- Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
- Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
- Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
- Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
- Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
- Adjusted Financial Leverage
- Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The income tax profile exhibits significant volatility over the five-year period ending December 31, 2021, characterized by a transition from substantial tax expenses to tax benefits and a subsequent return to moderate expenses.
- Current Income Tax Trends
- Current tax expenses experienced a sharp decline from 437 million USD in 2017 to a tax benefit of 54 million USD in 2019. Following this low point, a gradual increase occurred, reaching 85 million USD by 2021. This fluctuation indicates considerable variance in taxable income during these intervals.
- Deferred Income Tax Patterns
- Deferred taxes show an oscillating trajectory between expenses and benefits. A peak expense of 52 million USD was recorded in 2018, while the remaining years consistently reflected deferred tax benefits, ranging from 22 million USD to 61 million USD. These figures suggest the presence of temporary differences that provided tax relief in most of the observed years.
- Net Income Tax Provisions
- Total tax provisions shifted from a high of 376 million USD in 2017 to a net benefit of 88 million USD in 2019. This represents a significant reversal in the tax burden. Although 2020 maintained a small net benefit of 14 million USD, 2021 saw a return to a positive provision of 58 million USD. The overall trajectory suggests a period of tax-advantaged results or losses between 2019 and 2020, followed by a return to taxable profitability in 2021.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR)
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Federal statutory income tax rate | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 21.00% | 35.00% | |
| Effective income tax rate | 6.00% | 1.00% | -22.00% | 23.00% | 83.00% |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of the income tax environment reveals significant volatility in the effective income tax rate (EITR) relative to the federal statutory rate between 2017 and 2021.
- Federal Statutory Rate Transition
- A sharp reduction in the federal statutory income tax rate occurred between 2017 and 2018, decreasing from 35.00% to 21.00%. This rate remained constant at 21.00% through the conclusion of the period in 2021.
- Effective Income Tax Rate Volatility
- The EITR exhibited extreme fluctuations. In 2017, the rate peaked at 83.00%, representing a substantial premium over the statutory rate. This was followed by a normalization in 2018, where the EITR dropped to 23.00%, closely aligning with the revised statutory baseline.
- Analysis of Tax Benefits and Divergence
- A significant inversion is observed in 2019, with the EITR falling to -22.00%, indicating the realization of a tax benefit. Subsequent years showed a continued divergence from the statutory rate; the EITR remained suppressed at 1.00% in 2020 and 6.00% in 2021. The persistent gap between the statutory 21.00% and the actual effective rates from 2019 through 2021 suggests the impact of significant tax credits, deferred tax adjustments, or other non-statutory tax mitigations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Components of Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of deferred tax accounts from 2017 to 2021 reveals a period of significant volatility in both asset and liability components, largely driven by fluctuations in operating losses and capital investments in property, plant, and equipment.
- Deferred Tax Asset Components
- The primary driver of deferred tax assets was operating loss carryforwards, which exhibited a strong upward trend from 1,030 million US dollars in 2017 to a peak of 1,966 million US dollars in 2020, before retreating to 1,541 million US dollars in 2021. In contrast, foreign tax credits remained stagnant at 611 million US dollars throughout the entire five-year period. Employee benefits showed a consistent downward trend, decreasing from 111 million US dollars in 2017 to 66 million US dollars by 2021.
- Valuation Allowance and Net Assets
- Gross deferred tax assets peaked in 2020 at 2,697 million US dollars. However, these were offset by a substantial valuation allowance, which fluctuated between 699 million and 948 million US dollars. This allowance indicates a periodic adjustment in the estimated realizability of the tax assets. After applying the valuation allowance, net deferred tax assets reached their highest point in 2020 at 1,749 million US dollars.
- Deferred Tax Liability Components
- Deferred tax liabilities were predominantly influenced by property, plant, and equipment, which fluctuated significantly. This component reached its maximum liability of 1,892 million US dollars in 2020, compared to 1,332 million US dollars in 2017. Accrued revenue, another liability component, showed a steady decline in magnitude, moving from 81 million US dollars in 2017 to a negligible amount by 2021.
- Net Deferred Tax Position
- The net deferred tax position transitioned between asset and liability states. A net deferred tax liability was present in 2017 (344 million US dollars), which shifted to a net asset position of 194 million US dollars in 2018. From 2019 through 2021, the position returned to a net liability status, though the magnitude of the net liability narrowed over the final three years, moving from 186 million US dollars in 2019 to 136 million US dollars in 2021.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities, Classification
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The analysis of deferred tax items reveals a significant and consistent reduction in noncurrent deferred tax liabilities over the period from 2017 to 2021, alongside a decline in reported noncurrent deferred tax assets during the initial phase of the observed period.
- Noncurrent Deferred Tax Liabilities
- A substantial decrease in deferred tax liabilities is observed, falling from 833 million USD in 2017 to 136 million USD by the end of 2021. The most pronounced reduction occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the balance dropped by approximately 76%. From 2018 through 2021, the liability continued to decline at a steady, moderate pace, decreasing from 199 million USD to 136 million USD.
- Noncurrent Deferred Tax Assets
- During the period for which data is available, noncurrent deferred tax assets exhibited a downward trend, decreasing from 489 million USD in 2017 to 393 million USD in 2018. No values are reported for these assets for the subsequent fiscal years ending in 2019, 2020, and 2021.
- Net Deferred Tax Position
- In 2017, the company held a net deferred tax liability position of 344 million USD. By 2018, the position shifted to a net deferred tax asset of 194 million USD, driven by the sharp contraction of liabilities. The continued annual reduction in deferred tax liabilities from 2019 to 2021 indicates a persistent decrease in the company's future estimated tax obligations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Financial Statements: Removal of Deferred Taxes
Marathon Oil Corp., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
A comprehensive analysis of the financial position from 2017 to 2021 reveals a consistent contraction in the balance sheet, characterized by a steady decline in both total assets and total liabilities. The removal of deferred taxes highlights a distinct divergence between reported and adjusted financial metrics, particularly in the early years of the period.
- Asset and Liability Trends
- Reported total assets decreased monotonically from 22,012 million US$ in 2017 to 16,994 million US$ in 2021. The variance between reported and adjusted assets was most prominent in 2017 and 2018, after which the figures converged completely by 2019. Concurrently, reported total liabilities fell from 10,304 million US$ to 6,308 million US$ over the same period. Adjusted total liabilities remained consistently lower than reported liabilities, with the most significant adjustment occurring in 2017, indicating a substantial volume of deferred tax liabilities.
- Equity Position Impact
- Adjusted stockholders' equity generally maintained a higher value than reported equity throughout most of the period. While reported equity peaked in 2019 at 12,153 million US$, the adjusted figure for the same year was higher at 12,339 million US$. This pattern suggests that the removal of deferred tax liabilities improves the perceived net asset position of the entity.
- Net Income Volatility
- Profitability exhibited extreme volatility, with significant reported losses in 2017 and 2020, contrasted by modest gains in 2018, 2019, and 2021. The adjustments to net income resulting from the removal of deferred taxes were relatively minor in proportion to the overall losses and gains, although they consistently modified the reported bottom line across all five years.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Ratios: Removal of Deferred Taxes (Summary)
Marathon Oil Corp., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
The financial performance between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in profitability and returns, mirroring the cyclical nature of the industry. Periodic shifts between substantial losses and moderate gains are evident across all profitability metrics.
- Profitability Margins
- Net profit margins exhibit extreme fluctuations, with deep losses reported in 2017 (-130.87%) and 2020 (-46.85%), contrasted by positive margins in 2018, 2019, and 2021. The removal of deferred taxes results in minimal deviations from reported figures; however, the adjusted margins slightly exacerbate the losses observed during the 2017 and 2020 downturns.
- Asset Efficiency and Capital Structure
- Total asset turnover remained relatively low throughout the period, reaching a peak of 0.33 in 2021. No variance exists between reported and adjusted figures, indicating that deferred tax adjustments do not influence asset efficiency metrics. In contrast, financial leverage shows a steady downward trend, decreasing from a reported 1.88 in 2017 to 1.59 in 2021. Adjusted leverage is consistently lower than reported values, suggesting that deferred tax liabilities contribute to a higher reported leverage ratio.
- Return Metrics
- Return on Equity (ROE) and Return on Assets (ROA) correlate closely with net profit margin volatility. ROE experienced a wide range of outcomes, from a low of -48.88% in 2017 to a recovery of 8.85% in 2021. ROA followed a parallel trajectory, moving from -26.00% in 2017 to 5.57% in 2021. The impact of removing deferred taxes on these return ratios is marginal and lacks a consistent directional trend over the five-year period.
In summary, the adjustment for deferred taxes has a negligible impact on the overall interpretation of operational efficiency and profitability trends. The most consistent effect of the adjustment is the reduction of the financial leverage ratio, implying that the removal of these tax effects presents a slightly more conservative view of the company's capital structure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Net Profit Margin
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Net profit margin = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 946 ÷ 5,601 = 16.89%
2 Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Revenues
= 100 × 919 ÷ 5,601 = 16.41%
The financial performance between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in both absolute net income and profit margins. The period is marked by two distinct cycles of severe loss and subsequent recovery, reflecting a high degree of sensitivity to external market conditions.
- Adjusted Net Profit Margin Trends
- A profound negative margin of -132.27% was recorded in 2017, followed by a sharp recovery to a peak of 19.45% in 2018. This margin subsequently contracted to 8.81% in 2019 before falling sharply again to -47.56% in 2020. A return to positive profitability occurred in 2021, with the adjusted net profit margin recovering to 16.41%.
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- A consistent correlation is observed between reported and adjusted net profit margins throughout the five-year period. In years of profitability—specifically 2018, 2019, and 2021—the reported margins were marginally higher than the adjusted margins. Conversely, during the deficit years of 2017 and 2020, the adjusted net profit margins were more deeply negative than the reported figures.
- Net Income Volatility
- The absolute values of adjusted net income mirrored the margin fluctuations, swinging from a loss of 5,784 million US$ in 2017 to a profit of 1,148 million US$ in 2018. A second significant downturn occurred in 2020 with an adjusted loss of 1,473 million US$, which was subsequently offset by a return to a profit of 919 million US$ in 2021.
The data indicates a cyclical pattern of profitability. While the recovery in 2021 demonstrates a return to operational viability, the margins have not yet returned to the peak levels observed in 2018, and the repeated occurrences of deep negative margins highlight substantial financial instability over the analyzed timeframe.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Total Asset Turnover
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Total asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Total assets
= 5,601 ÷ 16,994 = 0.33
2 Adjusted total asset turnover = Revenues ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 5,601 ÷ 16,994 = 0.33
The financial data indicates a consistent reduction in the total asset base coupled with significant volatility in asset utilization efficiency between 2017 and 2021. While total assets followed a steady downward trajectory, the adjusted total asset turnover ratio experienced cyclical fluctuations, reaching its lowest point in 2020 before recovering to a period high in 2021.
- Asset Base Contraction
- A sustained decline in total assets is observed over the five-year period. Reported total assets decreased from 22,012 million US$ in 2017 to 16,994 million US$ in 2021, representing a total reduction of approximately 22.8%. Adjusted total assets followed a nearly identical trend, converging fully with reported assets starting in 2019.
- Adjusted Total Asset Turnover Volatility
- The adjusted total asset turnover ratio demonstrates a non-linear trend. An initial increase from 0.20 in 2017 to 0.28 in 2018 was followed by a moderate decline to 0.25 in 2019. A sharp contraction occurred in 2020, where the ratio dropped to 0.17, indicating a significant decrease in the revenue generated per unit of asset. However, a strong recovery was recorded in 2021, with the ratio ascending to 0.33, the highest level within the analyzed timeframe.
- Convergence of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- In the early years of the analysis, a slight variance existed between reported and adjusted asset figures. By the end of 2019, these values became identical, resulting in a complete alignment between the reported total asset turnover and the adjusted total asset turnover for the remainder of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Financial Leverage
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 16,994 ÷ 10,686 = 1.59
2 Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 16,994 ÷ 10,822 = 1.57
A consistent downward trend in total asset valuation and financial leverage is observed between 2017 and 2021. While reported assets declined steadily from 22,012 million US$ to 16,994 million US$, the financial structure shifted toward a less leveraged position, as evidenced by the contraction of both reported and adjusted leverage ratios over the five-year period.
- Asset Base Contraction
- Reported total assets decreased by approximately 22.8% from 2017 to 2021. Adjusted total assets mirrored this decline, moving from 21,523 million US$ in 2017 to 16,994 million US$ in 2021. By 2019, the variance between reported and adjusted assets disappeared, with both figures aligning at 20,245 million US$ and remaining identical through 2021.
- Equity Dynamics
- Stockholders' equity exhibited more volatility than assets. Reported equity grew modestly from 11,708 million US$ in 2017 to a peak of 12,153 million US$ in 2019, before experiencing a sharp decline to 10,561 million US$ in 2020 and a slight recovery to 10,686 million US$ in 2021. Adjusted stockholders' equity remained consistently higher than reported equity throughout the period, suggesting that tax-related adjustments provided a positive offset to the reported equity base.
- Financial Leverage Trends
- Reported financial leverage declined from 1.88 in 2017 to 1.59 in 2021, with a temporary uptick to 1.70 in 2020. Adjusted financial leverage followed a nearly identical trajectory, starting at 1.79 in 2017 and ending at 1.57 in 2021. The adjusted ratio remained lower than the reported ratio in every year analyzed, indicating that the adjustment for income taxes effectively reduces the perceived financial risk and leverage of the entity.
- Comparative Leverage Analysis
- The gap between reported and adjusted financial leverage was most pronounced in 2017 (0.09 difference) and narrowed by 2021 (0.02 difference). This convergence suggests a reduction in the impact of tax-related balance sheet adjustments on the overall leverage profile over time.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Equity (ROE)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 ROE = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 946 ÷ 10,686 = 8.85%
2 Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 919 ÷ 10,822 = 8.49%
The financial performance from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in net income and a corresponding fluctuation in return on equity (ROE). The company experienced severe losses in 2017 and 2020, interspersed with periods of profitability in 2018, 2019, and 2021.
- Profitability Trends
- Net income demonstrated extreme variance over the five-year period. A substantial reported loss of 5,723 million US$ in 2017 was followed by a recovery to a profit of 1,096 million US$ in 2018. This profit declined to 480 million US$ in 2019 before falling back into a negative position of 1,451 million US$ in 2020. A return to profitability occurred in 2021 with a reported net income of 946 million US$.
- Equity Stability
- Stockholders' equity remained relatively stable compared to the volatility of earnings. Reported equity peaked at 12,153 million US$ in 2019 before decreasing to 10,561 million US$ in 2020 and slightly recovering to 10,686 million US$ in 2021. The adjusted equity figures followed a similar trajectory, maintaining a range between approximately 10.7 billion and 12.3 billion US$.
- Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis
- The reported ROE mirrored the volatility of net income, plummeting to -48.88% in 2017 and dropping to -13.74% in 2020. Positive returns were recorded in 2018 (9.04%), 2019 (3.95%), and 2021 (8.85%). The adjusted ROE remained closely aligned with reported figures, though it provided a slightly higher return in 2018 (9.62%) and a less severe loss in 2017 (-47.99%).
- Comparison of Reported and Adjusted Metrics
- The variance between reported and adjusted figures for both net income and ROE is marginal across most years. The most notable divergence occurred in 2017 and 2018, where adjusted net income was slightly higher or lower than reported figures, suggesting a limited impact from the adjustments used to calculate the adjusted ROE relative to the primary drivers of financial volatility.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2021 Calculations
1 ROA = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 946 ÷ 16,994 = 5.57%
2 Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 919 ÷ 16,994 = 5.41%
The financial performance between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in net income and a consistent contraction of the total asset base. The relationship between reported and adjusted figures indicates that while adjustments impact the final calculations, both sets of metrics follow the same general trajectory of cyclical losses and recoveries.
- Net Income Trends
- Reported net income exhibited extreme fluctuations, starting with a substantial loss of 5,723 million in 2017, recovering to 1,096 million in 2018, and experiencing another downturn in 2020 with a loss of 1,451 million before returning to a profit of 946 million in 2021. Adjusted net income followed a similar pattern, though it recorded a deeper loss in 2017 and a slightly higher gain in 2018 compared to reported figures.
- Asset Base Contraction
- A steady downward trend is observed in the asset base over the five-year period. Reported total assets decreased from 22,012 million in 2017 to 16,994 million in 2021. Adjusted total assets mirrored this decline, starting at 21,523 million in 2017 and converging completely with reported assets from 2019 through 2021.
- Adjusted Return on Assets (ROA) Analysis
- Adjusted ROA demonstrated high volatility, reflecting the instability of net income relative to a shrinking asset base. A significant low was recorded in 2017 at -26.87%, followed by a recovery to 5.49% in 2018. Performance dipped again in 2020 to -8.20% before stabilizing at 5.41% in 2021. The proximity of adjusted ROA to reported ROA suggests that the adjustments made to income and assets provide a refined but fundamentally similar view of operational efficiency.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?