AI Tokens
Stock Analysis on Net

Texas Pacific Land Corp. (NYSE:TPL)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since November 6, 2024.

Enterprise Value to EBITDA (EV/EBITDA)

Microsoft Excel

Earnings before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA)

Texas Pacific Land Corp., EBITDA calculation

US$ in thousands

Microsoft Excel
12 months ended: Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019
Net income 405,645 446,362 269,980 176,049 318,728
Add: Income tax expense 111,916 122,493 93,037 43,613 83,527
Earnings before tax (EBT) 517,561 568,855 363,017 219,662 402,255
Add: Interest expense — — — — —
Earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) 517,561 568,855 363,017 219,662 402,255
Add: Depreciation, depletion and amortization 14,757 15,376 16,257 14,395 8,906
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 532,318 584,231 379,274 234,057 411,161

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).


The financial performance from 2019 to 2023 is characterized by a period of volatility followed by a substantial recovery and a subsequent slight moderation. A significant contraction in profitability occurred in 2020, followed by a strong growth trajectory that peaked in 2022 across all measured earnings metrics.

EBITDA Trend Analysis
EBITDA experienced a sharp decline of approximately 43% between 2019 and 2020, falling from 411,161 thousand to 234,057 thousand. A robust recovery followed, with EBITDA increasing for two consecutive years to reach a peak of 584,231 thousand in 2022, a 149% increase from the 2020 low. A modest contraction of 8.9% was observed in 2023, with the value settling at 532,318 thousand.
Operating Structure and Depreciation
A consistently narrow gap between EBIT and EBITDA indicates that depreciation and amortization expenses remain low relative to total earnings. These non-cash charges remained stable, fluctuating between approximately 8.9 million and 16.3 million over the five-year period, which suggests a business model with low capital intensity.
Earnings Conversion and Capital Structure
The identical values for Earnings Before Tax (EBT) and Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) across all reported years indicate an absence of interest expenses, suggesting a capital structure with little to no debt. The primary variance between EBITDA and Net Income is attributable to tax obligations, with Net Income closely mirroring the volatility and growth patterns of EBITDA, peaking at 446,362 thousand in 2022.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Current

Texas Pacific Land Corp., current EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Enterprise value (EV) 29,822,736
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) 532,318
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA 56.02
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors1
Chevron Corp. 11.22
ConocoPhillips 7.16
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 10.53
EV/EBITDA, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 8.85
EV/EBITDA, Industry
Energy 8.92

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31).

1 Click competitor name to see calculations.

If the company EV/EBITDA is lower then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively undervalued.
Otherwise, if the company EV/EBITDA is higher then the EV/EBITDA of benchmark then company is relatively overvalued.


Enterprise Value to EBITDA Ratio, Historical

Texas Pacific Land Corp., historical EV/EBITDA calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2023 Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019
Selected Financial Data (US$ in thousands)
Enterprise value (EV)1 10,949,083 13,255,177 7,410,929 8,342,714 4,956,658
Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA)2 532,318 584,231 379,274 234,057 411,161
Valuation Ratio
EV/EBITDA3 20.57 22.69 19.54 35.64 12.06
Benchmarks
EV/EBITDA, Competitors4
Chevron Corp. 6.34 4.74 7.18 — —
ConocoPhillips 5.64 3.82 6.34 — —
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp. 5.81 4.54 7.07 — —
EV/EBITDA, Sector
Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels 5.95 4.47 6.97 — —
EV/EBITDA, Industry
Energy 6.18 4.75 7.24 — —

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2023-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).

1 See details »

2 See details »

3 2023 Calculation
EV/EBITDA = EV ÷ EBITDA
= 10,949,083 ÷ 532,318 = 20.57

4 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The five-year period analyzed shows significant volatility in both Enterprise Value (EV) and EBITDA, resulting in fluctuating valuation multiples. The EV/EBITDA ratio transitioned from a relatively low multiple in 2019 to a higher, more volatile range over the subsequent four years, indicating a shift in market valuation relative to operational earnings.

Enterprise Value Trends
Enterprise Value exhibited substantial growth and volatility, increasing from approximately US$ 4.96 billion in 2019 to a peak of US$ 13.26 billion in 2022. Following this peak, a contraction occurred, with the value moderating to US$ 10.95 billion by the end of 2023.
EBITDA Performance
EBITDA experienced a sharp decline in 2020, falling to US$ 234.1 million from US$ 411.2 million in 2019. A consistent recovery trend followed, with earnings reaching a period high of US$ 584.2 million in 2022 and remaining robust at US$ 532.3 million in 2023.
EV/EBITDA Ratio Analysis
The valuation multiple reached an extreme peak of 35.64 in 2020, primarily driven by the divergence between an increasing Enterprise Value and a contracting EBITDA. From 2021 through 2023, the ratio stabilized within a narrower range between 19.54 and 22.69. While this represents a normalization from the 2020 spike, the current valuation multiple remains significantly elevated compared to the 12.06 ratio observed in 2019.

AI Ask an analyst for more

Hi, I’m an AI-powered financial analyst at Stock Analysis on Net.
Without a user account, I tend to respond rather slowly.

How can I help you?