AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Steel Dynamics Inc. (NASDAQ:STLD)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since October 26, 2022.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Steel Dynamics Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 50.98% = 25.65% × 1.99
Dec 31, 2020 12.68% = 5.94% × 2.13
Dec 31, 2019 16.47% = 8.11% × 2.03
Dec 31, 2018 31.98% = 16.34% × 1.96
Dec 31, 2017 24.25% = 11.85% × 2.05

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility over the observed five-year period, characterized by a peak in 2018, a subsequent decline through 2020, and a substantial surge in 2021. The analysis of the two-component disaggregation indicates that these fluctuations were driven almost exclusively by changes in operational efficiency and profitability rather than shifts in financial leverage.

Return on Equity (ROE) Trends
ROE increased from 24.25% in 2017 to 31.98% in 2018, before entering a downward trend that bottomed at 12.68% in 2020. A sharp recovery occurred in 2021, with ROE climbing to 50.98%, representing the highest return in the period analyzed.
Return on Assets (ROA) as the Primary Driver
The movements in ROA closely mirror the trajectory of ROE. ROA rose to 16.34% in 2018 and fell to a low of 5.94% in 2020, coinciding with the dip in equity returns. The exceptional increase in ROE in 2021 is directly attributable to the spike in ROA to 25.65%, suggesting that the improvement in equity returns was fueled by increased net income relative to total assets.
Stability of Financial Leverage
Financial leverage remained remarkably stable throughout the period, fluctuating within a narrow range between 1.96 and 2.13. Because the leverage ratio did not trend upward or downward significantly, it played a negligible role in the volatility of the ROE. The company maintained a consistent capital structure, ensuring that the amplified returns on equity were a result of operational performance rather than increased debt utilization.
Synthesis of DuPont Components
The relationship between the components confirms that the company's ability to generate returns for shareholders is highly sensitive to asset productivity. The correlation between ROA and ROE is nearly absolute, while the constant nature of the financial leverage ratio indicates a conservative approach to debt that avoids utilizing leverage as a tool to artificially inflate ROE during periods of operational decline.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Steel Dynamics Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 50.98% = 17.46% × 1.47 × 1.99
Dec 31, 2020 12.68% = 5.74% × 1.04 × 2.13
Dec 31, 2019 16.47% = 6.41% × 1.26 × 2.03
Dec 31, 2018 31.98% = 10.64% × 1.53 × 1.96
Dec 31, 2017 24.25% = 8.52% × 1.39 × 2.05

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility over the five-year period, starting at 24.25% in 2017 and reaching a peak of 50.98% by 2021. A notable contraction occurred between 2018 and 2020, with ROE dropping from 31.98% to 12.68%, followed by a sharp recovery. The analysis of the three DuPont components reveals that this volatility was driven primarily by operational performance and efficiency rather than changes in capital structure.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability margins demonstrated substantial fluctuation, characterized by a decline from 10.64% in 2018 to a low of 5.74% in 2020. The subsequent increase to 17.46% in 2021 represents the most significant driver of the overall ROE expansion, indicating a marked improvement in cost management or pricing power during the final year of the period.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization efficiency peaked in 2018 at 1.53 before trending downward to 1.04 in 2020. The recovery to 1.47 in 2021 suggests a return to higher operational throughput and more effective use of the asset base to generate revenue, complementing the growth in profit margins.
Financial Leverage
The leverage ratio remained consistently stable, hovering between 1.96 and 2.13 throughout the analyzed timeframe. Because financial leverage showed negligible variance, it is concluded that the fluctuations in ROE were not the result of increased financial risk or shifts in the debt-to-equity mix, but were instead entirely dependent on the interaction between profit margins and asset turnover.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Steel Dynamics Inc., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2021 50.98% = 0.77 × 0.99 × 23.00% × 1.47 × 1.99
Dec 31, 2020 12.68% = 0.80 × 0.88 × 8.13% × 1.04 × 2.13
Dec 31, 2019 16.47% = 0.77 × 0.87 × 9.51% × 1.26 × 2.03
Dec 31, 2018 31.98% = 0.78 × 0.93 × 14.79% × 1.53 × 1.96
Dec 31, 2017 24.25% = 0.86 × 0.88 × 11.29% × 1.39 × 2.05

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibited significant volatility between 2017 and 2021, characterized by a pronounced decline from a 2018 peak of 31.98% to a low of 12.68% in 2020, followed by a substantial recovery to 50.98% in 2021.

Operating Profitability
The EBIT margin emerged as the most volatile component and the primary driver of ROE fluctuations. After reaching 14.79% in 2018, the margin contracted consistently over the next two years, bottoming at 8.13% in 2020. The subsequent surge to 23.00% in 2021 represents a critical inflection point in operational profitability.
Asset Utilization
Asset turnover followed a cyclical trend, peaking at 1.53 in 2018 before declining to 1.04 by 2020. The recovery to 1.47 in 2021 indicates an improved ability to generate revenue from the company's asset base, complementing the expansion in profit margins.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage remained remarkably stable throughout the period, fluctuating within a tight range between 1.96 and 2.13. This stability indicates that the dramatic shifts in ROE were not the result of changes in the capital structure or increased debt reliance, but were instead driven by fundamental operational performance.
Interest and Tax Burdens
The tax burden remained relatively constant, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86, suggesting a stable effective tax environment. The interest burden showed a gradual improvement, reaching its highest level of 0.99 in 2021, which signifies that interest expenses consumed a negligible portion of operating earnings by the end of the analyzed period.

The analysis concludes that the exceptional increase in ROE observed in 2021 was the result of a synchronized improvement in both operating margins and asset turnover, while the financial leverage and tax burdens remained neutral factors.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Steel Dynamics Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2021 25.65% = 17.46% × 1.47
Dec 31, 2020 5.94% = 5.74% × 1.04
Dec 31, 2019 8.11% = 6.41% × 1.26
Dec 31, 2018 16.34% = 10.64% × 1.53
Dec 31, 2017 11.85% = 8.52% × 1.39

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The analysis of Return on Assets (ROA) reveals a period of significant volatility between 2017 and 2021. ROA experienced an initial increase, followed by a two-year decline, culminating in a substantial surge in the final year of the period. This trajectory is the direct result of the combined movements in profitability margins and asset utilization efficiency.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability exhibited instability, reaching a peak of 17.46% in 2021. Following an initial rise to 10.64% in 2018, margins contracted for two consecutive years, hitting a low of 5.74% in 2020. The subsequent increase in 2021 represents a significant expansion from the 2020 trough, suggesting a strong recovery in pricing power or operational cost control.
Asset Turnover
Operational efficiency followed a similar trend to profitability. Asset turnover increased to 1.53 in 2018 before declining steadily to a low of 1.04 by 2020. This contraction indicates a period of diminished revenue generation relative to the asset base. A recovery to 1.47 in 2021 demonstrates a return to higher levels of asset productivity.
Return on Assets (ROA)
The composite ROA reflects the compounding effect of both margins and turnover. The peak ROA of 25.65% in 2021 was driven by the simultaneous optimization of both net profit margins and asset turnover. Conversely, the decline to 5.94% in 2020 was the result of the convergence of the lowest recorded profit margin and the lowest asset turnover ratio within the analyzed five-year period.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Steel Dynamics Inc., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2021 25.65% = 0.77 × 0.99 × 23.00% × 1.47
Dec 31, 2020 5.94% = 0.80 × 0.88 × 8.13% × 1.04
Dec 31, 2019 8.11% = 0.77 × 0.87 × 9.51% × 1.26
Dec 31, 2018 16.34% = 0.78 × 0.93 × 14.79% × 1.53
Dec 31, 2017 11.85% = 0.86 × 0.88 × 11.29% × 1.39

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The return on assets (ROA) exhibited significant volatility over the five-year period, characterized by a cyclical decline from 2018 through 2020, followed by a sharp recovery in 2021. The ROA reached a peak of 25.65% in 2021, a substantial increase from the five-year low of 5.94% recorded in 2020.

EBIT Margin
Operational profitability served as the primary driver of the overall ROA fluctuations. A downward trend was observed from 2018 (14.79%) to 2020 (8.13%), representing a compression in operating margins. This was followed by a dramatic expansion in 2021, where the margin reached 23.00%, indicating a significant increase in operating efficiency or favorable pricing dynamics.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization efficiency mirrored the trend of the EBIT margin. The turnover ratio declined from a peak of 1.53 in 2018 to a trough of 1.04 in 2020, suggesting a period of reduced revenue generation relative to the asset base. A strong rebound occurred in 2021, with the ratio rising to 1.47, contributing to the overall recovery in ROA.
Interest Burden
The interest burden remained relatively stable and close to unity throughout the period, moving from 0.88 in 2017 to 0.99 in 2021. This stability indicates that interest expenses had a minimal and consistent impact on the conversion of operating profit to net income.
Tax Burden
The tax burden showed minor fluctuations, remaining within a range of 0.77 to 0.86. The lack of significant variance in this ratio suggests that changes in the effective tax rate were not a contributing factor to the volatility observed in the ROA.

In summary, the dramatic increase in ROA by the end of the period was fundamentally driven by concurrent improvements in both operating margins and asset turnover, while financing costs and tax obligations remained stable and non-influential to the trend.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

Steel Dynamics Inc., decomposition of net profit margin ratio

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Dec 31, 2021 17.46% = 0.77 × 0.99 × 23.00%
Dec 31, 2020 5.74% = 0.80 × 0.88 × 8.13%
Dec 31, 2019 6.41% = 0.77 × 0.87 × 9.51%
Dec 31, 2018 10.64% = 0.78 × 0.93 × 14.79%
Dec 31, 2017 8.52% = 0.86 × 0.88 × 11.29%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).


The profitability profile from 2017 to 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in operating performance, culminating in a substantial expansion of margins in the final year. The net profit margin exhibits a strong positive correlation with the EBIT margin, indicating that operating efficiency is the primary driver of bottom-line results.

EBIT Margin Trends
Operating profitability experienced a fluctuating trajectory, rising from 11.29% in 2017 to a peak of 14.79% in 2018, before declining to a period low of 8.13% in 2020. This downward trend was sharply reversed in 2021, where the EBIT margin surged to 23.00%, representing the most significant driver of the overall increase in net profit margin.
Interest Burden Analysis
The interest burden remained relatively stable between 0.87 and 0.93 from 2017 through 2020, suggesting a consistent relationship between operating income and pre-tax income. By 2021, the ratio improved to 0.99, indicating that interest expenses became almost negligible relative to EBIT, thereby allowing nearly all operating gains to flow through to the pre-tax income level.
Tax Burden Consistency
The tax burden fluctuated within a narrow range, moving from 0.86 in 2017 to a low of 0.77 in 2021. While there was a slight decrease in the ratio over the five-year period, the impact of taxation remained a secondary factor compared to the volatility of operating margins.
Net Profit Margin Synthesis
The net profit margin mirrored the volatility of the EBIT margin, dipping to 5.74% in 2020 before reaching 17.46% in 2021. The dramatic expansion in the final year was the result of a synergistic effect: a record high EBIT margin combined with a near-perfect interest burden ratio, which minimized leakage between operating profit and net income.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?