AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

EOG Resources Inc. (NYSE:EOG)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 27, 2020.

Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)

Microsoft Excel

Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

EOG Resources Inc., EBITDA calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Net income (loss) 2,734,910 3,419,040 2,582,579 (1,096,686) (4,524,515)
Add: Income tax expense 810,357 821,958 (1,921,397) (460,819) (2,397,041)
Earnings before tax (EBT) 3,545,267 4,240,998 661,182 (1,557,505) (6,921,556)
Add: Net interest expense 185,129 245,052 274,372 281,681 237,393
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 3,730,396 4,486,050 935,554 (1,275,824) (6,684,163)
Add: Depreciation, depletion and amortization 3,749,704 3,435,408 3,409,387 3,553,417 3,313,644
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 7,480,100 7,921,458 4,344,941 2,277,593 (3,370,519)

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).


The financial trajectory from 2015 to 2019 is characterized by a significant recovery from initial losses to a period of sustained profitability. A consistent upward trend is observed across all earnings metrics, peaking in 2018 before experiencing a slight moderation in 2019.

EBITDA Growth and Recovery
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization exhibited the most rapid recovery of all metrics. After a deficit of 3,370,519 thousand US dollars in 2015, the figure transitioned to a positive 2,277,593 thousand US dollars by 2016. This growth accelerated through 2018, where EBITDA reached a peak of 7,921,458 thousand US dollars, representing a substantial increase in operational cash flow potential.
Comparative Profitability Lag
A notable lag exists between the recovery of operational earnings (EBITDA) and bottom-line profitability. While EBITDA became positive in 2016, net income and EBIT did not return to positive territory until 2017. This suggests that depreciation, amortization, and interest expenses heavily weighed on the net results during the early phase of the recovery period.
Analysis of Peak and Contraction
The year 2018 represents the high point for all analyzed financial items, with net income reaching 3,419,040 thousand US dollars and EBITDA peaking at 7,921,458 thousand US dollars. A slight contraction is observed in 2019, with EBITDA declining to 7,480,100 thousand US dollars and net income decreasing to 2,734,910 thousand US dollars, indicating a marginal softening of earnings performance following the 2018 peak.
Operational Efficiency Trends
The narrowing gap between EBIT and EBITDA from 2017 to 2019 suggests a stabilization in the impact of depreciation and amortization relative to overall earnings growth. The shift from a negative EBIT of 6,684,163 thousand US dollars in 2015 to a positive 3,730,396 thousand US dollars in 2019 reflects a comprehensive reversal of the company's operational financial position.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current

EOG Resources Inc., current EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Enterprise value (EV) 38,070,738
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 7,480,100
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA 5.09
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors1
Chevron Corp. 11.93
ConocoPhillips 7.71
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 11.39

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical

EOG Resources Inc., historical EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Enterprise value (EV)1 38,070,738 59,000,426 67,432,214 61,864,092 43,608,770
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 7,480,100 7,921,458 4,344,941 2,277,593 (3,370,519)
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA3 5.09 7.45 15.52 27.16 —
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2019 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 38,070,738 ÷ 7,480,100 = 5.09

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2015 and 2019, a significant shift in valuation metrics is evident, characterized by a contraction in the Enterprise Value to EBITDA multiple alongside a substantial recovery in operational profitability.

Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
The enterprise value experienced an initial upward trajectory, rising from US$ 43.6 billion in 2015 to a peak of US$ 67.4 billion in 2017. This was followed by a period of contraction, with the value declining to US$ 59.0 billion in 2018 and reaching a period low of US$ 38.1 billion by December 31, 2019.
EBITDA Performance
A strong recovery in earnings is observed, transitioning from a negative EBITDA of US$ 3.37 billion in 2015 to positive earnings of US$ 2.28 billion in 2016. Profitability continued to scale upward, peaking at US$ 7.92 billion in 2018, with a slight moderation to US$ 7.48 billion in 2019.
EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
The EV/EBITDA ratio exhibited a consistent and sharp decline over the period for which it was calculated. Starting at 27.16 in 2016, the ratio decreased to 15.52 in 2017, 7.45 in 2018, and finally 5.09 in 2019. This compression of the multiple suggests that the growth in EBITDA significantly outpaced the changes in enterprise value, resulting in a lower valuation multiple relative to operational cash flow.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?