EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
Hess Corp. pages available for free this week:
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to Hess Corp. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2022 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The analysis of economic value added reveals a period of significant financial volatility characterized by a consistent inability to generate positive economic profit between 2018 and 2022. While the organization has failed to create economic value over this timeframe, a strong recovery trend is observable in the final two years of the period.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- Operating performance experienced extreme fluctuations, moving from a modest profit in 2018 to a severe deficit of negative 2,506 million US$ in 2020. A sharp reversal occurred thereafter, with NOPAT climbing to 1,404 million US$ in 2021 and further increasing to 3,165 million US$ by 2022, representing a substantial recovery in operational profitability.
- Cost of Capital and Invested Capital
- The cost of capital showed a gradual upward trajectory, rising from 18.66% in 2018 to 20.97% in 2022. This increasing hurdle rate coincided with a fluctuating invested capital base, which contracted to a low of 16,448 million US$ in 2020 before expanding again to 18,062 million US$ by 2022. The combination of a larger capital base and a higher cost of capital has increased the total capital charge the company must overcome to achieve economic profitability.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit remained negative throughout the five-year period, indicating that the returns on invested capital were insufficient to cover the cost of capital. The deficit widened significantly in 2020, reaching negative 5,416 million US$. However, a consistent narrowing of this gap is observed from 2021 through 2022, with the economic profit improving to negative 623 million US$. This trajectory suggests that the rapid growth in NOPAT is effectively offsetting the rising cost of capital, moving the organization closer to a break-even point in terms of economic value creation.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation.
3 2022 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
4 2022 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation.
The financial data over the five-year period exhibits significant volatility in key profitability measures for the company.
- Net income (loss) attributable to Hess Corporation
-
The net income shows a negative trend from 2018 through 2020, with losses deepening each year and peaking at a substantial loss in 2020. Specifically, the company recorded losses of $282 million, $408 million, and $3,093 million respectively in those years. However, a marked recovery occurred in 2021, with net income turning positive to $559 million, followed by a further substantial increase to $2,096 million in 2022. This indicates a strong rebound in profitability after a difficult period culminating in 2020.
- Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)
-
Similar to net income, NOPAT declined sharply from 2018 to 2020, moving from a profit of $159 million in 2018 to a significant loss of $2,506 million in 2020. Notably, the decline in NOPAT was steeper than for net income, which may suggest operational challenges or non-operating factors affecting net income differently. From 2021 onwards, NOPAT exhibits a strong recovery, reaching $1,404 million in 2021 and rising to $3,165 million in 2022, surpassing pre-2018 levels. This recovery highlights a substantial improvement in operational profitability and tax efficiency.
Overall, the data demonstrates the company's transition from significant losses during the 2018-2020 period to robust profitability in 2021 and 2022. The peak losses in 2020 may reflect extraordinary circumstances or operational setbacks, followed by a significant turnaround. Both net income and NOPAT reflect this trend, with NOPAT showing a more pronounced recovery in 2022, indicating enhanced core operating performance relative to net income gains.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
- Provision (benefit) for income taxes
- The provision for income taxes exhibits significant volatility over the five-year period. Starting at 335 million USD in 2018, it rose substantially to 461 million USD in 2019. In 2020, the figure turned negative to -11 million USD, indicating a tax benefit rather than a provision. The trend reversed sharply in 2021, with the provision increasing dramatically to 600 million USD, followed by a further increase to 1,099 million USD in 2022. This suggests an increasing tax expense or liability in the most recent years, possibly due to higher pre-tax earnings or changes in tax regulations.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes showed a relatively stable but fluctuating pattern. The amount increased slightly from 504 million USD in 2018 to 547 million USD in 2019, then dropped substantially to 146 million USD in 2020. This decrease corresponds with the sharp drop in the provision for income taxes in 2020, reflecting lower tax payments during that year. In 2021, cash operating taxes rebounded to 586 million USD and further increased significantly to 904 million USD in 2022. This rise mirrors the increased tax provision, indicating higher cash outflows related to tax payments in the latter years.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of equity equivalents to total Hess Corporation stockholders’ equity.
4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
Analysis of the financial data reveals several key trends in the debt, equity, and invested capital of the company over the five-year period ending December 31, 2022.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases increased steadily from $7,434 million in 2018 to $9,150 million in 2022. This represents a gradual accumulation of liabilities over the five years, indicating a strategic move towards higher leverage or increased financing requirements. The rate of increase slowed notably between 2020 and 2022, suggesting a stabilization in borrowing or lease commitments.
- Total stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity showed a different pattern, starting at $9,629 million in 2018 then declining sharply through 2020 to a low of $5,366 million. This substantial reduction, nearly halving equity value, may reflect net losses, dividends, share buybacks, or other equity-reducing activities during this period. However, from 2020 onwards, equity rebounded progressively, reaching $7,855 million by the end of 2022, indicating a recovery phase, possibly driven by improved profitability or equity financing events.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital decreased from $19,028 million in 2018 to $16,448 million in 2020, aligning with the decline in equity and increase in debt. From 2021 onwards, invested capital increased moderately each year, reaching $18,062 million in 2022. This suggests selective reinvestment or asset expansion after a period of contraction, reflecting a potentially cautious but constructive growth strategy.
Overall, the data illustrates a period of financial strain or restructuring between 2018 and 2020, marked by decreased equity and fluctuating capital levels alongside rising debt. Subsequent years show signs of recovery and cautious growth with equity rebuilding and stabilization in debt levels, complementing an increase in invested capital. This pattern suggests a phase of adaptation followed by strategic stabilization improving the company’s capital structure.
Cost of Capital
Hess Corp., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Debt and finance lease obligations3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Debt and finance lease obligations. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2022 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of economic value added indicators between 2018 and 2022 reveals a period of sustained negative economic profit that experienced a significant trough in 2020 followed by a consistent recovery trend. While the organization failed to achieve positive economic value throughout the five-year period, the trajectory indicates a substantial reduction in value erosion by the end of 2022.
- Economic Profit Trends
- Economic profit remained negative for the entire duration of the analysis. A relative stabilization occurred between 2018 and 2019, followed by a sharp decline in 2020, where losses peaked at negative 5,416 million US dollars. Subsequently, a strong recovery phase emerged, with losses narrowing to negative 1,879 million US dollars in 2021 and further improving to negative 623 million US dollars by December 31, 2022, representing a significant move toward the break-even point.
- Invested Capital Fluctuations
- Invested capital exhibited a downward trend from 19,028 million US dollars in 2018 to a period low of 16,448 million US dollars in 2020. Following this contraction, the capital base expanded steadily, reaching 18,062 million US dollars by 2022. This suggests a period of capital reduction or impairment around 2020, followed by a phased reinvestment in the business base.
- Economic Spread Ratio Performance
- The economic spread ratio mirrors the volatility of the economic profit. After remaining stagnant at negative 17.83% through 2018 and 2019, the ratio deteriorated sharply to negative 32.93% in 2020, indicating that the return on invested capital fell significantly below the cost of capital. However, the ratio improved dramatically over the next two years, rising to negative 11.13% in 2021 and reaching negative 3.45% in 2022.
The correlation between the narrowing economic profit and the improving economic spread ratio suggests an increase in operational efficiency or a favorable shift in the relationship between capital returns and the cost of capital. The progression from 2020 to 2022 demonstrates a successful mitigation of economic value loss, bringing the organization closer to generating positive economic value.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Sales and other operating revenues | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2022 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Sales and other operating revenues
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The analysis of economic value added reveals a period of consistent negative economic profit, although a strong recovery trajectory is evident from 2020 through 2022. While the company has not yet reached a threshold of positive economic value creation, the magnitude of economic losses has decreased substantially, closely correlating with a significant expansion in operating revenues.
- Economic Profit Performance
- Economic profit remained in negative territory throughout the observed five-year period. A peak deficit was recorded in 2020 at -5,416 million USD, representing the lowest point of economic value generation. Following this trough, a consistent upward trend is observed, with losses narrowing to -1,879 million USD in 2021 and further reducing to -623 million USD by the end of 2022.
- Revenue Trajectory and Impact
- Sales and other operating revenues exhibited significant volatility, declining from 6,323 million USD in 2018 to a low of 4,667 million USD in 2020. Subsequently, a period of aggressive growth occurred, with revenues reaching 11,324 million USD in 2022. This expansion in the top line appears to be a primary driver in the reduction of economic losses, suggesting that increased operational scale is narrowing the gap between net operating profit and the cost of capital.
- Economic Profit Margin Volatility
- The economic profit margin showed extreme fluctuations, mirroring the volatility of both revenue and economic profit. The margin reached a critical low of -116.04% in 2020, indicating that economic losses exceeded total operating revenues during that year. A sharp recovery followed, with the margin improving to -25.15% in 2021 and reaching -5.50% in 2022, signaling a move toward economic break-even.