AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

EOG Resources Inc. (NYSE:EOG)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since February 27, 2020.

Return on Capital (ROC)

Microsoft Excel

Return on capital (ROC) is after tax rate of return on net business assets. ROIC is unaffected by changes in interest rates or company debt and equity structure. It measures business productivity performance.


Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)

EOG Resources Inc., ROIC calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 3,773,634 4,671,245 783,732 (1,419,892) (6,843,163)
Invested capital2 32,663,914 30,360,840 26,570,707 26,322,407 24,433,279
Performance Ratio
ROIC3 11.55% 15.39% 2.95% -5.39% -28.01%
Benchmarks
ROIC, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Invested capital. See details »

3 2019 Calculation
ROIC = 100 × NOPAT ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × 3,773,634 ÷ 32,663,914 = 11.55%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2015 and 2019, a significant financial recovery was observed, characterized by a transition from substantial operational losses to positive returns. This period is marked by a consistent expansion of the capital base alongside a volatile but generally upward trajectory in profitability.

Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
A sharp recovery trend is evident in NOPAT, which moved from a deficit of US$ 6.84 billion in 2015 to a peak of US$ 4.67 billion in 2018. The organization achieved a break-even point and entered positive territory in 2017. A slight contraction occurred in 2019, with NOPAT decreasing to US$ 3.77 billion, though it remained significantly higher than the levels seen in the early part of the period.
Invested Capital
Invested capital exhibited a steady and uninterrupted increase over the five-year span. The capital base grew from US$ 24.43 billion in 2015 to US$ 32.66 billion in 2019. This indicates a sustained commitment to capital expenditure and asset growth, regardless of the immediate fluctuations in operating profit.
Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
The ROIC followed the trajectory of NOPAT, reflecting a dramatic improvement in capital efficiency. The ratio climbed from a low of -28.01% in 2015 to a peak of 15.39% in 2018. While 2017 marked the return to positive efficiency at 2.95%, the subsequent decline to 11.55% in 2019 suggests a diminishing marginal return on the increased invested capital during the final year of the analyzed period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Decomposition of ROIC

EOG Resources Inc., decomposition of ROIC

Microsoft Excel
ROIC = OPM1 × TO2 × 1 – CTR3
Dec 31, 2019 11.55% = 21.62% × 0.53 × 100.41%
Dec 31, 2018 15.39% = 26.08% × 0.57 × 103.68%
Dec 31, 2017 2.95% = 8.49% × 0.42 × 82.41%
Dec 31, 2016 -5.39% = -16.50% × 0.29 × 100.00%
Dec 31, 2015 -28.01% = -76.16% × 0.36 × 100.00%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Operating profit margin (OPM). See calculations »

2 Turnover of capital (TO). See calculations »

3 Effective cash tax rate (CTR). See calculations »


The financial performance between 2015 and 2019 is characterized by a significant recovery in return on invested capital, transitioning from a deep negative position to a positive, sustainable yield. The trajectory indicates a turnaround phase that peaked in 2018 before experiencing a slight normalization in 2019.

Return on Invested Capital (ROIC)
A strong upward trend is observed from 2015 to 2018, with ROIC moving from -28.01% to a peak of 15.39%. While there was a moderate decline to 11.55% in 2019, the overall period reflects a successful restoration of capital productivity.
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
The primary driver of the ROIC recovery was the drastic improvement in operating profitability. Margins shifted from a severe deficit of -76.16% in 2015 to positive territory by 2017 (8.49%), eventually reaching 26.08% in 2018. This expansion suggests a significant reduction in operating costs relative to revenue or a substantial increase in the price of realized outputs.
Turnover of Capital (TO)
Capital efficiency demonstrated a general improving trend, despite an initial dip in 2016. The turnover ratio rose from 0.29 in 2016 to 0.57 in 2018, indicating that the organization became more effective at generating revenue from its invested capital base. The 2019 ratio of 0.53 suggests a slight stabilization in asset productivity.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (1 - CTR)
The tax component remained relatively neutral throughout the period, hovering near 100% in most years. A notable exception occurred in 2017, where the value dropped to 82.41%, indicating a higher effective cash tax burden that year which marginally constrained the ROIC.

The decomposition reveals that the recovery in ROIC was a dual-function result of expanding profit margins and increased capital turnover. The volatility observed in 2015 and 2016 was mitigated by 2018, where the alignment of peak operating margins and peak capital turnover resulted in the highest return on invested capital for the period analyzed.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Operating Profit Margin (OPM)

EOG Resources Inc., OPM calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 3,773,634 4,671,245 783,732 (1,419,892) (6,843,163)
Add: Cash operating taxes2 (15,261) (165,618) 167,341 157,772 173,390
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 3,758,374 4,505,627 951,073 (1,262,121) (6,669,773)
 
Operating revenues and other 17,379,973 17,275,399 11,208,320 7,650,632 8,757,428
Profitability Ratio
OPM3 21.62% 26.08% 8.49% -16.50% -76.16%
Benchmarks
OPM, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2019 Calculation
OPM = 100 × NOPBT ÷ Operating revenues and other
= 100 × 3,758,374 ÷ 17,379,973 = 21.62%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


A comprehensive recovery in operational performance is evident between 2015 and 2019, characterized by a transition from significant operating losses to sustained profitability and expanded margins.

Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT)
A strong upward trend is observed in NOPBT, which moved from a deficit of US$ 6.67 billion in 2015 to a peak of US$ 4.51 billion in 2018. Although a moderate decline occurred in 2019, with NOPBT settling at US$ 3.76 billion, the overall period reflects a successful reversal of operational losses.
Operating Revenues and Other
Revenues demonstrated significant growth following a slight contraction in 2016. From a low of US$ 7.65 billion in 2016, revenues expanded to US$ 17.38 billion by 2019. The most rapid growth occurred between 2017 and 2018, where revenues increased by approximately 53%.
Operating Profit Margin (OPM)
The OPM shows a dramatic recovery, shifting from -76.16% in 2015 to a high of 26.08% in 2018. The move into positive territory in 2017 indicates a pivotal shift in cost management and revenue generation. The slight compression to 21.62% in 2019 suggests that operating expenses increased at a slightly faster rate than revenue during that specific fiscal year.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Turnover of Capital (TO)

EOG Resources Inc., TO calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Operating revenues and other 17,379,973 17,275,399 11,208,320 7,650,632 8,757,428
Invested capital1 32,663,914 30,360,840 26,570,707 26,322,407 24,433,279
Efficiency Ratio
TO2 0.53 0.57 0.42 0.29 0.36
Benchmarks
TO, Competitors3
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 Invested capital. See details »

2 2019 Calculation
TO = Operating revenues and other ÷ Invested capital
= 17,379,973 ÷ 32,663,914 = 0.53

3 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Between 2015 and 2019, there was a general upward trajectory in both operating revenues and invested capital, although the efficiency of capital utilization fluctuated significantly. While invested capital increased consistently every year, operating revenues experienced a period of volatility before stabilizing at a higher level toward the end of the period.

Operating Revenues
Revenues experienced a decline in 2016, falling to 7.65 billion US dollars from 8.76 billion US dollars in 2015. However, a strong recovery followed, with revenues climbing to 11.21 billion US dollars in 2017 and surging to 17.28 billion US dollars by 2018. Growth leveled off in 2019, ending the period at 17.38 billion US dollars.
Invested Capital
A consistent growth pattern is observed in the capital base. Invested capital rose from 24.43 billion US dollars in 2015 to 32.66 billion US dollars in 2019. This steady increase indicates a continuous commitment to expanding the asset base throughout the five-year window.
Turnover of Capital (TO)
The turnover ratio, which measures the efficiency of generating revenue from invested capital, reached its lowest point in 2016 at 0.29, coinciding with the dip in operating revenues. Efficiency improved substantially thereafter, peaking in 2018 at 0.57. In 2019, the ratio moderated to 0.53, suggesting that the growth in invested capital began to outpace the growth in revenue.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR)

EOG Resources Inc., CTR calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018 Dec 31, 2017 Dec 31, 2016 Dec 31, 2015
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 3,773,634 4,671,245 783,732 (1,419,892) (6,843,163)
Add: Cash operating taxes2 (15,261) (165,618) 167,341 157,772 173,390
Net operating profit before taxes (NOPBT) 3,758,374 4,505,627 951,073 (1,262,121) (6,669,773)
Tax Rate
CTR3 -0.41% -3.68% 17.59% — —
Benchmarks
CTR, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. — — — — —
ConocoPhillips — — — — —
Exxon Mobil Corp. — — — — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).

1 NOPAT. See details »

2 Cash operating taxes. See details »

3 2019 Calculation
CTR = 100 × Cash operating taxes ÷ NOPBT
= 100 × -15,261 ÷ 3,758,374 = -0.41%

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data reveals a significant transition in operational profitability and tax positioning between 2015 and 2019. A primary trend is the recovery of Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT), which moved from substantial losses in the early part of the period to strong positive earnings by 2018 and 2019.

Net Operating Profit Before Taxes (NOPBT) Trend
A stark recovery is observed in operational profitability. The period began with a significant loss of 6,669,773 thousand US dollars in 2015, which narrowed to a loss of 1,262,121 thousand US dollars in 2016. Profitability was achieved in 2017 with a positive NOPBT of 951,073 thousand US dollars, peaking in 2018 at 4,505,627 thousand US dollars before slightly moderating to 3,758,374 thousand US dollars in 2019.
Cash Operating Taxes and Tax Rate Dynamics
Cash operating taxes remained positive from 2015 through 2017, despite the operational losses incurred during the first two years. However, a reversal occurred in 2018 and 2019, where cash operating taxes became negative, reaching -165,618 thousand US dollars and -15,261 thousand US dollars respectively, indicating cash inflows from tax refunds or credits.
Effective Cash Tax Rate (CTR) Analysis
The effective cash tax rate reflects the disconnect between operational profit and actual cash tax outflows. In 2017, the CTR stood at 17.59% during the initial return to profitability. In 2018 and 2019, despite the company reporting its highest NOPBT levels, the CTR turned negative, recording -3.68% and -0.41% respectively. This suggests that tax benefits or adjustments outweighed the tax liabilities generated by the increased operating profits during those years.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?