Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 1,116) | (1,242) | 654) | 1,350) | (659) | |
| Invested capital2 | 14,862) | 16,214) | 17,954) | 17,565) | 17,726) | |
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| ROIC3 | 7.51% | -7.66% | 3.64% | 7.68% | -3.72% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| ROIC, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | 10.04% | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | 13.45% | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | 12.01% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 1,116 ÷ 14,862 = 7.51%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in operational profitability and a consistent reduction in the capital base, resulting in an unstable Return on Invested Capital (ROIC).
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Volatility
- NOPAT exhibited extreme fluctuations over the five-year period, oscillating between substantial losses and profits. Following a loss of US$ 659 million in 2017, profitability peaked at US$ 1,350 million in 2018 before declining to US$ 654 million in 2019. A severe downturn occurred in 2020, with NOPAT reaching its lowest point at negative US$ 1,242 million, followed by a recovery to US$ 1,116 million in 2021.
- Invested Capital Trajectory
- A general downward trend in invested capital is observed. The capital base remained relatively stable between 2017 and 2019, peaking at US$ 17,954 million in 2019. However, a pronounced decline occurred thereafter, with invested capital falling to US$ 16,214 million in 2020 and further to US$ 14,862 million by December 31, 2021, representing a total decrease of approximately 16% from 2017 levels.
- Return on Invested Capital (ROIC) Dynamics
- The ROIC closely mirrors the volatility of NOPAT, shifting from -3.72% in 2017 to 7.68% in 2018. A contraction occurred in 2019, bringing the ratio down to 3.64%, which preceded a sharp decline to -7.66% in 2020. By 2021, the ROIC recovered to 7.51%, returning to a performance level nearly identical to the 2018 peak, achieved on a significantly reduced capital base.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Decomposition of ROIC
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »
2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »
3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »
The return on invested capital (ROIC) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by alternating periods of negative and positive returns. The ROIC fluctuated from a low of -7.66% in 2020 to a peak of 7.68% in 2018, reflecting a highly cyclical performance pattern throughout the five-year period.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
- The operating profit margin served as the primary driver of ROIC volatility. A severe contraction occurred in 2020, where the margin dropped to -37.97%, correlating with the lowest ROIC of the period. Conversely, strong recoveries were noted in 2018 and 2021, with margins reaching 28.51% and 22.40%, respectively. This suggests that the overall return on capital is acutely sensitive to shifts in operational profitability.
- Turnover of Capital (TO)
- Capital efficiency showed a general upward trend toward the end of the period, despite a dip in 2020. The turnover ratio increased from 0.25 in 2017 to a peak of 0.38 in 2021. While less volatile than the operating profit margin, the decline to 0.19 in 2020 indicates a temporary reduction in the ability to generate revenue from the invested capital base during that year.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate Impact
- The impact of taxes on ROIC remained minimal during years of operational losses. In 2017 and 2020, the value of 1 minus the effective cash tax rate was 100%, indicating that tax obligations did not further reduce the returns during those periods of negative profitability. In years of positive returns, such as 2018 and 2021, the rate dropped to 80.22% and 88.91%, respectively, reflecting the erosion of pre-tax returns by cash tax payments.
The synthesis of these metrics indicates that the 2021 recovery in ROIC to 7.51% was supported by a simultaneous improvement in both operational profitability and capital turnover. The significant swing from 2020 to 2021 demonstrates a rapid restoration of both margin and efficiency, reversing the systemic decline observed in the 2020 fiscal year.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 1,116) | (1,242) | 654) | 1,350) | (659) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 139) | 66) | 1) | 333) | 559) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 1,255) | (1,176) | 655) | 1,682) | (100) | |
| Revenues | 5,601) | 3,097) | 5,063) | 5,902) | 4,373) | |
| Profitability Ratio | ||||||
| OPM3 | 22.40% | -37.97% | 12.94% | 28.51% | -2.29% | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| OPM, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | 15.98% | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | 29.99% | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | 14.69% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 1,255 ÷ 5,601 = 22.40%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in both top-line revenue and operating profitability. The operating profit margin exhibited sharp fluctuations, alternating between periods of substantial profitability and severe operating losses, reflecting a high degree of sensitivity to external market conditions.
- Revenue Dynamics
- Revenues experienced an initial increase from 4,373 million US$ in 2017 to a peak of 5,902 million US$ in 2018. A subsequent downward trend followed, reaching a five-year low of 3,097 million US$ in 2020, before rebounding strongly to 5,601 million US$ by the end of 2021.
- Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
- The NOPBT mirrored the volatility of revenues but with greater magnitude. After a marginal loss of 100 million US$ in 2017, profit surged to 1,682 million US$ in 2018. This was followed by a decline to 655 million US$ in 2019 and a significant deficit of 1,176 million US$ in 2020. A recovery was noted in 2021, with NOPBT returning to a positive 1,255 million US$.
- Operating Profit Margin (OPM) Trends
- The OPM showed extreme variance over the analyzed period. The margin moved from -2.29% in 2017 to a peak of 28.51% in 2018. A contraction occurred in 2019 (12.94%), culminating in a severe compression to -37.97% in 2020. The period concluded with a significant recovery to 22.40% in 2021, indicating a return to operational efficiency levels approaching those observed in 2018.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Turnover of Capital (TO)
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Revenues | 5,601) | 3,097) | 5,063) | 5,902) | 4,373) | |
| Invested capital1 | 14,862) | 16,214) | 17,954) | 17,565) | 17,726) | |
| Efficiency Ratio | ||||||
| TO2 | 0.38 | 0.19 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.25 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| TO, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | 0.80 | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | 0.60 | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | 1.01 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 Invested capital. See details »
2 2021 Calculation
TO = Revenues ÷ Invested capital
= 5,601 ÷ 14,862 = 0.38
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of capital efficiency between 2017 and 2021 reveals significant volatility in the turnover of capital, primarily driven by fluctuating revenue streams and a strategic reduction in the invested capital base toward the end of the period.
- Revenue Volatility
- Annual revenues demonstrated a non-linear trend, increasing from US$ 4,373 million in 2017 to a peak of US$ 5,902 million in 2018. A subsequent decline occurred in 2019, followed by a sharp contraction to US$ 3,097 million in 2020. However, a substantial recovery was observed in 2021, with revenues rising to US$ 5,601 million.
- Invested Capital Trends
- Invested capital remained relatively stable from 2017 through 2019, peaking at US$ 17,954 million. A consistent downward trend emerged thereafter, with capital decreasing to US$ 16,214 million in 2020 and further declining to US$ 14,862 million by the end of 2021, indicating a contraction or optimization of the asset base.
- Turnover of Capital Efficiency
- The turnover ratio mirrored the volatility of revenues, reaching its lowest point of 0.19 in 2020 during the period of minimum revenue. The ratio peaked at 0.38 in 2021, the highest value in the analyzed timeframe. This improvement in 2021 is attributed to the dual effect of recovering revenues and a reduced capital base, reflecting an increase in the efficiency of capital utilization.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | 1,116) | (1,242) | 654) | 1,350) | (659) | |
| Add: Cash operating taxes2 | 139) | 66) | 1) | 333) | 559) | |
| Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) | 1,255) | (1,176) | 655) | 1,682) | (100) | |
| Tax Rate | ||||||
| CTR3 | 11.09% | — | 0.20% | 19.78% | — | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| CTR, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | 21.79% | — | — | — | — | |
| ConocoPhillips | 25.25% | — | — | — | — | |
| ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. | 19.45% | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cash operating taxes. See details »
3 2021 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × 139 ÷ 1,255 = 11.09%
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in both operational profitability and the resulting cash tax obligations. The relationship between net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) and cash operating taxes reveals a non-linear correlation, where extreme fluctuations in tax burdens coincide with shifts in operational performance.
- Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
- Operational performance exhibited high variance, alternating between periods of loss and profit. Significant losses were recorded in 2017 and 2020, with the 2020 deficit of US$ 1,176 million representing the most substantial decline. These lows are contrasted by peaks in profitability in 2018 and 2021, which reached US$ 1,682 million and US$ 1,255 million, respectively.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash tax payments followed a steep downward trend from 2017 through 2019, falling from US$ 559 million to a minimum of US$ 1 million. A gradual recovery is observed in the subsequent two years, with payments increasing to US$ 66 million in 2020 and US$ 139 million in 2021.
- Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)
- The CTR demonstrates extreme instability, primarily driven by the volatility of NOPBT. In 2018, the CTR reached a peak of 19.78% during a period of strong profitability. This rate collapsed to 0.20% in 2019 despite the company remaining profitable. The CTR was absent during the loss-making years of 2017 and 2020, eventually returning to 11.09% in 2021 as operating profits recovered.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?