EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
EOG Resources Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Analysis of Long-term (Investment) Activity Ratios
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Enterprise Value (EV)
- Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Debt to Equity since 2005
- Price to Earnings (P/E) since 2005
- Price to Sales (P/S) since 2005
- Analysis of Debt
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to EOG Resources Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The financial trajectory from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by a significant recovery in operating profitability, which however remained insufficient to generate positive economic value. While the operating performance shifted from substantial losses to positive returns, the capital charge associated with the expanding invested capital base continued to outweigh these gains.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- A strong upward trend is observed in NOPAT, which transitioned from a deficit of US$ 6,843,163 thousand in 2015 to a surplus of US$ 3,773,634 thousand by 2019. The peak operating performance occurred in 2018, reaching US$ 4,671,245 thousand, before experiencing a moderate decline in the final year of the period.
- Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
- Invested capital demonstrated a consistent increase over the five-year period, growing from US$ 24,433,279 thousand in 2015 to US$ 32,663,914 thousand in 2019. Simultaneously, the cost of capital remained relatively stable and elevated, fluctuating within a narrow range between 19.61% and 20.80%.
- Economic Profit Analysis
- Despite the improvement in NOPAT, economic profit remained negative throughout the entire analysis period. The most severe value destruction occurred in 2015 with an economic profit of negative US$ 11,634,492 thousand. Although this figure improved steadily until 2018, reaching negative US$ 1,621,713 thousand, the trend reversed in 2019, with the deficit widening to negative US$ 2,693,846 thousand.
- Synthesis of Value Creation
- The persistence of negative economic profit indicates that the return on invested capital did not exceed the cost of capital. The expansion of the invested capital base, combined with a high cost of capital exceeding 19%, created a substantial hurdle that operating profits were unable to overcome, resulting in a net destruction of economic value over the specified timeframe.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).
3 2019 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
4 2019 Calculation
Tax benefit of net interest expense = Adjusted net interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).
The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in the company's profitability and operating performance over the five-year period.
- Net Income (Loss)
- There is a marked improvement from a substantial loss of approximately $4.52 billion in 2015 to a more moderate loss of about $1.10 billion in 2016. This negative trend reverses in 2017 when the company reports a net income of roughly $2.58 billion. The upward trajectory continues through 2018 and 2019, with net income increasing to approximately $3.42 billion and then slightly declining to about $2.73 billion, respectively. This pattern indicates a recovery and stabilization of net profitability after the initial losses in 2015 and 2016.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT data exhibits a similar trend to net income, with significant losses recorded in 2015 and 2016, amounting to approximately $6.84 billion and $1.42 billion, respectively. The company moves into positive territory in 2017 with a NOPAT of about $784 million, which then substantially increases to around $4.67 billion in 2018. There is a slight decrease in NOPAT to approximately $3.77 billion in 2019. These changes suggest improvements in core operational efficiency and profitability through the period, particularly from 2017 onwards.
Overall, the data indicates a transition from heavy losses to consistent profitability, reflecting either operational improvements, favorable market conditions, or other strategic adjustments that significantly enhanced financial performance starting in 2017. Both net income and NOPAT trends are aligned, reinforcing the conclusion of a robust turnaround in the company’s financial health over the observed years.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The financial data reveals several notable trends and changes over the examined periods.
- Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
- This item shows significant volatility throughout the years. In 2015 and 2016, the figures reflect substantial tax benefits, with values of approximately -2.4 billion and -460.8 million respectively, indicating periods of considerable tax relief or deferred tax benefits. The benefit peaked again in 2017 at nearly -1.9 billion, before reversing sharply in 2018 and 2019 to positive figures of 822 million and 810 million respectively. This shift from benefit to provision suggests a change in taxable income or tax obligations, possibly due to improved profitability or changes in tax regulations.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes presented a more stable but fluctuating pattern across the years. From 2015 to 2017, this expense remained positive, ranging between approximately 157.8 thousand and 173.4 thousand, indicating ongoing tax payments related to operations. Contrastingly, 2018 and 2019 show negative values of -165.6 thousand and -15.3 thousand, respectively, which could imply tax refunds, credits, or adjustments exceeding tax payments during these periods. The sharp decline and transition from positive to negative cash operating taxes in 2018 particularly highlight a notable operational or fiscal event impacting tax cash outflows.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
The financial data reveals several notable trends in the company's capital structure over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases show a consistent decline from 7,023,659 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 5,974,808 thousand US dollars in 2019. This represents a reduction of approximately 15% over the period, indicating a strategic effort to decrease debt obligations.
- Stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity demonstrates a steady and significant increase each year, rising from 12,943,035 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 21,640,716 thousand US dollars by the end of 2019. This growth, approximately 67% over five years, suggests retained earnings accumulation and possible additional equity issuances, strengthening the company's financial base.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital shows an upward trend throughout the period, increasing from 24,433,279 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 32,663,914 thousand US dollars at the end of 2019, marking a growth of about 34%. This trend indicates ongoing investments in assets, supporting the company's expansion or operational needs.
Overall, the combination of decreasing debt levels alongside increasing equity and invested capital suggests a strengthening of the capital structure with a shift towards greater equity financing. This could enhance the company's financial stability and capacity for future investment.
Cost of Capital
EOG Resources Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial performance from 2015 to 2019 reflects a consistent period of economic value destruction, as indicated by negative economic profit and a negative economic spread ratio. While a recovery trend was observed between 2015 and 2018, a moderate reversal occurred in 2019.
- Economic Profit
- A substantial narrowing of economic losses is observed from 2015 through 2018, with the deficit improving from -11.63 billion US dollars to -1.62 billion US dollars. This suggests a period of operational improvement and a reduction in the gap between actual returns and the cost of capital. However, this trajectory shifted in 2019, with economic losses widening to -2.69 billion US dollars.
- Invested Capital
- There was a continuous expansion of the capital base throughout the five-year period. Invested capital grew steadily from 24.43 billion US dollars in 2015 to 32.66 billion US dollars by the end of 2019, indicating a persistent increase in the total assets deployed to generate returns.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio remained in negative territory for the entire duration, confirming that the return on invested capital failed to meet the cost of capital. A marked improvement in the ratio occurred between 2015 (-47.62%) and 2018 (-5.34%), reflecting a significant reduction in the cost-of-capital deficit. This trend reversed slightly in 2019, as the ratio declined to -8.25%, mirroring the downturn in economic profit.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Operating revenues and other | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2019 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Operating revenues and other
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
Between 2015 and 2019, a general trend of recovery in economic performance is observed, characterized by a substantial reduction in economic losses and a significant increase in operating revenues. Although the entity failed to achieve a positive economic profit during this period, the trajectory indicated a narrowing gap between operating returns and the cost of capital until 2018.
- Economic Profit Trajectory
- Economic losses showed a consistent narrowing from December 31, 2015, through December 31, 2018, moving from negative 11.6 billion US dollars to negative 1.6 billion US dollars. This trend was interrupted in 2019, as the economic profit widened again to negative 2.7 billion US dollars, indicating a reversal of the prior recovery phase.
- Operating Revenue Performance
- Operating revenues and other income exhibited strong overall growth, increasing from 8.7 billion US dollars in 2015 to 17.4 billion US dollars in 2019. Following a minor decline in 2016, revenues grew aggressively between 2017 and 2018, effectively doubling compared to the 2015 baseline.
- Economic Profit Margin Analysis
- The economic profit margin experienced a marked improvement, shifting from negative 132.85% in 2015 to negative 9.39% in 2018. This indicates that the company significantly reduced the shortfall between its net operating profit and its capital charge relative to its revenue. However, the margin declined to negative 15.50% in 2019, reflecting the increased economic losses and a slight stagnation in revenue growth during that year.