net sales exhibited volatility and experienced a significant surge in the final year, the efficiency of collecting outstanding receivables has deteriorated steadily.
- Receivables Turnover Trend
- A continuous downward trajectory is observed in the receivables turnover ratio, which decreased from 11.53 in 2017 to 8.07 in 2021. The decline was gradual between 2017 and 2019, but the rate of deterioration accelerated between 2020 and 2021, marking the lowest efficiency level in the observed period.
- Correlation Between Sales and Receivables
- Net sales fluctuated throughout the period, ending with a sharp increase to 12,357,400 thousand US$ in 2021. However, the growth in net receivables has outpaced sales growth in the latter years. Specifically, in 2021, net receivables increased by approximately 73.9% compared to the previous year, while net sales grew by approximately 42.3%, contributing to the reduction in the turnover ratio.
- Operating Efficiency Implications
- The steady reduction in the turnover ratio indicates a lengthening of the average collection period. The shift from a ratio of 11.53 to 8.07 suggests a weakening in credit collection efficiency, resulting in a larger proportion of working capital being tied up in accounts receivable relative to the volume of annual sales.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Payables Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 9,157,100) | 7,616,800) | 8,009,000) | 8,088,900) | 6,566,600) | |
| Accounts payable | 1,260,700) | 769,100) | 680,400) | 780,900) | 540,900) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Payables turnover1 | 7.26 | 9.90 | 11.77 | 10.36 | 12.14 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Payables Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Linde plc | 5.01 | — | — | — | — | |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | 4.74 | — | — | — | — | |
| Payables Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Chemicals | 4.90 | — | — | — | — | |
| Payables Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Materials | 5.41 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Accounts payable
= 9,157,100 ÷ 1,260,700 = 7.26
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An examination of the payables turnover from 2017 to 2021 reveals a general downward trend in the frequency with which obligations to suppliers are settled. The ratio decreased from 12.14 in 2017 to 7.26 in 2021, indicating a consistent lengthening of the payment cycle over the five-year period.
- Payables Turnover Volatility
- The turnover ratio exhibited moderate fluctuations between 2017 and 2020, maintaining a range between 9.90 and 12.14. However, a significant decline occurred in 2021, where the ratio dropped to 7.26. This represents the lowest point in the analyzed period and suggests a marked slowdown in the rate at which accounts payable are cleared.
- Correlation Between COGS and Liabilities
- While the cost of goods sold reached a period peak of $9.16 billion in 2021, the balance of accounts payable grew at a disproportionately faster rate. Accounts payable increased from $769.1 million in 2020 to $1.26 billion in 2021. This sharp increase in short-term liabilities relative to the growth in cost of goods sold is the primary driver for the compression of the turnover ratio.
- Operational Implications
- The steady decline in the turnover ratio suggests a strategic or operational shift toward extending payment terms with suppliers. By increasing the average time taken to pay creditors, the company has effectively increased its reliance on supplier credit to manage short-term liquidity, which is most evident in the substantial leap in payable balances during the final year of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Working Capital Turnover
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Current assets | 5,325,300) | 3,521,200) | 3,718,200) | 4,237,000) | 4,616,500) | |
| Less: Current liabilities | 4,787,400) | 3,146,500) | 2,591,700) | 2,483,700) | 2,031,100) | |
| Working capital | 537,900) | 374,700) | 1,126,500) | 1,753,300) | 2,585,400) | |
| Net sales | 12,357,400) | 8,681,700) | 8,906,300) | 9,587,300) | 7,409,400) | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Working capital turnover1 | 22.97 | 23.17 | 7.91 | 5.47 | 2.87 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Linde plc | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Working Capital Turnover, Sector | ||||||
| Chemicals | — | — | — | — | — | |
| Working Capital Turnover, Industry | ||||||
| Materials | 15.37 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= 12,357,400 ÷ 537,900 = 22.97
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
An analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a significant shift in the management of working capital between 2017 and 2021. While net sales experienced substantial growth over the period, the working capital base contracted sharply, resulting in a dramatic escalation of the working capital turnover ratio.
- Working Capital Trends
- A consistent downward trajectory is observed in working capital from 2017 through 2020, with values declining from US$ 2,585,400 thousand to a low of US$ 374,700 thousand. A slight reversal of this trend occurred in 2021, as working capital increased to US$ 537,900 thousand.
- Net Sales Performance
- Net sales exhibited overall growth, increasing from US$ 7,409,400 thousand in 2017 to US$ 12,357,400 thousand by 2021. Although slight contractions occurred in 2019 and 2020, the period ended with a significant surge in revenue during the final year of the analysis.
- Working Capital Turnover Analysis
- The working capital turnover ratio rose exponentially from 2.87 in 2017 to 23.17 in 2020, before settling at 22.97 in 2021. This rapid increase is primarily driven by the substantial reduction in working capital rather than the growth in sales. The transition from a ratio of 2.87 to approximately 23.0 indicates an increasingly aggressive operational strategy, where a much smaller amount of working capital is utilized to support a larger volume of sales, suggesting a lean approach to liquidity management.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Inventory Processing Period
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Inventory turnover | 3.34 | 4.38 | 3.86 | 3.56 | 4.24 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period1 | 109 | 83 | 95 | 102 | 86 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Linde plc | 36 | — | — | — | — | |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | 62 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector | ||||||
| Chemicals | 46 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry | ||||||
| Materials | 69 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 3.34 = 109
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The inventory management efficiency between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by notable volatility, reflecting a fluctuating cycle of inventory movement and processing speed.
- Inventory Turnover Analysis
- The turnover ratio exhibited an inconsistent trajectory over the five-year period. After an initial decline from 4.24 in 2017 to 3.56 in 2018, the ratio improved steadily, peaking at 4.38 in 2020. This trend was abruptly reversed in 2021, when the ratio dropped to 3.34, marking the lowest efficiency level in the analyzed timeframe.
- Average Inventory Processing Period Trends
- The duration required to process inventory moved in inverse correlation with the turnover ratio. The processing period extended from 86 days in 2017 to 102 days in 2018, followed by a contraction to a period low of 83 days in 2020. However, 2021 saw a significant expansion in the processing cycle, which reached a maximum of 109 days.
- Operational Efficiency Insights
- The data indicates that operational liquidity regarding inventory reached its peak in 2020, characterized by the highest turnover and the shortest processing time. The shift observed in 2021 suggests a deceleration in inventory throughput, resulting in a longer holding period and a higher proportional investment in unsold goods compared to previous years.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Receivable Collection Period
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Receivables turnover | 8.07 | 9.85 | 11.08 | 11.43 | 11.53 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average receivable collection period1 | 45 | 37 | 33 | 32 | 32 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Linde plc | 53 | — | — | — | — | |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | 43 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector | ||||||
| Chemicals | 49 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry | ||||||
| Materials | 40 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 8.07 = 45
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of short-term activity ratios reveals a consistent decline in the efficiency of receivables management over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021.
- Receivables Turnover
- A continuous downward trajectory is observed in the receivables turnover ratio, which decreased from 11.53 in 2017 to 8.07 by the end of 2021. The rate of decline accelerated after 2019, indicating a slower conversion of accounts receivable into cash.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- The average collection period remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2019, fluctuating only between 32 and 33 days. However, a notable increase occurred in subsequent years, rising to 37 days in 2020 and reaching 45 days in 2021. This represents an expansion of the collection cycle by 13 days over the analyzed period.
The inverse correlation between the decreasing turnover ratio and the increasing collection period suggests a weakening in credit collection efficiency. The trend indicates that capital is remaining tied up in receivables for longer durations, which may impact short-term liquidity and the overall operational cash flow cycle.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Cycle
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 109 | 83 | 95 | 102 | 86 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 45 | 37 | 33 | 32 | 32 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Operating cycle1 | 154 | 120 | 128 | 134 | 118 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Operating Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Linde plc | 89 | — | — | — | — | |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | 105 | — | — | — | — | |
| Operating Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Chemicals | 95 | — | — | — | — | |
| Operating Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Materials | 109 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 109 + 45 = 154
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The operating cycle exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by an overall expansion in the time required to convert current assets into cash. While there was a period of contraction between 2018 and 2020, the cycle ended the period at its highest point, indicating a decrease in short-term operational efficiency.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- The period required to process inventory showed an inconsistent trend, fluctuating from 86 days in 2017 to a peak of 109 days in 2021. After an initial increase in 2018, a downward trend occurred through 2020, where the period reached a five-year low of 83 days. However, the sharp increase to 109 days in 2021 suggests a significant slowing of inventory turnover or an intentional increase in stock levels.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- A steady upward trend is observed in the collection of receivables. The period remained stable at 32 to 33 days from 2017 through 2019, followed by a gradual increase to 37 days in 2020 and a more pronounced rise to 45 days in 2021. This trajectory indicates a lengthening of the credit cycle and a potential decline in the efficiency of accounts receivable management.
- Operating Cycle
- The total operating cycle mirrored the volatility of the inventory processing period but was further amplified by the rising collection period. From a baseline of 118 days in 2017, the cycle expanded to 134 days in 2018, contracted to 120 days by 2020, and ultimately surged to 154 days in 2021. The 36-day increase between 2017 and 2021 reflects a combined impact of slower inventory movement and delayed payment collections.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Average Payables Payment Period
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Payables turnover | 7.26 | 9.90 | 11.77 | 10.36 | 12.14 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days) | ||||||
| Average payables payment period1 | 50 | 37 | 31 | 35 | 30 | |
| Benchmarks (no. days) | ||||||
| Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Linde plc | 73 | — | — | — | — | |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | 77 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Payables Payment Period, Sector | ||||||
| Chemicals | 74 | — | — | — | — | |
| Average Payables Payment Period, Industry | ||||||
| Materials | 67 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 7.26 = 50
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2017 and 2021, a consistent trend toward extending the duration required to settle obligations to suppliers is observed. This shift is evidenced by a general decline in the payables turnover ratio and a corresponding increase in the average payables payment period.
- Payables Turnover Trend
- The payables turnover ratio exhibited a downward trajectory, decreasing from 12.14 in 2017 to 7.26 in 2021. Despite a temporary increase to 11.77 in 2019, the ratio declined steadily thereafter, indicating a reduction in the frequency with which the company clears its accounts payable throughout the year.
- Average Payables Payment Period Analysis
- The average period for payment increased from 30 days in 2017 to 50 days in 2021. The progression was characterized by moderate fluctuations between 2017 and 2020, ranging from 30 to 37 days. However, a significant acceleration occurred in 2021, with the payment period extending by 13 days in a single year to reach a five-year peak of 50 days.
- Operational Insights
- The expansion of the payment cycle suggests a strategic shift toward utilizing supplier credit as a source of short-term financing. By delaying outflows, the company has effectively increased its operating liquidity. The marked increase observed in the final year of the period suggests either a renegotiation of payment terms with vendors or a deliberate effort to preserve cash reserves.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Cash Conversion Cycle
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data | ||||||
| Average inventory processing period | 109 | 83 | 95 | 102 | 86 | |
| Average receivable collection period | 45 | 37 | 33 | 32 | 32 | |
| Average payables payment period | 50 | 37 | 31 | 35 | 30 | |
| Short-term Activity Ratio | ||||||
| Cash conversion cycle1 | 104 | 83 | 97 | 99 | 88 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2 | ||||||
| Linde plc | 16 | — | — | — | — | |
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | 28 | — | — | — | — | |
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector | ||||||
| Chemicals | 21 | — | — | — | — | |
| Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry | ||||||
| Materials | 42 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 2021 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 109 + 45 – 50 = 104
2 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The cash conversion cycle exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, ending the period at its highest level of 104 days. While a temporary improvement was noted in 2020, where the cycle reached a five-year low of 83 days, the subsequent increase in 2021 indicates a decline in short-term operational efficiency.
- Average Inventory Processing Period
- Inventory management shows a fluctuating pattern with a marked increase in the final year. The period rose from 86 days in 2017 to a peak of 109 days in 2021. This upward trajectory, particularly the sharp increase following 2020, suggests a slowdown in inventory turnover or a strategic increase in stock levels.
- Average Receivable Collection Period
- A consistent upward trend is observed in the collection of receivables. The period remained stable at 32 to 33 days from 2017 through 2019, but climbed steadily to 37 days in 2020 and reached 45 days by 2021. This trend indicates a slowing rate of cash recovery from customers.
- Average Payables Payment Period
- The company has progressively extended the time taken to settle obligations with suppliers. The payment period increased from 30 days in 2017 to 50 days in 2021. The acceleration of this trend in the final two years suggests a strategic shift to preserve cash by leveraging supplier credit.
The expansion of the cash conversion cycle in 2021 was primarily driven by the combined effects of slower inventory turnover and delayed receivable collections. Although the extension of the payables payment period served to partially mitigate the impact on liquidity, it was insufficient to offset the operational delays in inventory and receivables, resulting in an overall increase in the time required to convert resource inputs into cash flows.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?