Free Cash Flow to The Firm (FCFF)
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1, 2 See details »
Between 2017 and 2021, the financial profile exhibited significant fluctuations in both operating cash flows and free cash flow to the firm (FCFF), characterized by a strong overall growth trajectory interrupted by a sharp contraction in 2020.
- Operating Cash Flow Trends
- Net cash provided by operating activities showed a general upward trend, increasing from 739.6 million USD in 2017 to 2.2 billion USD by 2021. A notable peak occurred in 2018, followed by relative stability in 2019 and a moderate decline in 2020 before the significant surge in 2021.
- FCFF Volatility and Performance
- The free cash flow to the firm demonstrated higher volatility than operating cash flows. After increasing from 666.4 million USD in 2017 to 1.27 billion USD in 2018, FCFF experienced a steady decline, reaching a deficit of -101.4 million USD in 2020. A strong recovery followed in 2021, with FCFF returning to 1.32 billion USD.
- Analysis of Capital Expenditure Impact
- A significant divergence between operating cash flow and FCFF is evident in 2020. While operating activities remained positive at 987 million USD, the negative FCFF indicates that capital expenditures during this period substantially exceeded the cash generated from operations. This pattern suggests a period of intensive investment in fixed assets or strategic expansion during that fiscal year.
- Comparative Recovery Analysis
- The 2021 recovery represents a sharp reversal of the 2020 downturn. The increase in FCFF from a negative position to 1.32 billion USD, coupled with the record high in operating cash flow, indicates a transition from a heavy investment phase back to a period of high cash generation.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Interest Paid, Net of Tax
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
2 2021 Calculation
Cash paid for interest, tax = Cash paid for interest × EITR
= 103,374 × 22.90% = 23,673
3 2021 Calculation
Capitalized interest on construction in progress assets, tax = Capitalized interest on construction in progress assets × EITR
= 50,500 × 22.90% = 11,565
An analysis of the financial data from 2017 to 2021 reveals a significant shift in how interest expenses are managed and recognized, alongside a general reduction in the effective tax burden. While direct cash outflows for interest peaked in 2019 before declining, there is a pronounced upward trajectory in interest capitalization related to construction projects.
- Effective Income Tax Rate (EITR) Trends
- The effective income tax rate experienced a notable decrease from 33.10% in 2017 to 22.90% in 2021. The most significant reduction occurred between 2017 and 2018, where the rate dropped by over 10 percentage points. For the period between 2018 and 2021, the rate remained relatively stable, fluctuating within a narrow range between 19.10% and 22.90%.
- Cash Interest Expenditures
- Cash paid for interest, net of tax, exhibited a bell-shaped trend over the five-year period. Expenditures increased from 90,570 thousand US dollars in 2017 to a peak of 104,142 thousand US dollars in 2019. Subsequently, a downward trend emerged, with payments falling to 90,277 thousand US dollars in 2020 and further decreasing to 79,701 thousand US dollars by the end of 2021. This indicates a reduction in the net cash burden of interest payments during the latter part of the analyzed period.
- Capitalized Interest on Construction in Progress
- A substantial increase is observed in the capitalization of interest on construction in progress assets, net of tax. Starting at a nominal 1,137 thousand US dollars in 2017, the figures grew modestly until 2019, followed by an exponential surge. Capitalized interest rose to 19,335 thousand US dollars in 2020 and doubled to 38,936 thousand US dollars in 2021. This pattern suggests an acceleration in capital investment and the expansion of long-term asset bases, shifting a larger portion of interest costs from immediate expense to balance sheet capitalization.
The inverse relationship between declining cash interest payments and rapidly increasing capitalized interest suggests a strategic shift toward large-scale capital projects. By capitalizing a greater volume of interest, the immediate impact on net income is mitigated, while the long-term asset value increases. This financial transition occurred against a backdrop of a lower and more stabilized effective income tax rate.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Current
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | |
| Enterprise value (EV) | 18,879,145) |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF) | 1,316,534) |
| Valuation Ratio | |
| EV/FCFF | 14.34 |
| Benchmarks | |
| EV/FCFF, Competitors1 | |
| Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 68.13 |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | |
| Materials | 28.99 |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31).
1 Click competitor name to see calculations.
If the company EV/FCFF is lower then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/FCFF is higher then the EV/FCFF of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.
Enterprise Value to FCFF Ratio, Historical
| Dec 31, 2021 | Dec 31, 2020 | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands) | ||||||
| Enterprise value (EV)1 | 15,168,019) | 10,864,840) | 6,678,596) | 9,665,432) | 12,412,536) | |
| Free cash flow to the firm (FCFF)2 | 1,316,534) | (101,411) | 1,052,744) | 1,274,453) | 666,378) | |
| Valuation Ratio | ||||||
| EV/FCFF3 | 11.52 | — | 6.34 | 7.58 | 18.63 | |
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| EV/FCFF, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Freeport-McMoRan Inc. | 12.13 | — | — | — | — | |
| EV/FCFF, Industry | ||||||
| Materials | 20.85 | — | — | — | — | |
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
3 2021 Calculation
EV/FCFF = EV ÷ FCFF
= 15,168,019 ÷ 1,316,534 = 11.52
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The financial trajectory between 2017 and 2021 is characterized by significant volatility in both enterprise valuation and cash flow generation. A notable contraction in enterprise value occurred between 2017 and 2019, followed by a strong expansion in the subsequent two years, while cash flow experienced a sharp decline into negative territory before recovering.
- Enterprise Value (EV) Trends
- Enterprise value declined from $12.41 billion in 2017 to a period low of $6.68 billion in 2019. This downward trend reversed sharply starting in 2020, with the value climbing to $15.17 billion by the end of 2021, representing a substantial increase in the overall market valuation of the firm's operations.
- Free Cash Flow to the Firm (FCFF) Performance
- FCFF exhibited instability over the five-year period. After an initial increase from $666 million in 2017 to $1.27 billion in 2018, cash flow turned negative in 2020, reaching -$101 million. A recovery was observed in 2021, with FCFF rising to $1.32 billion, the highest level recorded in the period analyzed.
- EV/FCFF Ratio Interpretation
- The EV/FCFF ratio decreased from 18.63 in 2017 to 6.34 in 2019, suggesting a significant reduction in the multiple applied to the firm's cash flows. The ratio was not applicable for 2020 due to the negative FCFF. By 2021, the ratio rose to 11.52, indicating that the increase in enterprise value outpaced the recovery in free cash flow.
AI Ask an analyst for more
Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.
How can I help you?