Stock Analysis on Net

Hess Corp. (NYSE:HES)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since November 2, 2023.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard American Express Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check American Express SafeKey

Economic Profit

Hess Corp., economic profit calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) experienced considerable volatility, moving from US$159 million in 2018 to a substantial loss of US$2,506 million in 2020, before recovering to US$3,165 million in 2022. Concurrently, the cost of capital generally increased over the five-year span, while invested capital showed a decreasing trend from 2018 to 2020, followed by an increase in the subsequent two years.

Economic Profit Trend
Economic profit consistently remained negative throughout the analyzed period, indicating that the company’s returns did not exceed its cost of capital. The largest negative economic profit occurred in 2020, at US$-5,416 million, coinciding with the largest NOPAT loss. While the negative economic profit lessened in 2021 and 2022, reaching US$-623 million, it remained a substantial shortfall. The trend suggests improving, but still insufficient, returns relative to the capital employed.
NOPAT and Cost of Capital Relationship
The relationship between NOPAT and the cost of capital is a key driver of the observed economic profit. The significant decline in NOPAT in 2020, coupled with a relatively stable cost of capital, resulted in the most substantial economic loss. The recovery in NOPAT in 2021 and 2022 partially offset the impact of the increasing cost of capital, leading to a reduction in the magnitude of the economic loss. However, the cost of capital increased from 18.66% in 2018 to 20.97% in 2022, consistently exceeding the returns generated by operations.
Invested Capital Dynamics
Invested capital decreased from US$19,028 million in 2018 to US$16,448 million in 2020, potentially reflecting divestitures or reduced capital expenditure. The subsequent increase to US$18,062 million in 2022 suggests reinvestment or acquisitions. The fluctuations in invested capital, in conjunction with the NOPAT volatility, significantly impacted the economic profit calculations.

Overall, the analysis reveals a period of challenging economic performance. While NOPAT demonstrated recovery towards the end of the period, the consistently negative economic profit indicates that the company struggled to generate returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital. The increasing cost of capital presents an ongoing challenge to achieving positive economic profit.


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

Hess Corp., NOPAT calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents2
Interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability3
Adjusted interest expense
Tax benefit of interest expense4
Adjusted interest expense, after taxes5
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation.

3 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

4 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation.


The financial data over the five-year period exhibits significant volatility in key profitability measures for the company.

Net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation

The net income shows a negative trend from 2018 through 2020, with losses deepening each year and peaking at a substantial loss in 2020. Specifically, the company recorded losses of $282 million, $408 million, and $3,093 million respectively in those years. However, a marked recovery occurred in 2021, with net income turning positive to $559 million, followed by a further substantial increase to $2,096 million in 2022. This indicates a strong rebound in profitability after a difficult period culminating in 2020.

Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Similar to net income, NOPAT declined sharply from 2018 to 2020, moving from a profit of $159 million in 2018 to a significant loss of $2,506 million in 2020. Notably, the decline in NOPAT was steeper than for net income, which may suggest operational challenges or non-operating factors affecting net income differently. From 2021 onwards, NOPAT exhibits a strong recovery, reaching $1,404 million in 2021 and rising to $3,165 million in 2022, surpassing pre-2018 levels. This recovery highlights a substantial improvement in operational profitability and tax efficiency.

Overall, the data demonstrates the company's transition from significant losses during the 2018-2020 period to robust profitability in 2021 and 2022. The peak losses in 2020 may reflect extraordinary circumstances or operational setbacks, followed by a significant turnaround. Both net income and NOPAT reflect this trend, with NOPAT showing a more pronounced recovery in 2022, indicating enhanced core operating performance relative to net income gains.


Cash Operating Taxes

Hess Corp., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


Provision (benefit) for income taxes
The provision for income taxes exhibits significant volatility over the five-year period. Starting at 335 million USD in 2018, it rose substantially to 461 million USD in 2019. In 2020, the figure turned negative to -11 million USD, indicating a tax benefit rather than a provision. The trend reversed sharply in 2021, with the provision increasing dramatically to 600 million USD, followed by a further increase to 1,099 million USD in 2022. This suggests an increasing tax expense or liability in the most recent years, possibly due to higher pre-tax earnings or changes in tax regulations.
Cash operating taxes
Cash operating taxes showed a relatively stable but fluctuating pattern. The amount increased slightly from 504 million USD in 2018 to 547 million USD in 2019, then dropped substantially to 146 million USD in 2020. This decrease corresponds with the sharp drop in the provision for income taxes in 2020, reflecting lower tax payments during that year. In 2021, cash operating taxes rebounded to 586 million USD and further increased significantly to 904 million USD in 2022. This rise mirrors the increased tax provision, indicating higher cash outflows related to tax payments in the latter years.

Invested Capital

Hess Corp., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in millions

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Current portion of long-term debt
Current portion of finance lease obligations
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Long-term finance lease obligations
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Total Hess Corporation stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Equity equivalents3
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax4
Noncontrolling interests
Adjusted total Hess Corporation stockholders’ equity
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of equity equivalents to total Hess Corporation stockholders’ equity.

4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.


Analysis of the financial data reveals several key trends in the debt, equity, and invested capital of the company over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022.

Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases increased steadily from $7,434 million in 2018 to $9,150 million in 2022. This represents a gradual accumulation of liabilities over the five years, indicating a strategic move towards higher leverage or increased financing requirements. The rate of increase slowed notably between 2020 and 2022, suggesting a stabilization in borrowing or lease commitments.
Total stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity showed a different pattern, starting at $9,629 million in 2018 then declining sharply through 2020 to a low of $5,366 million. This substantial reduction, nearly halving equity value, may reflect net losses, dividends, share buybacks, or other equity-reducing activities during this period. However, from 2020 onwards, equity rebounded progressively, reaching $7,855 million by the end of 2022, indicating a recovery phase, possibly driven by improved profitability or equity financing events.
Invested capital
Invested capital decreased from $19,028 million in 2018 to $16,448 million in 2020, aligning with the decline in equity and increase in debt. From 2021 onwards, invested capital increased moderately each year, reaching $18,062 million in 2022. This suggests selective reinvestment or asset expansion after a period of contraction, reflecting a potentially cautious but constructive growth strategy.

Overall, the data illustrates a period of financial strain or restructuring between 2018 and 2020, marked by decreased equity and fluctuating capital levels alongside rising debt. Subsequent years show signs of recovery and cautious growth with equity rebuilding and stabilization in debt levels, complementing an increase in invested capital. This pattern suggests a phase of adaptation followed by strategic stabilization improving the company’s capital structure.


Cost of Capital

Hess Corp., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease obligations3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease obligations3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease obligations3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease obligations3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Debt and finance lease obligations3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in millions

2 Equity. See details »

3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

Hess Corp., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Chevron Corp.
ConocoPhillips
Exxon Mobil Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic spread ratio exhibited a volatile pattern over the five-year period. Initially, the ratio remained constant before demonstrating a significant decline, followed by a period of improvement. Economic profit consistently registered as a negative value throughout the observed timeframe, though the magnitude of the loss decreased over time.

Economic Spread Ratio
The economic spread ratio was -17.83% in both 2018 and 2019, indicating a consistent underperformance relative to the cost of capital during those years. A substantial decrease was observed in 2020, with the ratio falling to -32.93%, representing the lowest point in the period. This suggests a significant widening of the gap between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital. The ratio improved considerably in 2021 to -11.13%, and continued to improve in 2022, reaching -3.45%. This indicates a narrowing of the gap between returns and the cost of capital, though the ratio remained negative.
Economic Profit
Economic profit was negative across all years analyzed. The largest loss occurred in 2020, at US$ -5,416 million. Losses decreased in 2021 to US$ -1,879 million and further decreased in 2022 to US$ -623 million. This suggests an improving trend in profitability relative to the cost of capital, aligning with the improvement in the economic spread ratio.
Invested Capital
Invested capital decreased from US$ 19,028 million in 2018 to US$ 16,448 million in 2020. A slight increase was observed in 2021 to US$ 16,885 million, followed by a more substantial increase to US$ 18,062 million in 2022. The fluctuations in invested capital may have influenced the economic spread ratio, although the primary driver appears to be changes in economic profit.

The trend suggests a gradual improvement in the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital, as evidenced by the increasing economic spread ratio and decreasing economic profit losses. However, the continued negative economic profit indicates that the company is still not generating sufficient returns to cover its cost of capital.


Economic Profit Margin

Hess Corp., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Economic profit1
Sales and other operating revenues
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Chevron Corp.
ConocoPhillips
Exxon Mobil Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Sales and other operating revenues
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The economic profit margin exhibited significant fluctuations between 2018 and 2022. Initially negative, the margin demonstrated improvement over the period, though it remained below zero by the end of 2022.

Economic Profit Margin Trend
In 2018 and 2019, the economic profit margin was consistently negative, registering at -53.65% and -51.25% respectively. This indicates that the company’s economic profit, calculated as net operating profit after tax less the cost of capital, was substantially negative relative to its sales. A notable deterioration occurred in 2020, with the margin plummeting to -116.04%, coinciding with a substantial decrease in sales and other operating revenues. The margin improved considerably in 2021 to -25.15%, alongside an increase in sales. This positive trend continued into 2022, with the economic profit margin reaching -5.50%, representing the highest value within the observed period and a significant reduction in the magnitude of the negative margin.

The relationship between sales and the economic profit margin appears to be correlated. The largest negative margin in 2020 corresponds with the lowest sales figure during the period. Conversely, the highest sales figure in 2022 is associated with the least negative economic profit margin. However, the economic profit itself remained negative throughout the entire period, suggesting that while sales fluctuations impact the margin, the underlying cost of capital consistently exceeded the operating profit generated.

Economic Profit
Economic profit itself moved from -3,392 million in 2018 to -3,329 million in 2019, a slight improvement. It then worsened significantly to -5,416 million in 2020, before improving to -1,879 million in 2021 and further to -623 million in 2022. This trajectory mirrors the trend observed in the economic profit margin, indicating that the absolute value of economic loss decreased over time.

The substantial improvement in the economic profit margin from 2020 to 2022 suggests increasing efficiency in generating economic profit relative to revenue, or a reduction in the cost of capital. Nevertheless, continued negative economic profit indicates that the company is still not generating returns sufficient to cover its cost of capital.