Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

Marathon Oil Corp. (NYSE:MRO)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since August 4, 2022.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Marathon Oil Corp., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 72.74 40.75 70.32 61.48 34.71
Receivables turnover 4.90 4.15 4.51 5.47 4.04
Payables turnover 5.05 3.70 3.87 4.47 3.13
Working capital turnover 30.44 7.76 12.98 5.42 7.31
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 5 9 5 6 11
Add: Average receivable collection period 74 88 81 67 90
Operating cycle 79 97 86 73 101
Less: Average payables payment period 72 99 94 82 116
Cash conversion cycle 7 -2 -8 -9 -15

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


An analysis of the operating activity ratios reveals a significant shift in the management of short-term assets and liabilities over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021. The company maintains a highly efficient inventory movement process, although its overall liquidity cycle has transitioned from a supplier-funded model to a traditional cash-outlay model.

Inventory and Receivables Management
Inventory turnover exhibits high volatility, peaking at 72.74 in 2021. This efficiency is reflected in the average inventory processing period, which remained consistently low, ranging between 5 and 11 days. In contrast, the receivables turnover remains relatively stable, fluctuating between 4.04 and 5.47. The average receivable collection period is substantially longer than the inventory period, averaging between 67 and 90 days, indicating that the primary delay in the operating cycle stems from customer payment terms rather than product movement.
Payables and Obligations
A consistent trend of accelerated payments to suppliers is evident. The payables turnover increased from 3.13 in 2017 to 5.05 in 2021. This is mirrored by the average payables payment period, which declined from 116 days in 2017 to 72 days in 2021. This suggests a strategic shift or a necessity to settle obligations more rapidly, reducing the company's reliance on trade credit for operational funding.
Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC) and Operating Cycle
The operating cycle experienced a general contraction from 101 days in 2017 to 79 days in 2021. The most notable transition is observed in the cash conversion cycle, which remained negative from 2017 through 2020, reaching -15 days in 2017. A negative CCC indicates that the company was effectively financed by its suppliers. However, in 2021, the CCC turned positive at 7 days, signaling that the company now requires its own liquidity to fund the gap between paying suppliers and receiving cash from customers.
Working Capital Utilization
Working capital turnover shows a dramatic increase in 2021, rising to 30.44 from 7.76 in the previous year. This sharp spike suggests a significant increase in the efficiency of generating revenue relative to the net working capital invested, or potentially a substantial reduction in the working capital base during that fiscal period.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Turnover Ratios


Average No. Days


Inventory Turnover

Marathon Oil Corp., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenues from contracts with customers 5,601 3,097 5,063 5,902 4,373
Inventories 77 76 72 96 126
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 72.74 40.75 70.32 61.48 34.71
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 24.68 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 37.94 — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 14.73 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 18.18 — — — —
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Energy 16.82 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Revenues from contracts with customers ÷ Inventories
= 5,601 ÷ 77 = 72.74

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of short-term activity ratios reveals a volatile but generally improving efficiency in inventory management between 2017 and 2021. While revenues experienced significant fluctuations, particularly a sharp contraction in 2020 followed by a strong recovery in 2021, inventory levels were consistently reduced and subsequently stabilized.

Inventory Level Trends
A marked decrease in total inventories is observed from 2017 to 2019, falling from 126 million US$ to 72 million US$. Following this period, inventory levels remained relatively flat, fluctuating narrowly between 72 million and 77 million US$ through 2021. This indicates a strategic shift toward maintaining leaner inventory holdings.
Inventory Turnover Volatility
The inventory turnover ratio demonstrates significant variability, starting at 34.71 in 2017 and reaching a peak of 72.74 by 2021. A notable surge occurred between 2017 and 2019, where the ratio more than doubled. This trend was interrupted in 2020, when the turnover ratio dropped to 40.75, directly correlating with a substantial decline in revenues from contracts with customers during that fiscal year.
Operational Correlation and Efficiency
The recovery observed in 2021 shows the inventory turnover ratio reaching its highest point in the five-year period. This improvement was driven by a return to higher revenue levels of 5,601 million US$ while maintaining a low inventory base of 77 million US$. The figures suggest that the organization's ability to generate sales relative to its inventory investment has improved substantially over the analyzed period, despite the external shocks experienced in 2020.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Receivables Turnover

Marathon Oil Corp., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenues 5,601 3,097 5,063 5,902 4,373
Receivables, less reserve 1,142 747 1,122 1,079 1,082
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 4.90 4.15 4.51 5.47 4.04
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 8.45 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 6.87 — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 10.29 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 9.20 — — — —
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Energy 8.75 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Revenues ÷ Receivables, less reserve
= 5,601 ÷ 1,142 = 4.90

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of the receivables turnover ratio indicates a period of volatility between 2017 and 2021, closely mirroring fluctuations in annual revenues. While the efficiency of converting receivables into cash varied, the ratio remained consistently above 4.0 throughout the five-year period.

Revenue and Collection Efficiency Correlation
A peak in receivables turnover was observed in 2018, reaching 5.47, which coincided with a significant increase in revenues to 5,902 million USD. This indicates a period of high operational efficiency where credit sales were converted to cash more rapidly than in previous years.
Impact of the 2020 Contraction
In 2020, revenues experienced a sharp decline to 3,097 million USD. Concurrently, receivables decreased to 747 million USD. Despite the substantial reduction in top-line activity, the receivables turnover ratio only moderately declined to 4.15, suggesting that the company successfully managed its credit exposure in proportion to the drop in sales volume.
Recovery and Stabilization
By 2021, the turnover ratio recovered to 4.90 as revenues rebounded to 5,601 million USD. The increase in receivables to 1,142 million USD reflects a return to higher operating levels, while the improved turnover ratio demonstrates a restoration of collection efficiency approaching the 2018 peak.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Payables Turnover

Marathon Oil Corp., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Revenues from contracts with customers 5,601 3,097 5,063 5,902 4,373
Accounts payable 1,110 837 1,307 1,320 1,395
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 5.05 3.70 3.87 4.47 3.13
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 9.46 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 9.12 — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 10.39 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 9.94 — — — —
Payables Turnover, Industry
Energy 9.69 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Payables turnover = Revenues from contracts with customers ÷ Accounts payable
= 5,601 ÷ 1,110 = 5.05

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a general increase in the efficiency of managing accounts payable over the five-year period from 2017 to 2021. While revenues experienced significant volatility, characterized by a sharp decline in 2020 followed by a robust recovery in 2021, the payables turnover ratio demonstrated an overall upward trajectory, indicating a more accelerated settlement of supplier obligations.

Payables Turnover Evolution
The payables turnover ratio rose from 3.13 in 2017 to 5.05 by 2021. This growth suggests a systemic shift toward faster payment cycles. A significant jump was observed between 2017 and 2018, where the ratio increased to 4.47, before stabilizing between 3.70 and 3.87 during the 2019-2020 period.
Operational Contraction and Stability
During the fiscal year ending December 31, 2020, a substantial contraction in operational volume is evident, with revenues falling to 3,097 million USD and accounts payable decreasing to 837 million USD. Despite this decline, the payables turnover remained resilient at 3.70, implying that the company maintained a consistent pace of obligations settlement relative to its decreased scale of operations.
Recovery and Peak Efficiency
The 2021 fiscal year shows a strong recovery in both revenue, which climbed to 5,601 million USD, and payables turnover, which reached a peak of 5.05. The fact that the turnover ratio reached its highest level while accounts payable remained lower than 2017-2019 levels suggests an optimized management of short-term liabilities and improved liquidity application toward vendors.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Working Capital Turnover

Marathon Oil Corp., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 1,821 1,612 2,135 2,921 2,566
Less: Current liabilities 1,637 1,213 1,745 1,832 1,968
Working capital 184 399 390 1,089 598
 
Revenues 5,601 3,097 5,063 5,902 4,373
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 30.44 7.76 12.98 5.42 7.31
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 22.40 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 11.37 — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 110.19 — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 35.45 — — — —
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Energy 31.75 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Revenues ÷ Working capital
= 5,601 ÷ 184 = 30.44

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term operating activity reveals a period of significant fluctuation in the efficiency of working capital utilization from 2017 through 2021. The working capital turnover ratio experienced high volatility, culminating in a dramatic increase in the final year of the observed period.

Revenue Performance
Revenues demonstrated a non-linear trajectory, peaking at 5,902 million US dollars in 2018 before experiencing a sharp contraction to 3,097 million US dollars in 2020. A robust recovery followed in 2021, with revenues rising to 5,601 million US dollars.
Working Capital Trends
Working capital exhibited a general downward trend over the five-year period. After reaching a peak of 1,089 million US dollars in 2018, the figure declined sharply in 2019 and continued to decrease to a period low of 184 million US dollars by December 31, 2021.
Working Capital Turnover Dynamics
The turnover ratio fluctuated between a low of 5.42 in 2018 and a high of 30.44 in 2021. The decline in 2018 was driven by an expansion of working capital that outpaced revenue growth. A significant spike occurred in 2019, followed by a correction in 2020 as revenues plummeted. The most substantial acceleration occurred in 2021, where the ratio reached 30.44. This surge resulted from the convergence of recovering revenues and a substantial reduction in the working capital base, indicating an exceptionally lean relationship between net current assets and revenue generation in the final year.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Inventory Processing Period

Marathon Oil Corp., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 72.74 40.75 70.32 61.48 34.71
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 5 9 5 6 11
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 15 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 10 — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 25 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 20 — — — —
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry
Energy 22 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 72.74 = 5

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of operating activity ratios from 2017 to 2021 reveals a volatile but generally improving trend in inventory management efficiency. A strong inverse correlation is evident between the rate of inventory turnover and the duration of the inventory processing period.

Inventory Turnover
A significant upward trajectory was observed between 2017 and 2019, with the ratio increasing from 34.71 to 70.32. This growth was interrupted in 2020, when the ratio declined to 40.75, suggesting a temporary slowdown in inventory movement. A robust recovery followed in 2021, with the ratio reaching a five-year peak of 72.74.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The time required to process inventory showed a marked decrease from 11 days in 2017 to 5 days in 2019. This efficiency gain was partially reversed in 2020, as the period lengthened to 9 days. By 2021, the processing period returned to 5 days, mirroring the efficiency levels seen in 2019.

The fluctuations observed in 2020 indicate a period of decreased operational velocity, which was swiftly corrected in the following year. Overall, the transition from an 11-day processing period in 2017 to a 5-day period in 2021 demonstrates a long-term shift toward a leaner and more rapid inventory cycle.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Receivable Collection Period

Marathon Oil Corp., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 4.90 4.15 4.51 5.47 4.04
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 74 88 81 67 90
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 43 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 53 — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 35 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 40 — — — —
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Energy 42 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 4.90 = 74

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of receivables activity from 2017 to 2021 reveals a fluctuating pattern in the efficiency of credit collection. A significant improvement in liquidity management was observed in 2018, followed by a period of relative decline through 2020, and a subsequent recovery in 2021.

Receivables Turnover
The turnover ratio exhibited volatility over the five-year period, peaking at 5.47 in 2018 before trending downward to 4.15 by 2020. This decline suggests a temporary reduction in the frequency with which the company collected its average receivable balance. A reversal of this trend occurred in 2021, as the ratio increased to 4.90, indicating an improved ability to convert credit sales into cash.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection period moved in inverse correlation with the turnover ratio. A sharp reduction from 90 days in 2017 to 67 days in 2018 represented the highest level of operational efficiency in the analyzed timeframe. This efficiency diminished over the following two years, with the collection period extending to 81 days in 2019 and 88 days in 2020. By the end of 2021, the period decreased to 74 days, marking a return toward more efficient collection cycles.

The overall trajectory indicates that while the company experienced a degradation in collection speed between 2019 and 2020, the operational recovery observed in 2021 suggests a strengthening of credit management practices. The fluctuations suggest that the company's short-term operating activity is subject to periodic variability, although it remained more efficient in 2021 than at the start of the analyzed period in 2017.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Operating Cycle

Marathon Oil Corp., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 5 9 5 6 11
Average receivable collection period 74 88 81 67 90
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 79 97 86 73 101
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 58 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 63 — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 60 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 60 — — — —
Operating Cycle, Industry
Energy 64 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 5 + 74 = 79

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The operating cycle demonstrates a general trend of contraction over the five-year period, decreasing from 101 days in 2017 to 79 days in 2021. This reduction indicates an overall improvement in the efficiency of converting current assets into cash, although the trajectory has been characterized by intermittent volatility rather than a linear decline.

Average Inventory Processing Period
Inventory management remains highly efficient and stable, with processing periods consistently remaining in the single or low double digits. After a peak of 11 days in 2017, the period decreased to 5 days by 2019, experienced a marginal increase to 9 days in 2020, and returned to 5 days in 2021. Due to the minimal duration of this phase, inventory turnover exerts negligible influence on the total duration of the operating cycle.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The collection of receivables is the primary driver of fluctuations within the operating cycle. A significant improvement was noted between 2017 and 2018, where the collection period dropped from 90 days to 67 days. However, this efficiency was partially reversed over the following two years, peaking again at 88 days in 2020 before improving to 74 days in 2021. The volatility in this metric suggests varying degrees of effectiveness in credit management or shifts in customer payment terms during this period.
Operating Cycle Synthesis
The total operating cycle mirrors the movements of the receivable collection period almost exactly, confirming that the company's liquidity timeline is heavily dependent on the speed of payment collection rather than inventory movement. Despite the increase observed between 2018 and 2020, the cycle ended the period 22 days shorter than it began in 2017, representing a net increase in short-term operational efficiency.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Average Payables Payment Period

Marathon Oil Corp., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 5.05 3.70 3.87 4.47 3.13
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 72 99 94 82 116
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 39 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 40 — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 35 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 37 — — — —
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Energy 38 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 5.05 = 72

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The analysis of short-term activity ratios reveals a fluctuating but generally accelerating cycle in the settlement of obligations to suppliers between 2017 and 2021.

Payables Turnover
The payables turnover ratio demonstrated an overall upward trajectory, increasing from 3.13 in 2017 to a peak of 5.05 by the end of 2021. Although a period of slight contraction occurred between 2018 and 2020—where the ratio declined from 4.47 to 3.70—the substantial increase in 2021 indicates a more rapid cycle of clearing accounts payable.
Average Payables Payment Period
The duration required to settle payables exhibited significant volatility over the five-year period. A sharp reduction was observed between 2017 and 2018, with the payment period falling from 116 days to 82 days. This was followed by a gradual increase, reaching 99 days in 2020, before dropping to a five-year low of 72 days in 2021.
Working Capital Trends
An inverse correlation is maintained between the turnover ratio and the payment period. The overall decrease in the average payment period from 116 days to 72 days suggests an acceleration in cash outflows to creditors. The convergence of the highest turnover ratio and the lowest payment period in 2021 indicates the most efficient or aggressive settlement of short-term liabilities within the analyzed timeframe.

AI Ask an analyst for more


Cash Conversion Cycle

Marathon Oil Corp., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 5 9 5 6 11
Average receivable collection period 74 88 81 67 90
Average payables payment period 72 99 94 82 116
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 7 -2 -8 -9 -15
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Chevron Corp. 19 — — — —
ConocoPhillips 23 — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. 25 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 23 — — — —
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry
Energy 26 — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 2021 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 5 + 74 – 72 = 7

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The cash conversion cycle demonstrates a significant transition from a negative position to a positive one over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021. This shift indicates a change in the company's working capital efficiency and its reliance on supplier financing to fund operations.

Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period remains consistently low and stable, fluctuating between 5 and 11 days. A slight increase to 9 days was observed in 2020, but the period returned to 5 days by 2021, suggesting a highly efficient movement of inventory.
Receivable Collection Period
The collection of receivables exhibits moderate volatility. The period decreased from 90 days in 2017 to 67 days in 2018, followed by a steady increase peaking at 88 days in 2020. By the end of 2021, the collection period improved to 74 days.
Payables Payment Period
A clear downward trend is observed in the average payables payment period. Starting at 116 days in 2017, the period declined to 72 days by 2021. This contraction indicates that the company is settling its obligations to suppliers more rapidly than in previous years.
Cash Conversion Cycle Analysis
The cash conversion cycle shifted from a negative 15 days in 2017 to a positive 7 days in 2021. Between 2017 and 2020, the negative cycle indicated that the company was able to generate cash from sales before its accounts payable became due, effectively using supplier credit as a source of interest-free financing. The transition to a positive cycle in 2021 is primarily attributable to the reduction in the payables payment period, which now occurs faster than the combined time required to process inventory and collect receivables.

AI Ask an analyst for more