EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
EOG Resources Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Cash Flow Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Enterprise Value to FCFF (EV/FCFF)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Operating Profit Margin since 2005
- Total Asset Turnover since 2005
- Aggregate Accruals
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to EOG Resources Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The net operating profit after taxes shows a significant improvement over the analyzed period. It begins with a substantial loss of approximately -6.84 billion USD in 2015, which narrows dramatically to about -1.42 billion USD in 2016. The company then attains positive NOPAT values starting in 2017, with 784 million USD, followed by continuous growth to 4.67 billion USD in 2018 before slightly declining to 3.77 billion USD in 2019. This trend indicates a strong recovery and operational improvement over these years.
- Cost of Capital
- The cost of capital remains relatively stable throughout the period, fluctuating modestly between 16.67% and 17.66%. It peaks at 17.66% in 2017 and slightly decreases to 16.84% by 2019. This consistency suggests a steady perceived risk and return requirement by investors during the timeframe.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital displays a steady upward trend, increasing from approximately 24.43 billion USD in 2015 to 32.66 billion USD in 2019. The growth indicates ongoing investment in assets, supporting business operations and potential expansion efforts. Notably, there is a sharper increase between 2017 and 2018 compared to prior years, suggesting an acceleration in capital deployment during that period.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit remains negative throughout the period, though the magnitude of loss contracts significantly over the years. Starting with a steep deficit of about -10.92 billion USD in 2015, the negative figure decreases to -1.73 billion USD by 2019. The reduction in economic profit losses parallels the improvement seen in NOPAT, implying that while the company has yet to generate positive economic profit, it is moving closer to covering its cost of capital.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).
3 2019 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
4 2019 Calculation
Tax benefit of net interest expense = Adjusted net interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).
The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in the company's profitability and operating performance over the five-year period.
- Net Income (Loss)
- There is a marked improvement from a substantial loss of approximately $4.52 billion in 2015 to a more moderate loss of about $1.10 billion in 2016. This negative trend reverses in 2017 when the company reports a net income of roughly $2.58 billion. The upward trajectory continues through 2018 and 2019, with net income increasing to approximately $3.42 billion and then slightly declining to about $2.73 billion, respectively. This pattern indicates a recovery and stabilization of net profitability after the initial losses in 2015 and 2016.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
- The NOPAT data exhibits a similar trend to net income, with significant losses recorded in 2015 and 2016, amounting to approximately $6.84 billion and $1.42 billion, respectively. The company moves into positive territory in 2017 with a NOPAT of about $784 million, which then substantially increases to around $4.67 billion in 2018. There is a slight decrease in NOPAT to approximately $3.77 billion in 2019. These changes suggest improvements in core operational efficiency and profitability through the period, particularly from 2017 onwards.
Overall, the data indicates a transition from heavy losses to consistent profitability, reflecting either operational improvements, favorable market conditions, or other strategic adjustments that significantly enhanced financial performance starting in 2017. Both net income and NOPAT trends are aligned, reinforcing the conclusion of a robust turnaround in the company’s financial health over the observed years.
Cash Operating Taxes
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
The financial data reveals several notable trends and changes over the examined periods.
- Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
- This item shows significant volatility throughout the years. In 2015 and 2016, the figures reflect substantial tax benefits, with values of approximately -2.4 billion and -460.8 million respectively, indicating periods of considerable tax relief or deferred tax benefits. The benefit peaked again in 2017 at nearly -1.9 billion, before reversing sharply in 2018 and 2019 to positive figures of 822 million and 810 million respectively. This shift from benefit to provision suggests a change in taxable income or tax obligations, possibly due to improved profitability or changes in tax regulations.
- Cash Operating Taxes
- Cash operating taxes presented a more stable but fluctuating pattern across the years. From 2015 to 2017, this expense remained positive, ranging between approximately 157.8 thousand and 173.4 thousand, indicating ongoing tax payments related to operations. Contrastingly, 2018 and 2019 show negative values of -165.6 thousand and -15.3 thousand, respectively, which could imply tax refunds, credits, or adjustments exceeding tax payments during these periods. The sharp decline and transition from positive to negative cash operating taxes in 2018 particularly highlight a notable operational or fiscal event impacting tax cash outflows.
Invested Capital
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.
4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
The financial data reveals several notable trends in the company's capital structure over the five-year period ending December 31, 2019.
- Total reported debt & leases
- The total reported debt and leases show a consistent decline from 7,023,659 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 5,974,808 thousand US dollars in 2019. This represents a reduction of approximately 15% over the period, indicating a strategic effort to decrease debt obligations.
- Stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity demonstrates a steady and significant increase each year, rising from 12,943,035 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 21,640,716 thousand US dollars by the end of 2019. This growth, approximately 67% over five years, suggests retained earnings accumulation and possible additional equity issuances, strengthening the company's financial base.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital shows an upward trend throughout the period, increasing from 24,433,279 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 32,663,914 thousand US dollars at the end of 2019, marking a growth of about 34%. This trend indicates ongoing investments in assets, supporting the company's expansion or operational needs.
Overall, the combination of decreasing debt levels alongside increasing equity and invested capital suggests a strengthening of the capital structure with a shift towards greater equity financing. This could enhance the company's financial stability and capacity for future investment.
Cost of Capital
EOG Resources Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Long-term debt and finance leases3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 US$ in thousands
2 Equity. See details »
3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit exhibited a consistent improvement over the analyzed period. Starting from a substantial negative value in 2015, the losses gradually diminished each year, reaching the smallest shortfall in 2018 before slightly increasing again in 2019. This pattern indicates a progressive reduction in the economic loss, suggesting improving operational efficiency or profitability, despite the fact that economic profit remained negative throughout the period.
- Invested Capital
- The invested capital showed a steady upward trend over the five-year span. Beginning at approximately 24.4 billion US dollars in 2015, it increased each year, culminating in over 32.6 billion US dollars by the end of 2019. This continuous growth reflects ongoing investment in the company's assets, likely supporting future expansion or operational capacity increases.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio mirrored the trend seen in economic profit, starting at a very negative value close to -44.7% in 2015 and improving each year until it approached near zero in 2018. However, in 2019, the ratio declined again but remained better than at the beginning of the period. This metric’s movement indicates a narrowing gap between the returns generated and the cost of capital, though the company did not achieve a positive spread during these years.
- Overall Insights
- Overall, the data reveals progressive financial improvement, highlighted by decreasing economic losses and narrowing negative economic spread ratios. Despite this progress, the company had not reached positive economic profit by 2019. The increasing invested capital suggests sustained investments, which might have contributed to these improvements but also implies the need for continued focus on generating adequate returns to justify the expanded capital base.
Economic Profit Margin
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Operating revenues and other | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| ConocoPhillips | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2019 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Operating revenues and other
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
- Economic Profit
- The economic profit showed a consistent improvement from 2015 to 2018, moving from a significant negative figure of approximately -10.9 billion USD to a much smaller negative value of around -674 million USD. This trend indicates a reduction in losses over the period. However, in 2019, the economic profit worsened again, increasing in negative value to approximately -1.7 billion USD.
- Operating Revenues and Other
- Operating revenues exhibited a generally upward trajectory throughout the period analyzed. Starting at about 8.76 billion USD in 2015, revenues slightly declined in 2016 to 7.65 billion USD before increasing substantially in the subsequent years. By 2018, revenues reached nearly 17.28 billion USD and remained steady in 2019 at approximately 17.38 billion USD. This progression suggests an overall expansion in revenue-generating activities.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin also demonstrated significant improvement from 2015 to 2018, increasing from -124.65% to -3.9%. This marks a narrowing of losses relative to revenue. However, similar to the trend in economic profit, the margin deteriorated slightly in 2019 to -9.93%, indicating a reduced efficiency or higher costs relative to revenues in that year.
- Summary of Trends
- Overall, the financial data reveals an initial successful effort to reduce economic losses and improve profitability margins between 2015 and 2018, supported by strong revenue growth. The reversal in economic profit and margin in 2019 suggests emerging challenges that impacted the company's ability to convert increased revenues into economic profit during that year. The relatively stable high revenue figures in 2018 and 2019 indicate that the issue was not revenue generation but potentially increased costs or other operational inefficiencies.