Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

EOG Resources Inc. (NYSE:EOG)

$22.49

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 27, 2020.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.

Paying user area

The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.

This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.


We accept:

Visa Mastercard Maestro Discover JCB PayPal Google Pay
Visa Secure Mastercard Identity Check

Economic Profit

EOG Resources Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1
Cost of capital2
Invested capital3
 
Economic profit4

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2019 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= × =


The financial trajectory from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by a significant recovery in operating profitability, although this improvement was insufficient to generate positive economic value. While a transition from substantial operating losses to positive net operating profit after taxes was achieved, the cost of maintaining and expanding the invested capital base resulted in a persistent negative economic profit throughout the period.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A strong upward trend is observed in NOPAT, which rose from a deficit of approximately 6.84 billion US dollars in 2015 to a peak of 4.67 billion US dollars in 2018, before moderating to 3.77 billion US dollars in 2019. This progression indicates a substantial recovery in core operational efficiency and a return to profitability after a period of severe operating losses.
Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
Invested capital demonstrated a consistent increase, growing from 24.43 billion US dollars in 2015 to 32.66 billion US dollars in 2019. Throughout this expansion of the capital base, the cost of capital remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 19.66% and 20.86%. This stability indicates a constant hurdle rate that the company was required to exceed to create economic value.
Economic Profit Performance
Economic profit remained negative across the entire five-year analysis, signifying that the company failed to generate returns above its cost of capital. There was a notable narrowing of the economic loss from 11.65 billion US dollars in 2015 to 1.64 billion US dollars in 2018. However, this trend reversed in 2019, with the economic loss widening to 2.71 billion US dollars. The persistence of negative economic profit, despite positive NOPAT in later years, reveals that the growth in invested capital and the high cost of capital continued to outweigh the operating gains.

Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

EOG Resources Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Net income (loss)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents2
Net interest expense
Interest expense, operating lease liability3
Adjusted net interest expense
Tax benefit of net interest expense4
Adjusted net interest expense, after taxes5
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).

3 2019 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =

4 2019 Calculation
Tax benefit of net interest expense = Adjusted net interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =

5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).


The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in the company's profitability and operating performance over the five-year period.

Net Income (Loss)
There is a marked improvement from a substantial loss of approximately $4.52 billion in 2015 to a more moderate loss of about $1.10 billion in 2016. This negative trend reverses in 2017 when the company reports a net income of roughly $2.58 billion. The upward trajectory continues through 2018 and 2019, with net income increasing to approximately $3.42 billion and then slightly declining to about $2.73 billion, respectively. This pattern indicates a recovery and stabilization of net profitability after the initial losses in 2015 and 2016.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
The NOPAT data exhibits a similar trend to net income, with significant losses recorded in 2015 and 2016, amounting to approximately $6.84 billion and $1.42 billion, respectively. The company moves into positive territory in 2017 with a NOPAT of about $784 million, which then substantially increases to around $4.67 billion in 2018. There is a slight decrease in NOPAT to approximately $3.77 billion in 2019. These changes suggest improvements in core operational efficiency and profitability through the period, particularly from 2017 onwards.

Overall, the data indicates a transition from heavy losses to consistent profitability, reflecting either operational improvements, favorable market conditions, or other strategic adjustments that significantly enhanced financial performance starting in 2017. Both net income and NOPAT trends are aligned, reinforcing the conclusion of a robust turnaround in the company’s financial health over the observed years.


Cash Operating Taxes

EOG Resources Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Income tax provision (benefit)
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)
Add: Tax savings from net interest expense
Cash operating taxes

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The financial data reveals several notable trends and changes over the examined periods.

Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
This item shows significant volatility throughout the years. In 2015 and 2016, the figures reflect substantial tax benefits, with values of approximately -2.4 billion and -460.8 million respectively, indicating periods of considerable tax relief or deferred tax benefits. The benefit peaked again in 2017 at nearly -1.9 billion, before reversing sharply in 2018 and 2019 to positive figures of 822 million and 810 million respectively. This shift from benefit to provision suggests a change in taxable income or tax obligations, possibly due to improved profitability or changes in tax regulations.
Cash Operating Taxes
Cash operating taxes presented a more stable but fluctuating pattern across the years. From 2015 to 2017, this expense remained positive, ranging between approximately 157.8 thousand and 173.4 thousand, indicating ongoing tax payments related to operations. Contrastingly, 2018 and 2019 show negative values of -165.6 thousand and -15.3 thousand, respectively, which could imply tax refunds, credits, or adjustments exceeding tax payments during these periods. The sharp decline and transition from positive to negative cash operating taxes in 2018 particularly highlight a notable operational or fiscal event impacting tax cash outflows.

Invested Capital

EOG Resources Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Current portion of long-term debt
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Operating lease liability1
Total reported debt & leases
Stockholders’ equity
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2
Equity equivalents3
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax4
Adjusted stockholders’ equity
Invested capital

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.


The financial data reveals several notable trends in the company's capital structure over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019.

Total reported debt & leases
The total reported debt and leases show a consistent decline from 7,023,659 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 5,974,808 thousand US dollars in 2019. This represents a reduction of approximately 15% over the period, indicating a strategic effort to decrease debt obligations.
Stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity demonstrates a steady and significant increase each year, rising from 12,943,035 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 21,640,716 thousand US dollars by the end of 2019. This growth, approximately 67% over five years, suggests retained earnings accumulation and possible additional equity issuances, strengthening the company's financial base.
Invested capital
Invested capital shows an upward trend throughout the period, increasing from 24,433,279 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 32,663,914 thousand US dollars at the end of 2019, marking a growth of about 34%. This trend indicates ongoing investments in assets, supporting the company's expansion or operational needs.

Overall, the combination of decreasing debt levels alongside increasing equity and invested capital suggests a strengthening of the capital structure with a shift towards greater equity financing. This could enhance the company's financial stability and capacity for future investment.


Cost of Capital

EOG Resources Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt and finance leases3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt and finance leases3 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 21.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt and finance leases3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt and finance leases3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 ÷ = × =
Long-term debt and finance leases3 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Operating lease liability4 ÷ = × × (1 – 35.00%) =
Total:

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

EOG Resources Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Invested capital2
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Chevron Corp.
ConocoPhillips
Exxon Mobil Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2019 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


From 2015 to 2019, the organization consistently failed to generate positive economic value, as evidenced by negative economic profit and a negative economic spread ratio throughout the entire five-year period. However, a significant trend of recovery was observed between 2015 and 2018, characterized by a steady narrowing of economic losses, before a slight reversal occurred in 2019.

Economic Profit Analysis
Economic profit remained negative for the duration of the analyzed period, indicating that the returns generated were insufficient to cover the cost of capital. A substantial improvement trend occurred between 2015 and 2018, with economic losses decreasing from 11.6 billion US dollars to 1.6 billion US dollars. This trajectory of recovery was interrupted in 2019, as economic profit declined again to negative 2.7 billion US dollars.
Invested Capital Trends
A consistent upward trend in invested capital is observed, growing from 24.4 billion US dollars in 2015 to 32.6 billion US dollars by 2019. This steady increase in the capital base occurred concurrently with the period of narrowing economic losses, suggesting continued investment in assets and operations despite the lack of positive economic value added.
Economic Spread Ratio Interpretation
The economic spread ratio, which measures the difference between the return on invested capital and the weighted average cost of capital, showed a marked improvement for most of the period. The ratio rose from a low of -47.67% in 2015 to -5.40% in 2018, signaling a significant reduction in the disparity between the cost of capital and the actual returns. In 2019, the ratio retreated to -8.30%, mirroring the increase in economic losses and indicating a slight widening of the spread deficit.

Economic Profit Margin

EOG Resources Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1
Operating revenues and other
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Chevron Corp.
ConocoPhillips
Exxon Mobil Corp.

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2019 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Operating revenues and other
= 100 × ÷ =

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial trajectory between 2015 and 2019 indicates a significant trend toward recovery in economic value creation, characterized by a substantial reduction in economic losses and a strong expansion in operating revenues, although the entity did not reach a positive economic profit within the observed period.

Economic Profit Trends
A consistent reduction in economic losses is observed from 2015 through 2018, with the deficit narrowing from 11.6 billion US dollars to 1.6 billion US dollars. This trend suggests a progressive closing of the gap between the company's net operating profit and its cost of capital. However, this recovery was interrupted in 2019, as economic profit declined again to a loss of 2.7 billion US dollars.
Operating Revenue Growth
Operating revenues experienced a slight contraction in 2016, falling to 7.6 billion US dollars from 8.7 billion US dollars in 2015. Subsequently, a period of aggressive growth followed, with revenues increasing to 11.2 billion US dollars in 2017 and peaking at 17.3 billion US dollars in 2018 and 2019. The stability of revenue between 2018 and 2019 contrasts with the deterioration of economic profit during the same interval.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin showed a dramatic improvement from 2015 to 2018, moving from -132.99% to -9.48%. This compression of the negative margin indicates that the company became significantly more efficient at generating revenue relative to its capital charges. In 2019, the margin widened to -15.60%, reflecting a decrease in the efficiency of value creation despite the maintenance of high revenue levels.