Paying user area
Try for free
ConocoPhillips pages available for free this week:
- Balance Sheet: Assets
- Common-Size Income Statement
- Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Present Value of Free Cash Flow to Equity (FCFE)
- Selected Financial Data since 2005
- Return on Assets (ROA) since 2005
- Total Asset Turnover since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to ConocoPhillips for $24.99.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
The financial performance indicators demonstrate significant fluctuations over the five-year period. A substantial increase in profitability metrics is evident from 2021 to 2022, followed by a period of moderation and relative stabilization. Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) serves as a key metric in understanding this performance.
- EBITDA Trend
- EBITDA experienced a marked increase from US$20.804 billion in 2021 to US$36.537 billion in 2022, representing a growth of approximately 75.6%. This was the largest single-year increase observed within the period. Subsequently, EBITDA decreased to US$25.338 billion in 2023, a decline of approximately 30.6% from the prior year. Further moderation occurred in 2024, with EBITDA reaching US$24.054 billion. A slight recovery is noted in 2025, with EBITDA increasing to US$25.011 billion.
- Relationship between Net Income and EBITDA
- While both net income and EBITDA increased significantly in 2022, the subsequent declines in 2023 and 2024 were not mirrored to the same extent. This suggests that factors beyond operational profitability, such as changes in interest expense, taxes, or non-cash charges, played a more prominent role in influencing net income during those years. The ratio of EBITDA to net income varied, indicating shifts in the cost structure impacting bottom-line profitability.
- EBIT and EBITDA Comparison
- The difference between EBIT and EBITDA remained relatively consistent across the years, primarily reflecting depreciation and amortization expenses. This indicates a stable capital expenditure and asset base over the analyzed period. The consistent difference suggests that changes in depreciation and amortization did not significantly contribute to the overall fluctuations in earnings.
- EBT and EBITDA Comparison
- The gap between EBT and EBITDA also remained relatively stable, indicating consistent tax rates and a predictable impact of taxes on overall profitability. The relationship between these two metrics suggests that changes in tax regulations or tax planning strategies did not materially affect the company’s earnings during the period.
In summary, the period began with substantial growth in earnings, followed by a period of adjustment and stabilization. While EBITDA remains a significant indicator of operational performance, the fluctuations in net income suggest that other financial factors are also influencing overall profitability.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | |
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) | |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/EBITDA | |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors1 | |
| Chevron Corp. | |
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | |
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | |
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | |
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | |
| Energy | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2025 | Dec 31, 2024 | Dec 31, 2023 | Dec 31, 2022 | Dec 31, 2021 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | ||||||
| Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 | ||||||
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Chevron Corp. | ||||||
| Exxon Mobil Corp. | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Sector | ||||||
| Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | ||||||
| EV/EBITDA, Industry | ||||||
| Energy | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2025-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2024-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
3 2025 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The Enterprise Value to EBITDA ratio exhibited fluctuations over the five-year period. Initial values decreased significantly before stabilizing and showing a slight increase towards the end of the observed timeframe. Enterprise Value demonstrated a generally increasing trend, while EBITDA experienced more volatility.
- Enterprise Value
- Enterprise Value increased from US$131,808 million in 2021 to US$149,429 million in 2025. The largest increase occurred between 2021 and 2022, with a more moderate growth rate observed in subsequent years. A slight decrease was noted between 2022 and 2023, followed by a further decrease between 2023 and 2024, before resuming an upward trajectory in 2025.
- EBITDA
- EBITDA showed considerable variation. A substantial increase was recorded from US$20,804 million in 2021 to US$36,537 million in 2022. However, EBITDA then decreased to US$25,338 million in 2023 and further to US$24,054 million in 2024. A modest increase to US$25,011 million was observed in 2025, but remained below the 2022 peak.
- EV/EBITDA Ratio
- The EV/EBITDA ratio began at 6.34 in 2021, decreasing substantially to 3.82 in 2022, coinciding with the significant rise in EBITDA. The ratio then increased to 5.64 in 2023 and continued to rise to 5.91 in 2024. A further slight increase to 5.97 was observed in 2025. The ratio’s movement suggests that while Enterprise Value generally increased, the fluctuations in EBITDA had a more pronounced effect on the ratio, particularly in the earlier years of the period.
The stabilization of the EV/EBITDA ratio in the latter part of the period suggests a potential equilibrium between Enterprise Value and EBITDA growth rates. The initial decrease in the ratio, followed by a period of increase, indicates a dynamic relationship between these two financial metrics.