Economic Value Added (EVA)
EVA is registered trademark of Stern Stewart.
Economic value added or economic profit is the difference between revenues and costs,where costs include not only expenses, but also cost of capital.
Paying user area
Try for free
DuPont de Nemours Inc. pages available for free this week:
- Income Statement
- Common-Size Balance Sheet: Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
- Analysis of Profitability Ratios
- Analysis of Reportable Segments
- Analysis of Geographic Areas
- Common Stock Valuation Ratios
- Price to FCFE (P/FCFE)
- Dividend Discount Model (DDM)
- Net Profit Margin since 2005
- Debt to Equity since 2005
The data is hidden behind: . Unhide it.
Get full access to the entire website from $10.42/mo, or
get 1-month access to DuPont de Nemours Inc. for $22.49.
This is a one-time payment. There is no automatic renewal.
We accept:
Economic Profit
DuPont de Nemours Inc., economic profit calculation
US$ in millions
| 12 months ended: | Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT)1 | ||||||
| Cost of capital2 | ||||||
| Invested capital3 | ||||||
| Economic profit4 | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 NOPAT. See details »
2 Cost of capital. See details »
3 Invested capital. See details »
4 2019 Calculation
Economic profit = NOPAT – Cost of capital × Invested capital
= – × =
The period under review demonstrates significant fluctuations in financial performance. Net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) experienced considerable volatility, beginning at US$8,206 million, declining to US$3,846 million, then further decreasing to US$2,498 million before a partial recovery to US$4,932 million, and ultimately resulting in a loss of US$572 million. The cost of capital exhibited an increasing trend from 15.19% to 21.56% over the period, with some intermediate decreases. Invested capital showed a substantial increase initially, peaking at US$153,164 million, before declining to US$62,770 million. Consequently, economic profit displayed a marked deterioration, transitioning from a positive value of US$1,177 million to a substantial negative value of US$14,102 million.
- NOPAT Trend
- A clear pattern of initial decline followed by a brief recovery and then a significant loss is observed in net operating profit after taxes. The negative NOPAT in the final year is a notable concern, indicating operational underperformance relative to its cost of funding.
- Cost of Capital Trend
- The cost of capital generally increased over the period, suggesting potentially higher risk or increased financing costs. The increase in cost of capital, coupled with the declining NOPAT, significantly contributed to the negative economic profit.
- Invested Capital Trend
- Invested capital experienced a large increase between 2015 and 2017, followed by a substantial decrease. This suggests significant capital allocation and reallocation decisions were made during this period, potentially impacting returns. The decrease in invested capital did not translate into improved economic profit, indicating that the reduction in capital employed was not sufficient to offset the decline in profitability.
- Economic Profit Trend
- Economic profit consistently declined, moving from a positive value to a substantial negative value. This indicates that the company’s returns on invested capital were consistently below its cost of capital. The magnitude of the negative economic profit increased significantly over time, suggesting a worsening trend in value creation.
The combined effect of these trends resulted in a substantial erosion of economic profit. The increasing cost of capital and the volatility in NOPAT, alongside significant shifts in invested capital, appear to be the primary drivers of this outcome. The final year’s negative economic profit warrants further investigation to understand the underlying causes and potential corrective actions.
Net Operating Profit after Taxes (NOPAT)
DuPont de Nemours Inc., NOPAT calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Elimination of deferred tax expense. See details »
2 Addition of increase (decrease) in allowance for doubtful receivables.
3 Addition of increase (decrease) in LIFO reserve. See details »
4 Addition of increase (decrease) in deferred revenue.
5 Addition of increase (decrease) in restructuring reserve.
6 Addition of increase (decrease) in equity equivalents to net income attributable to DuPont.
7 2019 Calculation
Interest expense on capitalized operating leases = Operating lease liability × Discount rate
= × =
8 2019 Calculation
Tax benefit of interest expense = Adjusted interest expense × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
9 Addition of after taxes interest expense to net income attributable to DuPont.
10 2019 Calculation
Tax expense (benefit) of investment income = Investment income, before tax × Statutory income tax rate
= × 21.00% =
11 Elimination of after taxes investment income.
12 Elimination of discontinued operations.
The financial data reveals significant fluctuations in profitability metrics over the five-year period. Both net income attributable to DuPont and net operating profit after taxes (NOPAT) demonstrate notable volatility and an overall downward trend from 2015 to 2019.
- Net Income Attributable to DuPont
-
The net income experienced a steep decline from a peak of 7,685 million US dollars in 2015 to 1,460 million US dollars in 2017. Although there was a partial recovery in 2018 where net income increased to 3,844 million US dollars, the figure sharply contracted again to only 498 million US dollars in 2019. This pattern highlights increasing challenges in maintaining consistent profitability.
- Net Operating Profit After Taxes (NOPAT)
-
The NOPAT metric follows a similar variable trend but shows even greater volatility throughout the period. It begins at 8,206 million US dollars in 2015 and falls sharply to 2,498 million US dollars by 2017. Despite a rebound in 2018 to 4,932 million US dollars, the NOPAT turns negative in 2019, indicating an operational loss of 572 million US dollars. This negative result in 2019 suggests operational difficulties or increased costs impacting the company's core profitability that year.
Overall, the data suggests a period of significant financial distress and operational challenges, especially towards the end of the timeline. Both net income and NOPAT show a loss of momentum post-2015 with a critical downturn in 2019. The negative NOPAT position in 2019 might call for a closer examination of the company’s operational efficiency and expense management during this period.
Cash Operating Taxes
DuPont de Nemours Inc., cash operating taxes calculation
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
- Provision for (benefit from) income taxes on continuing operations
- The provision for income taxes on continuing operations demonstrates significant volatility over the analyzed period. In 2015, the provision was high at 2147 million US dollars, but it drastically decreased to 9 million US dollars in 2016, indicating a sharp reduction in tax expenses or changes in tax benefits. The following year, 2017, reported a negative value of -476 million US dollars, suggesting a tax benefit or credit rather than an expense. However, the provision increased again in 2018 to 1489 million US dollars before declining sharply to 140 million US dollars in 2019. Overall, the data reveals a highly fluctuating trend without a clear upward or downward consistency.
- Cash operating taxes
- Cash operating taxes exhibit a generally increasing trend from 2015 to 2018, starting at 2158 million US dollars in 2015 and peaking at 2222 million US dollars in 2018. This upward movement suggests rising actual cash outflows related to tax payments during the initial years. However, in 2019, a marked decrease to 751 million US dollars occurs, indicating a substantial drop in cash taxes paid. This shift may be reflective of tax strategy changes, timing differences, or altered profitability affecting cash tax obligations.
Invested Capital
DuPont de Nemours Inc., invested capital calculation (financing approach)
US$ in millions
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Addition of capitalized operating leases.
2 Elimination of deferred taxes from assets and liabilities. See details »
3 Addition of allowance for doubtful accounts receivable.
4 Addition of LIFO reserve. See details »
5 Addition of deferred revenue.
6 Addition of restructuring reserve.
7 Addition of equity equivalents to total DuPont stockholders’ equity.
8 Removal of accumulated other comprehensive income.
9 Subtraction of construction in progress.
10 Subtraction of marketable securities.
The financial data indicates significant fluctuations in the company's capital structure and invested capital over the five-year period.
- Total reported debt & leases
- This metric exhibits a rising trend from 2015 to 2018, increasing from 19,250 million US dollars to a peak of 43,241 million US dollars in 2018. However, this upward trajectory reverses sharply in 2019, with total debt decreasing to 18,001 million US dollars, indicating a substantial reduction in leverage or paydown of debt obligations during that year.
- Total DuPont stockholders’ equity
- Stockholders’ equity remains relatively stable between 2015 and 2016 but undergoes a dramatic increase in 2017, reaching 100,330 million US dollars, which is nearly quadruple the 2016 figure. This elevated level slightly declines in 2018 to 94,571 million but experiences a steep decrease in 2019 down to 40,987 million US dollars. The pronounced spikes and drops suggest significant equity transactions, asset revaluations, or changes in retained earnings during these years.
- Invested capital
- Invested capital follows a similar pattern to equity, growing moderately from 46,288 million US dollars in 2015 to 50,610 million in 2016, then experiencing a sharp increase to 149,192 million in 2017 and remaining close in 2018 at 153,164 million. In 2019, invested capital declines significantly to 62,770 million. This trajectory aligns with the movements seen in both equity and reported debt, indicating substantial changes in the company’s total capital invested in operating assets.
Overall, the data reflects periods of major capital structure changes, including a notable increase in both equity and debt leading up to 2017 and 2018, followed by a significant reduction in debt and equity in 2019. These shifts may be attributable to corporate restructuring, acquisitions, divestitures, or refinancing activities during these years. The volatility in invested capital further corroborates these possibilities, suggesting the company underwent important strategic financial decisions impacting its balance sheet composition and capital deployment.
Cost of Capital
DuPont de Nemours Inc., cost of capital calculations
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Preferred stock, series A, $1.00 par (book value) | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Short-term borrowings and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Preferred stock, series A, $1.00 par (book value) | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 21.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Short-term borrowings and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Preferred stock, series A, $1.00 par (book value) | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Short-term borrowings and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Preferred stock, series A, $1.00 par (book value) | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Short-term borrowings and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
| Capital (fair value)1 | Weights | Cost of capital | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equity2 | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Preferred stock, series A, $1.00 par (book value) | ÷ | = | × | = | |||||||||
| Short-term borrowings and long-term debt3 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Operating lease liability4 | ÷ | = | × | × (1 – 35.00%) | = | ||||||||
| Total: | |||||||||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 US$ in millions
2 Equity. See details »
3 Short-term borrowings and long-term debt. See details »
4 Operating lease liability. See details »
Economic Spread Ratio
DuPont de Nemours Inc., economic spread ratio calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Invested capital2 | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic spread ratio3 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Spread Ratio, Competitors4 | ||||||
| Linde plc | ||||||
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 Invested capital. See details »
3 2019 Calculation
Economic spread ratio = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Invested capital
= 100 × ÷ =
4 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The period under review demonstrates a significant decline in economic performance, as indicated by the economic spread ratio and economic profit. Initially positive, economic profit transitions to substantial losses, while invested capital fluctuates considerably. The economic spread ratio consistently decreases, reflecting a widening gap between the return on invested capital and the cost of capital.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit begins at US$1,177 million in 2015, indicating value creation. However, it quickly becomes negative, reaching -US$4,603 million in 2016. Subsequent years show further deterioration, with the largest loss of -US$26,028 million in 2017, followed by -US$19,905 million in 2018 and -US$14,102 million in 2019. This consistent negative trend suggests an increasing inability to generate returns exceeding the cost of capital.
- Invested Capital
- Invested capital increases from US$46,288 million in 2015 to US$50,610 million in 2016. A substantial increase is then observed in 2017, reaching US$149,192 million, followed by a slight increase to US$153,164 million in 2018. A significant decrease occurs in 2019, with invested capital falling to US$62,770 million. This volatility in invested capital may be linked to acquisitions, divestitures, or changes in operational needs, but it coincides with declining economic profit.
- Economic Spread Ratio
- The economic spread ratio starts at 2.54% in 2015, indicating a positive spread between returns and the cost of capital. This ratio declines sharply to -9.10% in 2016, and continues to worsen, reaching -17.45% in 2017, -13.00% in 2018, and finally -22.47% in 2019. The consistently negative and deepening ratio confirms that the company’s returns on invested capital are falling further below its cost of capital, signifying a substantial erosion of economic value.
The combined trends suggest a growing divergence between capital deployment and value creation. While invested capital experienced significant fluctuations, the consistent decline in economic profit and the increasingly negative economic spread ratio indicate a fundamental issue with profitability relative to the capital employed. Further investigation into the drivers of these trends is warranted.
Economic Profit Margin
DuPont de Nemours Inc., economic profit margin calculation, comparison to benchmarks
| Dec 31, 2019 | Dec 31, 2018 | Dec 31, 2017 | Dec 31, 2016 | Dec 31, 2015 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selected Financial Data (US$ in millions) | ||||||
| Economic profit1 | ||||||
| Net sales | ||||||
| Add: Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue | ||||||
| Adjusted net sales | ||||||
| Performance Ratio | ||||||
| Economic profit margin2 | ||||||
| Benchmarks | ||||||
| Economic Profit Margin, Competitors3 | ||||||
| Linde plc | ||||||
| Sherwin-Williams Co. | ||||||
Based on: 10-K (reporting date: 2019-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2018-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2017-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2016-12-31), 10-K (reporting date: 2015-12-31).
1 Economic profit. See details »
2 2019 Calculation
Economic profit margin = 100 × Economic profit ÷ Adjusted net sales
= 100 × ÷ =
3 Click competitor name to see calculations.
The economic profit margin exhibited significant volatility between 2015 and 2019. Initially positive, it deteriorated substantially over the period, culminating in a large negative value in the final year. This analysis details the observed trends in economic profit, adjusted net sales, and the resulting economic profit margin.
- Economic Profit
- Economic profit began at US$1,177 million in 2015. It then experienced a dramatic decline, becoming negative in 2016 at -US$4,603 million. This negative trend continued, reaching a low of -US$26,028 million in 2017, before a partial recovery to -US$19,905 million in 2018. However, economic profit further decreased to -US$14,102 million in 2019.
- Adjusted Net Sales
- Adjusted net sales remained relatively stable between 2015 and 2016, fluctuating around US$48 million. A substantial increase was observed in 2017, reaching US$64,816 million, followed by a further increase to US$85,936 million in 2018. A significant decrease occurred in 2019, with adjusted net sales falling to US$21,512 million.
- Economic Profit Margin
- The economic profit margin began at 2.41% in 2015. It became negative in 2016, decreasing to -9.56%. The margin continued to worsen considerably, reaching -40.16% in 2017 and -23.16% in 2018. The most substantial decline occurred in 2019, with the economic profit margin falling to -65.55%. The negative trend in the economic profit margin closely mirrors the trend in economic profit, but is amplified by the fluctuations in adjusted net sales.
The divergence between adjusted net sales and economic profit is notable. While sales increased significantly in 2017 and 2018, economic profit remained negative and even worsened. The sharp decline in sales in 2019, coupled with continued negative economic profit, resulted in a substantially lower economic profit margin. This suggests that despite revenue growth in certain periods, the cost of capital or operational inefficiencies consistently exceeded the returns generated, leading to economic losses.