AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Texas Pacific Land Corp. (NYSE:TPL)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since November 6, 2024.

DuPont Analysis: Disaggregation of ROE, ROA, and Net Profit Margin

Microsoft Excel

Two-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Texas Pacific Land Corp., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = ROA × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2023 38.88% = 35.08% × 1.11
Dec 31, 2022 57.75% = 50.87% × 1.14
Dec 31, 2021 41.43% = 35.33% × 1.17
Dec 31, 2020 36.28% = 30.80% × 1.18
Dec 31, 2019 62.23% = 53.28% × 1.17

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).


The Return on Equity (ROE) exhibits significant volatility over the five-year period, characterized by a sharp contraction in 2020 followed by a recovery through 2022 and a subsequent decline in 2023. The ROE peaked in 2019 at 62.23% and reached a secondary peak of 57.75% in 2022, while the lowest point occurred in 2020 at 36.28%.

Return on Assets (ROA)
Operational profitability relative to assets serves as the primary driver of overall equity returns. ROA mirrors the trajectory of ROE, starting at 53.28% in 2019, dropping to 30.80% in 2020, and recovering to 50.87% in 2022 before receding to 35.08% in 2023. This indicates that the fluctuations in shareholder returns are almost entirely attributable to changes in asset efficiency and net income rather than financing strategies.
Financial Leverage
The financial leverage ratio remains exceptionally stable and low throughout the period, fluctuating minimally between a high of 1.18 in 2020 and a low of 1.11 in 2023. A gradual downward trend is observable from 2020 onward, suggesting a slight reduction in the reliance on debt to finance assets.
ROE Disaggregation Analysis
Under the two-component DuPont framework, the correlation between ROA and ROE is nearly absolute due to the negligible impact of the equity multiplier. Because financial leverage is maintained near 1.1, the company does not utilize significant debt to amplify returns. Consequently, the observed volatility in ROE is a direct reflection of the volatility in ROA, highlighting a business model where performance is driven by asset productivity rather than financial engineering.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Three-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Texas Pacific Land Corp., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2023 38.88% = 64.23% × 0.55 × 1.11
Dec 31, 2022 57.75% = 66.88% × 0.76 × 1.14
Dec 31, 2021 41.43% = 59.87% × 0.59 × 1.17
Dec 31, 2020 36.28% = 58.19% × 0.53 × 1.18
Dec 31, 2019 62.23% = 64.98% × 0.82 × 1.17

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).


A comprehensive analysis of the three-component DuPont disaggregation reveals that the volatility in Return on Equity (ROE) is primarily driven by fluctuations in asset efficiency rather than changes in profitability or financial leverage. While ROE experienced a significant decline from 62.23% in 2019 to 38.88% in 2023, the company continues to maintain an exceptionally high rate of return relative to standard industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin
Profitability remains consistently high and relatively stable, with margins fluctuating between a low of 58.19% in 2020 and a peak of 66.88% in 2022. The sustained margin above 58% indicates a strong ability to convert revenue into net income, suggesting a lean cost structure or high-margin revenue streams.
Asset Turnover
The asset turnover ratio is the most volatile component of the ROE calculation and the primary driver of performance variance. A sharp decrease from 0.82 in 2019 to 0.53 in 2020 was followed by a recovery to 0.76 in 2022, before retreating to 0.55 in 2023. This pattern suggests inconsistency in how efficiently assets are being utilized to generate revenue over the five-year period.
Financial Leverage
Financial leverage has remained remarkably stable and low, moving slightly from 1.17 in 2019 to 1.11 in 2023. The lack of significant movement in this ratio indicates that the company does not rely on debt to amplify its returns, and the variations in ROE are entirely a result of operational performance and asset efficiency.
Return on Equity (ROE)
The overall ROE trend closely mirrors the movement of the asset turnover ratio. The decline in ROE from 2019 to 2020 and again from 2022 to 2023 correlates directly with drops in asset efficiency. Despite these fluctuations, the ROE remains robust, supported by the consistently high net profit margins.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Five-Component Disaggregation of ROE

Texas Pacific Land Corp., decomposition of ROE

Microsoft Excel
ROE = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover × Financial Leverage
Dec 31, 2023 38.88% = 0.78 × 1.00 × 81.95% × 0.55 × 1.11
Dec 31, 2022 57.75% = 0.78 × 1.00 × 85.23% × 0.76 × 1.14
Dec 31, 2021 41.43% = 0.74 × 1.00 × 80.50% × 0.59 × 1.17
Dec 31, 2020 36.28% = 0.80 × 1.00 × 72.60% × 0.53 × 1.18
Dec 31, 2019 62.23% = 0.79 × 1.00 × 82.01% × 0.82 × 1.17

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).


Return on Equity (ROE) exhibits significant volatility over the five-year period, starting at 62.23% in 2019, declining to 36.28% in 2020, and ending at 38.88% in 2023. The fluctuations in ROE are primarily driven by changes in asset utilization rather than shifts in operating margins or financial leverage.

Operating Performance
The EBIT margin remains consistently high, maintaining a range between 72.60% and 85.23%. This indicates a strong and stable ability to generate operating profit from revenue, with a peak in efficiency observed in 2022.
Asset Efficiency
Asset turnover is the most volatile component of the ROE disaggregation. The ratio decreased from 0.82 in 2019 to 0.53 in 2020, recovered to 0.76 in 2022, and fell again to 0.55 in 2023. The close correlation between asset turnover and the overall ROE suggests that the company's ability to generate sales from its asset base is the primary determinant of equity returns.
Financial Structure and Interest
Financial leverage is low and demonstrates a slight downward trend, moving from 1.17 in 2019 to 1.11 in 2023. Furthermore, the interest burden remains constant at 1.00 throughout the period, indicating that interest expenses are negligible and do not impact the translation of operating profit into net income.
Taxation Impact
The tax burden remains relatively stable, fluctuating narrowly between 0.74 and 0.80. This suggests a consistent effective tax rate that has not significantly influenced the variance in ROE over the period analyzed.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Two-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Texas Pacific Land Corp., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Net Profit Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2023 35.08% = 64.23% × 0.55
Dec 31, 2022 50.87% = 66.88% × 0.76
Dec 31, 2021 35.33% = 59.87% × 0.59
Dec 31, 2020 30.80% = 58.19% × 0.53
Dec 31, 2019 53.28% = 64.98% × 0.82

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).


The analysis of the return on assets (ROA) from 2019 to 2023 reveals a period of significant volatility, with the overall performance driven primarily by fluctuations in asset efficiency rather than operational profitability. While ROA peaked in 2019 at 53.28% and reached a secondary high of 50.87% in 2022, it experienced notable contractions in 2020 and 2023, closing the period at 35.08%.

Net Profit Margin
Operational profitability has remained consistently high and relatively stable throughout the five-year period. The margin fluctuated within a range of 58.19% to 66.88%, maintaining a strong baseline of profitability per dollar of revenue. The peak margin occurred in 2022, followed by a slight moderation to 64.23% in 2023, suggesting that cost management and pricing power have remained robust despite changes in overall asset returns.
Asset Turnover
Asset utilization exhibits substantial volatility and serves as the primary driver of the observed changes in ROA. The ratio declined sharply from 0.82 in 2019 to 0.53 in 2020, followed by a recovery to 0.76 in 2022. However, a subsequent decrease to 0.55 in 2023 indicates a recurring challenge in optimizing asset efficiency or a significant increase in the asset base that has not yet been matched by proportional revenue growth.
ROA Disaggregation and Correlation
The two-component disaggregation confirms that the variance in ROA is highly correlated with the Asset Turnover ratio. For instance, the decline in ROA during 2020 and 2023 aligns directly with the drops in asset turnover, even while net profit margins remained strong. The surge in ROA in 2022 was the result of a synergistic effect, where both the highest net profit margin (66.88%) and a recovered asset turnover (0.76) converged to elevate the total return on assets.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Four-Component Disaggregation of ROA

Texas Pacific Land Corp., decomposition of ROA

Microsoft Excel
ROA = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin × Asset Turnover
Dec 31, 2023 35.08% = 0.78 × 1.00 × 81.95% × 0.55
Dec 31, 2022 50.87% = 0.78 × 1.00 × 85.23% × 0.76
Dec 31, 2021 35.33% = 0.74 × 1.00 × 80.50% × 0.59
Dec 31, 2020 30.80% = 0.80 × 1.00 × 72.60% × 0.53
Dec 31, 2019 53.28% = 0.79 × 1.00 × 82.01% × 0.82

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).


The Return on Assets (ROA) exhibits significant volatility over the five-year period, characterized by a cyclical pattern. A peak of 53.28% in 2019 was followed by a contraction to 30.80% in 2020, a recovery to 50.87% by 2022, and a subsequent decline to 35.08% in 2023. This fluctuation in overall profitability is primarily driven by variances in asset efficiency rather than shifts in operating margins or financial leverage.

Operating Profitability (EBIT Margin)
The EBIT margin remains consistently high, generally exceeding 80%. Despite a dip to 72.60% in 2020, the margin recovered to a peak of 85.23% in 2022 before settling at 81.95% in 2023. This indicates a robust ability to maintain high operational profitability relative to revenue.
Asset Use Efficiency (Asset Turnover)
Asset turnover is the most volatile component of the ROA disaggregation and serves as the primary driver of the observed fluctuations in returns. The ratio decreased from 0.82 in 2019 to 0.53 in 2020, showed a partial recovery to 0.76 in 2022, and fell again to 0.55 in 2023. These shifts suggest inconsistent efficiency in utilizing the asset base to generate sales.
Financial and Tax Burden
The interest burden remained constant at 1.00 throughout the entire period, indicating that interest expenses have no material impact on the return on assets. The tax burden showed minimal variance, fluctuating within a narrow range between 0.74 and 0.80, suggesting a stable effective tax environment over the analyzed timeframe.

In summary, the company maintains a high-margin operational model and a debt-free profile relative to its earnings. However, the instability in the ROA is directly correlated with the asset turnover ratio, indicating that the overall return is sensitive to the efficiency of asset utilization.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Disaggregation of Net Profit Margin

Texas Pacific Land Corp., decomposition of net profit margin ratio

Microsoft Excel
Net Profit Margin = Tax Burden × Interest Burden × EBIT Margin
Dec 31, 2023 64.23% = 0.78 × 1.00 × 81.95%
Dec 31, 2022 66.88% = 0.78 × 1.00 × 85.23%
Dec 31, 2021 59.87% = 0.74 × 1.00 × 80.50%
Dec 31, 2020 58.19% = 0.80 × 1.00 × 72.60%
Dec 31, 2019 64.98% = 0.79 × 1.00 × 82.01%

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).


The disaggregation of the net profit margin reveals a consistently high level of profitability characterized by strong operational efficiency and a lack of debt-servicing costs. The net profit margin fluctuated between a low of 58.19% in 2020 and a peak of 66.88% in 2022, closely mirroring the movements of the operating margin.

EBIT Margin
Operational profitability remains the primary driver of the net margin. The EBIT margin exhibited significant strength, maintaining a range between 72.60% and 85.23%. A notable contraction occurred in 2020, followed by a recovery and peak in 2022 at 85.23%, before normalizing to 81.95% in 2023.
Interest Burden
The interest burden remained constant at 1.00 throughout the entire five-year period. This indicates that interest expenses have no impact on the conversion of operating profit to pre-tax income, suggesting a capital structure devoid of significant interest-bearing debt.
Tax Burden
The tax burden has remained relatively stable, fluctuating slightly between 0.74 and 0.80. The lowest tax burden was observed in 2021 at 0.74, while the remaining years hovered around 0.78 to 0.80, demonstrating a consistent tax impact on the bottom line.
Net Profit Margin Synthesis
The overall volatility in the net profit margin is almost exclusively attributable to changes in the EBIT margin. Because the interest burden is non-existent and the tax burden is stable, the final net profit margin directly reflects the company's ability to manage operating expenses relative to revenue.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?