AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Mosaic Co. (NYSE:MOS)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 2, 2022.

Return on Capital (ROC)

Microsoft Excel

Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.


Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

Mosaic Co., ROIC calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 1,881,191 136,357 (1,197,855) 515,089 610,470
Invested capital2 15,843,300 14,653,500 15,092,200 15,589,131 15,024,306
Performance Ratio
ROIC3 11.87% 0.93% -7.94% 3.30% 4.06%
Benchmarks
ROIC, Competitors4
Linde plc 5.24% — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 14.91% — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 1,881,191 ÷ 15,843,300 = 11.87%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in profitability and capital efficiency, culminating in a substantial recovery by the end of the period.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A period of extreme fluctuation is observed in NOPAT. After a moderate decline between 2017 and 2018, the figure collapsed to a negative value of 1,197,855 thousand US$ in 2019. A recovery began in 2020 and accelerated sharply in 2021, where NOPAT reached a peak of 1,881,191 thousand US$, representing a significant increase over the preceding five years.
Invested Capital
Invested capital remained relatively stable throughout the analyzed period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 14,653,500 thousand US$ and 15,843,300 thousand US$. The lack of drastic swings in the capital base indicates that the changes in returns were driven primarily by operational profitability rather than significant changes in the company's asset or capital structure.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
ROIC closely mirrored the volatility of NOPAT. A downward trend occurred from 2017 (4.06%) to 2018 (3.30%), followed by a sharp contraction to -7.94% in 2019. This negative return indicates a period where the company failed to generate positive operating profit relative to its invested capital. However, a strong upward trajectory followed, with ROIC returning to positive territory in 2020 (0.93%) and expanding significantly to 11.87% in 2021, marking the highest level of capital efficiency in the reported timeframe.

The analysis indicates that while the capital base remained consistent, the company's ability to generate returns from that capital was subject to high variance, ending the period with a strong improvement in operational efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Decomposition of ROIC

Mosaic Co., decomposition of ROIC

Microsoft Excel
ROIC = OPM1 × TO2 × 1 – CTR3
Dec 31, 2021 11.87% = 19.48% × 0.78 × 78.13%
Dec 31, 2020 0.93% = 3.14% × 0.59 × 49.96%
Dec 31, 2019 -7.94% = -12.56% × 0.59 × 100.00%
Dec 31, 2018 3.30% = 7.58% × 0.61 × 70.90%
Dec 31, 2017 4.06% = 7.31% × 0.49 × 112.68%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »

2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »

3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »


The return on invested capital (ROIC) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a sharp contraction in 2019 followed by a substantial recovery. After starting at 4.06% in 2017, the metric declined to a trough of -7.94% in 2019 before climbing to a five-year peak of 11.87% by the end of 2021.

Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
The operating profit margin served as the primary driver of ROIC volatility. A stable period in 2017 and 2018 was interrupted by a severe decline to -12.56% in 2019, which directly precipitated the negative ROIC for that year. A subsequent recovery saw margins rise to 3.14% in 2020 and surge to 19.48% in 2021, indicating a strong rebound in operational profitability.
Turnover of Capital (TO)
Capital efficiency showed a generally positive trend over the five-year period. The turnover ratio increased from 0.49 in 2017 to 0.78 in 2021. While the ratio remained relatively stagnant between 2018 and 2020, the significant jump in 2021 suggests improved asset utilization and revenue generation relative to the capital invested.
Effective Cash Tax Rate Impact
The tax component, represented by 1 minus the effective cash tax rate, demonstrated erratic behavior. Values exceeding 100% in 2017 and 2019 indicate the presence of tax benefits or credits that positively impacted the after-tax return. The lowest point occurred in 2020 at 49.96%, representing the highest effective cash tax burden in the sequence, which tempered the recovery of the ROIC during that year.

The analysis indicates that the overall performance trend was dictated predominantly by operational profitability rather than asset efficiency or tax effects. The convergence of a peak operating margin and a peak capital turnover ratio in 2021 resulted in the highest observed ROIC of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Profit Margin (OPM)

Mosaic Co., OPM calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 1,881,191 136,357 (1,197,855) 515,089 610,470
Add: Cash operating taxes2 526,561 136,576 79,295 211,403 (68,678)
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 2,407,752 272,933 (1,118,560) 726,492 541,792
 
Net sales 12,357,400 8,681,700 8,906,300 9,587,300 7,409,400
Profitability Ratio
OPM3 19.48% 3.14% -12.56% 7.58% 7.31%
Benchmarks
OPM, Competitors4
Linde plc 17.33% — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 14.56% — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Net sales
= 100 × 2,407,752 ÷ 12,357,400 = 19.48%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating profit margin (OPM) from 2017 to 2021 reveals a period of extreme volatility, characterized by a severe profitability contraction in 2019 followed by a substantial recovery and expansion by the end of the period.

Revenue Trends
Net sales demonstrated an overall upward trajectory, rising from US$ 7.41 billion in 2017 to US$ 12.36 billion in 2021. While a slight decline in sales occurred between 2018 and 2020, the 2021 fiscal year marked a significant surge in top-line growth.
Operating Profitability Fluctuations
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) experienced high variance. Initial growth was observed from 2017 to 2018, with NOPBT increasing from US$ 541.8 million to US$ 726.5 million. This was followed by a sharp reversal in 2019, where NOPBT fell to a deficit of US$ 1.12 billion. Profitability returned in 2020 at US$ 272.9 million and escalated rapidly to a peak of US$ 2.41 billion in 2021.
Operating Profit Margin Analysis
The OPM mirrored the volatility of the NOPBT. Margins were relatively stable at 7.31% in 2017 and 7.58% in 2018, before plummeting to -12.56% in 2019. A recovery to 3.14% was recorded in 2020, followed by a dramatic expansion to 19.48% in 2021. This progression indicates a significant shift in operational efficiency or market conditions that allowed for a substantial increase in the proportion of sales retained as operating profit.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Turnover of Capital (TO)

Mosaic Co., TO calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net sales 12,357,400 8,681,700 8,906,300 9,587,300 7,409,400
Invested capital1 15,843,300 14,653,500 15,092,200 15,589,131 15,024,306
Efficiency Ratio
TO2 0.78 0.59 0.59 0.61 0.49
Benchmarks
TO, Competitors3
Linde plc 0.42 — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 1.26 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 Invested capital. See details »

2 2021 Calculation
TO = Net sales ÷ Invested capital
= 12,357,400 ÷ 15,843,300 = 0.78

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2017 and 2021, the efficiency of capital utilization exhibited a general upward trend, culminating in a significant peak in the final year of the period. While net sales experienced volatility, the stability of the invested capital base ensured that fluctuations in revenue directly influenced the turnover ratio.

Revenue Generation and Efficiency
Net sales grew from 7.41 billion US$ in 2017 to a peak of 12.36 billion US$ in 2021. This growth was not linear; a peak in 2018 was followed by a slight decline through 2020 before the sharp increase in 2021. Consequently, the turnover of capital ratio followed a similar pattern, rising from 0.49 in 2017 to 0.78 in 2021, indicating an improved ability to generate sales from the company's invested capital.
Invested Capital Stability
The invested capital remained relatively constant throughout the five-year period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 14.65 billion US$ and 15.84 billion US$. This stability suggests that the increases in the turnover ratio were driven primarily by top-line revenue growth rather than a reduction in the asset base or a significant restructuring of invested capital.
Turnover Ratio Trends
The capital turnover ratio improved by 29% between 2017 and 2018, moving from 0.49 to 0.61. This efficiency level remained largely stagnant during 2019 and 2020, holding steady at 0.59. A substantial acceleration occurred in 2021, where the ratio reached 0.78, marking the highest level of capital productivity within the observed timeframe.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)

Mosaic Co., CTR calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 1,881,191 136,357 (1,197,855) 515,089 610,470
Add: Cash operating taxes2 526,561 136,576 79,295 211,403 (68,678)
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 2,407,752 272,933 (1,118,560) 726,492 541,792
Tax Rate
CTR3 21.87% 50.04% — 29.10% -12.68%
Benchmarks
CTR, Competitors4
Linde plc 28.80% — — — —
Sherwin-Williams Co. 18.79% — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2021 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 526,561 ÷ 2,407,752 = 21.87%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of the effective cash tax rate (CTR) reveals significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, closely corresponding to fluctuations in net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT).

Net Operating Profit and Tax Correlation
Net operating profit before taxes exhibited extreme variance over the five-year period, shifting from a positive position in 2018 to a loss of approximately 1.12 billion in 2019, before ascending to a peak of 2.41 billion in 2021. Cash operating taxes mirrored this volatility, starting with a negative value of 68.68 million in 2017 and increasing to 526.56 million by the end of 2021.
Cash Tax Rate Trends
The effective cash tax rate showed substantial instability. A negative rate of -12.68% was recorded in 2017, followed by an increase to 29.10% in 2018. No rate was recorded for 2019, coinciding with the operating loss. A significant peak occurred in 2020, where the CTR reached 50.04%, representing a high tax burden relative to the NOPBT of 272.93 million for that period.
Fiscal Stabilization in 2021
In 2021, despite a substantial increase in cash operating taxes to 526.56 million, the CTR decreased to 21.87%. This reduction in the effective rate occurred alongside a surge in NOPBT, indicating that the tax burden as a percentage of operating profit normalized as the company's profitability scaled upward.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?