AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Mosaic Co. (NYSE:MOS)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 2, 2022.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Turnover Ratios

Average No. Days

Mosaic Co., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 3.34 4.38 3.86 3.56 4.24
Receivables turnover 8.07 9.85 11.08 11.43 11.53
Payables turnover 7.26 9.90 11.77 10.36 12.14
Working capital turnover 22.97 23.17 7.91 5.47 2.87
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 109 83 95 102 86
Add: Average receivable collection period 45 37 33 32 32
Operating cycle 154 120 128 134 118
Less: Average payables payment period 50 37 31 35 30
Cash conversion cycle 104 83 97 99 88

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


Analysis of short-term operating activity indicates a general deceleration in asset turnover and a lengthening of the cash conversion cycle toward the end of the observed period.

Asset Management and Turnover
Receivables turnover exhibits a consistent downward trend, decreasing from 11.53 in 2017 to 8.07 in 2021. This decline is mirrored by the average receivable collection period, which extended from 32 days to 45 days over the same timeframe. Inventory turnover remained volatile, reaching its lowest point in 2021 at 3.34, which contributed to an increase in the average inventory processing period to a peak of 109 days.
Liability and Working Capital Efficiency
Payables turnover declined from 12.14 in 2017 to 7.26 in 2021, reflecting a strategic or operational increase in the average payables payment period from 30 to 50 days. Simultaneously, working capital turnover experienced a substantial increase, rising from 2.87 in 2017 to 22.97 in 2021, with a particularly sharp acceleration occurring between 2019 and 2020.
Operating and Cash Conversion Cycles
The operating cycle lengthened significantly, reaching 154 days in 2021 compared to 118 days in 2017. Although the cash conversion cycle saw a temporary reduction to 83 days in 2020, it ultimately rose to 104 days by 2021. This indicates that the slowing of inventory movement and receivable collections in the final year outweighed the extended payment terms granted by suppliers.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Inventory Turnover

Mosaic Co., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Cost of goods sold 9,157,100 7,616,800 8,009,000 8,088,900 6,566,600
Inventories 2,741,400 1,739,200 2,076,400 2,270,200 1,547,200
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 3.34 4.38 3.86 3.56 4.24
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Linde plc 10.12 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 5.92 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Sector
Chemicals 7.91 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Materials 5.27 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Inventories
= 9,157,100 ÷ 2,741,400 = 3.34

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of short-term operating activity from 2017 to 2021 reveals a fluctuating pattern in inventory management efficiency. While the cost of goods sold generally trended upward over the five-year period, inventory levels exhibited significant volatility, resulting in an inconsistent inventory turnover ratio.

Inventory Turnover Ratio Trends
The inventory turnover ratio began at 4.24 in 2017 before declining to 3.56 in 2018. A period of improvement followed, with the ratio increasing to 3.86 in 2019 and peaking at 4.38 in 2020, marking the highest efficiency level in the observed period. This positive trend reversed sharply in 2021, when the ratio fell to 3.34, the lowest value recorded during the analyzed timeframe.
Correlation Between Inventory Levels and Cost of Goods Sold
The volatility in the turnover ratio is closely linked to substantial shifts in inventory holdings. In 2021, a significant increase in inventories to 2.74 billion US dollars outpaced the growth in the cost of goods sold, which reached 9.16 billion US dollars, thereby depressing the turnover ratio. Conversely, the efficiency peak in 2020 was driven by a reduction in inventory to 1.74 billion US dollars, indicating a leaner inventory position relative to the 7.62 billion US dollars in cost of goods sold during that year.
Operational Observations
The data suggests a lack of linear stability in inventory movement. The transition from 2020 to 2021 represents the most significant shift, where the rapid accumulation of stock significantly slowed the rate of inventory clearance, despite the highest annual cost of goods sold occurring in the same period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Receivables Turnover

Mosaic Co., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net sales 12,357,400 8,681,700 8,906,300 9,587,300 7,409,400
Receivables, net 1,531,900 881,100 803,900 838,500 642,600
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 8.07 9.85 11.08 11.43 11.53
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Linde plc 6.84 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 8.48 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Chemicals 7.41 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Materials 9.18 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Net sales ÷ Receivables, net
= 12,357,400 ÷ 1,531,900 = 8.07

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a consistent decline in receivables turnover over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. While net sales exhibited volatility and experienced a significant surge in the final year, the efficiency of collecting outstanding receivables has deteriorated steadily.

Receivables Turnover Trend
A continuous downward trajectory is observed in the receivables turnover ratio, which decreased from 11.53 in 2017 to 8.07 in 2021. The decline was gradual between 2017 and 2019, but the rate of deterioration accelerated between 2020 and 2021, marking the lowest efficiency level in the observed period.
Correlation Between Sales and Receivables
Net sales fluctuated throughout the period, ending with a sharp increase to 12,357,400 thousand US$ in 2021. However, the growth in net receivables has outpaced sales growth in the latter years. Specifically, in 2021, net receivables increased by approximately 73.9% compared to the previous year, while net sales grew by approximately 42.3%, contributing to the reduction in the turnover ratio.
Operating Efficiency Implications
The steady reduction in the turnover ratio indicates a lengthening of the average collection period. The shift from a ratio of 11.53 to 8.07 suggests a weakening in credit collection efficiency, resulting in a larger proportion of working capital being tied up in accounts receivable relative to the volume of annual sales.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Payables Turnover

Mosaic Co., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Cost of goods sold 9,157,100 7,616,800 8,009,000 8,088,900 6,566,600
Accounts payable 1,260,700 769,100 680,400 780,900 540,900
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 7.26 9.90 11.77 10.36 12.14
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Linde plc 5.01 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 4.74 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Sector
Chemicals 4.90 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Industry
Materials 5.41 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of goods sold ÷ Accounts payable
= 9,157,100 ÷ 1,260,700 = 7.26

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An examination of the payables turnover from 2017 to 2021 reveals a general downward trend in the frequency with which obligations to suppliers are settled. The ratio decreased from 12.14 in 2017 to 7.26 in 2021, indicating a consistent lengthening of the payment cycle over the five-year period.

Payables Turnover Volatility
The turnover ratio exhibited moderate fluctuations between 2017 and 2020, maintaining a range between 9.90 and 12.14. However, a significant decline occurred in 2021, where the ratio dropped to 7.26. This represents the lowest point in the analyzed period and suggests a marked slowdown in the rate at which accounts payable are cleared.
Correlation Between COGS and Liabilities
While the cost of goods sold reached a period peak of $9.16 billion in 2021, the balance of accounts payable grew at a disproportionately faster rate. Accounts payable increased from $769.1 million in 2020 to $1.26 billion in 2021. This sharp increase in short-term liabilities relative to the growth in cost of goods sold is the primary driver for the compression of the turnover ratio.
Operational Implications
The steady decline in the turnover ratio suggests a strategic or operational shift toward extending payment terms with suppliers. By increasing the average time taken to pay creditors, the company has effectively increased its reliance on supplier credit to manage short-term liquidity, which is most evident in the substantial leap in payable balances during the final year of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Working Capital Turnover

Mosaic Co., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Current assets 5,325,300 3,521,200 3,718,200 4,237,000 4,616,500
Less: Current liabilities 4,787,400 3,146,500 2,591,700 2,483,700 2,031,100
Working capital 537,900 374,700 1,126,500 1,753,300 2,585,400
 
Net sales 12,357,400 8,681,700 8,906,300 9,587,300 7,409,400
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 22.97 23.17 7.91 5.47 2.87
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Linde plc — — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. — — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Sector
Chemicals — — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Materials 15.37 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Net sales ÷ Working capital
= 12,357,400 ÷ 537,900 = 22.97

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a significant shift in the management of working capital between 2017 and 2021. While net sales experienced substantial growth over the period, the working capital base contracted sharply, resulting in a dramatic escalation of the working capital turnover ratio.

Working Capital Trends
A consistent downward trajectory is observed in working capital from 2017 through 2020, with values declining from US$ 2,585,400 thousand to a low of US$ 374,700 thousand. A slight reversal of this trend occurred in 2021, as working capital increased to US$ 537,900 thousand.
Net Sales Performance
Net sales exhibited overall growth, increasing from US$ 7,409,400 thousand in 2017 to US$ 12,357,400 thousand by 2021. Although slight contractions occurred in 2019 and 2020, the period ended with a significant surge in revenue during the final year of the analysis.
Working Capital Turnover Analysis
The working capital turnover ratio rose exponentially from 2.87 in 2017 to 23.17 in 2020, before settling at 22.97 in 2021. This rapid increase is primarily driven by the substantial reduction in working capital rather than the growth in sales. The transition from a ratio of 2.87 to approximately 23.0 indicates an increasingly aggressive operational strategy, where a much smaller amount of working capital is utilized to support a larger volume of sales, suggesting a lean approach to liquidity management.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Inventory Processing Period

Mosaic Co., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 3.34 4.38 3.86 3.56 4.24
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 109 83 95 102 86
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Linde plc 36 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 62 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector
Chemicals 46 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry
Materials 69 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 3.34 = 109

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The inventory management efficiency between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by notable volatility, reflecting a fluctuating cycle of inventory movement and processing speed.

Inventory Turnover Analysis
The turnover ratio exhibited an inconsistent trajectory over the five-year period. After an initial decline from 4.24 in 2017 to 3.56 in 2018, the ratio improved steadily, peaking at 4.38 in 2020. This trend was abruptly reversed in 2021, when the ratio dropped to 3.34, marking the lowest efficiency level in the analyzed timeframe.
Average Inventory Processing Period Trends
The duration required to process inventory moved in inverse correlation with the turnover ratio. The processing period extended from 86 days in 2017 to 102 days in 2018, followed by a contraction to a period low of 83 days in 2020. However, 2021 saw a significant expansion in the processing cycle, which reached a maximum of 109 days.
Operational Efficiency Insights
The data indicates that operational liquidity regarding inventory reached its peak in 2020, characterized by the highest turnover and the shortest processing time. The shift observed in 2021 suggests a deceleration in inventory throughput, resulting in a longer holding period and a higher proportional investment in unsold goods compared to previous years.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Receivable Collection Period

Mosaic Co., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 8.07 9.85 11.08 11.43 11.53
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 45 37 33 32 32
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Linde plc 53 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 43 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector
Chemicals 49 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Materials 40 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 8.07 = 45

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term activity ratios reveals a consistent decline in the efficiency of receivables management over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021.

Receivables Turnover
A continuous downward trajectory is observed in the receivables turnover ratio, which decreased from 11.53 in 2017 to 8.07 by the end of 2021. The rate of decline accelerated after 2019, indicating a slower conversion of accounts receivable into cash.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average collection period remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2019, fluctuating only between 32 and 33 days. However, a notable increase occurred in subsequent years, rising to 37 days in 2020 and reaching 45 days in 2021. This represents an expansion of the collection cycle by 13 days over the analyzed period.

The inverse correlation between the decreasing turnover ratio and the increasing collection period suggests a weakening in credit collection efficiency. The trend indicates that capital is remaining tied up in receivables for longer durations, which may impact short-term liquidity and the overall operational cash flow cycle.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Cycle

Mosaic Co., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 109 83 95 102 86
Average receivable collection period 45 37 33 32 32
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 154 120 128 134 118
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Linde plc 89 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 105 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Sector
Chemicals 95 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Industry
Materials 109 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 109 + 45 = 154

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating cycle exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by an overall expansion in the time required to convert current assets into cash. While there was a period of contraction between 2018 and 2020, the cycle ended the period at its highest point, indicating a decrease in short-term operational efficiency.

Average Inventory Processing Period
The period required to process inventory showed an inconsistent trend, fluctuating from 86 days in 2017 to a peak of 109 days in 2021. After an initial increase in 2018, a downward trend occurred through 2020, where the period reached a five-year low of 83 days. However, the sharp increase to 109 days in 2021 suggests a significant slowing of inventory turnover or an intentional increase in stock levels.
Average Receivable Collection Period
A steady upward trend is observed in the collection of receivables. The period remained stable at 32 to 33 days from 2017 through 2019, followed by a gradual increase to 37 days in 2020 and a more pronounced rise to 45 days in 2021. This trajectory indicates a lengthening of the credit cycle and a potential decline in the efficiency of accounts receivable management.
Operating Cycle
The total operating cycle mirrored the volatility of the inventory processing period but was further amplified by the rising collection period. From a baseline of 118 days in 2017, the cycle expanded to 134 days in 2018, contracted to 120 days by 2020, and ultimately surged to 154 days in 2021. The 36-day increase between 2017 and 2021 reflects a combined impact of slower inventory movement and delayed payment collections.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Average Payables Payment Period

Mosaic Co., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 7.26 9.90 11.77 10.36 12.14
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 50 37 31 35 30
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Linde plc 73 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 77 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector
Chemicals 74 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Materials 67 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 7.26 = 50

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2017 and 2021, a consistent trend toward extending the duration required to settle obligations to suppliers is observed. This shift is evidenced by a general decline in the payables turnover ratio and a corresponding increase in the average payables payment period.

Payables Turnover Trend
The payables turnover ratio exhibited a downward trajectory, decreasing from 12.14 in 2017 to 7.26 in 2021. Despite a temporary increase to 11.77 in 2019, the ratio declined steadily thereafter, indicating a reduction in the frequency with which the company clears its accounts payable throughout the year.
Average Payables Payment Period Analysis
The average period for payment increased from 30 days in 2017 to 50 days in 2021. The progression was characterized by moderate fluctuations between 2017 and 2020, ranging from 30 to 37 days. However, a significant acceleration occurred in 2021, with the payment period extending by 13 days in a single year to reach a five-year peak of 50 days.
Operational Insights
The expansion of the payment cycle suggests a strategic shift toward utilizing supplier credit as a source of short-term financing. By delaying outflows, the company has effectively increased its operating liquidity. The marked increase observed in the final year of the period suggests either a renegotiation of payment terms with vendors or a deliberate effort to preserve cash reserves.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Cash Conversion Cycle

Mosaic Co., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 109 83 95 102 86
Average receivable collection period 45 37 33 32 32
Average payables payment period 50 37 31 35 30
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 104 83 97 99 88
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Linde plc 16 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 28 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector
Chemicals 21 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry
Materials 42 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 109 + 45 – 50 = 104

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The cash conversion cycle exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, ending the period at its highest level of 104 days. While a temporary improvement was noted in 2020, where the cycle reached a five-year low of 83 days, the subsequent increase in 2021 indicates a decline in short-term operational efficiency.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory management shows a fluctuating pattern with a marked increase in the final year. The period rose from 86 days in 2017 to a peak of 109 days in 2021. This upward trajectory, particularly the sharp increase following 2020, suggests a slowdown in inventory turnover or a strategic increase in stock levels.
Average Receivable Collection Period
A consistent upward trend is observed in the collection of receivables. The period remained stable at 32 to 33 days from 2017 through 2019, but climbed steadily to 37 days in 2020 and reached 45 days by 2021. This trend indicates a slowing rate of cash recovery from customers.
Average Payables Payment Period
The company has progressively extended the time taken to settle obligations with suppliers. The payment period increased from 30 days in 2017 to 50 days in 2021. The acceleration of this trend in the final two years suggests a strategic shift to preserve cash by leveraging supplier credit.

The expansion of the cash conversion cycle in 2021 was primarily driven by the combined effects of slower inventory turnover and delayed receivable collections. Although the extension of the payables payment period served to partially mitigate the impact on liquidity, it was insufficient to offset the operational delays in inventory and receivables, resulting in an overall increase in the time required to convert resource inputs into cash flows.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?