Stock Analysis on Net

Northrop Grumman Corp. (NYSE:NOC)

This company has been moved to the archive! The financial data has not been updated since April 27, 2023.

Analysis of Short-term (Operating) Activity Ratios 

Microsoft Excel

Short-term Activity Ratios (Summary)

Northrop Grumman Corp., short-term (operating) activity ratios

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Turnover Ratios
Inventory turnover 29.78 35.02 38.63 33.95 35.63
Receivables turnover 24.22 24.31 24.52 25.52 20.78
Payables turnover 11.26 12.93 16.24 11.94 10.68
Working capital turnover 40.62 12.32 6.38 27.05 21.40
Average No. Days
Average inventory processing period 12 10 9 11 10
Add: Average receivable collection period 15 15 15 14 18
Operating cycle 27 25 24 25 28
Less: Average payables payment period 32 28 22 31 34
Cash conversion cycle -5 -3 2 -6 -6

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).


The analysis of the financial ratios and related metrics over the five-year period reveals several notable trends and fluctuations in operational efficiency and working capital management.

Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio shows variability, beginning at 35.63 in 2018 and peaking at 38.63 in 2020, followed by a decline to 29.78 in 2022. This indicates that the company generally maintained strong inventory management with a slightly slower turnover in the most recent year.
Receivables Turnover
The receivables turnover ratio increased markedly from 20.78 in 2018 to a high of 25.52 in 2019. It then stabilized around 24.2-24.5 through 2020 to 2022, suggesting consistent effectiveness in collecting receivables over the last three years.
Payables Turnover
The payables turnover ratio rose from 10.68 in 2018 to a peak of 16.24 in 2020, indicating faster payment to suppliers during that period. Subsequently, it declined to 11.26 by 2022, reflecting a longer payment period compared to the peak year.
Working Capital Turnover
This ratio showed significant volatility, increasing from 21.4 in 2018 to 27.05 in 2019, then plunging sharply to 6.38 in 2020 before recovering to 40.62 in 2022. The low value in 2020 suggests reduced efficiency or increased working capital investment that year, while the strong rebound in 2022 indicates improved utilization.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The average days inventory was held varied between 9 and 12 days, with the shortest period in 2020 (9 days) and the longest in 2022 (12 days). This aligns with the inventory turnover data, showing slightly slower inventory movement recently.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The days to collect receivables decreased from 18 days in 2018 to 14 days in 2019, then stabilized at approximately 15 days from 2020 through 2022, reflecting steady collection efficiency after initial improvement.
Operating Cycle
The operating cycle, combining inventory processing and receivables collection periods, decreased from 28 days in 2018 to around 24-25 days in the 2020-2021 period, with a slight increase to 27 days in 2022. This indicates a modest overall improvement in the cycle with a slight recent extension.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average payables payment days shortened significantly from 34 days in 2018 to 22 days in 2020, suggesting quicker payments to suppliers during that time. It then lengthened again to 32 days by 2022, indicating more extended payment terms or delayed payments in recent years.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle fluctuated around slightly negative values, starting at -6 days in 2018 and 2019, rising to 2 days in 2020, and then improving back to -5 days by 2022. A negative cash conversion cycle generally reflects efficient cash management, where payables are settled after inventory is sold and receivables collected. The positive value in 2020 suggests a temporary lag in this efficiency.

In summary, the data reflects a company with generally strong operational efficiency and effective working capital management, despite some volatility around 2020 likely influenced by external or internal factors. The recovery of working capital turnover and cash conversion cycle metrics by 2022 suggests a return to more optimal financial performance conditions.


Turnover Ratios


Average No. Days


Inventory Turnover

Northrop Grumman Corp., inventory turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales 29,128 28,399 29,321 26,582 23,304
Inventoried costs, net 978 811 759 783 654
Short-term Activity Ratio
Inventory turnover1 29.78 35.02 38.63 33.95 35.63
Benchmarks
Inventory Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 0.81 0.75 0.78
Caterpillar Inc. 2.54 2.53 2.55
Eaton Corp. plc 4.04 4.48 5.88
GE Aerospace 3.19 3.40 3.80
Honeywell International Inc. 4.04 4.29 4.94
Lockheed Martin Corp. 18.68 19.45 16.01
RTX Corp. 5.03 5.65 5.11
Inventory Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 2.28 2.28 2.28
Inventory Turnover, Industry
Industrials 4.28 4.03 3.71

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Inventory turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Inventoried costs, net
= 29,128 ÷ 978 = 29.78

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


The financial data for the company over the period from December 31, 2018, through December 31, 2022, reveals several noteworthy trends in cost of sales, inventoried costs, and inventory turnover.

Cost of Sales
The cost of sales demonstrates an overall upward trajectory from 2018 to 2022. It increased steadily from $23,304 million in 2018 to $29,321 million in 2020. There was a slight decline in 2021, dropping to $28,399 million, before rising again to $29,128 million in 2022. This pattern indicates a broad growth in expenses related to production or procurement, with minor fluctuations possibly due to operational adjustments or market conditions in 2021.
Inventoried Costs, Net
Inventoried costs have generally increased over this period, moving from $654 million in 2018 to $978 million by the end of 2022. Although there was a minor decrease between 2019 and 2020, the overall trend is upward. This increase reflects a growing investment in inventory, which may be associated with higher production levels or strategic stockpiling.
Inventory Turnover
Inventory turnover shows a declining trend from 2018 to 2022. It began at a high of 35.63 in 2018 and fluctuated slightly in the following years, reaching a peak of 38.63 in 2020 before decreasing more notably in 2021 and 2022 to 29.78. This decline indicates that the company is turning over its inventory less frequently, which could suggest slower sales relative to inventory levels or increased inventory holdings.

In summary, the data illustrates growing costs associated with sales and inventory holdings, while efficiency in converting inventory to sales, as measured by inventory turnover, has diminished over recent years. This combination could signal changes in demand patterns, supply chain strategies, or other operational factors affecting inventory management and cost control.


Receivables Turnover

Northrop Grumman Corp., receivables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Sales 36,602 35,667 36,799 33,841 30,095
Accounts receivable, net 1,511 1,467 1,501 1,326 1,448
Short-term Activity Ratio
Receivables turnover1 24.22 24.31 24.52 25.52 20.78
Benchmarks
Receivables Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 26.46 23.58 29.75
Caterpillar Inc. 6.39 5.68 5.33
Eaton Corp. plc 5.09 5.95 6.15
GE Aerospace 4.09 4.55 4.37
Honeywell International Inc. 4.77 5.04 4.78
Lockheed Martin Corp. 26.34 34.15 33.06
RTX Corp. 7.36 6.66 6.11
Receivables Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 7.36 7.57 7.30
Receivables Turnover, Industry
Industrials 8.17 7.76 7.57

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Receivables turnover = Sales ÷ Accounts receivable, net
= 36,602 ÷ 1,511 = 24.22

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Sales Trends
Sales have exhibited an overall upward trend from 2018 to 2022, increasing from $30,095 million in 2018 to $36,602 million in 2022. Growth was steady with a notable peak in 2020 at $36,799 million. There was a slight decline in 2021 to $35,667 million before recovering marginally in 2022. This pattern indicates stable revenue generation with minor fluctuations.
Accounts Receivable, Net
The net accounts receivable values have remained relatively stable throughout the period, with figures ranging from $1,326 million in 2019 to $1,511 million in 2022. The slight increase toward the end of the period suggests a modest rise in credit extended to customers or timing differences in collections, though overall levels have not changed drastically.
Receivables Turnover Ratio
The receivables turnover ratio shows a peak in 2019 at 25.52 and then a gradual decline through to 2022, ending at 24.22. Despite the decrease, the ratio remains relatively high and stable, indicating consistent efficiency in collecting receivables. The slight downward trend may reflect a marginal lengthening in collection periods or changes in credit policies.
Summary of Financial Position
The data presents a stable and growing sales profile coupled with consistent management of receivables. The marginal variations in accounts receivable and turnover ratios suggest efficient working capital management without significant deterioration. The company appears to maintain solid operational performance and credit control over the analyzed period.

Payables Turnover

Northrop Grumman Corp., payables turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Cost of sales 29,128 28,399 29,321 26,582 23,304
Trade accounts payable 2,587 2,197 1,806 2,226 2,182
Short-term Activity Ratio
Payables turnover1 11.26 12.93 16.24 11.94 10.68
Benchmarks
Payables Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 6.18 6.40 4.94
Caterpillar Inc. 4.76 4.36 4.75
Eaton Corp. plc 4.51 4.75 6.24
GE Aerospace 2.98 3.32 3.67
Honeywell International Inc. 3.53 3.40 3.86
Lockheed Martin Corp. 27.25 74.34 64.48
RTX Corp. 5.40 5.93 5.56
Payables Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 5.21 5.60 5.54
Payables Turnover, Industry
Industrials 7.83 7.81 7.49

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Payables turnover = Cost of sales ÷ Trade accounts payable
= 29,128 ÷ 2,587 = 11.26

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Cost of Sales
The cost of sales demonstrates an overall upward trend from 2018 through 2022, increasing from $23,304 million to $29,128 million. There was consistent growth between 2018 and 2020, with a peak in 2020 at $29,321 million. However, a slight decline was observed in 2021, dropping to $28,399 million, before rising again in 2022 to near previous high levels. This indicates fluctuating production or procurement costs, but generally increasing expenditure in this area over the five-year span.
Trade Accounts Payable
The trade accounts payable figures show some variability over the period. Starting at $2,182 million in 2018, the balance increased modestly in 2019, followed by a significant decrease in 2020 to $1,806 million. Subsequently, the amount rose substantially in 2021 and continued to increase in 2022, reaching $2,587 million, which represents the highest value in the dataset. This pattern may reflect shifts in payment policies or supplier negotiations affecting the timing and magnitude of payables.
Payables Turnover Ratio
The payables turnover ratio experienced fluctuations during the five-year period. It started at 10.68 in 2018, increasing steadily to a peak of 16.24 in 2020, suggesting a faster rate of paying off suppliers during that year. This was followed by a decline to 12.93 in 2021 and a further decrease to 11.26 in 2022. The initial rise indicates an improvement in liquidity or a strategy to pay suppliers more quickly, whereas the subsequent decline may imply a relaxation of such practices or changes in cash management strategy.

Working Capital Turnover

Northrop Grumman Corp., working capital turnover calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions)
Current assets 12,488 12,426 15,344 10,685 9,680
Less: Current liabilities 11,587 9,530 9,580 9,434 8,274
Working capital 901 2,896 5,764 1,251 1,406
 
Sales 36,602 35,667 36,799 33,841 30,095
Short-term Activity Ratio
Working capital turnover1 40.62 12.32 6.38 27.05 21.40
Benchmarks
Working Capital Turnover, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 3.42 2.34 1.69
Caterpillar Inc. 4.62 3.54 2.84
Eaton Corp. plc 8.70 65.65 5.42
GE Aerospace 7.93 4.94 2.26
Honeywell International Inc. 7.03 5.86 3.64
Lockheed Martin Corp. 12.93 11.52 12.01
RTX Corp. 20.15 9.75 7.52
Working Capital Turnover, Sector
Capital Goods 6.79 5.01 3.24
Working Capital Turnover, Industry
Industrials 10.34 6.90 4.52

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Working capital turnover = Sales ÷ Working capital
= 36,602 ÷ 901 = 40.62

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Working Capital
The working capital exhibited notable fluctuations over the observed period. Starting at US$ 1406 million in 2018, it decreased slightly to US$ 1251 million in 2019. In 2020, there was a significant increase, with working capital rising sharply to US$ 5764 million. This was followed by a considerable decline in 2021 to US$ 2896 million and a further drop to US$ 901 million in 2022. This pattern indicates high volatility in the company's short-term asset management and liquidity position.
Sales
Sales showed a generally upward trend from 2018 to 2020, increasing from US$ 30,095 million to US$ 36,799 million. In 2021, sales experienced a slight decrease to US$ 35,667 million but rebounded mildly in 2022 to US$ 36,602 million, nearly reaching the 2020 peak. Overall, sales remained relatively stable with moderate growth over the period.
Working Capital Turnover
The working capital turnover ratio exhibited considerable variation. It improved from 21.4 in 2018 to 27.05 in 2019, indicating increased efficiency in utilizing working capital to generate sales. In 2020, the ratio declined sharply to 6.38, reflecting the surge in working capital that year. Subsequently, the ratio almost doubled in 2021 to 12.32 and surged dramatically to 40.62 in 2022, corresponding with the significant reduction in working capital. The elevated turnover ratio in 2022 suggests a highly efficient use of working capital relative to sales but also points to potentially constrained short-term liquidity resources.
Insights
The data reveals considerable volatility in working capital despite relatively stable sales, suggesting fluctuations in the company's operational liquidity management. The sharp rise and subsequent declines in working capital over the years might reflect strategic decisions regarding operational funding or changes in current asset and liability management. The contrasting trends between working capital and its turnover ratio highlight changes in working capital efficiency, which improved recently but could indicate pressures on liquidity. Monitoring these metrics alongside cash flow and other liquidity indicators would be advisable for a comprehensive assessment.

Average Inventory Processing Period

Northrop Grumman Corp., average inventory processing period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Inventory turnover 29.78 35.02 38.63 33.95 35.63
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average inventory processing period1 12 10 9 11 10
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Inventory Processing Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 452 486 467
Caterpillar Inc. 144 144 143
Eaton Corp. plc 90 82 62
GE Aerospace 114 107 96
Honeywell International Inc. 90 85 74
Lockheed Martin Corp. 20 19 23
RTX Corp. 73 65 71
Average Inventory Processing Period, Sector
Capital Goods 160 160 160
Average Inventory Processing Period, Industry
Industrials 85 91 99

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average inventory processing period = 365 ÷ Inventory turnover
= 365 ÷ 29.78 = 12

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Inventory Turnover
The inventory turnover ratio exhibits fluctuations over the five-year period. Beginning at 35.63 in 2018, the ratio declined moderately to 33.95 in 2019, indicating a slight slowdown in the rate at which inventory was sold and replaced. In 2020, inventory turnover improved significantly to 38.63, suggesting a more efficient inventory management or increased sales activity during that year. However, this upward trend was not sustained, as the ratio fell again to 35.02 in 2021 and further dropped to 29.78 in 2022. The overall trend from 2018 to 2022 points to a general decrease in inventory turnover efficiency by the end of the period.
Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period, measured in number of days, inversely reflects the inventory turnover ratio. It started at 10 days in 2018, increased slightly to 11 days in 2019, and then shortened to 9 days in 2020, correlating with the peak in inventory turnover during that year. Following this improvement, the processing period reverted to 10 days in 2021, then extended notably to 12 days in 2022 - the longest period observed in the data. This suggests that inventory was held longer before being sold or used, which aligns with the declining inventory turnover ratio in the latter years.
Overall Insight
The data indicate that inventory management efficiency improved in 2020, as evidenced by higher turnover and shorter processing duration. However, the subsequent two years showed a decline in efficiency, with inventory being held for longer periods and turnover ratios decreasing. This pattern may suggest challenges in sales flow, supply chain, or inventory control that emerged after 2020, potentially impacting working capital and operational performance.

Average Receivable Collection Period

Northrop Grumman Corp., average receivable collection period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Receivables turnover 24.22 24.31 24.52 25.52 20.78
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average receivable collection period1 15 15 15 14 18
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Receivable Collection Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 14 15 12
Caterpillar Inc. 57 64 68
Eaton Corp. plc 72 61 59
GE Aerospace 89 80 83
Honeywell International Inc. 77 72 76
Lockheed Martin Corp. 14 11 11
RTX Corp. 50 55 60
Average Receivable Collection Period, Sector
Capital Goods 50 48 50
Average Receivable Collection Period, Industry
Industrials 45 47 48

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average receivable collection period = 365 ÷ Receivables turnover
= 365 ÷ 24.22 = 15

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Receivables Turnover
The receivables turnover ratio demonstrates a notable increase from 20.78 in 2018 to a peak of 25.52 in 2019, indicating an improvement in the efficiency of collection relative to sales or revenue during that period. Following this peak, the ratio experiences a slight decline over the subsequent three years, settling around 24.22 by the end of 2022. Despite the decrease from the 2019 high, the turnover remains elevated compared to the 2018 baseline, suggesting the company has generally maintained a high level of efficiency in managing receivables.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average receivable collection period decreases from 18 days in 2018 to 14 days in 2019, reflecting a swifter collection process. From 2019 onward, the collection period stabilizes at approximately 15 days, indicating consistent performance in converting receivables into cash. This stability corresponds with the relatively stable receivables turnover ratio in the later years, confirming sustained effectiveness in credit and collections management.
Overall Trend and Insights
The upward trend in receivables turnover ratio from 2018 to 2019, coupled with the reduction in average collection days, suggests significant improvements in working capital management during that timeframe. Although the receivables turnover ratio slightly declines through 2020 to 2022, it remains within a narrow range, indicating continued operational consistency in accounts receivable management. The stability in the average collection period further confirms this consistency. The data collectively reflects effective control over receivables, contributing positively to liquidity and cash flow management.

Operating Cycle

Northrop Grumman Corp., operating cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 12 10 9 11 10
Average receivable collection period 15 15 15 14 18
Short-term Activity Ratio
Operating cycle1 27 25 24 25 28
Benchmarks
Operating Cycle, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 466 501 479
Caterpillar Inc. 201 208 211
Eaton Corp. plc 162 143 121
GE Aerospace 203 187 179
Honeywell International Inc. 167 157 150
Lockheed Martin Corp. 34 30 34
RTX Corp. 123 120 131
Operating Cycle, Sector
Capital Goods 210 208 210
Operating Cycle, Industry
Industrials 130 138 147

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Operating cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period
= 12 + 15 = 27

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period exhibited minor fluctuations throughout the observed years. Starting at 10 days in 2018, it experienced a slight increase to 11 days in 2019, followed by a decrease to 9 days in 2020. Subsequently, it rose back to 10 days in 2021 and increased further to 12 days in 2022. This indicates some variability in inventory turnover efficiency, with a notable increase in inventory days in the most recent year, potentially suggesting slower inventory processing.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average receivable collection period demonstrated relative stability with a slight initial improvement. Starting at 18 days in 2018, it decreased significantly to 14 days in 2019, then slightly increased to 15 days in 2020 and remained consistent at 15 days through 2021 and 2022. This pattern suggests more efficient receivables management beginning in 2019, maintaining a steady collection period in subsequent years.
Operating Cycle
The operating cycle showed a general trend of reduction followed by a slight increase. Beginning at 28 days in 2018, it declined to 25 days in 2019 and further to 24 days in 2020. However, it increased again to 25 days in 2021 and 27 days in 2022. This cyclical movement corresponds with changes in both inventory processing and receivable collection periods. Despite the recent increase, the operating cycle remains slightly shorter than the initial 2018 value, indicating moderately improved overall operational efficiency over the five-year period.

Average Payables Payment Period

Northrop Grumman Corp., average payables payment period calculation, comparison to benchmarks

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Payables turnover 11.26 12.93 16.24 11.94 10.68
Short-term Activity Ratio (no. days)
Average payables payment period1 32 28 22 31 34
Benchmarks (no. days)
Average Payables Payment Period, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 59 57 74
Caterpillar Inc. 77 84 77
Eaton Corp. plc 81 77 58
GE Aerospace 123 110 100
Honeywell International Inc. 103 107 95
Lockheed Martin Corp. 13 5 6
RTX Corp. 68 62 66
Average Payables Payment Period, Sector
Capital Goods 70 65 66
Average Payables Payment Period, Industry
Industrials 47 47 49

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Average payables payment period = 365 ÷ Payables turnover
= 365 ÷ 11.26 = 32

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Payables Turnover
The payables turnover ratio exhibits a fluctuating trend over the analyzed period. Starting at 10.68 in 2018, the ratio increased significantly to 11.94 in 2019, reaching a peak of 16.24 in 2020. This spike suggests a notably faster rate of payables processing during that year. However, the ratio then declined to 12.93 in 2021 and further to 11.26 in 2022, indicating a slowdown in turnover pace compared to the 2020 peak but still remaining above the 2018 baseline. Overall, the pattern suggests changes in the company's payment cycle, with the highest efficiency in managing payables observed in 2020.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average payables payment period, expressed in days, generally mirrors the inverse movement of the payables turnover ratio over the same timeframe. The payment period decreased from 34 days in 2018 to 31 days in 2019, then sharply dropped to 22 days in 2020, reflecting a quicker payment process that correlates with the higher turnover ratio seen that year. Subsequently, the period lengthened to 28 days in 2021 and further to 32 days in 2022, signaling a relaxation in payment speed. These adjustments correspond with the diminishing payables turnover ratio post-2020, demonstrating a reversion to longer payment terms though still shorter than the initial 2018 figure.

Cash Conversion Cycle

Northrop Grumman Corp., cash conversion cycle calculation, comparison to benchmarks

No. days

Microsoft Excel
Dec 31, 2022 Dec 31, 2021 Dec 31, 2020 Dec 31, 2019 Dec 31, 2018
Selected Financial Data
Average inventory processing period 12 10 9 11 10
Average receivable collection period 15 15 15 14 18
Average payables payment period 32 28 22 31 34
Short-term Activity Ratio
Cash conversion cycle1 -5 -3 2 -6 -6
Benchmarks
Cash Conversion Cycle, Competitors2
Boeing Co. 407 444 405
Caterpillar Inc. 124 124 134
Eaton Corp. plc 81 66 63
GE Aerospace 80 77 79
Honeywell International Inc. 64 50 55
Lockheed Martin Corp. 21 25 28
RTX Corp. 55 58 65
Cash Conversion Cycle, Sector
Capital Goods 140 143 144
Cash Conversion Cycle, Industry
Industrials 83 91 98

Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2022-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2021-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2020-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).

1 2022 Calculation
Cash conversion cycle = Average inventory processing period + Average receivable collection period – Average payables payment period
= 12 + 1532 = -5

2 Click competitor name to see calculations.


Average Inventory Processing Period
The average inventory processing period experienced fluctuations over the five-year span. It started at 10 days in 2018, slightly increased to 11 days in 2019, then decreased to 9 days in 2020. The period returned to 10 days in 2021 before rising to 12 days in 2022. Overall, this indicates some variability in inventory management efficiency, with a noticeable increase in 2022 compared to previous years.
Average Receivable Collection Period
The average receivable collection period showed a general decline initially, moving from 18 days in 2018 down to 14 days in 2019. However, from 2019 onwards, the period stabilized around 15 days through 2020 to 2022. This suggests improved collection efficiency between 2018 and 2019, followed by consistent performance in subsequent years.
Average Payables Payment Period
The average payables payment period demonstrated a decreasing trend from 34 days in 2018 to a low of 22 days in 2020. Thereafter, it increased again to 28 days in 2021 and further to 32 days in 2022. This indicates an overall reduction in the time taken to pay suppliers during the first three years, followed by a gradual extension in payment duration through 2021 and 2022.
Cash Conversion Cycle
The cash conversion cycle fluctuated within a narrow range throughout the period. It was negative six days in both 2018 and 2019, worsened to positive two days in 2020, indicating a slight delay in cash recovery. It then improved again to negative three days in 2021 and negative five days in 2022. A negative cash conversion cycle suggests that the company was able to collect cash from customers before paying its suppliers, maintaining effective working capital management despite some yearly variations.