Adjustments to Current Assets
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31).
1 LIFO reserve. See details »
An analysis of current asset trends from 2014 to 2019 reveals a period of significant expansion followed by a contraction and subsequent stabilization. Both reported current assets and adjusted current assets followed a parallel trajectory, reaching a peak in 2016 before trending downward and plateauing toward the end of the period.
- Asset Growth and Contraction Patterns
- Reported current assets experienced rapid growth between 2014 and 2016, increasing from 12,242 million US$ to a peak of 25,883 million US$. This growth was followed by a notable decline in 2017 and 2018, reaching a low of 17,846 million US$, before recovering slightly to 18,700 million US$ by August 31, 2019.
- Analysis of Adjustment Variance
- A consistent positive discrepancy exists between reported current assets and adjusted current assets throughout the six-year period. While the base asset values fluctuated, the absolute value of the adjustments demonstrated a general upward trend. The difference between the two metrics expanded from 2,473 million US$ in 2014 to 3,295 million US$ in 2019, suggesting that the adjustments represent a growing proportion of the total current asset base over time.
- Correlation and Stability
- The adjusted current assets mirrored the volatility of the reported figures, peaking at 28,849 million US$ in 2016 and hitting a post-peak low of 20,921 million US$ in 2018. The tight correlation between these two lines of measurement indicates that the adjustments are applied consistently, though the widening gap suggests a shift in the underlying financial components requiring adjustment.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Total Assets
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31).
1 Operating lease right-of-use asset (before adoption of FASB Topic 842). See details »
2 LIFO reserve. See details »
The financial trajectory between August 31, 2014, and August 31, 2019, is characterized by a significant initial increase in asset valuation followed by a period of relative stabilization. Both total assets and adjusted total assets experienced a substantial surge during the first year of the observed period, after which they fluctuated within a narrow range.
- Asset Expansion Trends
- A sharp increase in valuation is observed between 2014 and 2015. Total assets rose from 37,182 million USD to 68,782 million USD, while adjusted total assets increased from 67,054 million USD to 101,257 million USD. This represents a rapid expansion of the balance sheet within a single fiscal year.
- Stability and Period Volatility
- Following the initial surge, asset levels entered a period of relative plateau. Total assets reached a peak of 72,688 million USD in 2016 before declining to 66,009 million USD in 2017 and stabilizing near 67,598 million USD by 2019. Adjusted total assets followed a nearly identical pattern, peaking at 103,134 million USD in 2016 and concluding the period at 97,521 million USD.
- Analysis of Adjusted Variance
- A consistent and substantial positive variance exists between total assets and adjusted total assets throughout the entire period. The difference between these two figures remains relatively constant, ranging from approximately 29,352 million USD to 32,475 million USD. The stability of this gap suggests that the adjustments are based on structural financial factors rather than operational fluctuations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Total Liabilities
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31).
1 Operating lease liability (before adoption of FASB Topic 842). See details »
2 Deferred income taxes. See details »
An examination of the liability structure reveals a significant escalation in both reported and adjusted total liabilities between 2014 and 2019. The most pronounced increase occurred between August 2014 and August 2015, indicating a substantial expansion of the financial obligations during that period.
- Total Liabilities Trend
- Reported total liabilities rose from US$ 16,621 million in 2014 to US$ 43,447 million in 2019. Aside from a temporary contraction in 2017 to US$ 37,735 million, the trajectory remained upward, representing an overall increase of approximately 161% over the five-year period.
- Adjusted Total Liabilities Trend
- Adjusted total liabilities followed a similar growth pattern, starting at US$ 42,972 million in 2014 and reaching US$ 67,393 million by 2019. The growth in adjusted liabilities was less volatile than the reported figures, increasing by approximately 57% over the analyzed timeframe.
- Liability Adjustment Variance
- A persistent and substantial gap exists between reported and adjusted total liabilities. This adjustment remained relatively stable, ranging from a high of US$ 26,351 million in 2014 to a low of US$ 23,313 million in 2017. The relative consistency of this variance suggests that the adjustments are linked to structural accounting factors rather than transient operational fluctuations.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Stockholders’ Equity
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., adjusted total Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. shareholders’ equity
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31).
1 Net deferred tax assets (liabilities). See details »
2 LIFO reserve. See details »
The financial trajectory of stockholders' equity between 2014 and 2019 is characterized by an initial sharp increase followed by a consistent multi-year decline. Both total shareholders' equity and adjusted total equity reached their peak in 2015, after which a steady erosion of equity value occurred through 2019.
- Total Shareholders' Equity Trends
- Total equity experienced a significant surge from US$ 20,457 million in 2014 to US$ 30,861 million in 2015. Subsequently, a persistent downward trend emerged, with the value decreasing annually to end at US$ 23,512 million by August 31, 2019, representing a decrease of approximately 23.8% from its 2015 peak.
- Adjusted Total Equity Trends
- The adjusted total equity followed a parallel trajectory, peaking at US$ 37,513 million in 2015 before declining to US$ 30,068 million in 2019. While the trend mirrors that of total equity, the adjusted figures remained consistently higher throughout the observed period, though they also exhibited a steady decline after 2015.
- Equity Adjustment Variance
- A consistent positive variance is observed between total equity and adjusted total equity. This adjustment gap widened significantly in 2015 and remained substantial through 2019, generally fluctuating between US$ 6,000 million and US$ 6,800 million during the final five years of the period.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Capitalization Table
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31).
1 Operating lease liability (before adoption of FASB Topic 842). See details »
2 Net deferred tax assets (liabilities). See details »
3 LIFO reserve. See details »
The capitalization structure between 2014 and 2019 demonstrates a significant divergence between reported financial metrics and adjusted values, indicating a substantial difference between the face value of the balance sheet and the adjusted capital position.
- Debt Profile and Adjustments
- Total reported debt experienced a sharp increase from US$ 4,510 million in 2014 to a peak of US$ 19,028 million in 2016, followed by a period of fluctuation ending at US$ 16,836 million in 2019. Adjusted total debt consistently remained significantly higher than reported figures, peaking at US$ 46,508 million in 2016 and ending the period at US$ 43,464 million. This suggests that reported debt figures consistently understated the total debt obligations when adjustments were applied.
- Equity Trends
- Total reported shareholders' equity reached a peak in 2015 at US$ 30,861 million, after which a consistent downward trend is observed, falling to US$ 23,512 million by 2019. Adjusted total equity followed a similar pattern, peaking in 2015 at US$ 37,513 million before declining to US$ 30,068 million. Although adjusted equity remained higher than reported equity throughout the analyzed period, both metrics indicate a steady erosion of the equity base from 2015 onward.
- Aggregate Capitalization
- Total reported capital grew rapidly between 2014 and 2016, subsequently plateauing around US$ 40,300 million from 2017 through 2019. Conversely, adjusted total capital remained substantially more elevated, peaking at US$ 82,396 million in 2016 and stabilizing above US$ 73,000 million in the following years. The magnitude of the gap between reported and adjusted total capital underscores a consistent and large-scale adjustment in the assessment of the total capital structure.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Adjustments to Reported Income
Walgreens Boots Alliance Inc., adjusted net earnings attributable to Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-08-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2014-08-31).
1 Deferred income tax expense (benefit). See details »
2 Increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »
An analysis of the financial results from August 31, 2014, to August 31, 2019, reveals a general growth trajectory in net earnings attributable to the company until a peak in 2018, followed by a decline in 2019. While reported net earnings remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2017, adjusted net earnings exhibited significant volatility during the same period.
- Reported Net Earnings Trend
- Reported net earnings grew substantially from 1,932 million US$ in 2014 to 4,220 million US$ in 2015. Following a period of relative stability between 2015 and 2017, earnings reached a peak of 5,024 million US$ in 2018 before contracting to 3,982 million US$ in 2019.
- Adjusted Net Earnings Volatility
- Adjusted net earnings demonstrate a less consistent pattern than reported earnings. A critical divergence occurred on August 31, 2016, where adjusted net earnings dropped sharply to 1,165 million US$, despite reported net earnings remaining high at 4,173 million US$. This indicates the impact of significant non-recurring adjustments or one-time charges during that fiscal year.
- Comparative Analysis of Adjustments
- In 2014, adjusted net earnings exceeded reported net earnings by 769 million US$. However, from 2015 onward, adjusted net earnings were generally lower than reported net earnings. The most pronounced gap occurred in 2016, while the 2019 fiscal year showed a widening gap again, with adjusted earnings falling 475 million US$ below reported net earnings.
Overall, the data indicates that while the reported bottom line showed resilience and growth for much of the five-year period, the adjusted figures reveal underlying volatility, particularly in 2016 and 2019, suggesting that non-GAAP adjustments played a substantial role in the company's perceived financial performance.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?