Stock Analysis on Net
Stock Analysis on Net

EOG Resources Inc. (NYSE:EOG)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 27, 2020.

Economic Value Added (EVA)

Microsoft Excel

EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.

Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.


Economic Profit

EOG Resources Inc., economic profit calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 3,773,634 4,671,245 783,732 (1,419,892) (6,843,163)
Cost of capital2 19.63% 20.55% 20.62% 20.31% 19.44%
Invested capital3 32,663,914 30,360,840 26,570,707 26,322,407 24,433,279
 
Economic profit4 (2,638,035) (1,567,082) (4,696,137) (6,766,839) (11,593,105)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cost of capital. See details »

3 Invested capital. See details »

4 2019 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= 3,773,634 – 19.63% × 32,663,914 = -2,638,035


The financial performance from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by a substantial recovery in operational profitability, although the organization failed to generate a positive economic profit throughout the analyzed period.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A significant upward trajectory is observed in NOPAT, which transitioned from a loss of 6.8 billion US dollars in 2015 to a peak profit of 4.6 billion US dollars in 2018. While a decline to 3.7 billion US dollars occurred in 2019, the overall trend indicates a successful return to operational profitability after deep losses in the early part of the period.
Invested Capital and Cost of Capital
Invested capital exhibited a consistent growth pattern, rising from 24.4 billion US dollars in 2015 to 32.6 billion US dollars by 2019. During this expansion, the cost of capital remained relatively stable, oscillating within a narrow range between 19.44% and 20.62%, suggesting a consistent risk profile and funding cost environment.
Economic Profit Trends
Economic profit remained negative for all five years, signifying that the company did not create value above its cost of capital. The economic loss narrowed considerably from 11.5 billion US dollars in 2015 to 1.5 billion US dollars in 2018. However, this progress reversed in 2019, with the economic profit falling back to negative 2.6 billion US dollars. This downturn in 2019 is attributable to the combination of a decrease in NOPAT and a continued increase in the total amount of invested capital, which expanded the capital charge.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)

EOG Resources Inc., NOPAT calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Net income (loss) 2,734,910 3,419,040 2,582,579 (1,096,686) (4,524,515)
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)1 870,370 1,043,148 (1,987,276) (515,206) (2,482,307)
Increase (decrease) in equity equivalents2 870,370 1,043,148 (1,987,276) (515,206) (2,482,307)
Net interest expense 185,129 245,052 274,372 281,681 237,393
Interest expense, operating lease liability3 27,978 19,577 15,519 13,703 14,390
Adjusted net interest expense 213,107 264,629 289,891 295,384 251,783
Tax benefit of net interest expense4 (44,752) (55,572) (101,462) (103,385) (88,124)
Adjusted net interest expense, after taxes5 168,354 209,057 188,429 192,000 163,659
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) 3,773,634 4,671,245 783,732 (1,419,892) (6,843,163)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »

2 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income (loss).

3 2019 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= 799,365 × 3.50% = 27,978

4 2019 Calculation
Tax benefit of net interest expense = Adjusted net interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= 213,107 × 21.00% = 44,752

5 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income (loss).


A significant financial recovery is observed between 2015 and 2019, characterized by a transition from substantial operational losses to consistent profitability. Both Net Income and Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) follow a similar V-shaped recovery trajectory, peaking in 2018 before experiencing a moderate contraction in 2019.

Net Income Performance
A period of significant instability is noted starting in 2015 with a loss of 4.52 billion US dollars. This loss narrowed in 2016 to 1.10 billion US dollars before shifting to a positive position of 2.58 billion US dollars in 2017. Profitability reached a peak of 3.42 billion US dollars in 2018, followed by a decline to 2.73 billion US dollars in 2019.
Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT) Trends
NOPAT exhibits more volatility than Net Income, recording a deep deficit of 6.84 billion US dollars in 2015. A strong recovery trend followed, with losses reducing to 1.42 billion US dollars in 2016 and turning positive in 2017 at 783.73 million US dollars. A substantial surge occurred in 2018, where NOPAT reached 4.67 billion US dollars, before receding to 3.77 billion US dollars in 2019.
Comparative Analysis of NOPAT and Net Income
A divergence in the relationship between operating and bottom-line profit is observed over the five-year period. From 2015 to 2017, NOPAT remained consistently lower than Net Income, suggesting that non-operating items provided a relative cushion or that operating inefficiencies were more pronounced than the final net result. However, in 2018 and 2019, this trend reversed, with NOPAT exceeding Net Income. In 2018, NOPAT was approximately 1.25 billion US dollars higher than Net Income, and in 2019, it remained 1.04 billion US dollars higher, indicating that operating performance became the primary driver of value creation, outweighing the impact of non-operating expenses or taxes.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Cash Operating Taxes

EOG Resources Inc., cash operating taxes calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Income tax provision (benefit) 810,357 821,958 (1,921,397) (460,819) (2,397,041)
Less: Deferred income tax expense (benefit) 870,370 1,043,148 (1,987,276) (515,206) (2,482,307)
Add: Tax savings from net interest expense 44,752 55,572 101,462 103,385 88,124
Cash operating taxes (15,261) (165,618) 167,341 157,772 173,390

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The analysis of tax-related items from 2015 through 2019 reveals a significant shift in the fiscal profile of the organization, transitioning from a period of substantial tax benefits to a period of tax provisions and fluctuating cash tax outflows.

Income Tax Provision Trends
Between 2015 and 2017, substantial income tax benefits were recorded, peaking at approximately $2.397 billion in 2015. This trend reversed in 2018 and 2019, where the entity transitioned to reporting positive tax provisions of $821.9 million and $810.4 million, respectively. This shift indicates a move from a tax-benefit position to a tax-expense position over the observed period.
Cash Operating Tax Volatility
Cash operating taxes exhibited relative stability from 2015 to 2017, with annual outflows ranging between $157.8 million and $173.4 million. However, a sharp reversal occurred in 2018, as the figure shifted to negative $165.6 million, representing a cash inflow. This trend persisted into 2019, although the cash inflow diminished to negative $15.3 million.
Correlation Between Provision and Cash Payments
A divergence is observable between the accounting tax provisions and actual cash tax movements. While the income tax provision showed massive benefits in the early part of the period, cash operating taxes remained positive outflows. Conversely, in 2018, as the income tax provision became a positive expense, the cash operating taxes shifted to a negative value, indicating a discrepancy between accrued tax accounting and actual cash settlements.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Invested Capital

EOG Resources Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Current portion of long-term debt 1,014,524 913,093 356,235 6,579 6,579
Long-term debt, excluding current portion 4,160,919 5,170,169 6,030,836 6,979,779 6,653,685
Operating lease liability1 799,365 499,411 380,358 323,191 363,395
Total reported debt & leases 5,974,808 6,582,673 6,767,429 7,309,549 7,023,659
Stockholders’ equity 21,640,716 19,364,188 16,283,273 13,981,581 12,943,035
Net deferred tax (assets) liabilities2 5,043,738 4,412,621 3,500,708 5,012,267 4,433,247
Equity equivalents3 5,043,738 4,412,621 3,500,708 5,012,267 4,433,247
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss, net of tax4 4,652 1,358 19,297 19,010 33,338
Adjusted stockholders’ equity 26,689,106 23,778,167 19,803,278 19,012,858 17,409,620
Invested capital 32,663,914 30,360,840 26,570,707 26,322,407 24,433,279

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.

2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »

3 Addition of equity equivalents to stockholders’ equity.

4 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.


An analysis of the capital structure from 2015 to 2019 reveals a strategic shift toward equity financing and a consistent expansion of the total capital base utilized for operations.

Total Reported Debt and Leases
A general downward trend is observed in debt and lease obligations over the five-year period. After a slight increase in 2016 to US$ 7.31 billion, the balance declined steadily for three consecutive years, ending at US$ 5.97 billion in 2019. This represents a reduction of approximately 14.9% relative to 2015 levels.
Stockholders' Equity
Equity demonstrated robust and uninterrupted growth, increasing from US$ 12.94 billion in 2015 to US$ 21.64 billion in 2019. This significant upward trajectory indicates a substantial increase in retained earnings or capital contributions, strengthening the company's solvency and internal funding capacity.
Invested Capital Growth
Total invested capital followed a consistent upward trajectory, rising from US$ 24.43 billion in 2015 to US$ 32.66 billion in 2019. The cumulative increase of approximately 33.7% suggests an ongoing expansion of the company's asset base intended to generate future economic value.
Capital Composition and Leverage
The growth in invested capital was driven primarily by the expansion of stockholders' equity, which more than offset the reduction in reported debt. This divergence indicates a deliberate deleveraging of the balance sheet, resulting in a capital structure that is increasingly funded by equity rather than debt.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Cost of Capital

EOG Resources Inc., cost of capital calculations

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 34,923,267 34,923,267 ÷ 41,232,532 = 0.85 0.85 × 22.66% = 19.19%
Long-term debt and finance leases3 5,509,900 5,509,900 ÷ 41,232,532 = 0.13 0.13 × 3.62% × (1 – 21.00%) = 0.38%
Operating lease liability4 799,365 799,365 ÷ 41,232,532 = 0.02 0.02 × 3.50% × (1 – 21.00%) = 0.05%
Total: 41,232,532 1.00 19.63%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 54,472,798 54,472,798 ÷ 61,070,781 = 0.89 0.89 × 22.66% = 20.21%
Long-term debt and finance leases3 6,098,571 6,098,571 ÷ 61,070,781 = 0.10 0.10 × 3.92% × (1 – 21.00%) = 0.31%
Operating lease liability4 499,411 499,411 ÷ 61,070,781 = 0.01 0.01 × 3.92% × (1 – 21.00%) = 0.03%
Total: 61,070,781 1.00 20.55%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 61,879,371 61,879,371 ÷ 68,893,883 = 0.90 0.90 × 22.66% = 20.35%
Long-term debt and finance leases3 6,634,155 6,634,155 ÷ 68,893,883 = 0.10 0.10 × 4.08% × (1 – 35.00%) = 0.26%
Operating lease liability4 380,358 380,358 ÷ 68,893,883 = 0.01 0.01 × 4.08% × (1 – 35.00%) = 0.01%
Total: 68,893,883 1.00 20.62%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 56,477,629 56,477,629 ÷ 64,029,530 = 0.88 0.88 × 22.66% = 19.99%
Long-term debt and finance leases3 7,228,710 7,228,710 ÷ 64,029,530 = 0.11 0.11 × 4.24% × (1 – 35.00%) = 0.31%
Operating lease liability4 323,191 323,191 ÷ 64,029,530 = 0.01 0.01 × 4.24% × (1 – 35.00%) = 0.01%
Total: 64,029,530 1.00 20.31%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »

Capital (fair value)1 Weights Cost of capital
Equity2 37,667,012 37,667,012 ÷ 44,859,189 = 0.84 0.84 × 22.66% = 19.03%
Long-term debt and finance leases3 6,828,782 6,828,782 ÷ 44,859,189 = 0.15 0.15 × 3.96% × (1 – 35.00%) = 0.39%
Operating lease liability4 363,395 363,395 ÷ 44,859,189 = 0.01 0.01 × 3.96% × (1 – 35.00%) = 0.02%
Total: 44,859,189 1.00 19.44%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 US$ in thousands

2 Equity. See details »

3 Long-term debt and finance leases. See details »

4 Operating lease liability. See details »


Economic Spread Ratio

EOG Resources Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1 (2,638,035) (1,567,082) (4,696,137) (6,766,839) (11,593,105)
Invested capital2 32,663,914 30,360,840 26,570,707 26,322,407 24,433,279
Performance Ratio
Economic spread ratio3 -8.08% -5.16% -17.67% -25.71% -47.45%
Benchmarks
Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2019 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × -2,638,035 ÷ 32,663,914 = -8.08%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the economic value added metrics from 2015 to 2019 reveals a period of substantial recovery in economic performance, although the organization did not achieve a positive economic profit during this interval. The trend is characterized by a consistent increase in the capital base alongside a significant reduction in economic losses until 2018, followed by a modest decline in 2019.

Economic Profit Trajectory
A marked improvement in economic profit was observed between 2015 and 2018, as economic losses narrowed from 11.59 billion US dollars to 1.57 billion US dollars. This positive trajectory was interrupted in 2019, when the economic profit declined to negative 2.64 billion US dollars, indicating a setback in the trend toward value creation.
Invested Capital Growth
Invested capital exhibited a consistent upward trend throughout the five-year period, growing from 24.43 billion US dollars in 2015 to 32.66 billion US dollars in 2019. This steady expansion of the capital base occurred concurrently with the reduction in economic losses.
Economic Spread Ratio Analysis
The economic spread ratio showed a strong recovery from a low of negative 47.45% in 2015 to a peak of negative 5.16% in 2018. This indicates that the gap between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital narrowed significantly over four years. However, the ratio widened slightly to negative 8.08% in 2019, mirroring the decline observed in absolute economic profit.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?


Economic Profit Margin

EOG Resources Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Economic profit1 (2,638,035) (1,567,082) (4,696,137) (6,766,839) (11,593,105)
Operating revenues and other 17,379,973 17,275,399 11,208,320 7,650,632 8,757,428
Performance Ratio
Economic profit margin2 -15.18% -9.07% -41.90% -88.45% -132.38%
Benchmarks
Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Economic profit. See details »

2 2019 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Operating revenues and other
= 100 × -2,638,035 ÷ 17,379,973 = -15.18%

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


An analysis of the financial performance from 2015 to 2019 reveals a period of significant recovery in economic value creation, although the company remained unable to generate a positive economic profit throughout the entire duration. A general trend of narrowing losses is evident from 2015 through 2018, followed by a slight regression in 2019.

Economic Profit Trends
The economic profit demonstrated a consistent upward trajectory from 2015 to 2018, moving from a deficit of US$ 11.59 billion to a deficit of US$ 1.57 billion. This improvement indicates a reduction in the gap between operating profits and the cost of capital. However, this positive momentum reversed in 2019, with the economic profit declining to negative US$ 2.64 billion, suggesting a resurgence of capital costs exceeding operating returns.
Operating Revenue Growth
Operating revenues and other income exhibited strong growth over the period, with the exception of a slight dip in 2016. Revenues increased from US$ 8.76 billion in 2015 to US$ 17.38 billion by 2019. The most substantial growth occurred between 2016 and 2018, where revenues more than doubled, which correlates with the period of fastest improvement in economic profit.
Economic Profit Margin Analysis
The economic profit margin shows a dramatic narrowing from -132.38% in 2015 to a peak of -9.07% in 2018. This shift reflects an increase in efficiency and a stronger ability to cover the cost of capital relative to the scale of operations. The margin deteriorated to -15.18% in 2019, indicating that while revenue remained stable, the economic value generated relative to those revenues decreased.

Overall, the period was characterized by a substantial recovery in the company's capacity to generate economic value, driven largely by significant revenue expansion. Despite this progress, the persistent negative economic profit margin indicates that the business did not achieve a return above its cost of capital during the analyzed five-year window.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.

How can I help you?