EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Hess Corp. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Statement of Comprehensive Income
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2005
- Price to Book Value (P/BV) since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Hess Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in economic profit. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) experienced considerable volatility, moving from a positive US$159 million in 2018 to a substantial loss of US$2,506 million in 2020, before recovering to US$3,165 million in 2022. This pattern directly influences the economic profit calculation.
- Economic Profit Trend
- Economic profit consistently remained negative throughout the analyzed period, ranging from a low of US$-5,434 million in 2020 to a high of US$-648 million in 2022. While the magnitude of the negative economic profit decreased in the most recent year, the company did not generate returns exceeding its cost of capital during any of these years.
The cost of capital exhibited an increasing trend over the five-year period, rising from 18.79% in 2018 to 21.11% in 2022. This increase in the cost of capital presents a greater hurdle for the company to achieve positive economic profit.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital decreased from US$19,028 million in 2018 to US$16,448 million in 2020, then showed a modest recovery, reaching US$18,062 million in 2022. The decline in invested capital during 2019 and 2020 likely reflects strategic decisions regarding asset allocation or divestitures, but did not translate into improved economic profit during that timeframe.
The substantial loss in NOPAT during 2020 appears to be the primary driver of the most significant negative economic profit in that year. The subsequent recovery in NOPAT in 2021 and 2022 contributed to a lessening of the economic loss, although it remained negative. The increasing cost of capital partially offset the benefits of the NOPAT recovery in the later years.
- Relationship between NOPAT and Economic Profit
- A strong correlation exists between NOPAT and economic profit. Years with higher NOPAT, such as 2018 and 2022, resulted in less negative economic profit figures, while the substantial loss in NOPAT in 2020 led to the largest economic loss. This highlights the importance of profitability in generating value for investors.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation.
3 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
4 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation.
The financial data over the five-year period exhibits significant volatility in key profitability measures for the company.
- Net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation
-
The net income shows a negative trend from 2018 through 2020, with losses deepening each year and peaking at a substantial loss in 2020. Specifically, the company recorded losses of $282 million, $408 million, and $3,093 million respectively in those years. However, a marked recovery occurred in 2021, with net income turning positive to $559 million, followed by a further substantial increase to $2,096 million in 2022. This indicates a strong rebound in profitability after a difficult period culminating in 2020.
- Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
-
Similar to net income, NOPAT declined sharply from 2018 to 2020, moving from a profit of $159 million in 2018 to a significant loss of $2,506 million in 2020. Notably, the decline in NOPAT was steeper than for net income, which may suggest operational challenges or non-operating factors affecting net income differently. From 2021 onwards, NOPAT exhibits a strong recovery, reaching $1,404 million in 2021 and rising to $3,165 million in 2022, surpassing pre-2018 levels. This recovery highlights a substantial improvement in operational profitability and tax efficiency.
Overall, the data demonstrates the company's transition from significant losses during the 2018-2020 period to robust profitability in 2021 and 2022. The peak losses in 2020 may reflect extraordinary circumstances or operational setbacks, followed by a significant turnaround. Both net income and NOPAT reflect this trend, with NOPAT showing a more pronounced recovery in 2022, indicating enhanced core operating performance relative to net income gains.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Provision (benefit) for income taxes
- The provision for income taxes exhibits significant volatility over the five-year period. Starting at 335 million USD in 2018, it rose substantially to 461 million USD in 2019. In 2020, the figure turned negative to -11 million USD, indicating a tax benefit rather than a provision. The trend reversed sharply in 2021, with the provision increasing dramatically to 600 million USD, followed by a further increase to 1,099 million USD in 2022. This suggests an increasing tax expense or liability in the most recent years, possibly due to higher pre-tax earnings or changes in tax regulations.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes showed a relatively stable but fluctuating pattern. The amount increased slightly from 504 million USD in 2018 to 547 million USD in 2019, then dropped substantially to 146 million USD in 2020. This decrease corresponds with the sharp drop in the provision for income taxes in 2020, reflecting lower tax payments during that year. In 2021, cash operating taxes rebounded to 586 million USD and further increased significantly to 904 million USD in 2022. This rise mirrors the increased tax provision, indicating higher cash outflows related to tax payments in the latter years.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of equity equivalents to total Hess Corporation stockholders’ equity.
4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Analysis of the financial data reveals several key trends in the debt, equity, and invested capital of the company over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases increased steadily from $7,434 million in 2018 to $9,150 million in 2022. This represents a gradual accumulation of liabilities over the five years, indicating a strategic move towards higher leverage or increased financing requirements. The rate of increase slowed notably between 2020 and 2022, suggesting a stabilization in borrowing or lease commitments.
- Total stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity showed a different pattern, starting at $9,629 million in 2018 then declining sharply through 2020 to a low of $5,366 million. This substantial reduction, nearly halving equity value, may reflect net losses, dividends, share buybacks, or other equity-reducing activities during this period. However, from 2020 onwards, equity rebounded progressively, reaching $7,855 million by the end of 2022, indicating a recovery phase, possibly driven by improved profitability or equity financing events.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital decreased from $19,028 million in 2018 to $16,448 million in 2020, aligning with the decline in equity and increase in debt. From 2021 onwards, invested capital increased moderately each year, reaching $18,062 million in 2022. This suggests selective reinvestment or asset expansion after a period of contraction, reflecting a potentially cautious but constructive growth strategy.
Overall, the data illustrates a period of financial strain or restructuring between 2018 and 2020, marked by decreased equity and fluctuating capital levels alongside rising debt. Subsequent years show signs of recovery and cautious growth with equity rebuilding and stabilization in debt levels, complementing an increase in invested capital. This pattern suggests a phase of adaptation followed by strategic stabilization improving the company’s capital structure.
Cost of Capital
Hess Corp., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic spread ratio exhibited a volatile pattern over the five-year period. Initially, the ratio remained relatively stable before experiencing a significant decline, followed by a recovery towards more positive territory.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- In 2018 and 2019, the economic spread ratio was consistently negative, registering at approximately -17.95% and -17.94% respectively. This indicates that the company’s return on invested capital was less than its cost of capital during these years.
- A substantial deterioration occurred in 2020, with the economic spread ratio falling to -33.04%. This represents the largest negative spread observed within the analyzed timeframe, suggesting a considerable underperformance relative to the cost of capital.
- The ratio improved considerably in 2021, reaching -11.26%, signaling a reduction in the gap between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital. This improvement suggests enhanced operational efficiency or a more favorable economic environment.
- Further improvement continued into 2022, with the economic spread ratio reaching -3.59%. While still negative, this represents the least negative spread observed, indicating a narrowing of the difference between returns and costs.
The economic spread ratio’s movement suggests a period of increasing financial strain culminating in 2020, followed by a gradual recovery in subsequent years. The trend implies that the company’s ability to generate returns exceeding its cost of capital has been improving, though it has not yet reached positive territory.
- Relationship to Economic Profit
- The negative economic profit values across all years align with the negative economic spread ratios. As economic profit is calculated using the economic spread, the consistent negative values in both metrics reinforce the observation that the company’s returns have not consistently covered its cost of capital.
- The magnitude of the economic profit loss generally corresponds with the economic spread ratio. The largest loss in economic profit occurred in 2020, coinciding with the most negative economic spread ratio.
The invested capital figures demonstrate a generally stable trend, with a decrease in 2020 followed by an increase in 2022. This fluctuation in invested capital may have influenced the economic spread ratio, but the primary driver appears to be the performance relative to the cost of capital.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Sales and other operating revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Sales and other operating revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited significant fluctuations between 2018 and 2022. Initially negative, the margin demonstrated improvement over the period, though remained below zero by the end of 2022. A review of the underlying figures reveals a complex relationship between economic profit and sales revenue.
- Economic Profit Margin Trend
- The economic profit margin began at -54.01% in 2018 and decreased to -51.58% in 2019, indicating a slight worsening in economic profitability relative to sales. A substantial decline was then observed in 2020, with the margin reaching -116.44%, driven by a significant decrease in economic profit alongside a reduction in sales and other operating revenues. The margin improved considerably in 2021 to -25.44%, coinciding with an increase in both economic profit and sales. This positive trend continued into 2022, with the margin reaching -5.73%, representing the highest value over the observed period and a substantial improvement in economic profitability.
- Relationship between Economic Profit and Margin
- The economic profit margin is directly influenced by the economic profit. The largest negative margin in 2020 corresponds with the largest negative economic profit of -5,434 million US dollars. Conversely, the least negative margin in 2022 aligns with the smallest negative economic profit of -648 million US dollars. This suggests that improvements in economic profit are the primary driver of the observed improvements in the economic profit margin.
- Sales Revenue Impact
- While economic profit is the dominant factor, sales and other operating revenues also play a role. The decrease in sales in 2020 likely exacerbated the negative impact of the lower economic profit, resulting in the exceptionally low margin. The substantial increase in sales revenue in 2022, to 11,324 million US dollars, contributed to the improved margin despite a continuing negative economic profit.
In summary, the economic profit margin demonstrates a volatile pattern, heavily influenced by changes in economic profit and, to a lesser extent, sales revenue. The trend indicates a move towards improved economic profitability, but the margin remains negative throughout the analyzed period.