EOG Resources Inc. (NYSE:EOG)

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

EOG Resources Inc., effective income tax rate (EITR) reconciliation

	Dec 31, 2019	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015
Statutory federal income tax rate	21.00%	21.00%	35.00%	35.00%	35.00%
State income tax, net of federal benefit	0.97%	1.12%	3.38%	0.15%	1.11%
Income tax provision related to foreign operations	0.87%	0.51%	-0.30%	-1.23%	-1.31%
Income tax provision related to Trinidad operations	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-3.71%	0.00%
Income tax provision related to United Kingdom operations	0.00%	0.00%	1.78%	0.00%	0.00%
Income tax provision related to Canadian operations	0.00%	0.00%	2.30%	0.00%	0.00%
Share-based compensation	0.02%	-0.47%	-4.63%	0.00%	0.00%
Other	0.00%	-0.18%	-0.03%	-0.62%	-0.17%
Effective income tax rate, before TCJA	22.86%	21.98%	37.50%	29.59%	34.63%
TCJA	0.00%	-2.60%	-328.10%	0.00%	0.00%
Effective income tax rate	22.86%	19.38%	-290.60%	29.59%	34.63%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

The effective income tax rate (EITR) exhibited significant volatility between 2015 and 2019, primarily driven by major legislative shifts and one-time accounting adjustments. While the underlying tax rate, excluding the impacts of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), remained relatively consistent with statutory trends, the final reported EITR was heavily skewed by the revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Statutory Rate Transition: A fundamental shift in the tax burden occurred between 2017 and 2018, as the statutory federal income tax rate decreased from 35.00% to 21.00%. This reduction established a new baseline for the EITR in the final two years of the period, contributing to a lower tax environment.
Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA): The TCJA introduced extreme volatility to the EITR, most notably in 2017 with a negative adjustment of 328.10%. This resulted in an anomalous effective income tax rate of -290.60% for that year. A secondary, smaller adjustment of -2.60% was recorded in 2018, further depressing the EITR to 19.38% before it stabilized at 22.86% in 2019.
Foreign and Regional Tax Provisions: Tax provisions related to foreign operations transitioned from providing a tax benefit between 2015 and 2017 to increasing the tax burden in 2018 and 2019. Specific regional impacts were observed sporadically, including a notable negative provision from Trinidad operations in 2016 (-3.71%) and positive provisions from United Kingdom and Canadian operations in 2017, which increased the tax rate by 1.78% and 2.30%, respectively.
Secondary Tax Adjustments: State income taxes, net of federal benefits, peaked in 2017 at 3.38% before stabilizing near 1% in 2018 and 2019. Share-based compensation provided a meaningful reduction to the tax rate in 2017 (-4.63%) and 2018 (-0.47%), though this benefit effectively disappeared by 2019.

When normalizing for the TCJA, the effective income tax rate demonstrated a trend of stabilization. After peaking at 37.50% in 2017, the pre-TCJA rate aligned more closely with the new 21% statutory federal rate, ending the period at 22.86% in 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

EOG Resources Inc., components of deferred tax assets and liabilities

US$ in thousands

	Dec 31, 2019	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015
Commodity hedging contracts	—)	—)	—)	22,206)	—)
Deferred compensation plans	—)	—)	—)	43,984)	38,559)
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward	—)	—)	—)	84,426)	93,316)
Foreign net operating loss	—)	—)	—)	37,251)	47,786)
Foreign valuation allowance	—)	—)	—)	(28,097)	(35,536)
Accrued expenses and liabilities	—)	—)	—)	13,754)	—)
Other	—)	—)	—)	(4,137)	3,687)
Net current deferred income tax assets	—)	—)	—)	169,387)	147,812)
Foreign oil and gas exploration and development costs deducted for tax under book depreciation, depletion and amortization	5,825)	4,359)	(40,851)	(39,852)	(57,569)
Foreign net operating loss	66,675)	55,175)	423,258)	314,899)	443,010)
Foreign valuation allowances	(70,455)	(58,932)	(365,379)	(268,499)	(380,104)
Foreign other	318)	175)	478)	438)	1,506)
Net noncurrent deferred income tax assets	2,363)	777)	17,506)	6,986)	6,843)
Oil and gas exploration and development costs deducted for tax over book depreciation, depletion and amortization	(5,277,550)	(4,583,517)	(3,788,680)	(5,759,219)	(5,182,793)
Commodity hedging contracts	4,699)	(4,883)	12,008)	—)	—)
Deferred compensation plans	47,650)	39,086)	35,832)	—)	—)
Accrued expenses and liabilities	8,502)	19,097)	(12,094)	—)	—)
Net operating loss, federal	—)	—)	69,262)	—)	—)
Equity awards	108,324)	93,977)	92,696)	139,787)	140,663)
Alternative minimum tax credit carryforward	31,904)	—)	77,114)	673,205)	685,189)
Undistributed foreign earnings	(15,746)	(22,945)	(19,684)	(280,099)	(258,403)
Other	46,116)	45,787)	15,332)	37,686)	27,442)
Net noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities	(5,046,101)	(4,413,398)	(3,518,214)	(5,188,640)	(4,587,902)
Net deferred income tax assets (liabilities)	(5,043,738)	(4,412,621)	(3,500,708)	(5,012,267)	(4,433,247)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

The net deferred income tax position remains a significant liability throughout the period from 2015 to 2019. The net deferred income tax liability fluctuated between a low of 3.5 billion USD in 2017 and a high of 5.04 billion USD in 2019. The overall tax position is characterized by substantial noncurrent liabilities that heavily outweigh both current and noncurrent deferred tax assets.

Primary Drivers of Deferred Tax Liabilities: The dominant factor contributing to the net liability is the difference between tax and book depreciation, depletion, and amortization for oil and gas exploration and development costs. This item created a liability of 5.18 billion USD in 2015, peaking at 5.76 billion USD in 2016, before decreasing to 3.79 billion USD in 2017 and rising again to 5.28 billion USD by 2019. This pattern indicates a consistent utilization of accelerated tax deductions relative to financial reporting expenses.
Shifts in Foreign Earnings and Tax Credits: A significant reduction in liabilities related to undistributed foreign earnings is observed starting in 2017. This liability dropped from 280 million USD in 2016 to 19.7 million USD in 2017, remaining low through 2019. Similarly, the alternative minimum tax (AMT) credit carryforward saw a sharp decline from 685 million USD in 2015 to 31.9 million USD by 2019, reflecting a substantial consumption or write-down of these tax attributes.
Analysis of Deferred Tax Assets and Valuation Allowances: Net noncurrent deferred income tax assets remained minimal relative to liabilities, peaking at 17.5 million USD in 2017 before declining to 2.36 million USD in 2019. Foreign net operating losses provided a recurring asset, although these were largely offset by corresponding foreign valuation allowances. For instance, in 2015, foreign net operating losses of 443 million USD were offset by a valuation allowance of 380 million USD, a trend that continued through 2019 where losses of 66.7 million USD were offset by an allowance of 70.5 million USD.
Current Deferred Tax Components: Net current deferred income tax assets were recorded at 147.8 million USD in 2015 and 169.4 million USD in 2016, driven by deferred compensation plans and alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards. However, data for these current assets is not present for the 2017 through 2019 period, suggesting a shift in the classification or realization of these items.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

EOG Resources Inc., deferred tax assets and liabilities, classification

US$ in thousands

	Dec 31, 2019	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015
Net current deferred income tax assets	—)	—)	—)	169,387)	147,812)
Net noncurrent deferred income tax assets	2,363)	777)	17,506)	6,986)	6,843)
Net noncurrent deferred income tax liabilities	5,046,101)	4,413,398)	3,518,214)	5,188,640)	4,587,902)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

The deferred tax position is characterized by a substantial and persistent net liability, with noncurrent liabilities consistently exceeding assets by several orders of magnitude throughout the reported period.

Noncurrent Deferred Tax Liabilities: A volatile trajectory is observed in noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, which remained the dominant component of the tax balance sheet. After starting at approximately 4.59 billion in 2015 and rising to 5.19 billion in 2016, a significant reduction occurred in 2017, where the balance dropped to 3.52 billion. This decline was followed by a steady increase over the next two years, reaching 4.41 billion in 2018 and 5.05 billion by 2019.
Deferred Tax Assets: Net current deferred tax assets were only reported for 2015 and 2016, showing a moderate increase from 147.8 million to 169.4 million before becoming unavailable in later periods. Noncurrent deferred tax assets remained immaterial relative to the liabilities, exhibiting a peak of 17.5 million in 2017 followed by a sharp contraction to 777 thousand in 2018, and a slight recovery to 2.4 million in 2019.
Net Tax Position Insight: The overwhelming prevalence of noncurrent liabilities suggests a significant accumulation of temporary differences between accounting and tax treatment. The magnitude of these liabilities indicates a consistent deferral of tax obligations, likely associated with capital-intensive operations and the timing of depreciation or depletion allowances.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

EOG Resources Inc., Financial Data: Reported vs. Adjusted

EOG Resources Inc., adjustments to financial statements

US$ in thousands

	Dec 31, 2019	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015
Adjustment to Current Assets
Current assets (as reported)	5,273,339)	5,057,390)	3,279,108)	3,554,603)	2,592,244)
Less: Current deferred tax assets, net	—)	—)	—)	169,387)	147,812)
Current assets (adjusted)	5,273,339)	5,057,390)	3,279,108)	3,385,216)	2,444,432)
Adjustment to Total Assets
Total assets (as reported)	37,124,608)	33,934,474)	29,833,078)	29,459,433)	26,975,244)
Less: Current deferred tax assets, net	—)	—)	—)	169,387)	147,812)
Less: Noncurrent deferred tax assets, net	2,363)	777)	17,506)	6,986)	6,843)
Total assets (adjusted)	37,122,245)	33,933,697)	29,815,572)	29,283,060)	26,820,589)
Adjustment to Total Liabilities
Total liabilities (as reported)	15,483,892)	14,570,286)	13,549,805)	15,477,852)	14,032,209)
Less: Noncurrent deferred tax liabilities, net	5,046,101)	4,413,398)	3,518,214)	5,188,640)	4,587,902)
Total liabilities (adjusted)	10,437,791)	10,156,888)	10,031,591)	10,289,212)	9,444,307)
Adjustment to Stockholders’ Equity
Stockholders’ equity (as reported)	21,640,716)	19,364,188)	16,283,273)	13,981,581)	12,943,035)
Less: Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)	(5,043,738)	(4,412,621)	(3,500,708)	(5,012,267)	(4,433,247)
Stockholders’ equity (adjusted)	26,684,454)	23,776,809)	19,783,981)	18,993,848)	17,376,282)
Adjustment to Net Income (loss)
Net income (loss) (as reported)	2,734,910)	3,419,040)	2,582,579)	(1,096,686)	(4,524,515)
Add: Deferred income tax expense (benefit)	870,370)	1,043,148)	(1,987,276)	(515,206)	(2,482,307)
Net income (loss) (adjusted)	3,605,280)	4,462,188)	595,303)	(1,611,892)	(7,006,822)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

An analysis of the financial position from 2015 to 2019 reveals a consistent growth trajectory in total assets and a significant divergence between reported and adjusted figures resulting from the removal of deferred taxes. Total assets increased from 26.98 billion US dollars in 2015 to 37.12 billion US dollars in 2019, showing a steady upward trend in the company's resource base.

Impact on Liabilities and Equity: The removal of deferred taxes leads to a substantial reduction in total liabilities across all observed years. For instance, in 2015, adjusted total liabilities were approximately 9.44 billion US dollars compared to reported liabilities of 14.03 billion US dollars. This adjustment consistently results in a higher adjusted stockholders' equity relative to reported equity. By 2019, adjusted stockholders' equity reached 26.68 billion US dollars, representing a significant increase over the reported equity of 21.64 billion US dollars.
Net Income Volatility and Adjustments: The transition from reported to adjusted net income demonstrates significant variability. Between 2015 and 2017, adjusted net income was consistently lower than reported net income, with the loss in 2015 deepening from 4.52 billion US dollars (reported) to 7.01 billion US dollars (adjusted). However, a reversal in this pattern occurred in 2018 and 2019, where adjusted net income exceeded reported figures. In 2019, adjusted net income was 3.61 billion US dollars, while reported net income was 2.73 billion US dollars.
Current Asset Stability: Adjustments to current assets remained relatively marginal compared to the broader balance sheet shifts. While reported current assets grew from 2.59 billion US dollars in 2015 to 5.27 billion US dollars in 2019, the adjusted values closely mirrored these figures, with the most notable variance appearing in 2015 and 2016, where adjusted current assets were slightly lower than reported.

The overall financial pattern indicates that deferred tax liabilities constitute a significant portion of the reported liability structure. The removal of these items not only strengthens the adjusted equity position but also alters the perceived profitability of the company, shifting from an adverse impact on net income in the early part of the period to a positive impact in the later years.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

EOG Resources Inc., Financial Ratios: Reported vs. Adjusted

EOG Resources Inc., adjusted financial ratios

	Dec 31, 2019	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015
Current Ratio
Reported current ratio	1.18	1.36	1.20	1.75	1.42
Adjusted current ratio	1.18	1.36	1.20	1.67	1.34
Net Profit Margin
Reported net profit margin	15.74%	19.79%	23.04%	-14.33%	-51.66%
Adjusted net profit margin	20.74%	25.83%	5.31%	-21.07%	-80.01%
Total Asset Turnover
Reported total asset turnover	0.47	0.51	0.38	0.26	0.32
Adjusted total asset turnover	0.47	0.51	0.38	0.26	0.33
Financial Leverage
Reported financial leverage	1.72	1.75	1.83	2.11	2.08
Adjusted financial leverage	1.39	1.43	1.51	1.54	1.54
Return on Equity (ROE)
Reported ROE	12.64%	17.66%	15.86%	-7.84%	-34.96%
Adjusted ROE	13.51%	18.77%	3.01%	-8.49%	-40.32%
Return on Assets (ROA)
Reported ROA	7.37%	10.08%	8.66%	-3.72%	-16.77%
Adjusted ROA	9.71%	13.15%	2.00%	-5.50%	-26.12%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

The analysis of financial ratios from 2015 to 2019 indicates that the removal of deferred taxes has a pronounced impact on profitability and solvency metrics, while liquidity and operational efficiency ratios remain largely unaffected.

Liquidity and Asset Efficiency: The current ratio shows a high degree of convergence between reported and adjusted values, particularly from 2017 through 2019, where the figures are identical. Similarly, total asset turnover remains nearly constant across both reporting methods, with negligible variances observed. This suggests that deferred tax adjustments do not materially alter the perception of short-term liquidity or the efficiency of asset utilization.
Profitability Margins: Net profit margins exhibit significant volatility and divergence. During the loss-making years of 2015 and 2016, adjusted margins were substantially more negative than reported margins. This trend continued into 2017, where the reported net profit margin of 23.04% was significantly higher than the adjusted margin of 5.31%. However, a reversal occurred in 2018 and 2019, with adjusted margins exceeding reported margins, suggesting that the impact of deferred taxes shifted from providing a reporting cushion to acting as a drag on reported profitability in later years.
Financial Leverage: A consistent gap is observed between reported and adjusted financial leverage. Reported leverage was systematically higher than adjusted leverage throughout the five-year period. While both metrics followed a downward trend—decreasing from 2.08 to 1.72 for reported and 1.54 to 1.39 for adjusted—the persistent difference indicates that deferred tax liabilities represent a significant component of the total liabilities reported on the balance sheet.
Returns on Equity (ROE) and Assets (ROA): The trends for ROE and ROA mirror the fluctuations seen in profit margins. In 2015 through 2017, adjusted ROE and ROA were lower or more negative than their reported counterparts. By 2018 and 2019, the adjusted returns surpassed the reported values, with adjusted ROA reaching 13.15% and 9.71% compared to reported values of 10.08% and 7.37%, respectively. This suggests that the removal of deferred taxes reveals a more volatile but ultimately stronger performance in the latter part of the period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

	Dec 31, 2019	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Current assets	5,273,339)	5,057,390)	3,279,108)	3,554,603)	2,592,244)
Current liabilities	4,486,988)	3,728,364)	2,725,542)	2,027,291)	1,819,287)
Liquidity Ratio
Current ratio¹	1.18	1.36	1.20	1.75	1.42
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Adjusted current assets	5,273,339)	5,057,390)	3,279,108)	3,385,216)	2,444,432)
Current liabilities	4,486,988)	3,728,364)	2,725,542)	2,027,291)	1,819,287)
Liquidity Ratio
Adjusted current ratio²	1.18	1.36	1.20	1.67	1.34

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

¹ Current ratio = Current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 5,273,339 ÷ 4,486,988 = 1.18

² Adjusted current ratio = Adjusted current assets ÷ Current liabilities
= 5,273,339 ÷ 4,486,988 = 1.18

The liquidity position shows a general expansion in current assets from 2015 to 2019, though this growth is accompanied by volatility in the current ratio. While the asset base increased significantly, the ratio of current assets to current liabilities experienced a overall downward trend toward the end of the period.

Current Asset Trends: Reported current assets grew from 2,592,244 thousand US dollars in 2015 to 5,273,339 thousand US dollars in 2019. A brief contraction occurred in 2017, followed by a substantial increase in 2018, where assets rose by approximately 54% over the previous year.
Current Ratio Fluctuations: The reported current ratio peaked at 1.75 in 2016 before declining to 1.18 by 2019. This pattern indicates that the growth in current liabilities outpaced the growth in current assets during the latter half of the observed period.
Analysis of Adjusted vs. Reported Metrics: A divergence between reported and adjusted current assets is observed only in 2015 and 2016. During these two years, adjusted assets were lower than reported assets, leading to a corresponding decrease in the adjusted current ratio. Specifically, the adjusted ratio was 1.34 in 2015 and 1.67 in 2016. From 2017 through 2019, there is a complete convergence between reported and adjusted values, suggesting that the adjustments related to income taxes no longer impacted the liquidity metrics.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

	Dec 31, 2019	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net income (loss)	2,734,910)	3,419,040)	2,582,579)	(1,096,686)	(4,524,515)
Operating revenues and other	17,379,973)	17,275,399)	11,208,320)	7,650,632)	8,757,428)
Profitability Ratio
Net profit margin¹	15.74%	19.79%	23.04%	-14.33%	-51.66%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Adjusted net income (loss)	3,605,280)	4,462,188)	595,303)	(1,611,892)	(7,006,822)
Operating revenues and other	17,379,973)	17,275,399)	11,208,320)	7,650,632)	8,757,428)
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted net profit margin²	20.74%	25.83%	5.31%	-21.07%	-80.01%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

¹ Net profit margin = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Operating revenues and other
= 100 × 2,734,910 ÷ 17,379,973 = 15.74%

² Adjusted net profit margin = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Operating revenues and other
= 100 × 3,605,280 ÷ 17,379,973 = 20.74%

A significant financial recovery is evident between 2015 and 2019, as the company transitioned from substantial net losses to consistent profitability. This period is characterized by a volatile start followed by a stabilization of earnings and profit margins.

Net Income Trajectory: Reported net income moved from a loss of 4.52 billion USD in 2015 to a peak of 3.42 billion USD in 2018. Adjusted net income followed a similar trajectory but exhibited greater volatility, with a deeper loss of 7.01 billion USD in 2015 and a higher peak of 4.46 billion USD in 2018. Both metrics indicate a successful turnaround starting in 2017.
Net Profit Margin Analysis: The reported net profit margin improved from -51.66% in 2015 to a high of 23.04% in 2017, before experiencing a gradual decline to 15.74% by 2019. In contrast, the adjusted net profit margin showed a more aggressive recovery curve, rising from -80.01% in 2015 to a peak of 25.83% in 2018, eventually settling at 20.74% in 2019.
Comparative Variance Between Reported and Adjusted Metrics: A divergence in performance is observed between reported and adjusted figures. From 2015 to 2017, adjusted net income and margins were consistently lower than reported figures, suggesting that adjustments for non-recurring items negatively impacted the adjusted results. However, this trend reversed in 2018 and 2019, where adjusted net income and profit margins exceeded reported values, indicating that the removal of certain expenses or losses improved the underlying operational profitability view.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

	Dec 31, 2019	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Operating revenues and other	17,379,973)	17,275,399)	11,208,320)	7,650,632)	8,757,428)
Total assets	37,124,608)	33,934,474)	29,833,078)	29,459,433)	26,975,244)
Activity Ratio
Total asset turnover¹	0.47	0.51	0.38	0.26	0.32
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Operating revenues and other	17,379,973)	17,275,399)	11,208,320)	7,650,632)	8,757,428)
Adjusted total assets	37,122,245)	33,933,697)	29,815,572)	29,283,060)	26,820,589)
Activity Ratio
Adjusted total asset turnover²	0.47	0.51	0.38	0.26	0.33

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

¹ Total asset turnover = Operating revenues and other ÷ Total assets
= 17,379,973 ÷ 37,124,608 = 0.47

² Adjusted total asset turnover = Operating revenues and other ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 17,379,973 ÷ 37,122,245 = 0.47

The financial data indicates a consistent expansion of the asset base alongside fluctuating levels of asset utilization efficiency between 2015 and 2019.

Total Asset Growth: Reported total assets grew steadily from US$ 26,975,244 thousand in 2015 to US$ 37,124,608 thousand by 2019. This represents a sustained increase in the company's resource base over the five-year period. Adjusted total assets closely mirror this trajectory, showing negligible variance from reported figures.
Asset Turnover Trends: The adjusted total asset turnover ratio exhibited volatility, beginning at 0.33 in 2015 and declining to 0.26 in 2016. A significant recovery followed, with the ratio rising to 0.38 in 2017 and reaching a peak of 0.51 in 2018, before moderating to 0.47 in 2019. This pattern suggests a period of improved operational efficiency in revenue generation per unit of asset peaking in 2018.
Reported versus Adjusted Metrics: A high degree of convergence is observed between reported and adjusted asset metrics. The difference in total asset turnover was only present in 2015, where the adjusted ratio was marginally higher at 0.33 compared to the reported 0.32. For the subsequent four years, the reported and adjusted ratios remained identical, indicating that the adjustments made to total assets had no material impact on the turnover calculations.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

	Dec 31, 2019	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Total assets	37,124,608)	33,934,474)	29,833,078)	29,459,433)	26,975,244)
Stockholders’ equity	21,640,716)	19,364,188)	16,283,273)	13,981,581)	12,943,035)
Solvency Ratio
Financial leverage¹	1.72	1.75	1.83	2.11	2.08
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Adjusted total assets	37,122,245)	33,933,697)	29,815,572)	29,283,060)	26,820,589)
Adjusted stockholders’ equity	26,684,454)	23,776,809)	19,783,981)	18,993,848)	17,376,282)
Solvency Ratio
Adjusted financial leverage²	1.39	1.43	1.51	1.54	1.54

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

¹ Financial leverage = Total assets ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 37,124,608 ÷ 21,640,716 = 1.72

² Adjusted financial leverage = Adjusted total assets ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 37,122,245 ÷ 26,684,454 = 1.39

The financial trajectory from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by a consistent expansion of the asset base and a simultaneous reduction in financial leverage. Both reported and adjusted total assets exhibited steady growth, increasing from approximately 26.9 billion US dollars in 2015 to over 37.1 billion US dollars by 2019. This expansion was mirrored by a significant rise in stockholders' equity, indicating a strengthening of the company's capital position over the five-year period.

Equity Adjustments: A substantial variance is observed between reported and adjusted stockholders' equity throughout the period. Adjusted equity remained consistently higher than reported figures, starting at 17.38 billion US dollars in 2015 and reaching 26.68 billion US dollars by 2019. This gap suggests that significant adjustments—likely related to the treatment of deferred tax liabilities or other accounting reclassifications—provide a more favorable view of the entity's net worth than the reported figures alone.
Reported Financial Leverage: Reported financial leverage peaked in 2016 at 2.11 before entering a sustained decline to 1.72 by the end of 2019. This downward trend indicates a systematic reduction in the reliance on debt relative to equity to fund assets.
Adjusted Financial Leverage: The adjusted financial leverage ratio is consistently lower than the reported ratio, reflecting the impact of the equity adjustments. This metric shows a steady contraction from 1.54 in 2015 and 2016 to 1.39 in 2019. The convergence of both reported and adjusted leverage toward lower values underscores a broader strategic shift toward a less leveraged capital structure.

The convergence of increasing equity and decreasing leverage ratios indicates an improvement in solvency and financial stability. The consistent gap between reported and adjusted leverage highlights that when specific financial adjustments are applied, the organization operates with a significantly lower risk profile than what is presented in the reported financial statements.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

	Dec 31, 2019	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net income (loss)	2,734,910)	3,419,040)	2,582,579)	(1,096,686)	(4,524,515)
Stockholders’ equity	21,640,716)	19,364,188)	16,283,273)	13,981,581)	12,943,035)
Profitability Ratio
ROE¹	12.64%	17.66%	15.86%	-7.84%	-34.96%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Adjusted net income (loss)	3,605,280)	4,462,188)	595,303)	(1,611,892)	(7,006,822)
Adjusted stockholders’ equity	26,684,454)	23,776,809)	19,783,981)	18,993,848)	17,376,282)
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROE²	13.51%	18.77%	3.01%	-8.49%	-40.32%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

¹ ROE = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 2,734,910 ÷ 21,640,716 = 12.64%

² Adjusted ROE = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Adjusted stockholders’ equity
= 100 × 3,605,280 ÷ 26,684,454 = 13.51%

The financial performance from 2015 through 2019 is characterized by a significant recovery cycle, transitioning from substantial losses to consistent profitability. Both reported and adjusted metrics indicate a sharp turnaround beginning in 2017, with performance peaking in 2018 before a slight moderation in 2019.

Net Income Trajectory: Reported net income shifted from a loss of 4.5 billion US dollars in 2015 to a peak profit of 3.4 billion US dollars in 2018. Adjusted net income exhibited greater volatility, recording a deeper loss of 7.0 billion US dollars in 2015 but reaching a higher peak of 4.5 billion US dollars in 2018. This divergence suggests that non-recurring items or specific adjustments significantly impacted the bottom line during the early part of the period.
Equity Expansion: A consistent upward trend is observed in stockholders' equity. Reported equity grew from 12.9 billion US dollars in 2015 to 21.6 billion US dollars by 2019. Similarly, adjusted equity increased from 17.4 billion US dollars to 26.7 billion US dollars over the same interval. This steady growth in the equity base indicates a strengthening of the balance sheet and an increase in retained value over the five-year period.
Return on Equity (ROE) Analysis: ROE followed a V-shaped recovery pattern. Reported ROE improved from -34.96% in 2015 to a high of 17.66% in 2018. Adjusted ROE showed a more pronounced swing, starting at -40.32% in 2015 and climbing to 18.77% in 2018. In 2019, both metrics experienced a decline, with reported ROE falling to 12.64% and adjusted ROE to 13.51%, reflecting a cooling of the rapid growth seen in the previous year.
Comparison of Reported vs. Adjusted Metrics: The adjusted ROE consistently amplified the trends seen in the reported ROE, showing deeper negatives during the loss years and higher positives during the peak profitability year of 2018. The convergence of reported and adjusted ROE in 2019 suggests a stabilization of the factors requiring adjustment relative to the overall equity base.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?

	Dec 31, 2019	Dec 31, 2018	Dec 31, 2017	Dec 31, 2016	Dec 31, 2015
As Reported
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net income (loss)	2,734,910)	3,419,040)	2,582,579)	(1,096,686)	(4,524,515)
Total assets	37,124,608)	33,934,474)	29,833,078)	29,459,433)	26,975,244)
Profitability Ratio
ROA¹	7.37%	10.08%	8.66%	-3.72%	-16.77%
Adjusted for Deferred Taxes
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Adjusted net income (loss)	3,605,280)	4,462,188)	595,303)	(1,611,892)	(7,006,822)
Adjusted total assets	37,122,245)	33,933,697)	29,815,572)	29,283,060)	26,820,589)
Profitability Ratio
Adjusted ROA²	9.71%	13.15%	2.00%	-5.50%	-26.12%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

2019 Calculations

¹ ROA = 100 × Net income (loss) ÷ Total assets
= 100 × 2,734,910 ÷ 37,124,608 = 7.37%

² Adjusted ROA = 100 × Adjusted net income (loss) ÷ Adjusted total assets
= 100 × 3,605,280 ÷ 37,122,245 = 9.71%

The financial performance between 2015 and 2019 is characterized by a significant recovery phase, transitioning from substantial net losses to sustained profitability. This turnaround is reflected in both reported and adjusted metrics, with the most pronounced recovery occurring between 2016 and 2018.

Net Income Trajectory: Reported net income shifted from a loss of 4.52 billion US dollars in 2015 to a peak of 3.42 billion US dollars in 2018. Adjusted net income exhibited greater volatility, recording a deeper loss of 7.01 billion US dollars in 2015 and reaching a higher peak of 4.46 billion US dollars in 2018, suggesting that adjustments had a magnifying effect on both the losses and the subsequent gains.
Asset Base Expansion: Total assets demonstrated a consistent upward trend, growing from approximately 26.98 billion US dollars in 2015 to 37.12 billion US dollars by 2019. The minimal variance between reported and adjusted total assets indicates that asset-level adjustments were immaterial relative to the overall scale of the balance sheet.
Return on Assets (ROA) Analysis: The Reported ROA improved from -16.77% in 2015 to a peak of 10.08% in 2018 before moderating to 7.37% in 2019. The Adjusted ROA followed a similar trajectory but with increased variance, swinging from -26.12% in 2015 to a peak of 13.15% in 2018. The divergence between these two metrics is most evident in the losses of 2015 and 2016, where adjusted figures presented a more severe outlook, and in the profitability of 2018 and 2019, where adjusted figures indicated higher efficiency than reported values.

AI Ask an analyst for more